ClinicalTrials.gg
WithdrawnNCT03868475VAPEXUpdated Mar 9, 2026

Comparing Vacuum-Assisted Percutaneous Excision to Open Surgical Excision for Borderline or High-Risk Breast Lesions

An interventional study of Vacuum-assisted percutaneous excision and Open surgical excision in Breast Fibroadenoma, Atypical Ductal Hyperplasia and Atypical Lobular Hyperplasia, sponsored by London Health Sciences Centre Research Institute OR Lawson Research Institute of St. Joseph's. Withdrawn. Open to female participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-03-09.

Sponsored by London Health Sciences Centre Research Institute OR Lawson Research Institute of St. Joseph's · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Why this study was withdrawn
Publication of only protocol desired
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
0
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

This randomized controlled trial compares vacuum-assisted percutaneous excision to open standard surgical excision in women who have high-risk or borderline, non-malignant breast lesions with respect to efficacy, safety, cosmesis and patient satisfaction.

Read the detailed description

In women diagnosed with high-risk or borderline, non-malignant breast lesions, is vacuum-assisted percutaneous excision (VAPE) comparable to open standard surgical excision with respect to efficacy, safety, cosmesis and patient satisfaction?

With the increase in breast imaging for screening there has been corresponding rise in detection of high-risk/borderline, non-malignant breast lesions that require surgical excision to confirm diagnosis and rule out underlying malignancy. Image-guided vacuum-assisted percutaneous excision (VAPE) could offer an alternative to standard open surgical excision for complete excision of these lesions with a possible improvement in patient satisfaction and cosmetic outcomes and decreased complications.

In this single-centre, non-inferiority designed prospective randomized, open label controlled trial, women over 18 years who are found to have a borderline or high-risk, non-malignant breast lesions on core needle biopsy will be considered eligible. Exclusion criteria will be women with a greater than 25% lifetime risk of breast cancer, patients whose pathology and imaging are discordant, and those with extensive calcifications extending over 2cm, a mass larger than 2 cm, or lesions with high-risk features. Informed consent will be obtained and patients will be randomized to standard surgical excision or VAPE. They will then be followed with imaging as appropriate.

The primary outcome measure is the incidence of complete removal of the lesion. The secondary outcome measures are patient satisfaction, cosmetic outcomes and complications such as bleeding and infection.

This trial is the first randomized controlled trial to investigate the role of VAPE compared to standard surgical excision as a means of completely excising borderline or high-risk breast, non-malignant breast lesions. The investigators hypothesize that VAPE will show comparable efficacy and may even have improved safety, cosmesis and patient satisfaction.

02

Conditions studied

  • Breast Fibroadenoma
  • Atypical Ductal Hyperplasia
  • Atypical Lobular Hyperplasia
  • Lobular Carcinoma in Situ
  • Flat Epithelial Atypia
  • Phyllodes; Fibroadenoma
  • Phyllodes Breast Tumor
  • Radial Scar
  • Breast Papilloma
  • Complex Sclerosing Papillary Lesion of the Breast

Keywords

  • High-risk breast lesions
  • Vacuum-assisted excision
  • Vacuum-assisted biopsy
  • Surgical excisional biopsy
  • Complete removal
  • Patient satisfaction
  • Cosmesis
03

In context

Fibroadenoma

27 studies on the registry are indexed under Fibroadenoma; 6 are open to participants now.

Browse Fibroadenoma studies →

Lead sponsor

London Health Sciences Centre Research Institute OR Lawson Research Institute of St. Joseph's is the lead sponsor of 331 studies on the registry; 137 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Women over age 18 with a core proven borderline or high-risk breast lesion that requires further excision for management based on the surgeon's assessment
  • must be obtained.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Women who are considered high-risk based on a greater than 25% lifetime risk of breast cancer as per the IBIS (International Breast Cancer Intervention Study) Breast Cancer Risk Evaluation Tool
  • Pathology that is felt to be discordant with imaging
  • Extensive calcifications extending more than 20 mm and/or masses greater than 30 mm
  • The following lesions will be excluded based on their increased risk of upstaging; lesions (other than fibroadenomas, phyllodes and papillomas) that are associated with a palpable mass, ADH (atypical ductal hyperplasia) with high-risk features (ADH with zonal necrosis, significant cytological atypia or more than 2 foci), LCIS (lobular carcinoma in situ) with high-risk features (associated with ADH, pleomorphic LCIS, zonal necrosis and > 4 foci) or discordant with imaging, papilloma with atypia, and spindle cell lesion (especially if there is atypia).
  • Lesions that are suspicious for borderline or malignant Phyllodes, DCIS (ductal carcinoma in situ), invasive mammary carcinoma, or encapsulated papillary carcinoma
  • Any lesion that either the radiologist, pathologist or surgeon feels is not amenable to VAPE or surgical excision
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Biopsy and archival tissue

A biopsy takes a small piece of tissue to examine. “Archival tissue” is a sample already taken, for example at diagnosis, and kept by the hospital.

Whether a stored sample will do depends on when it was taken, how much there is and what the study needs. Ask whether the study accepts your stored sample or needs a new biopsy.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
0 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Vacuum-assisted percutaneous excision

    Patients will undergo vacuum-assisted percutaneous excision (VAPE). The intervention group will have post-procedure imaging the same day to confirm complete excision. The intervention group will then have imaging at 6, 12, and 24 months as per the radiology algorithms for following suspicious lesions (BIRADS 3 category). If at any point during the imaging follow up, a suspicious lesion or calcifications are detected, it would be sampled with core needle biopsy and then surgically excised as appropriate. The intervention group will also be seen in clinic at 1 month with no imaging and then at 6, 12, and 24 months to correspond to the imaging visits.

    Procedure: Vacuum-assisted percutaneous excision

  • Active comparator
    Open surgical excision

    Patients will undergo standard open surgical excision. The control group will then have follow up imaging at 12 and 24 months as per the usual radiology algorithms following excision of a lesion. If at any point during the imaging follow up, a suspicious lesion or calcifications are detected, it would be sampled with core needle biopsy and then surgically excised as appropriate. The control group will also be seen in clinic at 1 month with no imaging and then at 12 and 24 months to correspond to the imaging visits.

    Procedure: Open surgical excision

Interventions

  • ProcedureVacuum-assisted percutaneous excision

    The intervention group will undergo the vacuum assisted percutaneous excision (VAPE). All VAPE procedures will be performed on a digital supine table using the ATEC© Breast Biopsy System hand piece (Hologic) with a 9-gauge needle and a 10 or 20 mm aperture providing 6-mmHg of suction strength to completely excise the breast lesion.

  • ProcedureOpen surgical excision

    The control group will undergo standard open surgical excision of the breast lesion. This will be done in the operating room using preoperative image-guided localization with radioactive seed (I-125) or in the procedure room of the Breast Care Centre if appropriate (i.e. lesion is palpable and localization is not required).

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Incidence of complete removal of the breast lesion

    No evidence of residual lesion at the time of excision or on follow up imaging exams and no need for further surgical re-excision for residual lesion.

    Time frame: 24 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Patient satisfaction

    Patient satisfaction as assessed by the BREAST-Q questionnaire for breast conserving therapy, Version 2.0, a validated patient-reported outcome measure that quantifies health-related quality of life and patient satisfaction. It will be completed preoperatively, and at 1, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. There are three components being assessed: 1. Physical well-being: 10 items scored using a 3-point scale (1=none of the time, 2=some of the time, 3=all of the time). 2. Psychosocial well-being: 10 items scored using a 5-point scale (1=none of the time, 2=a little of the time, 3=some of the time, 4=most of the time, 5=all of the time). 3. Satisfaction with breasts: 4 items scored using a 4-point scale (1=very dissatisfied, 2=somewhat dissatisfied, 3=somewhat satisfied, 4=very satisfied). Each component has a raw scale summed score (the sum of all the scores for each item) that is converted into a score from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) for analysis.

    Time frame: 12 months

  2. Cosmesis

    Cosmesis as assessed by the Modified Harvard-Harris Cosmetic Scale, a validated four-point scale that describes the overall aesthetic appearance of the breasts (categorical scale = excellent, good, fair or poor). It will be administered to both the patients as a self-assessment and the surgeons before the intervention and at various time points postoperatively (1 month, 6 months, and 12 months).

    Time frame: 12 months

Other outcomes

  1. Rate of Surgical Site Infections (SSI)

    As defined by the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) criteria (Pearson) as infection occurring within the first 30 post-operative days with at least one of the following: (a) purulent drainage from the incision or biopsy site, (b) organisms isolated from an aseptically obtained culture of fluid or tissue, (c) incision is deliberately opened by a surgeon AND patient has at least one of the following signs or symptoms: pain or tenderness, localized swelling, erythema, or heat, or (d) diagnosis of SSI by the surgeon

    Time frame: 30 days

  2. Number of patients that have a post-procedural bleeding or hematoma

    Any bleeding or hematoma that requires an intervention (such as re-operation to evacuate the hematoma or control the bleeding or aspiration of the hematoma)

    Time frame: 30 days

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 9, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03868475
Responsible party
Muriel Brackstone (Associate Professor of Surgery & Oncology, London Health Sciences Centre Research Institute OR Lawson Research Institute of St. Joseph's) — Principal investigator
First posted
Mar 11, 2019
Start date
Jan 2025 (estimated)
Primary completion
Jan 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Jan 1, 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Mar 9, 2026

Study contacts

Muriel Brackstone, PhD, MD
principal investigator · London Health Sciences Centre Research Institute OR Lawson Research Institute of St. Joseph's

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is withdrawn, as verified in Mar 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion