ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03842137Updated Oct 24, 2024Results posted

tDCS to Decrease Opioid Relapse (UG3)

An interventional study of tDCS and sham tDCS in Opioid Dependence and Craving, sponsored by Butler Hospital. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 21 Years to 50 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-10-24.

Sponsored by Butler Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
62
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
21 Years to 50 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

In the current proposal, the investigators will measure behavioral and brain responses following transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) to the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) (anode on right DLPFC, cathode on the left DLPFC) delivered during cognitive control network (CCN) priming. Participants with opioid dependence, in the first month of prescribed buprenorphine or methadone, will be assessed twice using electroencephalographic (EEG), once prior to tDCS+CCN priming and again at the completion of 5 sessions of tDCS+CCN priming (one week later). EEG will provide validation of expected changes in these networks following tDCS stimulation of the DLPFC.

Read the detailed description

Investigators propose to use EEG to examine oscillatory brain changes as well as self-reported craving before and after administration of five sessions of tDCS+Cognitive Control Network (CCN) priming stimulation vs. sham tDCS+CCN priming (randomized control trial) in 60 opioid dependent participants who recently initiated buprenorphine or methadone. Participants in the first month of prescribed buprenorphine or methadone will be assessed EEG, once prior to tDCS and again one week later after completion of 5 sessions of tDCS+CCN priming. EEG will be expected to provide 1) validation of expected network and oscillatory changes from tDCS-targeting and 2) an effect size for DLPFC vs sham stimulation. Go/no go criteria for the UG3 phase will be demonstration of enhanced frontal theta power during a WM task AND greater change (at least 10% difference between conditions, controlling for baseline craving) in subjective craving following the tDCS+CCN priming intervention compared to sham tDCS+CCN priming.

02

Conditions studied

  • Opioid Dependence
  • Craving
03

In context

Opioid-Related Disorders

1,439 studies on the registry are indexed under Opioid-Related Disorders; 291 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 62 is close to the median of 62 across 1,145 interventional studies indexed under Opioid-Related Disorders.

Browse Opioid-Related Disorders studies →

Lead sponsor

Butler Hospital is the lead sponsor of 118 studies on the registry; 13 are open to participants now.

Of its 5 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 4 (80%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
21 Years to 50 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • current opioid dependence
  • between 21-50 years of age
  • recent initiation of buprenorphine or methadone (\<30 days)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • current criteria for a DSM-V diagnosis of bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, schizo-affective, schizophreniform, or paranoid disorder
  • current suicidality
  • evidence of neurocognitive dysfunction
  • contraindications for tDCS (e.g seizure disorder)
  • probation/parole requirements or an upcoming move that might interfere with protocol participation
  • planning to terminate buprenorphine in less than 3 months
  • scalp lesions near the tDCS electrode sites
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
62 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    tDCS

    Each participant will undergo 5 consecutive (i.e., business days) sessions of active tDCS delivered to the DLPFC. During each session, participants are engaging in tasks that activate the cognitive control network.

    Device: tDCS

  • Sham comparator
    sham tDCS

    Each participant will undergo 5 consecutive (i.e., business days) sessions of sham tDCS delivered to the DLPFC. During each session, participants are engaging in tasks that activate the cognitive control network.

    Device: sham tDCS

Interventions

  • DevicetDCS

    Each participant will undergo 5 consecutive (i.e., business days) sessions of active tDCS delivered to the DLPFC. During each session, participants are engaging in tasks that activate the cognitive control network.

  • Devicesham tDCS

    Each participant will undergo 5 consecutive (i.e., business days) sessions of sham tDCS delivered to the DLPFC. During each session, participants are engaging in tasks that activate the cognitive control network.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Opioid Craving

    Penn Alcohol Craving (Modified for Opioids). This is a 5-item measure, with each item scored 0 to 6. Items are summed for a total score from 0 to 30. Higher scores = more craving.

    Time frame: 2 week

Secondary outcomes

  1. EEG Theta Brainwave Activity

    Theta event rate is examined as the number of times/second that brainwaves within the theta frequency range (4-7 Hz). Higher event rates reflect more activity during working memory task.

    Time frame: 2 weeks

07

Results

Posted Sep 19, 2024

Participant flow

Participant recruitment started June 4, 2019 and was completed on 2/21/23. Participants were recruited from both clinical settings and through community advertisements.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestonetDCSSham tDCS
Started2727
Completed2625
Not completed12

Outcome measures

PrimaryOpioid Craving

Penn Alcohol Craving (Modified for Opioids). This is a 5-item measure, with each item scored 0 to 6. Items are summed for a total score from 0 to 30. Higher scores = more craving.

Time frame:
2 week
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Opioid Craving
units on a scaletDCSSham tDCS
Opioid Craving8.92 ± 1.108.32 ± 1.12
Statistical analysis
  • tDCS vs Sham tDCS · Regression, Linear · p = .008 · Slope: -.53 · 95% CI -.91 to -.15Utilizing a regression model, baseline craving scores, group condition, and their interaction are regressed on 2-week craving scores.
SecondaryEEG Theta Brainwave Activity

Theta event rate is examined as the number of times/second that brainwaves within the theta frequency range (4-7 Hz). Higher event rates reflect more activity during working memory task.

Time frame:
2 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · events per second
EEG Theta Brainwave Activity
events per secondtDCSSham tDCS
EEG Theta Brainwave Activity.38 ± .06.33 ± .05
Statistical analysis
  • tDCS vs Sham tDCS · ANCOVA · p = .005

Adverse events

Collected over 2-weeks. Non-serious events are listed at a 2% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
tDCS0/27 (0%)0/27 (0%)1/27 (3.7%)
Sham tDCS0/27 (0%)0/27 (0%)2/27 (7.4%)
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventtDCSSham tDCS
NauseaGastrointestinal disorders0/271/27
HeadacheGeneral disorders0/271/27
Head ItchinessSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders1/270/27

Baseline characteristics

N=62 participants completed baselines and were enrolled in the study. Of these, n=8 were never randomized due to randomization occurring on the day of the first stimulation session.

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)tDCSSham tDCSNot RandomizedTotal
Mean33.19 ± 7.4434.48 ± 7.9135.75 ± 10.3834.08 ± 7.96
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)tDCSSham tDCSNot RandomizedTotal
Female914225
Male1813637
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)tDCSSham tDCSNot RandomizedTotal
Hispanic or Latino4307
Not Hispanic or Latino2324855
Unknown or Not Reported0000
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)tDCSSham tDCSNot RandomizedTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native0000
Asian0000
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander0000
Black or African American1326
White2322550
More than one race2114
Unknown or Not Reported1102
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)tDCSSham tDCSNot RandomizedTotal
United States2727862
Opioid Craving
Opioid Craving(units on a scale)tDCSSham tDCSNot RandomizedTotal
Mean11.07 ± 8.398.85 ± 7.848.75 ± 8.889.81 ± 8.12
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Butler Hospital
    Providence, Rhode Island 02906, United States
09

References and documents

Study documents

  • Protocol, analysis plan and consent form · Oct 22, 2023

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Jun 2019 to primary completion in Apr 2023, 46 months.

Results were first posted in Sep 2024, 1 year 4 months after primary completion.

Of 460 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Opioid-Related Disorders, half reached primary completion within 29 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 14 and three quarters within 48. This study's 46 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 491 studies reached it within 28 months; a quarter within 13 and three quarters within 46.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Feb 13, 2019
First posted
Feb 15, 2019
StartActual
Jun 4, 2019
Primary completionActual
Apr 30, 2023
CompletionActual
Aug 31, 2023
Results first posted
Sep 19, 2024
Last update
Oct 24, 2024
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 24, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03842137
Lead sponsor
Butler Hospital
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 15, 2019
Start date
Jun 4, 2019
Primary completion
Apr 30, 2023
Completion
Aug 31, 2023
Results posted
Sep 19, 2024
Last update
Oct 24, 2024

Study contacts

Ana M Abrantes, Ph.D.
principal investigator · Butler Hospital
Michael D Stein, M.D.
principal investigator · Boston University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion