CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03835715COMPLETEUpdated Mar 24, 2020

Study With Vortioxetine on Emotional Functioning in Patients With Depression

A Phase 4 interventional study of Vortioxetine in Major Depressive Disorder, sponsored by H. Lundbeck A/S. Completed at 23 sites in 4 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-03-24.

Sponsored by H. Lundbeck A/S · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
150
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The study will evaluate effectiveness of flexible dose vortioxetine 10-20 mg/day on emotional functioning in patients with MDD with an inadequate response to SSRIs/SNRIs.

02

Conditions studied

03

In context

Depressive Disorder

4,845 studies on the registry are indexed under Depressive Disorder; 514 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 150 is above the median of 80 across 3,999 interventional studies indexed under Depressive Disorder.

Browse Depressive Disorder studies →

Lead sponsor

H. Lundbeck A/S is the lead sponsor of 218 studies on the registry; 10 are open to participants now.

Of its 33 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 10 (30%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • The patient has a primary diagnosis of single or recurrent MDD according to DSM-5®. The current major depressive episode (MDE) must be confirmed using the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI).
  • The patient has had the current MDE for \<12 months.
  • The patient has a Montgomery and Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) total score ≥ 22 and ≤ 28 at the Baseline Visit.
  • The patient has been treated with SSRI/SNRI monotherapy (citalopram, escitalopram, paroxetine, duloxetine or venlafaxine) for at least 6 weeks at adequate dose for the current MDE and with an inadequate response and is a candidate for a switch in the investigator's opinion.
  • The patient wants to switch antidepressant treatment.
  • The patient has an ODQ total score ≥50 at baseline, while on SSRI/SNRI monotherapy (prior to switch).
  • The patient answered "Yes "to the screening question on emotional effects.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • The patient has a significant risk of suicide according to the investigator's clinical judgment or has made an actual suicide attempt in the previous 6 months prior to Baseline

Other in- and exclusion criteria may apply

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
150 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Vortioxetine

    Drug: Vortioxetine

Interventions

  • DrugVortioxetine

    Flexible doses (10-20 mg) of vortioxetine; 10 mg during the first week which may be increased up to 20 mg week 2-8

    Also known as: Brintellix ®

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change from baseline to Week 8 in Oxford Depression Questionnaire (ODQ) total score

    The ODQ is a patient-centred, self-report measure of emotional symptoms present in patients treated with antidepressants. The ODQ is a 26-item patient self-complete measure, spread over 3 sections and covering 5 dimensions of: not caring (NC), emotional detachment (ED), positive reduction (PR), general reduction (GR), and antidepressant as cause (AC). Response options are based on 5-point Likert scale with a score applied to each response.

    Time frame: From baseline to Week 8

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change from baseline to Week 8 in MEI total score.

    The Motivation and Energy Inventory (MEI) is a 27-item scale initially developed and validated for the purpose of evaluating interventions to improve motivation and energy in patients with depression. The MEI assesses three domains: mental or cognitive energy, social motivation, and physical energy. Scoring Respondents use scales ranging from 0 (indicating that the behavior is never present) to 5 or 6 (a behavior or feeling that is present very frequently or all of the time). Items 3-11, 13-15, 17, and 18 are reverse-scored in order to ensure that higher scores indicate greater levels of motivation and energy. All items use either a 5- or 7-point Likert type response scale.

    Time frame: From baseline to Week 8

  2. Change from baseline to Week 8 in DSST total score

    The Digit-Symbol Substitution Test (DSST) is a cognitive test designed to assess psychomotor speed of performance requiring visual perception, spatial decision-making and motor skills. The DSST is sensitive to cognitive impairments affecting attention, processing speed, and executive function (including working memory). The DSST consists of 133 digits and requires the subject to substitute each digit with a simple symbol in a 90-second period. Each correct symbol is counted. The total score is the number of correct symbols and the total score ranges from 0 (less than normal functioning) to 133 (greater than normal functioning).

    Time frame: From baseline to Week 8

  3. Change from baseline to Week 8 in ODQ domain scores (NC, ED, PR, GR, and AC)

    The Oxford Depression Questionnaire (ODQ) is a patient-centred, self-report measure of emotional symptoms present in patients treated with antidepressants. The ODQ is a 26-item patient self-complete measure, spread over 3 sections and covering 5 dimensions of: not caring (NC), emotional detachment (ED), positive reduction (PR), general reduction (GR), and antidepressant as cause (AC). Response options are based on 5-point Likert scale with a score applied to each response.

    Time frame: From baseline to Week 8

  4. Change from baseline to Week 8 in MADRS total score

    The Montgomery and Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) is a 10-item rating scale designed to assess the severity of the symptoms in depressive illness and to be sensitive to treatment effects. Symptoms are rated on a 7-point scale from 0 (no symptom) to 6 (severe symptom). The total score of the 10 items ranges from 0 to 60, with higher values indicating worse outcome.

    Time frame: From baseline to Week 8

  5. Change from baseline to Week 8 in SDS individual item scores (family, work, and social life)

    Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) measures disability. Total scores are computed by summing scores from all 3 items. Total score ranges from 0 to 30, with higher scores indicating greater disability. Reduction in SDS scores therefore indicates better outcome.

    Time frame: From baseline to Week 8

  6. Change from baseline to Week 8 in SDS total scores

    Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) measures disability. Total scores are computed by summing scores from all 3 items. Total score ranges from 0 to 30, with higher scores indicating greater disability. Reduction in SDS scores therefore indicates better outcome.

    Time frame: From baseline to Week 8

  7. Change from baseline to Week 8 in CGI-S score

    The Clinical Global Impression severity of illness (CGI-S) provides the clinician's impression of the patient's current state of mental illness. The clinician uses his or her clinical experience of this patient population to rate the severity of the patient's current mental illness on a 7-point scale ranging from 1 (normal - not at all ill) to 7 (among the most extremely ill patients).

    Time frame: From baseline to Week 8

  8. CGI-I score at Week 8

    The Clinical Global Impression - global improvement CGI-I provides the clinician's impression of the patient's improvement (or worsening). The clinician assesses the patient's condition relative to a baseline on a 7-point scale ranging from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse). In all cases, the assessment should be made independent of whether the rater believes the improvement is drug-related or not.

    Time frame: at Week 8

07

Study locations

23 sites
  • Office of Dr. Patrick Bourgoin (FR0011)
    Angoulême, France
  • Cabinet Psyche (FR0012)
    Douai, France
  • Dr. David Modavi Md, Office Of (FR0001)
    Toulouse, France
  • Private Practice Dr. Paule Khalifa (FR0010)
    Toulouse, France
  • GHS De Nancy - CPN Laxou (FR0006)
    Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France
  • Dr Karim Boutayeb MD, Office of (FR0009)
    Viersat, France
  • Centre Medical Ambroise Pare (FR0007)
    Élancourt, France
  • DSM Giulianova c/o ospedale di Giulianova (IT0004)
    Giulianova, Italy
  • Dipartimento Salute Mentale ASL Lecce (IT0006)
    Lecce, Italy
  • Universita degli Studi di Roma La Sapienza - Azienda Ospedaliera Sant Andrea (IT0013)
    Rome, Italy
  • JSC Romuvos Klinika (LT0002)
    Kaunas, Lithuania
  • Mental Health Centre Kaunas Outpatient Clinic (LT0005)
    Kaunas, Lithuania
  • JSC Nefridos klinika (LT0006)
    Klaipėda, Lithuania
  • Jsc Silutes Mental Health And Psychotherapy Center (LT0001)
    Silute, Lithuania
  • Antakalnis Psychiatric Consultation Centre (LT0003)
    Vilnius, Lithuania
  • PI Mental Health Center of Zirmunai (LT0004)
    Vilnius, Lithuania
  • Hospital Universitario Fundacion Alcorcon (ES0009)
    Alcorcón, Spain
  • Instituto Internacional de Neurociencias Aplicadas (ES0004)
    Barcelona, Spain
  • Centro De Salud Mental De Foios (ES0002)
    Foios, Spain
  • University of Oviedo (ES0011)
    Oviedo, Spain
  • Francesca Canellas Dols (ES0005)
    Palma De Mallorca, Spain
  • Hospital Clínico Universiatrio de Salamanca (ES0001)
    Salamanca, Spain
  • Centro De Especialidades A Doblada (ES0006)
    Vigo, Spain
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Christensen MC, Adair M, Loft H, McIntyre RS. The Motivation and Energy Inventory (MEI): Analysis of the clinically relevant response threshold in patients with major depressive disorder and emotional blunting using data from the COMPLETE study. J Affect Disord. 2023 Feb 15;323:547-553. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2022.11.033. Epub 2022 Nov 14. PubMed 36395989 ↗
  • Christensen MC, Fagiolini A, Florea I, Loft H, Cuomo A, Goodwin GM. Validation of the Oxford Depression Questionnaire: Sensitivity to change, minimal clinically important difference, and response threshold for the assessment of emotional blunting. J Affect Disord. 2021 Nov 1;294:924-931. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2021.07.099. Epub 2021 Jul 31. PubMed 34378539 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 24, 2020, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03835715
Lead sponsor
H. Lundbeck A/S
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 8, 2019
Start date
Feb 5, 2019
Primary completion
Feb 21, 2020
Completion
Feb 21, 2020
Last update
Mar 24, 2020

Study contacts

Email contact via H. Lundbeck A/S
study director · LundbeckClinicalTrials@Lundbeck.com

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion