ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT03822702Updated Jun 26, 2023

Biomechanical Assessment and Biofeedback-training System for Handwriting

An interventional study of Biofeedback Training and Motor Training in Writing Learning Disability, sponsored by National Cheng-Kung University Hospital. Recruiting at 1 site in Taiwan. Open to participants aged 5 Years to 65 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-06-26.

Sponsored by National Cheng-Kung University Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Jun 2025, 1 year 5 months ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
  • Registered 2 years 8 months after the study started (first participant enrolled May 2016, registered Jan 2019).
  • Started May 2016; still recruiting 10 years 6 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
125
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
5 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to investigate the real-time kinetics of handwriting regarding the design of the utensil and fine motor performances from biomechanical perspectives. It includes three parts.

The first part is an observational study design and the specific aim of the first part of the study is to establish a novel kinetic assessment system incorporated with Force Acquisition Pens (FAPs) designed with different barrel sizes and shapes for handwriting. The thorough calibration, examination of reliability and validity will be presented in this study.

The second part is also an observational study design and the specific aim of the second part of the study is to investigate the handwriting mechanisms using the kinetic assessment system incorporated with the motion capture system with children who have writing difficulties.

The third part is an interventional study design and the aim of this final part is to integrate the kinetic assessment system and the intervention concept to establish a Biomechanical Assessment and Biofeedback-training System for Handwriting (BABSH). Comparison of the intervention effect of the BABSH and traditional training for the children with handwriting difficulties will also be carried out in this part.

02

Conditions studied

  • Writing Learning Disability

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • handwriting
  • kinetics
  • kinematics
  • handwriting difficulty
03

In context

Learning Disabilities

270 studies on the registry are indexed under Learning Disabilities; 62 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 125 is above the median of 60 across 181 interventional studies indexed under Learning Disabilities.

Browse Learning Disabilities studies →

Lead sponsor

National Cheng-Kung University Hospital is the lead sponsor of 277 studies on the registry; 70 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
5 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Able to use pen to write
  2. Children volunteers must study in elementary schools

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Handwriting problems are related to muscular, skeletal, nerve and brain damage or disease.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
125 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • No intervention
    1st part:System development of Adult

    No intervention. Subjects need to use 6 types of special pen to do the specific writing tasks for one hour. The same tasks will be ask to do again three days later.

  • No intervention
    1st part:System development of Child

    No intervention. Subjects need to use 6 types of special pen to do the specific writing tasks for one hour. The same tasks will be ask to do again three days later.

  • No intervention
    2nd part:Handwriting Difficulty

    No intervention. Subjects need to do the specific writing tasks and fine motor test for one hour with sensors on the hand. A handwriting screening questionnaire shall be filled.

  • Experimental
    3rd part: Biofeedback Training

    This program includes 1 hour pre-test, 8 times training and 1 hour post-test. For pre-test, subjects need to do the specific writing tasks and fine motor test for one hour. A handwriting screening questionnaire shall be filled. For post-test, the same procedure will be ask to do again about one and a half month later . After pre-test, eight times of Biofeedback Training will be asked. Each time will take 50 minutes, one or two times a week. All training will be completed in about one and a half month.

    Other: Biofeedback Training

  • Experimental
    3rd part: Motor Training

    This program includes 1 hour pre-test, 8 times training and 1 hour post-test. For pre-test, subjects need to do the specific writing tasks and fine motor test for one hour. A handwriting screening questionnaire shall be filled. For post-test, the same procedure will be ask to do again about one and a half month later . After pre-test, eight times of Motor Training will be asked. Each time will take 50 minutes, one or two times a week. All training will be completed in about one and a half month.

    Other: Motor Training

  • No intervention
    3rd part:Control Group

    No intervention. Subjects need to do the specific writing tasks and fine motor test for one hour. A handwriting screening questionnaire shall be filled. The same procedure will be ask to do again about one and a half month later.

Interventions

  • OtherBiofeedback Training

    Biofeedback training targeted to goals that are relevant to the handwriting skills for children by using a force acquisitional pen.

  • OtherMotor Training

    Motor training targeted to goals that are relevant to the handwriting skills for children by using a personal designed motor training program.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in the result of Chinese Handwriting Evaluation Form

    A questionnaire about handwriting performance. Each item is rated on a five-point ordinal scale

    Time frame: baseline, 1.5 months

  2. Change in the total point score of three subtests of Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency, Second Edition (BOT-2)

    These three subtests are 'fine motor precision (subtest-1) ', 'fine motor integration (subtest-2)' and 'manual dexterity (subtest-3)'. The raw scores of the three subtests were then transformed into point scores based on the BOT-2 manual. The total point scores of the three subtests will be analyzed. For subtest-1, the range of total point score is 0 to 41. For subtest-2, the range of total point score is 0 to 40. For subtest-3, the range of total point score is 0 to 45. Higher total point scores represent a better performance (outcome).

    Time frame: baseline, 1.5 months

  3. Change in the handwriting kinetic parameters

    The kinetic parameters designed by measuring the real finger force applied on a force acquisitional pen.

    Time frame: baseline, 1.5 months

  4. Change in the handwriting kinematic parameters

    The kinematic parameters designed by measuring the real hand motion using motion analysis system.

    Time frame: baseline, 1.5 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in the pinch force

    three types of pinch force were recorded by a pinch meter

    Time frame: baseline, 1.5 months

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started May 2016 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Jun 2025, 109 months after the start.

Of 96 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Learning Disabilities, half reached primary completion within 30 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 9 and three quarters within 53. This study's planned 109 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 99 studies reached it within 29 months; a quarter within 9 and three quarters within 51.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jan 28, 2019
First posted
Jan 30, 2019
StartActual
May 9, 2016
Primary completionEst.
Jun 2025
CompletionEst.
Jun 2025
Last update
Jun 26, 2023
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 26, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03822702
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jan 30, 2019
Start date
May 9, 2016
Primary completion
Jun 2025 (estimated)
Completion
Jun 2025 (estimated)
Last update
Jun 26, 2023

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

No contact was published for this record. The registry link below has the sponsor’s details.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion