CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03814876FITSUpdated Nov 18, 2023

Family Intervention Following Traumatic Injury

An interventional study of Group session psycho-education and FITS in Acquired Brain Injury and Spinal Cord Injuries, sponsored by Rigshospitalet, Denmark. Completed at 1 site in Denmark. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 99 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-11-18.

Sponsored by Rigshospitalet, Denmark · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 9 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Apr 2018, registered Jan 2019).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
157
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 99 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to investigate the effectiveness of a manualized intervention (FITS) to families living with brain injury or spinal cord injury. The intervention will be provided by a trained neuropsychologist and consists of 8 structured sessions of 90 minutes duration. The intervention group will be compared to a control group receiving treatment as usual, one psycho-educational group session of a 2 hour duration.

02

Conditions studied

  • Acquired Brain Injury
  • Spinal Cord Injuries
03

In context

Brain Injuries

2,113 studies on the registry are indexed under Brain Injuries; 385 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 157 is above the median of 48 across 1,331 interventional studies indexed under Brain Injuries.

Browse Brain Injuries studies →

Lead sponsor

Rigshospitalet, Denmark is the lead sponsor of 1,017 studies on the registry; 183 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 99 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Acquired brain injury or spinal cord injury
  • Talk and read Danish
  • Minimum 6 months to 2 years since discharge
  • Family members must be actively involved in the patient's rehabilitation

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Severe aphasia
  • Families, where other family members require a substantial amount of care
  • Prior psychiatric or neurological disease
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
157 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    SCI intervention

    Spinal cord injury intervention group

    Behavioral: FITS

  • Active comparator
    SCI control

    Spinal cord injury control

    Behavioral: Group session psycho-education

  • Experimental
    TBI intervention

    Traumatic brain injury intervention group

    Behavioral: FITS

  • Active comparator
    TBI control

    Traumatic brain injury control group

    Behavioral: Group session psycho-education

Interventions

  • BehavioralGroup session psycho-education

    Active comparator - control group

  • BehavioralFITS

    Manualized family intervention

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Disease specific quality of life

    Measured by Qolibri for patients with traumatic brain injury. The QOLIBRI consists of six novel items that assess overall satisfaction with facets of life relevant to people with TBI. Areas covered by the questionnaire include physical condition, cognition, emotions, function in daily life, personal and social life, and current situation and future prospects. Responses to each item are scored 1 ('Not at all') to 5 ('Very'), and the sum of all items was converted arithmetically to a percentage scale, with 0 representing the lowest possible HRQoL on the questionnaire and 100 the best possible HRQoL.

    Time frame: Change from day 0 to week 8, follow up at six months

  2. Generic quality of life

    Short Form-36 (SF-36) completed by all participants. SF-36, a measure of self-reported HRQoL. The questionnaire comprises 36 items addressing eight dimensions of health: vitality physical functioning bodily pain general health perceptions physical role functioning emotional role functioning social role functioning mental health. The original summative scoring algorithm will be used, and raw scores will be converted into standard SF-36 scores ranging from 0-100 by calculating the product 100∗(actual sum score / highest possible score), with higher scores indicating better health. The scores will be evaluated according to Danish norms provided by Bjorner, Damsga°rd, Watt, and Bech (1997). This normative study showed high Cronbach's alpha coefficients on all the sub-scales ranging from .75-.85 (Bjorner et al., 1997).

    Time frame: Change from day 0 to week 8, follow up at six months

  3. Disease specific quality of life

    QoL basic data elements for spinal cord injury for patients with spinal cord injury. The QoL Basic Data Set consists of three items on satisfaction with life as a whole, satisfaction with physical health and satisfaction with psychological health during the past 4 weeks. Each item is answered on a 0-10 numerical rating scale with markers 'complete dissatisfaction' and 'complete satisfaction'.

    Time frame: Change from day 0 to week 8, follow up at six months

  4. Caregiver burden

    Caregiver burden questionnaire. The burden of the caregivers will be assessed using the 22-item scale Caregiver Burden (CB). The scale consists of five sub-scales: General Strain, Isolation, Disappointment, Emotional Involvement and Environment. A Total Burden index is given by calculating the mean of all 22 items. Each of the 22-items is scored 1-4 (Not at all, Seldom, Sometimes, Often) and the items cover aspects such as caregiver health, psychological well-being, relationship, social network, physical workload and environmental aspects.

    Time frame: Change from day 0 to week 8, follow up at six months

  5. Self-perceived burden

    Burden perceived by the patient (SPB). The patients' SPB was measured with the Danish version of Self-Perceived Burden Scale (SPBS), which contains 10 items and scores range from 0-50. The 10 items were selected based on one single, general burden factor (Cousineau et al. 2003). Higher scores indicate high SPB. To estimate how severe self-perceived burden did patients feel, SPBS scores can be categorised into four stages: none to little (≤ 19), mild to moderate (20-29),moderate to severe (30-39) and severe (≥40).

    Time frame: Change from day 0 to week 8, follow up at six months

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Rigshospitalet
    Hvidovre, 2650, Denmark
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Stevens LF, Lehan T, Duran MAS, Plaza SLO, Arango-Lasprilla JC. Pilot Study of a Newly Developed Intervention for Families Facing Serious Injury. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil. 2016 Winter;22(1):49-59. doi: 10.1310/sci2201-49. PubMed 29398893 ↗
  • Soendergaard PL, Wolffbrandt MM, Biering-Sorensen F, Nordin M, Schow T, Arango-Lasprilla JC, Norup A. A manual-based family intervention for families living with the consequences of traumatic injury to the brain or spinal cord: a study protocol of a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2019 Nov 27;20(1):646. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3794-5. Erratum In: Trials. 2019 Dec 27;20(1):771. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3978-z. PubMed 31775831 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 18, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03814876
Lead sponsor
Rigshospitalet, Denmark
Collaborators
The Danish Victims Fund, The Association of Eastern Founders
Responsible party
Anne Norup (Principle investigator, neuropsychologist, Rigshospitalet, Denmark) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jan 24, 2019
Start date
Apr 1, 2018
Primary completion
Jan 1, 2023
Completion
Apr 1, 2023
Last update
Nov 18, 2023

Study contacts

Pernille Langer Soendergaard, MSc
study chair · Rigshospitalet, Denmark

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Nov 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion