ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03807635Updated Jan 22, 2019

Simulated Clinical Use Testing on Safety Lancets (Test A)

An interventional study of ergoLance safety lancet and Acti-Lance safety lancet in Needle Stick, sponsored by HTL-Strefa S.A.. Completed at 2 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-01-22.

Sponsored by HTL-Strefa S.A. · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
20
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

A simulated clinical use testing on the HTL-Strefa's safety lancets

Read the detailed description

This study aims to evaluate the safety of the use of the safety lancets: ergoLance and Acti-Lance in the prevention of NSI and to evaluate the user's opinion with regards to the handling characteristics of the medical devices.

The simulated use clinical study will involve healthcare professionals (HCPs) who routinely use safety lancets to collect blood samples and lay persons.

02

Conditions studied

  • Needle Stick

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • needlestick
  • needlestick injury
  • safety lancet
  • sharps injury prevention
  • capillary blood sampling
03

In context

Needlestick Injuries

30 studies on the registry are indexed under Needlestick Injuries; 3 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 20 is below the median of 67 across 23 interventional studies indexed under Needlestick Injuries.

Browse Needlestick Injuries studies →

Lead sponsor

HTL-Strefa S.A. is the lead sponsor of 8 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

The inclusion criteria for HCP and lay person evaluators have been chosen based on FDA guidance:

  • (HCP evaluators only) - evaluators who routinely use safety lancets to collect capillary blood samples (prevention of the learning curve artifacts)
  • evaluators will be United States (US) residents
  • evaluators can read, write, and speak English
  • evaluators are at least 18 years old
  • evaluators are able to understand and provide signed consent for the study
  • evaluators are willing to comply with the study protocol, including being willing to answer questions and complete questionnaires.
  • evaluators have no concerns about the ability to perform the simulated skin pricking.

Lay person evaluators will have a diverse range of ages (18+ years), socioeconomic statuses, and race/ethnic backgrounds. UL-Wiklund will recruit some lay person evaluators with reduced vision and dexterity. Users without safety lancet experience may also be included in this simulated clinical use study.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

HCPs:

  • They do not routinely use safety lancets to collect capillary blood samples,
  • They cannot read, write, and speak English,
  • They or a family member have a business or consulting relationship with a pharmaceutical or medical device company, or
  • They have participated in a product evaluation or marketing study involving safety lancets within the last six months

Lay people:

  • They cannot read, write, and speak English,
  • They or a family member have a business or consulting relationship with a pharmaceutical or medical device company, or
  • They have participated in a product evaluation or marketing study involving safety lancets within the last six months
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
20 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    simulation of skin pricking type 450

    The evaluator simulated the capillary blood sampling with the safety lancet type 450

    Device: ergoLance safety lancet

  • Experimental
    simulation of skin pricking type 610

    The evaluator simulated the capillary blood sampling with the safety lancet type 610

    Device: Acti-Lance safety lancet

Interventions

  • DeviceergoLance safety lancet

    The ergoLance contact activated safety lancets type 450 are sterile, single-use safety lancets designed for the sampling of capillary blood from the fingertip of patients.

  • DeviceActi-Lance safety lancet

    The Acti-Lance safety lancet type 610 is a sterile, single use device used to carry out skin punctures for the purpose of collecting capillary blood samples.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. The true failure rate of the tested devices

    Time frame: At time of testing, up to 90 minutes

  2. Effectiveness of the safety lancet's sharps injury prevention features

    Evaluator questionnaire using five-point response Likert scale (coded from 1 "strongly disagree" to 5 "strongly agree") to measure respondents' attitudes to a particular question or statement. Numbers assigned to Likert scale express a "greater than" relationship.

    Time frame: At time of testing, up to 90 minutes

Secondary outcomes

  1. Subjective assessments regarding evaluators' interactions with the tested safety lancets

    Evaluator questionnaire using five-point response Likert scale (coded from 1 "strongly disagree" to 5 "strongly agree") to measure respondents' attitudes to a particular question or statement. Numbers assigned to Likert scale express a "greater than" relationship.

    Time frame: At time of testing, up to 90 minutes

  2. Safety of the devices based on the evaluators' assessments (five-point response scale)

    Evaluator questionnaire using five-point response Likert scale (coded from 1 "strongly disagree" to 5 "strongly agree") to measure any and all observed needlestick injuries and device malfunctions. Numbers assigned to Likert scale express a "greater than" relationship.

    Time frame: At time of testing, up to 90 minutes

  3. Various aspects of the ease of use.

    Evaluator questionnaire using five-point response Likert scale (coded from 1 "strongly disagree" to 5 "strongly agree") to measure respondents' attitudes to a particular question or statement. Numbers assigned to Likert scale express a "greater than" relationship.

    Time frame: At time of testing, up to 90 minutes

  4. Any handling, usability questions / issues associated with the device

    Evaluator questionnaire using five-point response Likert scale (coded from 1 "strongly disagree" to 5 "strongly agree") to measure respondents' attitudes to a particular question or statement. Numbers assigned to Likert scale express a "greater than" relationship.

    Time frame: At time of testing, up to 90 minutes

07

Study locations

2 sites
  • UL LLC
    Chicago, Illinois 60606, United States
  • Schlesinger Associates
    Boston, Massachusetts 02116, United States
08

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Nov 2018 to primary completion in Dec 2018, 0 months.

Of 12 interventional studies with no phase under Needlestick Injuries, half reached primary completion within 2 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 0 and three quarters within 5. This study's 0 months is below that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jan 10, 2019
First posted
Jan 17, 2019
StartActual
Nov 30, 2018
Primary completionActual
Dec 13, 2018
CompletionActual
Dec 13, 2018
Last update
Jan 22, 2019
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 22, 2019, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03807635
Lead sponsor
HTL-Strefa S.A.
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jan 17, 2019
Start date
Nov 30, 2018
Primary completion
Dec 13, 2018
Completion
Dec 13, 2018
Last update
Jan 22, 2019

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jan 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion