CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03802864Updated Dec 17, 2020Results posted

Post-operative Pain Control of Testicular Sperm Extraction Using Liposomal Bupivacaine

A Phase 4 interventional study of Liposomal Bupivacaine and Standard Bupivacaine in Male Infertility, sponsored by Weill Medical College of Cornell University. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to male participants aged 18 Years to 99 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-12-17.

Sponsored by Weill Medical College of Cornell University · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
50
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 99 Years
Sex
Male
01

Study summary

The study is a drug trial comparing the post-operative pain control provided by liposomal bupivacaine (a local anesthetic) against standard bupivacaine (a different formulation of the local anesthetic) for men undergoing testicular sperm extraction.

02

Conditions studied

03

In context

Infertility

2,506 studies on the registry are indexed under Infertility; 407 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 50 is below the median of 120 across 1,698 interventional studies indexed under Infertility.

Browse Infertility studies →

Lead sponsor

Weill Medical College of Cornell University is the lead sponsor of 867 studies on the registry; 160 are open to participants now.

Of its 119 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 91 (76%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 99 Years
Sexes eligible
Male
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Men scheduled for surgical sperm retrieval for infertility
  • Men 18 years and older who can provide informed consent
  • No documented allergy to bupivacaine or celecoxib

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Prior history of substance abuse
  • Any narcotic use within the last 3 months
  • Concomitant use of aspirin
  • Any of the following comorbidities: renal failure, heart disease, peptic ulcer disease, cerebrovascular disease, significant liver disease, untreated depression, chronic pain disorder, or bleeding diatheses
  • Medical history or concurrent illness that the investigator considers sufficiently serious to interfere with the conduct, completion, or results of this trial, or constitutes an unacceptable risk to the subject
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Care provider, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
50 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Liposomal Bupivacaine

    Participants in this arm will have a single injection of liposomal bupivacaine admixed with standard bupivacaine (266mg liposomal bupivacaine mixed with 50mg bupivacaine hydrochloride) at the conclusion of their surgical sperm retrieval procedure.

    Drug: Liposomal Bupivacaine

  • Active comparator
    Standard Bupivacaine

    Participants in this arm will have a single injection of standard bupivacaine (100mg bupivacaine hydrochloride) at the conclusion of their surgical sperm retrieval procedure.

    Drug: Standard Bupivacaine

Interventions

  • DrugLiposomal Bupivacaine

    After surgical sperm retrieval, the wound will be injected with liposomal bupivacaine (266 mg) mixed with standard bupivacaine (bupivacaine hydrochloride 50mg) for post-operative pain relief.

  • DrugStandard Bupivacaine

    After surgical sperm retrieval, the wound will be injected only with standard bupivacaine (bupivacaine hydrochloride 100mg) for post-operative pain relief.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Pain Scores 48 Hours After Surgery

    Every 8 hours in the first 48 hours post-surgery, subjects were prompted to report their pain score on the 11-point numerical pain rating scale, NRS-11 (Numerical Rating Scale, 11 points). 0 indicates no pain and 10 indicates worst possible pain. Each subject's pain scores were then plotted against time, and the area under the curve was then computed. The minimum composite score would be 0 (no pain ever reported), and the maximum composite score would be 480 (maximum pain (score of 10) reported each time across 48 hours).

    Time frame: First 48 hours after surgery

Secondary outcomes

  1. Pain Scores 60 Hours After Surgery

    Every 12 hours in the first 60 hours post-surgery, subjects were prompted to report their pain score on the 11-point numerical pain rating scale, NRS-11 (Numerical Rating Scale, 11 points). 0 indicates no pain and 10 indicates worst possible pain. Each subject's pain scores were then plotted against time, and the area under the curve was then computed. The minimum composite score would be 0 (no pain ever reported), and the maximum composite score would be 600 (maximum pain (score of 10) reported each time across 60 hours).

    Time frame: First 60 hours after surgery

  2. Pain Scores 7 Days After Surgery

    Every 12 hours in the first 7 days post-surgery, subjects were prompted to report their pain score on the 11-point numerical pain rating scale, NRS-11 (Numerical Rating Scale, 11 points). 0 indicates no pain and 10 indicates worst possible pain. Each subject's pain scores were then plotted against time, and the area under the curve was then computed. The minimum composite score would be 0 (no pain ever reported), and the maximum composite score would be 1680 (maximum pain (score of 10) reported each time across 168 hours).

    Time frame: First 7 days after surgery

  3. Narcotic Requirement

    Total number of narcotic tablets required between the intervention and control arms during post-operative day 1 through 7.

    Time frame: First 7 days after surgery

  4. Time to Narcotic Rescue

    Time (in hours) to first rescue narcotic utilization between the two arms.

    Time frame: First 7 days after surgery

  5. Pain Control Satisfaction

    Overall satisfaction of pain control regimen self reported on post-operative day 7. The prompt required a yes/no answer. The percent of participants answering "yes" will be compared between the two arms.

    Time frame: 7th day after surgery

  6. Percentage of Patients Not Requiring Any Narcotics

    The percentage of patients remaining opiate free by post-operative day 7.

    Time frame: 7th day after surgery

07

Results

Posted Dec 17, 2020

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneLiposomal BupivacaineStandard Bupivacaine
Started2525
Completed2525
Not completed00

Outcome measures

PrimaryPain Scores 48 Hours After Surgery

Every 8 hours in the first 48 hours post-surgery, subjects were prompted to report their pain score on the 11-point numerical pain rating scale, NRS-11 (Numerical Rating Scale, 11 points). 0 indicates no pain and 10 indicates worst possible pain. Each subject's pain scores were then plotted against time, and the area under the curve was then computed. The minimum composite score would be 0 (no pain ever reported), and the maximum composite score would be 480 (maximum pain (score of 10) reported each time across 48 hours).

Time frame:
First 48 hours after surgery
Reported as:
Mean · Scores*Hour
Pain Scores 48 Hours After Surgery
Scores*HourLiposomal BupivacaineStandard Bupivacaine
Pain Scores 48 Hours After Surgery118.4 ± 99.798.2 ± 68.9
Statistical analysis
  • Liposomal Bupivacaine vs Standard Bupivacaine · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.41
SecondaryPain Scores 60 Hours After Surgery

Every 12 hours in the first 60 hours post-surgery, subjects were prompted to report their pain score on the 11-point numerical pain rating scale, NRS-11 (Numerical Rating Scale, 11 points). 0 indicates no pain and 10 indicates worst possible pain. Each subject's pain scores were then plotted against time, and the area under the curve was then computed. The minimum composite score would be 0 (no pain ever reported), and the maximum composite score would be 600 (maximum pain (score of 10) reported each time across 60 hours).

Time frame:
First 60 hours after surgery
Reported as:
Mean · Scores*Hour
Pain Scores 60 Hours After Surgery
Scores*HourLiposomal BupivacaineStandard Bupivacaine
Pain Scores 60 Hours After Surgery140.7 ± 107.8116 ± 83.2
Statistical analysis
  • Liposomal Bupivacaine vs Standard Bupivacaine · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.37
SecondaryPain Scores 7 Days After Surgery

Every 12 hours in the first 7 days post-surgery, subjects were prompted to report their pain score on the 11-point numerical pain rating scale, NRS-11 (Numerical Rating Scale, 11 points). 0 indicates no pain and 10 indicates worst possible pain. Each subject's pain scores were then plotted against time, and the area under the curve was then computed. The minimum composite score would be 0 (no pain ever reported), and the maximum composite score would be 1680 (maximum pain (score of 10) reported each time across 168 hours).

Time frame:
First 7 days after surgery
Reported as:
Mean · Scores*Hour
Pain Scores 7 Days After Surgery
Scores*HourLiposomal BupivacaineStandard Bupivacaine
Pain Scores 7 Days After Surgery286.6 ± 202.7233.1 ± 209.9
Statistical analysis
  • Liposomal Bupivacaine vs Standard Bupivacaine · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.36
SecondaryNarcotic Requirement

Total number of narcotic tablets required between the intervention and control arms during post-operative day 1 through 7.

Time frame:
First 7 days after surgery
Reported as:
Mean · Count of narcotic tablets
Narcotic Requirement
Count of narcotic tabletsLiposomal BupivacaineStandard Bupivacaine
Narcotic Requirement2.6 ± 4.41.6 ± 3.1
Statistical analysis
  • Liposomal Bupivacaine vs Standard Bupivacaine · Regression, Linear · p = 0.28
SecondaryTime to Narcotic Rescue

Time (in hours) to first rescue narcotic utilization between the two arms.

Time frame:
First 7 days after surgery
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Time to Narcotic Rescue
ParticipantsLiposomal BupivacaineStandard Bupivacaine
0 to 40 Hours After Surgery108
41 to 80 Hours After Surgery00
81 to 120 Hours After Surgery03
121 to 160 Hours After Surgery21
Never Required Narcotics1313
Statistical analysis
  • Liposomal Bupivacaine vs Standard Bupivacaine · Log Rank · p = 0.78
SecondaryPain Control Satisfaction

Overall satisfaction of pain control regimen self reported on post-operative day 7. The prompt required a yes/no answer. The percent of participants answering "yes" will be compared between the two arms.

Time frame:
7th day after surgery
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Pain Control Satisfaction
ParticipantsLiposomal BupivacaineStandard Bupivacaine
Yes - Adequate pain control achieved2220
No - Adequate pain control not achieved01
Statistical analysis
  • Liposomal Bupivacaine vs Standard Bupivacaine · Fisher Exact · p = 0.49
SecondaryPercentage of Patients Not Requiring Any Narcotics

The percentage of patients remaining opiate free by post-operative day 7.

Time frame:
7th day after surgery
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Percentage of Patients Not Requiring Any Narcotics
ParticipantsLiposomal BupivacaineStandard Bupivacaine
No narcotics required1516
Narcotics required109
Statistical analysis
  • Liposomal Bupivacaine vs Standard Bupivacaine · Fisher Exact · p = 0.99

Adverse events

Collected over Subjects were monitored for adverse events from the time of their initial surgery until 3 weeks after surgery.. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Liposomal Bupivacaine0/25 (0%)0/25 (0%)3/25 (12%)
Standard Bupivacaine0/25 (0%)0/25 (0%)4/25 (16%)
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventLiposomal BupivacaineStandard Bupivacaine
Back PainMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders0/252/25
ConstipationGastrointestinal disorders2/251/25
Scrotal PainReproductive system and breast disorders0/251/25
Scrotal infectionReproductive system and breast disorders1/250/25

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Liposomal BupivacaineStandard BupivacaineTotal
Mean37.2 ± 9.336.4 ± 11.936.8 ± 10.6
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Liposomal BupivacaineStandard BupivacaineTotal
Female000
Male252550
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Liposomal BupivacaineStandard BupivacaineTotal
Hispanic or Latino101
Not Hispanic or Latino242549
Unknown or Not Reported000
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Liposomal BupivacaineStandard BupivacaineTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native000
Asian246
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander000
Black or African American123
White221941
More than one race000
Unknown or Not Reported000
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Liposomal BupivacaineStandard BupivacaineTotal
United States252550
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Weill Cornell Medicine Department of Urology
    New York, New York 10065, United States
09

References and documents

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Nov 14, 2018

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 17, 2020, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03802864
Lead sponsor
Weill Medical College of Cornell University
Collaborators
Pacira Pharmaceuticals, Inc
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jan 14, 2019
Start date
Feb 4, 2019
Primary completion
Jan 30, 2020
Completion
Jan 30, 2020
Results posted
Dec 17, 2020
Last update
Dec 17, 2020

Study contacts

Russell Hayden, MD
principal investigator · Weill Medical College of Cornell University

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Nov 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion