CClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT03798405PAIN-SparingUpdated Jul 22, 2022

Reactive vs. Proactive Pain Control in IBD

An interventional study of Proactive Analgesic Inpatient Narcotic-Sparing in Inflammatory Bowel Diseases, Pain and Opioid Use, sponsored by Cedars-Sinai Medical Center. Terminated at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-07-22.

Sponsored by Cedars-Sinai Medical Center · Not applicable, Interventional, and Health services research

Why this study was terminated
COVID-19-related restrictions
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
33
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The investigators will compare two physician behaviors for managing pain in patients with IBD: proactive vs. reactive. Both the proactive and reactive behavior/strategies are standard of care at the institution in which the study will be performed. The PROACTIVE strategy is an IBD-specific analgesic orderset (built into our EMR and approved by the institution's Pharmacy and Therapeutics committee), the REACTIVE strategy is a traditional "reactive" analgesic prescribing (prescribing medications only when patients have pain). The PROACTIVE IBD-specific analgesic orderset consists of medications which have evidence for use in IBD-related pain. This orderset is an educational guide, it does not force any order. The reactive prescribing habits could contain an array of pain medications depending on what the provider wants to prescribe.

Aims:

Aim 1: To assess whether there is a difference in pain scores or functional activity among hospitalized patients with IBD between reactive vs proactive physician behaviors.

Aim 2: To assess whether there is a difference in inpatient opioid-prescribing between reactive vs proactive physician behaviors.

Aim 3: To assess whether there is a difference in health care utilization, including length-of-stay and 30-day readmission, between reactive vs proactive physician behaviors.

Read the detailed description

Prospective, investigator-blinded, single-institution randomized-control trial . Consecutive adult patients with IBD (Crohn's disease or ulcerative colitis) admitted to the hospital will be screened for eligibility, and eligible patients will be approached and consented to participate. Subjects will be randomized to receive the P.A.I.N.-Sparing bundle or usual care. Patient randomization will be stratified by provider to avoid bias, using a web-based in-house system (RANDI3). Subjects will also be provided with a fitness tracker (Fitbit(R)) to measure functional status during their hospital stay.

02

Conditions studied

  • Inflammatory Bowel Diseases
  • Pain
  • Opioid Use
  • Crohn Disease
  • Ulcerative Colitis

Keywords

  • Pain
  • Inflammatory Bowel Disease
  • Opioids
03

In context

Crohn Disease

1,880 studies on the registry are indexed under Crohn Disease; 461 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 33 is below the median of 66 across 1,188 interventional studies indexed under Crohn Disease.

Browse Crohn Disease studies →

Lead sponsor

Cedars-Sinai Medical Center is the lead sponsor of 442 studies on the registry; 109 are open to participants now.

Of its 62 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 47 (76%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Adults with confirmed IBD diagnosis
  • Admitted for primary IBD-related sign or symptom

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Admitted for primary non-IBD complaint
  • Surgery in the last 30 days
  • Alternative (non-IBD) GI diagnosis determined
  • Age \<18
  • Pregnancy
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Health services research
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
33 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Proactive

    Proactive Analgesic Inpatient Narcotic-Sparing: Pain management in patients in the proactive physician-behavior group will be based on the IBD Pain orderset in our EMR. This orderset is already in use and standard-of-care at Cedars. The orderset uses pain medications, which have evidence for use in IBD. The orderset is simply a guide to clinicians and does not force any doctor or patient to be in a "protocol".

    Behavioral: Proactive Analgesic Inpatient Narcotic-Sparing

  • No intervention
    Reactive (Control Group)

    Pain management in patients in the reactive group (control group) will follow traditional prescribing habits. As different providers vary in the way they treat pain, analgesic medication prescribing in the control group will be inherently variable in nature. The control group does not constitute a lack of treatment or placebo; rather, pain management in the control group will not be proactive as in the intervention group.

Interventions

  • BehavioralProactive Analgesic Inpatient Narcotic-Sparing

    Medications suggested to the physician with enhanced ease of ordering.

    Also known as: P.A.I.N.-Sparing Bundle

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Patient-Reported Pain Scores

    Visual Analog Pain Numeric Rating Scale (Scale range 0 (no pain) to 10 (severe pain))

    Time frame: Difference in the average daily pain score from the first to the last day of hospitalization, typically 7 days.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Healthcare Utilization

    Hospital length of stay (in days)

    Time frame: From hospital admission until hospital discharge, typically 7 days.

  2. Functional Activity

    FitBit activity (number of steps per day)

    Time frame: From hospital admission until hospital discharge, typically 7 days.

  3. Opioid-Consumption

    Milligram morphine-equivalents consumed per day

    Time frame: From hospital admission until hospital discharge, typically 7 days.

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
    Los Angeles, California 90048, United States
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 22, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03798405
Lead sponsor
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
Responsible party
Gil Melmed (co-Director, Inflammatory Bowel Disease Center, Principal Investigator, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jan 10, 2019
Start date
Jan 1, 2019
Primary completion
Jul 1, 2022
Completion
Jul 1, 2022
Last update
Jul 22, 2022

Study contacts

Gil Y Melmed, MD, MS
principal investigator · Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
Sameer K Berry, MD, MBA
study director · Cedars-Sinai Medical Center

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in Jul 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion