ClinicalTrials.gg
Active, not recruitingNCT03797157N-forteUpdated Jul 23, 2024

Human Milk Fortification in Extremely Preterm Infants

A Phase 2/3 interventional study of H2MF and Bovine milk-based fortifier in Necrotizing Enterocolitis, Sepsis and Mortality, sponsored by Thomas Abrahamsson, MD, PhD. Active, not recruiting at 5 sites in Sweden. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-07-23.

Sponsored by Thomas Abrahamsson, MD, PhD · Phase 2/3, Interventional, and Prevention

Phase
Phase 2/3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
229
Allocation
Randomized
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This is a randomised controlled multi-centre trial comparing the effect of diet supplementation of a human breast milk-based nutrient fortifier (H2MF®) with standard bovine protein-based nutrient fortifier in 222 extremely preterm infants (born before gestational week 28+0) exclusively fed with human breast milk (own mother´s milk and/or donor milk). The infants will be randomised to receive either the human breast-milk based H2MF® or the standard bovine protein-based nutrient fortifier when oral feeds have reached \<100 ml/kg/day.

The randomised intervention, stratified by centre, will continue until the target gestational week 34+0. The infant must not be fed with formula during the intervention period. The allocation will be concealed before inclusion, but after randomisation the study is not blinded.

Primary endpoint of the intervention is the composite variable necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC), sepsis and mortality.

The enrolled infants are characterised with clinical data including growth, feeding intolerance, use of enteral and parenteral nutrition, treatment, antibiotics and complications collected daily in a study specific case report form from birth until discharge from the hospital (not longer than gestational week 44+0). A follow up focusing on neurological development, growth and feeding problems will be performed at 2 years of age (corrected) and 5.5 years of age.

Read the detailed description

This is a randomised controlled multi-centre trial comparing the effect of diet supplementation of a human breast milk-based nutrient fortifier (H2MF®) with standard bovine protein-based nutrient fortifier in 222 extremely preterm infants (born before gestational week 28+0) exclusively fed with human breast milk (own mother´s milk and/or donor milk). The infants will be randomised to receive either the human breast-milk based H2MF® or the standard bovine protein-based nutrient fortifier when oral feeds have reached \<100 ml/kg/day. If fortification with extra enteral lipids is needed during the intervention period, the infants receiving H2MF® will be supplemented with the human milk-based Prolact CR®, while the infants receiving standard bovine protein-based fortification will be supplemented with the standard lipid products used at the unit. The study subject will be enrolled at level III neonatal intensive care unit (NICU)s. Only infants with a home clinic with the logistics to maintain the intervention until gestational week 34+0 will be included.

The randomised intervention, stratified by centre, will continue until the target gestational week 34+0. The infant must not be fed with formula during the intervention period. The allocation will be concealed before inclusion, but after randomisation the study is not blinded. It would not be possible to prescribe the fortifier and prepare of the breast milk in a blinded fashion, since the fortifiers are not exactly equal in nutrient content and also look different. Instead the assessment of several of the outcomes will be made blinded, such as the assessment of X-ray images in NEC cases.

The enrolled infants are characterised with clinical data including growth, feeding intolerance, use of enteral and parenteral nutrition, treatment, antibiotics and complications collected daily in a study specific case report form from birth until discharge from the hospital (not longer than gestational week 44+0). A follow up focusing on neurological development, growth and feeding problems will be performed at 2 years of age (corrected) and 5.5 years.

Since it is often difficult to distinguish between the diagnoses of NEC and sepsis, and their clinical consequences, the investigator's primary endpoint of the intervention is the composite variable NEC, sepsis and mortality. Secondary endpoints are feeding intolerance and other severe complication such as Bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD), Retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) and neurological impairment. Stool, urine and blood samples are also collected for microbiology, metabolomic and immunology analysis in order to study underlying mechanisms. Health economic analyses will be made to evaluate the costs and benefits of an introduction of human milk-based fortifier in NICUs in the Nordic countries.

Analyses will be conducted using an intention to treat approach. An evaluation will be performed when 20 infants have been included to evaluate feasibility and make it possible to adjust the protocol for the remaining part of the study. Safety analyses will be performed by an independent data and safety monitoring board (DSMB) when 50, 100 and 150 infants have been included. A sample size re-estimation will be made by an independent statistician when 150 infants have been included. Thus, the definitive sample size might be increased (never decreased) based on this interim analysis. The study can be terminated before 322 infants have been enrolled based on a decision of the sponsor and the DSMB, if the primary outcome is significantly lower (with a significance level \<0.001) in the H2MF® than in the standard fortification group in the interim analysis made after 150 infants have completed the neonatal period. The study subject will be enrolled at level III NICUs in the Nordic Countries. All study subjects will be followed during the neonatal period until discharge (not longer than gestational week 44+0) and also be included in a follow up at 2 and 5.5 years of age based on the national follow up program for extremely preterm infants.

02

Conditions studied

  • Necrotizing Enterocolitis
  • Sepsis
  • Mortality
03

In context

Enterocolitis, Necrotizing

228 studies on the registry are indexed under Enterocolitis, Necrotizing; 44 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 229 is above the median of 103 across 127 interventional studies indexed under Enterocolitis, Necrotizing.

Browse Enterocolitis, Necrotizing studies →

Lead sponsor

This is the only study on the registry with Thomas Abrahamsson, MD, PhD as lead sponsor.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Gestational age at birth 22+0-27+6: based on prenatal ultrasonography.
  • Enteral feeds \< 100 mL/kg/day at the day of randomisation.
  • Written from the legal guardians of the infant.
  • The home clinic of the infant has the logistics of maintaining the intervention until gestational week 34+0

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Lethal or complicated malformation known at the time of inclusion
  • Chromosomal anomalies known at the time of inclusion
  • No realistic hope for survival at the time of inclusion
  • Gastrointestinal malformation known at the time of inclusion
  • Abdominal surgery before the time of inclusion
  • Participation in another intervention trial aiming at having an effect on growth, nutrition, feeding intolerance or severe complications such as NEC and sepsis
  • Infants having nutrient fortifier or formula prior to randomisation
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2 / Phase 3
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
229 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    H2MF

    Human milk-based breast milk fortifier

    Dietary Supplement: H2MF

  • Active comparator
    Standard fortifier

    Standard care: bovine milk-based breast milk fortifier

    Dietary Supplement: Bovine milk-based fortifier

Interventions

  • Dietary supplementH2MF

    H2MF is a human milk-based breastmilk fortifier for preterm infants

  • Dietary supplementBovine milk-based fortifier

    Bovine milk-based fortifier is the standard breast milk fortifier in Sweden

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. The incidence of the composite of necrotizing enterocolitis, culture-proven sepsis and mortality

    An infant should have had any of these diagnoses to fulfil the criterion

    Time frame: From birth until discharge from hospital (but not longer than gestational week 44+0)

Secondary outcomes

  1. The incidence of the composite of necrotizing enterocolitis and culture-proven sepsis

    An infant should have had any of these diagnoses to fulfil the criterion

    Time frame: From birth until discharge from hospital (but not longer than gestational week 44+0)

  2. The incidence of the composite of necrotizing enterocolitis culture-proven sepsis, bronchopulmonary dysplasia, retinopathy of prematurity and mortality (Mortality and morbidity index)

    An infant should have had any of these diagnoses to fulfil the criterion

    Time frame: From birth until discharge from hospital (but not longer than gestational week 44+0)

  3. Time to reach full enteral feeds

    The day of life the infant has received at least 150 mL/kg enteral feeds

    Time frame: From birth until discharge from hospital (but not longer than gestational week 44+0)

  4. Number of feeding interruptions

    Number of days feedings held for ≥12 hours or feeds reduced by \>50% (ml/kg/d) not due to a clinical procedure or transitioning to the breast

    Time frame: From birth until discharge from hospital (but not longer than gestational week 44+0)

  5. Numbers of days with parenteral nutrition

    Number of days of parental amino acid and/or lipid infusion. Only days when the enteral feed \<150mL/kg/day should be included

    Time frame: From birth until discharge from hospital (but not longer than gestational week 44+0)

  6. Number of large gastric aspirates per day

    ≥100% pre-feed volume (2 hours feeding volume if continuous feeding). Lower limit=2 ml/kg.

    Time frame: From birth until discharge from hospital (but not longer than gestational week 44+0)

  7. Stool frequency

    Time frame: From birth until discharge from hospital (but not longer than gestational week 44+0)

  8. Time to regain birth weight

    Time frame: From birth until discharge from hospital (but not longer than gestational week 44+0)

  9. Change in head circumference in centimeters

    Time frame: At 7, 14, 21 and 28 days, the end of intervention (gestational week 34+0), gestational week 36+0, at discharge from neonatal ward (or at gestational week 44+0, whatever comes first) and at 2 years of age (corrected) and 5.5 years of age (uncorrected).

  10. Change in weight in gram

    Time frame: At 7, 14, 21 and 28 days, the end of intervention (gestational week 34+0), gestational week 36+0, at discharge from neonatal ward (or at gestational week 44+0, whatever comes first) and at 2 years of age (corrected) and 5.5 years of age (uncorrected).

  11. Change in length in centimeters

    Time frame: At 7, 14, 21 and 28 days, the end of intervention (gestational week 34+0), gestational week 36+0, at discharge from neonatal ward (or at gestational week 44+0, whatever comes first) and at 2 years of age (corrected) and 5.5 years of age (uncorrected).

  12. The mortality incidence

    Time frame: From birth until discharge from hospital (but not loner than gestational week 44+0)

  13. The incidence of necrotising enterocolitis: Bell´s stage II-III

    Time frame: From birth until discharge from hospital (but not loner than gestational week 44+0)

  14. The incidence spontaneous intestinal perforation

    Time frame: From birth until discharge from hospital (but not loner than gestational week 44+0)

  15. The incidence of abdominal surgery

    Time frame: From birth until discharge from hospital (but not loner than gestational week 44+0)

  16. The incidence culture-proven sepsis

    Time frame: From birth until discharge from hospital (but not loner than gestational week 44+0)

  17. The incidence of suspected sepsis, not culture-proven

    Time frame: From birth until discharge from hospital (but not loner than gestational week 44+0)

  18. The incidence of pneumonia

    Pathological X-ray confirmed by an independent radiologist, need of increased respiratory support/oxygen and laboratory inflammatory response

    Time frame: From birth until discharge from hospital (but not loner than gestational week 44+0)

  19. The incidence of bronchopulmonary dysplasia

    Need of extra oxygen, continuous positive air pressure (CPAP) or ventilator at gestational week 36+0

    Time frame: At gestational week 36+0

  20. The incidence of retinopathy of the prematurity

    Classified into stage I-V. The diagnosis is set after gestational week 42+0

    Time frame: From birth until gestational week 42+0

  21. The incidence of intraventricular haemorrhage

    Classified into grade I-IV according to Papile

    Time frame: From birth until discharge from hospital (but not loner than gestational week 44+0)

  22. The incidence of periventricular leukomalacia

    Criteria according to de Vries

    Time frame: From birth until discharge from hospital (but not loner than gestational week 44+0)

  23. Number of days with intensive care

    Need of respirator or CPAP until discharge (not later than gestational week 44+0).

    Time frame: From birth until discharge from hospital (but not loner than gestational week 44+0)

  24. Length of stay at the hospital

    Gestational week and day at discharge (not later than gestational week 44+0).

    Time frame: From birth until discharge from hospital (but not loner than gestational week 44+0)

  25. Length of need of feeding tube

    Gestational week and day when the infant does not need it anymore (not later than gestational week 44+0)

    Time frame: From birth until discharge from hospital (but not loner than gestational week 44+0)

  26. Neurocognitive development at 2 years

    Bayleys III, PARCA-R (Parental Report of Children´s Abilities-Revised) and ASQ-3 (Ages and stages questionnaire)

    Time frame: At 2 years of age

  27. Prevalence of cerebral palsy at 2 years

    Time frame: At 2 years of age

  28. Prevalence of epilepsy at 2 years

    Time frame: At 2 years of age

  29. Prevalence of squint and/or impaired vision at 2 years

    Time frame: At 2 years of age

  30. Prevalence of impaired hearing at 2 years

    Time frame: At 2 years of age

  31. The number of infants needing extra oxygen and/or ventilatory support after discharge from the hospital at the neonatal period

    Time frame: From gestational week 44 until 2 years of age

  32. The incidence of wheeze and/or asthma

    Time frame: From birth until 2 years of life

  33. The incidence of severe infections after discharge from the neonatal unit

    Time frame: From gestational week 44 until 2 years of age

  34. The number of infants needing feeding tube after discharge from the hospital at the neonatal period

    Time frame: From gestational week 44 until 2 years of age

  35. The number of infants needing extra nutritional support after discharge from the hospital at the neonatal period

    Time frame: From gestational week 44 until 2 years of age

  36. The prevalence of neurocognitive development at 5.5 years

    Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence IV (WPPSI-IV TM) and Movement ABC-2: the total scale points as well as the points of sub scales (motor, cognitive, language) will be presented. The prevalence of infants with a realist below 2 standard deviations will be defined to have mental retardation.

    Time frame: At 5.5 years of age

  37. The prevalence of cerebral palsy at 5.5 years

    Time frame: At 5.5 years of age

  38. The prevalence of epilepsy at 5.5 years of age

    Time frame: At 5.5 years of age

  39. The prevalence of squint and/or impaired vision at 5.5 years of age

    Time frame: At 5.5 years of age

  40. The prevalence of children with impaired hearing at 5.5 years of age

    Time frame: At 5.5 years of age

  41. The prevalence of wheeze and/or asthma at 5.5 years of age

    Time frame: At 5.5 years of age

  42. Microbiome composition in stool samples

    The relative abundance and diversity of microbial taxa will be analyses with next generation sequencing and be related till the study intervention

    Time frame: At 1, 2, 3 and 4 weeks of age and gestational week 36+0

  43. Levels of subclasses of T and B cells and granulocytes in blood samples

    T helper subsets (TH1, Th2, TH17, Treg), T cells subsets associated with the intestinal mucosa (gamma/delta-T cells, MAIT cells) and neutrophils will be assessed using masscytometry

    Time frame: At 1, 2 and 4 weeks of age and gestational week 36+0

  44. Levels of immune markers in plasma

    Pre planned analyses are anti-inflammatory (e.g. IL-10) and proinflammatory (e.g. TNF) cytokines and chemokines (e.g. CXCL11, CCL18).

    Time frame: At 1, 2 and 4 weeks of age and gestational week 36+0

  45. Levels of growth factors in plasma samples

    The levels of growth factors such as IGF-1 and the associated IGFBP-3 will be analysed.

    Time frame: At 1, 2 and 4 weeks of age and gestational week 36+0

  46. Levels of lipids in plasma samples

    Fatty acids in plasma

    Time frame: At 1, 2 and 4 weeks of age and gestational week 36+0

  47. Levels of neurotransmitters in plasma samples

    Neurotransmitters such as GABA and serotonin in plasma

    Time frame: At 1, 2 and 4 weeks of age and gestational week 36+0

  48. Levels of metabolic peptides in urine samples

    Metabolic peptide will be measured with proton nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy (NMR), liquid chromatography (LC) and mass spectroscopy couple to gas chromatography (GC-MC).

    Time frame: At 1, 2, 3 and 4 weeks of age and gestational week 36+0

  49. Levels of markers of central nervous system (CNS) damage in plasma samples

    Markers of CNS damage such as neurofilament light protein will be measured in plasma

    Time frame: At 1, 2 and 4 weeks of age and gestational week 36+0

  50. Levels of proteins in breast milk samples

    Protein composition will be measured with multiplex methods

    Time frame: At 1, 2, 3 and 4 weeks of age and gestational week 36+0

  51. Levels of human milk oligosaccharides in breast milk samples

    The levels of human milk oligosaccharides will be measured with high-performance anion-exchange chromatography with pulsed amperometric detection.

    Time frame: At 1, 2, 3 and 4 weeks of age and gestational week 36+0

  52. Health care costs

    The number of days at each level of care will be recorded until discharge from the hospital (not longer than gestational week 44+0). The cost will be calculated by multiplying the number of days at each level of care by the average cost

    Time frame: From birth until discharge from hospital (but not loner than gestational week 44+0)

07

Study locations

5 sites
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Jensen GB, Ahlsson F, Domellof M, Elfvin A, Naver L, Abrahamsson T. Nordic study on human milk fortification in extremely preterm infants: a randomised controlled trial-the N-forte trial. BMJ Open. 2021 Nov 23;11(11):e053400. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-053400. PubMed 34815288 ↗

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 23, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03797157
Lead sponsor
Thomas Abrahamsson, MD, PhD
Collaborators
Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Region Uppsala, Vasterbottens lans landsting, Prolacta Bioscience, Region Stockholm
Responsible party
Thomas Abrahamsson, MD, PhD (Principal Investigator, MD PhD, Ostergotland County Council, Sweden) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Jan 9, 2019
Start date
Feb 1, 2019
Primary completion
Sep 1, 2022
Completion
Jan 31, 2029 (estimated)
Last update
Jul 23, 2024

Study contacts

Thomas R Abrahamsson, MD, PhD
principal investigator · Region Östergötland

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is active, not recruiting, as verified in Jul 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion