CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03796598Updated May 25, 2025Results posted

FMT in Cirrhosis and Hepatic Encephalopathy

A Phase 1/2 interventional study of Fecal Microbial transplant Capsules and Fecal Microbial Transplant Enema in Cirrhosis and Hepatic Encephalopathy, sponsored by VA Office of Research and Development. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 21 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-05-25.

Sponsored by VA Office of Research and Development · Phase 1/2, Interventional, and Other

Phase
Phase 1/2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
60
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
21 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Patients with end stage of liver disease or cirrhosis can develop confusion due to high ammonia and inflammation. This confusion is brought upon by changes in the bacteria in the bowels and may not respond to current standard of care treatments. Repeated episodes of confusion can make it difficult for patients to function and may result in multiple admissions to the hospital and burden on the family. The investigators have studied using a healthy person's stool to replace the bowel bacteria, called fecal microbial transplant, in small studies with good results. In this trial the investigators propose to perform these procedures using an upper and lower route in Veterans who suffer from this condition and follow them for safety and HE and related hospitalizations over 6 months. The investigators will compare this to placebo treatments and hope that this intervention can improve the health and daily functioning of affected patients.

Read the detailed description

Indication: Cirrhosis and hepatic encephalopathy

Study Objectives: To evaluate the safety and tolerability of fecal transplant in patients with cirrhosis and hepatic encephalopathy

Rationale and Supporting Evidence:

Hepatic encephalopathy affects 30-45% of patients with cirrhosis and adversely affects survival in these patients. The mainstay of treatment for hepatic encephalopathy (HE) has long been the manipulation of the gut flora through antibiotics, prebiotics or probiotics. The current first and second line therapies for HE in the US are lactulose and rifaximin respectively that uniquely act within the confines of the gut lumen with encouraging clinical results. However, there is a subset of patients with HE that continues to recur despite being on both treatments. This patient group is at a higher risk of poor outcomes because HE has now been removed from liver transplant priority and multiple episodes of HE can result in cumulative brain injury which may be irreversible. Therefore, the prevention of recurrent HE is an important therapeutic goal.

The investigators' group and other reports have shown that patients with HE and cirrhosis are more likely to have overgrowth of potentially pathogenic bacterial taxa such as Enterobacteriaceae and reduction of autochthonous species such as Lachnospiraceae and Ruminococcaceae in the stool and the colonic mucosa. This has been linked to poor performance on cognitive tests that are a hallmark of HE and with increased systemic inflammation in these patients.

Therefore, a gut-based therapeutic option that can potentially improve the recurrence rate and the overall prognosis is needed. Fecal transplant has been shown to be effective in conditions with predominant gut-bacterial overgrowth or alteration such as recurrent Clostridium difficile and inflammatory bowel disease. Safe protocols have been developed across the world and studies are being performed in the US under FDA-monitored INDs. Limitations to performing fecal transplant include identifying and screening appropriate donors, which is time consuming and costly, with the cost typically falling to the patient or donor as the required screening is generally not covered by insurance.

The investigators' preliminary data suggest that a one-time administration of an FMT-enema using a rationally-selected donor is safe in patients with cirrhosis and recurrent HE. However, given the small bowel overgrowth and the predominantly small bowel location for bacterial translocation in cirrhosis, which is out of the reach of an enema, an upper GI route for FMT needs to be explored. In the investigators' published experience, a single enema from a rationally-derived donor was associated with significantly lower total and HE-related hospitalizations compared to patients who were randomized to standard of care, with a stable long-term course over >1 year. The investigators' data show that FMT was associated with favorable changes in fecal bile acid (BA) profile with a decrease in proportions of fecal secondary BAs, conjugated BAs and increase in sulfated BAs, indicating a healthier milieu. The investigators also have preliminary data defining the safety of oral FMT capsules in patients with cirrhosis and HE in a current trial led by us. The use of combined oral and rectal routes of FMT, which can potentially alleviate both small bowel and colonic translocation are likely to be better than either alone.

Overall aim: To determine the effect of dual oral and rectal administration of FMT from a rational donor on clinical outcomes (HE and related hospitalizations, brain function, quality of life) and host-microbiota interactions (microbial composition and bile acid composition with systemic and intestinal inflammation), compared to single route of administration and placebo, along with a second oral capsular FMT vs placebo administration in patients with cirrhosis and HE using a randomized, phase II clinical trial.

Design overview: Four groups of outpatients with cirrhosis will be randomized using random sequence generator into placebo and FMT groups and followed for 6 months under an FDA IND double-blind clinical trial.

02

Conditions studied

  • Cirrhosis
  • Hepatic Encephalopathy

Keywords

  • fecal microbial transplant
  • cirrhosis
  • hepatic encephalopathy
03

In context

Liver Cirrhosis

1,642 studies on the registry are indexed under Liver Cirrhosis; 358 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 60 is below the median of 72 across 995 interventional studies indexed under Liver Cirrhosis.

Browse Liver Cirrhosis studies →

Lead sponsor

VA Office of Research and Development is the lead sponsor of 1,733 studies on the registry; 396 are open to participants now.

Of its 206 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 180 (87%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
21 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Cirrhosis diagnosed by either of the following in a patient with chronic liver disease

    • Liver Biopsy
    • Radiologic evidence of varices, cirrhosis or portal hypertension
    • Laboratory evidence of platelet count \<100,000 or AST/ALT ratio>1
    • Endoscopic evidence of varices or portal gastropathy
    • Fibroscan values suggestive of cirrhosis
  • On treatment for hepatic encephalopathy (patient can be on lactulose and rifaximin)
  • Able to give written, informed consent (demonstrated by mini-mental status exam>25 at the time of consenting)
  • Women of child bearing potential must agree to use effective contraception for the duration of the study and for 10 days prior and 30 days after the study
  • Negative pregnancy test in women of childbearing age

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • MELD score >22
  • WBC count \<1000 cells/mm3
  • Platelet count\<25,000/mm3
  • TIPS in place for less than a month
  • Currently on antibiotics apart from rifaximin
  • Infection at the time of the FMT (diagnosed by blood culture positivity, urinalysis, paracentesis as needed)
  • Hospitalization for any non-elective cause within the last 1 month
  • Patients who are pregnant or nursing (will be checked using a urine pregnancy test)
  • Patients who are incarcerated
  • Patients who are incapable of giving their own informed consent
  • Patients who are immuno-compromised due to the following reasons:

    • HIV infection (any CD4 count)
    • Inherited/primary immune disorders
    • Current or recent (\<3 mos) treatment with anti-neoplastic agent
    • Current or recent (\<3 mos) treatment with any immunosuppressant medications [including but not limited to monoclonal antibodies to B and T cells, anti-TNF agents, glucocorticoids, antimetabolites (azathioprine, 6-mercaptopurine), calcineurin inhibitors (tacrolimus, cyclosporine), mycophenolate mofetil].

      • Subjects who are otherwise immunocompetent and have discontinued any immunosuppressant medications 3 or more months prior to enrollment may be eligible to enroll
  • Patients on renal replacement therapy
  • Patients with untreated, in-situ colorectal cancer
  • Patients with a history of chronic intrinsic GI diseases such as inflammatory bowel disease

    • ulcerative colitis, Crohn's disease or microscopic colitis

      • eosinophilic gastroenteritis or celiac disease
  • Major gastro-intestinal or intra-abdominal surgery in the last three months

Other Exclusion Criteria:

  • Enema-related

    • Platelet count\<25,000
    • Grade IV hemorrhoids
  • Safety-related:

    • Dysphagia
    • History of aspiration, gastroparesis, intestinal obstruction
    • Ongoing antibiotic use (except for Rifaximin)
    • Severe anaphylactic food allergy
    • Allergy to ingredients Generally Recognized As Safe in the FMT capsules (glycerol, sodium chloride, hypromellose, gellan gum, titanium dioxide, theobroma oil)
    • Adverse event attributable to prior FMT
    • ASA Class IV or V
    • Pregnant or nursing patients
    • Acute illness or fever within 48 hours of the day of planned FMT
    • Immunocompromised due to medical conditions
    • Probiotics use within the last 48 hours of the day of planned FMT
    • Any condition that the physician investigators deem unsafe, including other conditions or medications that the investigator determines puts the participant at greater risk from FMT
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 1 / Phase 2
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
60 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo

    Oral and rectal placebo at visit 2 Oral placebo at day 30

    Other: Placebo

  • Active comparator
    Group 3: Oral placebo and rectal FMT

    Oral placebo and rectal FMT at visit 2 Oral placebo at day 30

    Drug: Fecal Microbial Transplant Enema · Other: Placebo

  • Active comparator
    Group 2: Oral FMT and rectal placebo

    Oral FMT and rectal placebo at visit 2 Oral FMT at day 30

    Drug: Fecal Microbial transplant Capsules

  • Experimental
    Group 1: Dual Oral and rectal FMT

    Dual Oral and rectal FMT at visit 2 Oral FMT at day 30

    Drug: Fecal Microbial transplant Capsules · Drug: Fecal Microbial Transplant Enema

Interventions

  • DrugFecal Microbial transplant Capsules

    Oral capsules of FMT

  • DrugFecal Microbial Transplant Enema

    FMT enema

  • OtherPlacebo

    Placebo

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Serious Adverse Events Related to FMT

    Number of patients with serious adverse events between groups related to FMT, especially related to HE

    Time frame: 6 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Adverse Events Related to FMT

    Number of patients with adverse events that do not fit the criteria of serious adverse events between groups related to FMT

    Time frame: 6 months

  2. Change in Microbial Diversity in Stool

    Shannon diversity index compared to baseline and engraftment related to the donor at baseline, within 30 days and then monthly till 6 months. Ranges usually from 0-10, higher values represent a better diversity. There are no maximum values.

    Time frame: 6 months

  3. Sickness Impact Profile Change

    Quality of life assessment change defined by Sickness Impact Profile total score at 30 days and 6 months between groups. This is a percentage result ranges usually from 0-100. A higher score indicates worse quality of life related to the participant's health within 24 hours.

    Time frame: 30 days and 6 months

  4. Psychometric Hepatic Encephalopathy Score Performance Change

    Cognitive assessment change using the Psychometric hepatic encephalopathy score between groups at 60 days Range is -15 to +5 and higher is better

    Time frame: 60 days

  5. EncephalApp Stroop Off and On Time Change

    Cognitive assessment change using the Stroop Off and On Time change at 60 days and 6 months. This is in seconds. EncephalApp stroop is a computerized test of attention, psychomotor speed and cognitive flexibility. A higher time required to complete 5 correct runs in both Off and On stages is the measure here. There no maximum values but the lower amount of time that is needed, the better is the cognitive function.

    Time frame: 60 days

  6. Change in Microbial Diversity in Saliva

    Shannon diversity index compared to baseline at 30 days and then monthly till 6 months. Ranges usually from 0-10. Higher values represent a better diversity. There are no maximum values.

    Time frame: 60 days

  7. HE Related Events

    Number of patients with Hepatic encephalopathy related events

    Time frame: 6 months

07

Results

Posted May 25, 2025

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestonePlaceboGroup 3: Oral Placebo and Rectal FMTGroup 2: Oral FMT and Rectal PlaceboGroup 1: Dual Oral and Rectal FMT
Started15151515
Completed15151515
Not completed0000

Outcome measures

PrimarySerious Adverse Events Related to FMT

Number of patients with serious adverse events between groups related to FMT, especially related to HE

Time frame:
6 months
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Serious Adverse Events Related to FMT
ParticipantsPlaceboGroup 3: Oral Placebo and Rectal FMTGroup 2: Oral FMT and Rectal PlaceboGroup 1: Dual Oral and Rectal FMT
Serious Adverse Events Related to FMT0000
SecondaryAdverse Events Related to FMT

Number of patients with adverse events that do not fit the criteria of serious adverse events between groups related to FMT

Time frame:
6 months
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Adverse Events Related to FMT
ParticipantsPlaceboGroup 3: Oral Placebo and Rectal FMTGroup 2: Oral FMT and Rectal PlaceboGroup 1: Dual Oral and Rectal FMT
Adverse Events Related to FMT0000
SecondaryChange in Microbial Diversity in Stool

Shannon diversity index compared to baseline and engraftment related to the donor at baseline, within 30 days and then monthly till 6 months. Ranges usually from 0-10, higher values represent a better diversity. There are no maximum values.

Time frame:
6 months
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Change in Microbial Diversity in Stool
units on a scalePlaceboGroup 3: Oral Placebo and Rectal FMTGroup 2: Oral FMT and Rectal PlaceboGroup 1: Dual Oral and Rectal FMT
Change in Microbial Diversity in Stool1.45 ± 0.371.46 ± 0.331.71 ± 0.331.53 ± 0.72
SecondarySickness Impact Profile Change

Quality of life assessment change defined by Sickness Impact Profile total score at 30 days and 6 months between groups. This is a percentage result ranges usually from 0-100. A higher score indicates worse quality of life related to the participant's health within 24 hours.

Time frame:
30 days and 6 months
Reported as:
Median · units on a scale
Sickness Impact Profile Change
units on a scalePlaceboGroup 3: Oral Placebo and Rectal FMTGroup 2: Oral FMT and Rectal PlaceboGroup 1: Dual Oral and Rectal FMT
Sickness Impact Profile Change9.63 (3 to 21)15.62 (7.94 to 24.49)18.15 (8.78 to 23.59)15.94 (13.04 to 26.65)
SecondaryPsychometric Hepatic Encephalopathy Score Performance Change

Cognitive assessment change using the Psychometric hepatic encephalopathy score between groups at 60 days Range is -15 to +5 and higher is better

Time frame:
60 days
Reported as:
Median · score on a scale
Psychometric Hepatic Encephalopathy Score Performance Change
score on a scalePlaceboGroup 3: Oral Placebo and Rectal FMTGroup 2: Oral FMT and Rectal PlaceboGroup 1: Dual Oral and Rectal FMT
Psychometric Hepatic Encephalopathy Score Performance Change-7 (-11 to -3)-3 (-7 to -2)-5 (-9 to 1)-5.5 (-10.25 to 1.75)
SecondaryEncephalApp Stroop Off and On Time Change

Cognitive assessment change using the Stroop Off and On Time change at 60 days and 6 months. This is in seconds. EncephalApp stroop is a computerized test of attention, psychomotor speed and cognitive flexibility. A higher time required to complete 5 correct runs in both Off and On stages is the measure here. There no maximum values but the lower amount of time that is needed, the better is the cognitive function.

Time frame:
60 days
Reported as:
Median · units on a scale (seconds)
EncephalApp Stroop Off and On Time Change
units on a scale (seconds)PlaceboGroup 3: Oral Placebo and Rectal FMTGroup 2: Oral FMT and Rectal PlaceboGroup 1: Dual Oral and Rectal FMT
EncephalApp Stroop Off and On Time Change218.5 (175.6 to 281.5)194.1 (161.9 to 265.3)184.8 (171.1 to 260.0)235.3 (177.6 to 248.0)
SecondaryChange in Microbial Diversity in Saliva

Shannon diversity index compared to baseline at 30 days and then monthly till 6 months. Ranges usually from 0-10. Higher values represent a better diversity. There are no maximum values.

Time frame:
60 days
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Change in Microbial Diversity in Saliva
units on a scalePlaceboGroup 3: Oral Placebo and Rectal FMTGroup 2: Oral FMT and Rectal PlaceboGroup 1: Dual Oral and Rectal FMT
Change in Microbial Diversity in Saliva1.55 ± 0.391.57 ± 0.721.57 ± 0.301.56 ± 0.29
SecondaryHE Related Events

Number of patients with Hepatic encephalopathy related events

Time frame:
6 months
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
HE Related Events
ParticipantsPlaceboGroup 3: Oral Placebo and Rectal FMTGroup 2: Oral FMT and Rectal PlaceboGroup 1: Dual Oral and Rectal FMT
HE Related Events6022

Adverse events

Collected over 6 months. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Placebo1/15 (6.7%)6/15 (40%)0/15 (0%)
Group 3: Oral Placebo and Rectal FMT0/15 (0%)5/15 (33.3%)0/15 (0%)
Group 2: Oral FMT and Rectal Placebo1/15 (6.7%)5/15 (33.3%)0/15 (0%)
Group 1: Dual Oral and Rectal FMT1/15 (6.7%)6/15 (40%)0/15 (0%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventPlaceboGroup 3: Oral Placebo and Rectal FMTGroup 2: Oral FMT and Rectal PlaceboGroup 1: Dual Oral and Rectal FMT
Liver-related hospitalizationsHepatobiliary disorders6/152/152/152/15
InfectionInfections and infestations3/152/152/153/15
FallsMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders1/150/151/151/15
Seizure recurrenceNervous system disorders0/151/150/150/15

Baseline characteristics

Patients with cirrhosis and hepatic encephalopathy

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)PlaceboGroup 3: Oral Placebo and Rectal FMTGroup 2: Oral FMT and Rectal PlaceboGroup 1: Dual Oral and Rectal FMTTotal
Mean63.4 ± 7.560.6 ± 10.363.0 ± 11.765.0 ± 7.163.0 ± 9.2
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)PlaceboGroup 3: Oral Placebo and Rectal FMTGroup 2: Oral FMT and Rectal PlaceboGroup 1: Dual Oral and Rectal FMTTotal
Female313512
Male1214121048
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected(Participants)PlaceboGroup 3: Oral Placebo and Rectal FMTGroup 2: Oral FMT and Rectal PlaceboGroup 1: Dual Oral and Rectal FMTTotal
Count of participants————0
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(Participants)PlaceboGroup 3: Oral Placebo and Rectal FMTGroup 2: Oral FMT and Rectal PlaceboGroup 1: Dual Oral and Rectal FMTTotal
United States1515151560
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Hunter Holmes McGuire VA Medical Center, Richmond, VA
    Richmond, Virginia 23249-0001, United States
09

References and documents

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Oct 14, 2020

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 25, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03796598
Lead sponsor
VA Office of Research and Development
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jan 8, 2019
Start date
Jul 29, 2019
Primary completion
Dec 19, 2023
Completion
Dec 20, 2023
Results posted
May 25, 2025
Last update
May 25, 2025

Study contacts

Jasmohan S. Bajaj, MD MS
principal investigator · Hunter Holmes McGuire VA Medical Center, Richmond, VA

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in May 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion