A Phase 1/2 interventional study of Fecal Microbial transplant Capsules and Fecal Microbial Transplant Enema in Cirrhosis and Hepatic Encephalopathy, sponsored by VA Office of Research and Development. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 21 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-05-25.
Sponsored by VA Office of Research and Development · Phase 1/2, Interventional, and Other
Patients with end stage of liver disease or cirrhosis can develop confusion due to high ammonia and inflammation. This confusion is brought upon by changes in the bacteria in the bowels and may not respond to current standard of care treatments. Repeated episodes of confusion can make it difficult for patients to function and may result in multiple admissions to the hospital and burden on the family. The investigators have studied using a healthy person's stool to replace the bowel bacteria, called fecal microbial transplant, in small studies with good results. In this trial the investigators propose to perform these procedures using an upper and lower route in Veterans who suffer from this condition and follow them for safety and HE and related hospitalizations over 6 months. The investigators will compare this to placebo treatments and hope that this intervention can improve the health and daily functioning of affected patients.
Indication: Cirrhosis and hepatic encephalopathy
Study Objectives: To evaluate the safety and tolerability of fecal transplant in patients with cirrhosis and hepatic encephalopathy
Rationale and Supporting Evidence:
Hepatic encephalopathy affects 30-45% of patients with cirrhosis and adversely affects survival in these patients. The mainstay of treatment for hepatic encephalopathy (HE) has long been the manipulation of the gut flora through antibiotics, prebiotics or probiotics. The current first and second line therapies for HE in the US are lactulose and rifaximin respectively that uniquely act within the confines of the gut lumen with encouraging clinical results. However, there is a subset of patients with HE that continues to recur despite being on both treatments. This patient group is at a higher risk of poor outcomes because HE has now been removed from liver transplant priority and multiple episodes of HE can result in cumulative brain injury which may be irreversible. Therefore, the prevention of recurrent HE is an important therapeutic goal.
The investigators' group and other reports have shown that patients with HE and cirrhosis are more likely to have overgrowth of potentially pathogenic bacterial taxa such as Enterobacteriaceae and reduction of autochthonous species such as Lachnospiraceae and Ruminococcaceae in the stool and the colonic mucosa. This has been linked to poor performance on cognitive tests that are a hallmark of HE and with increased systemic inflammation in these patients.
Therefore, a gut-based therapeutic option that can potentially improve the recurrence rate and the overall prognosis is needed. Fecal transplant has been shown to be effective in conditions with predominant gut-bacterial overgrowth or alteration such as recurrent Clostridium difficile and inflammatory bowel disease. Safe protocols have been developed across the world and studies are being performed in the US under FDA-monitored INDs. Limitations to performing fecal transplant include identifying and screening appropriate donors, which is time consuming and costly, with the cost typically falling to the patient or donor as the required screening is generally not covered by insurance.
The investigators' preliminary data suggest that a one-time administration of an FMT-enema using a rationally-selected donor is safe in patients with cirrhosis and recurrent HE. However, given the small bowel overgrowth and the predominantly small bowel location for bacterial translocation in cirrhosis, which is out of the reach of an enema, an upper GI route for FMT needs to be explored. In the investigators' published experience, a single enema from a rationally-derived donor was associated with significantly lower total and HE-related hospitalizations compared to patients who were randomized to standard of care, with a stable long-term course over >1 year. The investigators' data show that FMT was associated with favorable changes in fecal bile acid (BA) profile with a decrease in proportions of fecal secondary BAs, conjugated BAs and increase in sulfated BAs, indicating a healthier milieu. The investigators also have preliminary data defining the safety of oral FMT capsules in patients with cirrhosis and HE in a current trial led by us. The use of combined oral and rectal routes of FMT, which can potentially alleviate both small bowel and colonic translocation are likely to be better than either alone.
Overall aim: To determine the effect of dual oral and rectal administration of FMT from a rational donor on clinical outcomes (HE and related hospitalizations, brain function, quality of life) and host-microbiota interactions (microbial composition and bile acid composition with systemic and intestinal inflammation), compared to single route of administration and placebo, along with a second oral capsular FMT vs placebo administration in patients with cirrhosis and HE using a randomized, phase II clinical trial.
Design overview: Four groups of outpatients with cirrhosis will be randomized using random sequence generator into placebo and FMT groups and followed for 6 months under an FDA IND double-blind clinical trial.
1,642 studies on the registry are indexed under Liver Cirrhosis; 358 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 60 is below the median of 72 across 995 interventional studies indexed under Liver Cirrhosis.
Browse Liver Cirrhosis studies →VA Office of Research and Development is the lead sponsor of 1,733 studies on the registry; 396 are open to participants now.
Of its 206 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 180 (87%) have results posted.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Cirrhosis diagnosed by either of the following in a patient with chronic liver disease
Exclusion Criteria:
Patients who are immuno-compromised due to the following reasons:
Current or recent (\<3 mos) treatment with any immunosuppressant medications [including but not limited to monoclonal antibodies to B and T cells, anti-TNF agents, glucocorticoids, antimetabolites (azathioprine, 6-mercaptopurine), calcineurin inhibitors (tacrolimus, cyclosporine), mycophenolate mofetil].
Patients with a history of chronic intrinsic GI diseases such as inflammatory bowel disease
ulcerative colitis, Crohn's disease or microscopic colitis
Other Exclusion Criteria:
Enema-related
Safety-related:
Oral and rectal placebo at visit 2 Oral placebo at day 30
Other: Placebo
Oral placebo and rectal FMT at visit 2 Oral placebo at day 30
Drug: Fecal Microbial Transplant Enema · Other: Placebo
Oral FMT and rectal placebo at visit 2 Oral FMT at day 30
Drug: Fecal Microbial transplant Capsules
Dual Oral and rectal FMT at visit 2 Oral FMT at day 30
Drug: Fecal Microbial transplant Capsules · Drug: Fecal Microbial Transplant Enema
Oral capsules of FMT
FMT enema
Placebo
Serious Adverse Events Related to FMT
Number of patients with serious adverse events between groups related to FMT, especially related to HE
Time frame: 6 months
Adverse Events Related to FMT
Number of patients with adverse events that do not fit the criteria of serious adverse events between groups related to FMT
Time frame: 6 months
Change in Microbial Diversity in Stool
Shannon diversity index compared to baseline and engraftment related to the donor at baseline, within 30 days and then monthly till 6 months. Ranges usually from 0-10, higher values represent a better diversity. There are no maximum values.
Time frame: 6 months
Sickness Impact Profile Change
Quality of life assessment change defined by Sickness Impact Profile total score at 30 days and 6 months between groups. This is a percentage result ranges usually from 0-100. A higher score indicates worse quality of life related to the participant's health within 24 hours.
Time frame: 30 days and 6 months
Psychometric Hepatic Encephalopathy Score Performance Change
Cognitive assessment change using the Psychometric hepatic encephalopathy score between groups at 60 days Range is -15 to +5 and higher is better
Time frame: 60 days
EncephalApp Stroop Off and On Time Change
Cognitive assessment change using the Stroop Off and On Time change at 60 days and 6 months. This is in seconds. EncephalApp stroop is a computerized test of attention, psychomotor speed and cognitive flexibility. A higher time required to complete 5 correct runs in both Off and On stages is the measure here. There no maximum values but the lower amount of time that is needed, the better is the cognitive function.
Time frame: 60 days
Change in Microbial Diversity in Saliva
Shannon diversity index compared to baseline at 30 days and then monthly till 6 months. Ranges usually from 0-10. Higher values represent a better diversity. There are no maximum values.
Time frame: 60 days
HE Related Events
Number of patients with Hepatic encephalopathy related events
Time frame: 6 months
| Milestone | Placebo | Group 3: Oral Placebo and Rectal FMT | Group 2: Oral FMT and Rectal Placebo | Group 1: Dual Oral and Rectal FMT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Started | 15 | 15 | 15 | 15 |
| Completed | 15 | 15 | 15 | 15 |
| Not completed | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Number of patients with serious adverse events between groups related to FMT, especially related to HE
| Participants | Placebo | Group 3: Oral Placebo and Rectal FMT | Group 2: Oral FMT and Rectal Placebo | Group 1: Dual Oral and Rectal FMT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Serious Adverse Events Related to FMT | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Number of patients with adverse events that do not fit the criteria of serious adverse events between groups related to FMT
| Participants | Placebo | Group 3: Oral Placebo and Rectal FMT | Group 2: Oral FMT and Rectal Placebo | Group 1: Dual Oral and Rectal FMT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adverse Events Related to FMT | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Shannon diversity index compared to baseline and engraftment related to the donor at baseline, within 30 days and then monthly till 6 months. Ranges usually from 0-10, higher values represent a better diversity. There are no maximum values.
| units on a scale | Placebo | Group 3: Oral Placebo and Rectal FMT | Group 2: Oral FMT and Rectal Placebo | Group 1: Dual Oral and Rectal FMT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Change in Microbial Diversity in Stool | 1.45 ± 0.37 | 1.46 ± 0.33 | 1.71 ± 0.33 | 1.53 ± 0.72 |
Quality of life assessment change defined by Sickness Impact Profile total score at 30 days and 6 months between groups. This is a percentage result ranges usually from 0-100. A higher score indicates worse quality of life related to the participant's health within 24 hours.
| units on a scale | Placebo | Group 3: Oral Placebo and Rectal FMT | Group 2: Oral FMT and Rectal Placebo | Group 1: Dual Oral and Rectal FMT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sickness Impact Profile Change | 9.63 (3 to 21) | 15.62 (7.94 to 24.49) | 18.15 (8.78 to 23.59) | 15.94 (13.04 to 26.65) |
Cognitive assessment change using the Psychometric hepatic encephalopathy score between groups at 60 days Range is -15 to +5 and higher is better
| score on a scale | Placebo | Group 3: Oral Placebo and Rectal FMT | Group 2: Oral FMT and Rectal Placebo | Group 1: Dual Oral and Rectal FMT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Psychometric Hepatic Encephalopathy Score Performance Change | -7 (-11 to -3) | -3 (-7 to -2) | -5 (-9 to 1) | -5.5 (-10.25 to 1.75) |
Cognitive assessment change using the Stroop Off and On Time change at 60 days and 6 months. This is in seconds. EncephalApp stroop is a computerized test of attention, psychomotor speed and cognitive flexibility. A higher time required to complete 5 correct runs in both Off and On stages is the measure here. There no maximum values but the lower amount of time that is needed, the better is the cognitive function.
| units on a scale (seconds) | Placebo | Group 3: Oral Placebo and Rectal FMT | Group 2: Oral FMT and Rectal Placebo | Group 1: Dual Oral and Rectal FMT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EncephalApp Stroop Off and On Time Change | 218.5 (175.6 to 281.5) | 194.1 (161.9 to 265.3) | 184.8 (171.1 to 260.0) | 235.3 (177.6 to 248.0) |
Shannon diversity index compared to baseline at 30 days and then monthly till 6 months. Ranges usually from 0-10. Higher values represent a better diversity. There are no maximum values.
| units on a scale | Placebo | Group 3: Oral Placebo and Rectal FMT | Group 2: Oral FMT and Rectal Placebo | Group 1: Dual Oral and Rectal FMT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Change in Microbial Diversity in Saliva | 1.55 ± 0.39 | 1.57 ± 0.72 | 1.57 ± 0.30 | 1.56 ± 0.29 |
Number of patients with Hepatic encephalopathy related events
| Participants | Placebo | Group 3: Oral Placebo and Rectal FMT | Group 2: Oral FMT and Rectal Placebo | Group 1: Dual Oral and Rectal FMT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HE Related Events | 6 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Collected over 6 months. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.
| Group | Deaths | Serious | Other |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | 1/15 (6.7%) | 6/15 (40%) | 0/15 (0%) |
| Group 3: Oral Placebo and Rectal FMT | 0/15 (0%) | 5/15 (33.3%) | 0/15 (0%) |
| Group 2: Oral FMT and Rectal Placebo | 1/15 (6.7%) | 5/15 (33.3%) | 0/15 (0%) |
| Group 1: Dual Oral and Rectal FMT | 1/15 (6.7%) | 6/15 (40%) | 0/15 (0%) |
| Event | Placebo | Group 3: Oral Placebo and Rectal FMT | Group 2: Oral FMT and Rectal Placebo | Group 1: Dual Oral and Rectal FMT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Liver-related hospitalizationsHepatobiliary disorders | 6/15 | 2/15 | 2/15 | 2/15 |
| InfectionInfections and infestations | 3/15 | 2/15 | 2/15 | 3/15 |
| FallsMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | 1/15 | 0/15 | 1/15 | 1/15 |
| Seizure recurrenceNervous system disorders | 0/15 | 1/15 | 0/15 | 0/15 |
Patients with cirrhosis and hepatic encephalopathy
| Age, Continuous(years) | Placebo | Group 3: Oral Placebo and Rectal FMT | Group 2: Oral FMT and Rectal Placebo | Group 1: Dual Oral and Rectal FMT | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | 63.4 ± 7.5 | 60.6 ± 10.3 | 63.0 ± 11.7 | 65.0 ± 7.1 | 63.0 ± 9.2 |
| Sex: Female, Male(Participants) | Placebo | Group 3: Oral Placebo and Rectal FMT | Group 2: Oral FMT and Rectal Placebo | Group 1: Dual Oral and Rectal FMT | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Female | 3 | 1 | 3 | 5 | 12 |
| Male | 12 | 14 | 12 | 10 | 48 |
| Race and Ethnicity Not Collected(Participants) | Placebo | Group 3: Oral Placebo and Rectal FMT | Group 2: Oral FMT and Rectal Placebo | Group 1: Dual Oral and Rectal FMT | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Count of participants | — | — | — | — | 0 |
| Region of Enrollment(Participants) | Placebo | Group 3: Oral Placebo and Rectal FMT | Group 2: Oral FMT and Rectal Placebo | Group 1: Dual Oral and Rectal FMT | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 15 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 60 |
Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.
Plan to share: No
This study is completed, as verified in May 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
VA Office of Research and Development