ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03773575PREVENA-AMPUpdated Mar 25, 2026Results posted

Evaluation of Closed Incision Negative Pressure Dressing (PREVENA) to Prevent Lower Extremity Amputation Wound Complications

An interventional study of PREVENA™ PEEL & PLACE™ Dressing Kit in Amputation, Amputation; Postoperative, Sequelae and Wound Dehiscence, sponsored by Thomas Jefferson University. Completed at 3 sites in 2 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-03-25.

Sponsored by Thomas Jefferson University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
272
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study is a prospective, multi-center, two-arm, unblinded, and randomized controlled trial with a goal of evaluating the impact of a closed incision negative pressure dressing (PREVENA) on incidence of post-operative wound complications and medical costs in patients undergoing lower extremity amputation.

Read the detailed description

This is a prospective, multi-center, two-arm, unblinded, randomized controlled trial to evaluate the impact of a closed incision negative pressure dressing (PREVENA™ PEEL \& PLACE™ Dressing Kit) on incidence of post-operative wound complications in patients undergoing above-the-knee (AKA) or below-the-knee (BKA) amputation. Up to 440 subjects at approximately five (5) participating sites will be randomized to receive either the Prevena dressing or a standard care dressing. The incision will be assessed for complications at post-op day 5 or day 6 and at approximately 30 days after discharge. The primary outcome of this study is reported wound complications, including dehiscence (opening of the incision), seroma, lymph leak, infection (deep or superficial), hematoma (blood clots), ischemia (decreased blood supply), and necrosis (tissue death) A major complication is defined as any wound complication requiring intravenous or oral antibiotics, reoperation and/or hospital readmission. All data (demographics, medical history, and clinical outcomes) will be collected via medical record review

02

Conditions studied

  • Amputation
  • Amputation; Postoperative, Sequelae
  • Wound Dehiscence
  • Seroma
  • Wound Infection, Surgical
  • Lymph Leakage
03

In context

Seroma

101 studies on the registry are indexed under Seroma; 22 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 272 is above the median of 100 across 92 interventional studies indexed under Seroma.

Browse Seroma studies →

Lead sponsor

Thomas Jefferson University is the lead sponsor of 393 studies on the registry; 70 are open to participants now.

Of its 45 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 21 (47%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Male or female adults 18 years or older
  2. Patients undergoing above-knee amputation (includes the revision of emergency guillotine amputations)
  3. Patients undergoing below-knee amputation (includes the revision of emergency guillotine amputations)
  4. signed by patient

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Minors under 18 years
  2. Women who are pregnant or breastfeeding
  3. Patients having BOTH legs amputated
  4. Patients with sensitivity to silver
  5. Unwilling or unable to provide
  6. Inability to comply with planned study procedures
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
272 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Prevena

    PREVENA™ PEEL \& PLACE™ Dressing Kit

    Device: PREVENA™ PEEL & PLACE™ Dressing Kit

  • No intervention
    Standard Care

    sterile gauze dressing supplemented with an Ace wrap

Interventions

  • DevicePREVENA™ PEEL & PLACE™ Dressing Kit

    In combination with a negative pressure pump (V.A.C. ® Therapy Unit, KCI USA, Inc.), the Prevena dressing is designed to provide negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) over surgical incisions (incisional NPWT).

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Overall Rate of Wound Complications

    Presence of any of the following post-procedure: * Dehiscence (skin or fascia) * Seroma * Lymph leak * Infection (superficial or deep, using CDC Surgical Site Infection criteria) * Hematoma * Ischemia * Necrosis

    Time frame: 30 days post procedure

Secondary outcomes

  1. Length of Stay (LOS)

    index LOS is defined as days from operation to discharge; 30d LOS is defined as the index LOS plus all readmission days within 30d related to any wound complication

    Time frame: 30 days post procedure

  2. 30-day Return to Operating Room (ROR)

    Reoperation for wound complication within 30 days involving incision and drainage in the operating room; opening the skin to drain a superficial soft tissue infection at bedside or in the office is not considered reoperation

    Time frame: 30 days post procedure

  3. 30-day Hospital Readmissions

    Rehospitalization for wound complication within 30 days

    Time frame: 30 days post procedure

  4. Incidence of Skin Dehiscence

    Individual rates of the incidence of skin dehiscence

    Time frame: 30 days post procedure

  5. Incidence of Fascial Dehiscence

    Individual incidence rate of fascial dehiscence

    Time frame: 30 Days

  6. Incidence of Superficial Skin Infection

    Individual incidence of superficial skin infection

    Time frame: 30 days

  7. Incidence of Deep Skin Infection

    Individual incidence of deep skin infection

    Time frame: 30 days

  8. Incidence of Seroma

    Individual incidence of seroma

    Time frame: 30 Days

  9. Incidence of Hematoma

    Individual Incidence of Hematoma

    Time frame: 30 days

  10. Incidence of Necrosis

    Individual incidence of Necrosis

    Time frame: 30 Days

07

Results

Posted Feb 12, 2026

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestonePrevenaStandard Care
Started137135
Completed134129
Not completed36

Outcome measures

PrimaryOverall Rate of Wound Complications

Presence of any of the following post-procedure: * Dehiscence (skin or fascia) * Seroma * Lymph leak * Infection (superficial or deep, using CDC Surgical Site Infection criteria) * Hematoma * Ischemia * Necrosis

Time frame:
30 days post procedure
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Overall Rate of Wound Complications
ParticipantsPrevenaStandard Care
Overall Rate of Wound Complications2631
SecondaryLength of Stay (LOS)

index LOS is defined as days from operation to discharge; 30d LOS is defined as the index LOS plus all readmission days within 30d related to any wound complication

Time frame:
30 days post procedure
Reported as:
Mean · Length of stay in days
Length of Stay (LOS)
Length of stay in daysPrevenaStandard Care
Length of Stay (LOS)10 ± 7.69.6 ± 6.5
Secondary30-day Return to Operating Room (ROR)

Reoperation for wound complication within 30 days involving incision and drainage in the operating room; opening the skin to drain a superficial soft tissue infection at bedside or in the office is not considered reoperation

Time frame:
30 days post procedure
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
30-day Return to Operating Room (ROR)
ParticipantsPrevenaStandard Care
30-day Return to Operating Room (ROR)511
Secondary30-day Hospital Readmissions

Rehospitalization for wound complication within 30 days

Time frame:
30 days post procedure
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
30-day Hospital Readmissions
ParticipantsPrevenaStandard Care
30-day Hospital Readmissions1215
SecondaryIncidence of Skin Dehiscence

Individual rates of the incidence of skin dehiscence

Time frame:
30 days post procedure
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Incidence of Skin Dehiscence
ParticipantsPrevenaStandard Care
Incidence of Skin Dehiscence1511
SecondaryIncidence of Fascial Dehiscence

Individual incidence rate of fascial dehiscence

Time frame:
30 Days
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Incidence of Fascial Dehiscence
ParticipantsPrevenaStandard Care
Incidence of Fascial Dehiscence22
SecondaryIncidence of Superficial Skin Infection

Individual incidence of superficial skin infection

Time frame:
30 days
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Incidence of Superficial Skin Infection
ParticipantsPrevenaStandard Care
Incidence of Superficial Skin Infection22
SecondaryIncidence of Deep Skin Infection

Individual incidence of deep skin infection

Time frame:
30 days
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Incidence of Deep Skin Infection
ParticipantsPrevenaStandard Care
Incidence of Deep Skin Infection54
SecondaryIncidence of Seroma

Individual incidence of seroma

Time frame:
30 Days
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Incidence of Seroma
ParticipantsPrevenaStandard Care
Incidence of Seroma11
SecondaryIncidence of Hematoma

Individual Incidence of Hematoma

Time frame:
30 days
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Incidence of Hematoma
ParticipantsPrevenaStandard Care
Incidence of Hematoma23
SecondaryIncidence of Necrosis

Individual incidence of Necrosis

Time frame:
30 Days
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Incidence of Necrosis
ParticipantsPrevenaStandard Care
Incidence of Necrosis410

Adverse events

Collected over 30 days following hospitalization for amputation. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Prevena1/134 (0.7%)11/134 (8.2%)0/134 (0%)
Standard Care1/129 (0.8%)14/129 (10.9%)0/129 (0%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 16
Most frequent serious events
EventPrevenaStandard Care
Worsening post-procedure painInjury, poisoning and procedural complications0/1343/129
Delayed Wound HealingSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders0/1342/129
Homorrhage from Operative SiteVascular disorders0/1342/129
SepsisImmune system disorders2/1340/129
Skin DehiscenceSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders2/1341/129
Gastrointestinal HemorrhageGastrointestinal disorders1/1341/129
HematomaSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders0/1341/129
Interstitial Lung DiseaseRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders0/1341/129
PneumoniaRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders0/1341/129
Soft Tissue InfectionSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders1/1341/129

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)PrevenaStandard CareTotal
Mean65 ± 1364 ± 1165 ± 12
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)PrevenaStandard CareTotal
Female404282
Male9487181
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)PrevenaStandard CareTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native213
Asian055
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander000
Black or African American423779
White8685171
More than one race101
Unknown or Not Reported314
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)PrevenaStandard CareTotal
Hispanic or Latino81321
Not Hispanic or Latino117103220
Unknown or Not Reported91322
08

Study locations

3 sites
  • Westchester Medical Center
    Valhalla, New York 10595, United States
  • Thomas Jefferson University/Hospital
    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19107, United States
  • Gemelli Hospital
    Roma, RM 8, 00168, Italy
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Hasanadka R, McLafferty RB, Moore CJ, Hood DB, Ramsey DE, Hodgson KJ. Predictors of wound complications following major amputation for critical limb ischemia. J Vasc Surg. 2011 Nov;54(5):1374-82. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2011.04.048. Epub 2011 Aug 15. PubMed 21840153 ↗
  • Belmont PJ Jr, Davey S, Orr JD, Ochoa LM, Bader JO, Schoenfeld AJ. Risk factors for 30-day postoperative complications and mortality after below-knee amputation: a study of 2,911 patients from the national surgical quality improvement program. J Am Coll Surg. 2011 Sep;213(3):370-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2011.05.019. Epub 2011 Jul 1. PubMed 21723151 ↗
  • Stannard JP, Volgas DA, McGwin G 3rd, Stewart RL, Obremskey W, Moore T, Anglen JO. Incisional negative pressure wound therapy after high-risk lower extremity fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 2012 Jan;26(1):37-42. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e318216b1e5. PubMed 21804414 ↗
  • Pachowsky M, Gusinde J, Klein A, Lehrl S, Schulz-Drost S, Schlechtweg P, Pauser J, Gelse K, Brem MH. Negative pressure wound therapy to prevent seromas and treat surgical incisions after total hip arthroplasty. Int Orthop. 2012 Apr;36(4):719-22. doi: 10.1007/s00264-011-1321-8. Epub 2011 Jul 15. PubMed 21761149 ↗
  • Grauhan O, Navasardyan A, Hofmann M, Muller P, Stein J, Hetzer R. Prevention of poststernotomy wound infections in obese patients by negative pressure wound therapy. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013 May;145(5):1387-92. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2012.09.040. Epub 2012 Oct 27. PubMed 23111014 ↗
  • Hyldig N, Birke-Sorensen H, Kruse M, Vinter C, Joergensen JS, Sorensen JA, Mogensen O, Lamont RF, Bille C. Meta-analysis of negative-pressure wound therapy for closed surgical incisions. Br J Surg. 2016 Apr;103(5):477-86. doi: 10.1002/bjs.10084. PubMed 26994715 ↗
  • Kwon J, Staley C, McCullough M, Goss S, Arosemena M, Abai B, Salvatore D, Reiter D, DiMuzio P. A randomized clinical trial evaluating negative pressure therapy to decrease vascular groin incision complications. J Vasc Surg. 2018 Dec;68(6):1744-1752. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2018.05.224. Epub 2018 Aug 17. PubMed 30126781 ↗
  • O'Brien PC, Fleming TR. A multiple testing procedure for clinical trials. Biometrics. 1979 Sep;35(3):549-56. PubMed 497341 ↗

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 25, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03773575
Collaborators
Acelity
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Dec 12, 2018
Start date
Jan 15, 2019
Primary completion
Jul 15, 2024
Completion
Aug 15, 2024
Results posted
Feb 12, 2026
Last update
Mar 25, 2026

Study contacts

Paul DiMuzio, MD
principal investigator · Thomas Jefferson University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion