ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT03750513Updated Nov 10, 2026

LET Optimized IMPT in Treating Pediatric Patients With Ependymoma

A Phase 1 interventional study of Linear Energy Transfer-Optimized Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy and Quality-of-Life Assessment in Anaplastic Ependymoma and Ependymoma, sponsored by M.D. Anderson Cancer Center. Recruiting at 2 sites in United States. Open to participants aged Up to 22 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-11-10.

Sponsored by M.D. Anderson Cancer Center · Phase 1, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Apr 2019; still recruiting 7 years 7 months later.
Phase
Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
48
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
Up to 22 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This phase I trial studies the side effects of linear energy transfer (LET) optimized image modulated proton therapy (IMPT) in treating pediatric patients with ependymoma. Radiation therapy such as LET optimized IMPT, uses proton beams to kill tumor cells and shrink tumors without damaging surrounding normal tissues.

Read the detailed description

PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:

I. To evaluate the safety of linear energy transfer (LET) optimized image modulated proton therapy (IMPT) (bio-IMPT) for pediatric patients with ependymoma.

SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:

I. To utilize advanced multiparametric magnetic resonance (MR) imaging to identify imaging biomarkers of structural and biological changes after proton therapy in pediatric ependymoma patients.

II. To compare quantitative image biomarkers in patients treated with bio-IMPT and standard proton therapy using a voxel level analysis.

III. To test and evaluate the validity of relative biological effectiveness (RBE) models and enhance their precision based on prospectively collected clinical image biomarkers.

IV. To evaluate acute and late toxicities, including pseudoprogression and symptom burden, in patients treated with bio-IMPT.

V. To estimate progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). VI. To evaluate disease outcomes following the use of a simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) for pediatric ependymoma patients with gross residual disease following surgery.

OUTLINE:

Patients receive LET optimized IMPT for up to 6 weeks.

After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up at 1 month, then every 3 months for up to 24 months.

02

Conditions studied

  • Anaplastic Ependymoma
  • Ependymoma

Browse trials for

03

In context

Ependymoma

224 studies on the registry are indexed under Ependymoma; 35 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 48 is above the median of 28 across 174 interventional studies indexed under Ependymoma.

Browse Ependymoma studies →

Lead sponsor

M.D. Anderson Cancer Center is the lead sponsor of 3,047 studies on the registry; 578 are open to participants now.

Of its 612 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 409 (67%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Up to 22 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Previous pathologic confirmation of ependymoma, World Health Organization (WHO) grade II or III
  • Disease must be confined to the brain (no evidence of spread on MR imaging of the spine or on staging lumbar puncture)
  • Patient may not receive chemotherapy concurrent with radiation
  • Signed by patient and/or parents or legal guardian
  • Lansky performance status score of 50 -100

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with previous radiation therapy to the brain
  • Ependymoma of the spine
  • Disseminated ependymoma requiring craniospinal radiation therapy
  • Pregnancy
  • Inability to undergo MR imaging
  • Inability to receive gadolinium-based contrast agent
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 1
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
48 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Treatment (LET optimized IMPT)

    Patients receive LET optimized IMPT for up to 6 weeks.

    Radiation: Linear Energy Transfer-Optimized Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy · Other: Quality-of-Life Assessment · Other: Questionnaire Administration

Interventions

  • RadiationLinear Energy Transfer-Optimized Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy

    Given LET optimized IMPT

    Also known as: LET-Optimized IMPT, LET-Optimized Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy, Linear Energy Transfer (LET)-Optimized Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy (IMPT)

  • OtherQuality-of-Life Assessment

    Ancillary studies

    Also known as: Quality of Life Assessment

  • OtherQuestionnaire Administration

    Ancillary studies

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Incidence of adverse events

    The safety of linear energy transfer-optimized intensity modulated proton therapy will be defined by treatment failures which include imaging changes consistent with necrosis in the presence of Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.03 symptoms of grade 3 brain necrosis and/or local recurrence within the first 6 months from the end of proton therapy.

    Time frame: Up to 6 months post treatment

Secondary outcomes

  1. Identify imaging biomarkers of structural and biological changes after proton therapy

    Descriptive statistics will be used to summarize the study data.

    Time frame: Up to 24 months post-treatment

  2. Quantitative image biomarkers

    Descriptive statistics will be used to summarize the study data.

    Time frame: Up to 24 months post-treatment

  3. Validity of relative biological effectiveness models

    Descriptive statistics will be used to summarize the study data.

    Time frame: Up to 24 months post-treatment

  4. Incidence of late and acute toxicities

    Descriptive statistics will be used to summarize the study data. For each study cohort, we will tabulate treatment- failures and other relevant clinically-related features. Interval estimates for proportions will be provided using exact 95% confidence intervals.

    Time frame: Up to 24 months post treatment

  5. Progression-free survival

    The method of Kaplan and Meier will be used to provide estimates.

    Time frame: Up to 24 months post treatment

  6. Overall survival

    The method of Kaplan and Meier will be used to provide estimates.

    Time frame: Up to 24 months post treatment

  7. Disease outcomes following the use of a simultaneous integrated boost

    Descriptive statistics will be used to summarize the study data.

    Time frame: Up to 24 months post-treatment

07

Study locations

1 of 2 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

09

Timeline

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Apr 2019 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Dec 2027, 104 months after the start.

Of 36 non-industry phase 1 interventional studies under Ependymoma, half reached primary completion within 65 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 39 and three quarters within 92. This study's planned 104 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 42 studies reached it within 62 months; a quarter within 39 and three quarters within 92.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Nov 15, 2018
First posted
Nov 23, 2018
StartActual
Apr 1, 2019
Primary completionEst.
Dec 31, 2027
CompletionEst.
Dec 31, 2027
Last update
Nov 10, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Minor edits
Nothing that changes what the study is or who can join. Edited: verification date
1 update, last Nov 10, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Nov 10, 2026
    Minor edits only
    + 1 other change: verification date

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03750513
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Nov 23, 2018
Start date
Apr 1, 2019
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 31, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Nov 10, 2026

Study contacts

David Grosshans
Contact
dgrossha@mdanderson.org
713-563-2300
David R Grosshans
principal investigator · M.D. Anderson Cancer Center

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion