ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03747302Updated Sep 14, 2022Results posted

HPV Message Testing and Social Media Campaign

An interventional study of Social Media Message about HPV and HPV vaccine and Social media message about risk of electronic cigarettes. in Vaccine and Human Papilloma Virus, sponsored by Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center. Completed at 1 site in United States. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-09-14.

Sponsored by Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center · Not applicable, Interventional, and Health services research

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
1,043
Allocation
Randomized
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This project involves a social media campaign to increase parent's knowledge and acceptance of the HPV (human papillomavirus) vaccine. The current vaccine protects against nine types of HPV, including seven that are known to cause cancer. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) estimates that the current HPV vaccine could prevent 90% of cancer cases caused by HPV, including cases of cervical cancer, oropharyngeal (mouth and throat) cancer, anal cancer, and others. About 150 and 104 cases of HPV-associated cancers are diagnosed each year in New Hampshire and Vermont, respectively-many of which could be prevented through vaccination. Currently, only 49.8% of New Hampshire adolescents and 44.3% of Vermont adolescents were not up-to-date for HPV vaccination as of 2016. This social media campaign is testing a set of campaign messages with parents locally and nationally to see which messages are most effective in improving their knowledge and acceptance of the vaccine. A study survey link will monitor the number of people reached and will measure parental intention to get their children vaccinated against HPV.

02

Conditions studied

  • Vaccine
  • Human Papilloma Virus

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Adolescence
  • Attitudes
  • Parents
  • Vaccination
03

In context

Behavior

404 studies on the registry are indexed under Behavior; 167 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 1,043 is above the median of 120 across 316 interventional studies indexed under Behavior.

Browse Behavior studies →

Lead sponsor

Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center is the lead sponsor of 486 studies on the registry; 69 are open to participants now.

Of its 31 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 21 (68%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • parents of children 9-14 years old

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • non-parents
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Health services research
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
1,043 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    HPV Messaging

    Subjects are randomized to receive one of five messages on one of the four themes about HPV vaccination.

    Other: Social Media Message about HPV and HPV vaccine

  • Other
    Control Message

    Subjects are randomized to receive one of five messages about electronic cigarettes.

    Other: Social media message about risk of electronic cigarettes.

Interventions

  • OtherSocial Media Message about HPV and HPV vaccine

    Messages educate parents with facts about HPV vaccination.

  • OtherSocial media message about risk of electronic cigarettes.

    Messages educate parents with facts about electronic cigarettes. This is an attention control group without outcomes obtained.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Attitudes About HPV Vaccine

    Change in Attitudes about HPV vaccine: Pre to post test comparison of summated 9 items measured on a 7-point scale of HPV vaccine attitudes. Scores range from a minimum of 9 to a maximum of 63. Higher scores indicated more positive attitudes toward HPV vaccination. Change was calculated from two time points, the later time point(\<1 hour post messaging intervention) minus value at baseline.

    Time frame: Post test completed < 1 hour post messaging intervention

Secondary outcomes

  1. Behavioral Intention to Vaccinate Their Child With HPV Vaccine

    A sub-group of parents of 9-14 year old children who had not been vaccinated were asked on pre- and post-test: How likely is it that she/he will receive the HPV vaccine in the next 12 months? Responses range form 1 (very likely) to 5 (not very likely). HPV vaccination behavioral intent change scores were calculated by subtracting pre- and post- test values. It is a negative-value scale, in which smaller values indicate more positive attitude change after exposure to the viewed message.

    Time frame: Ore test immediately before viewing message and post- test immediately after viewing message. Approximately one hour.

07

Results

Posted Sep 14, 2022

Participant flow

1713 prospective participants responded to a social media or MTurk posting about the study between 12/12/18 to 04/15/19. 39 declined to consent. Of the remaining 1674 participants: 631 had no child and were deemed ineligible,.1043 people were eligible and consented to be in the study. Of that, 45 dropped before random assignment. As such, 998 people were eligible, provided a consent, and completed a baseline survey.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneHPV MessagingControl Messaging
Started834164
Completed833162
Not completed12
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject12

Outcome measures

PrimaryChange in Attitudes About HPV Vaccine

Change in Attitudes about HPV vaccine: Pre to post test comparison of summated 9 items measured on a 7-point scale of HPV vaccine attitudes. Scores range from a minimum of 9 to a maximum of 63. Higher scores indicated more positive attitudes toward HPV vaccination. Change was calculated from two time points, the later time point(\<1 hour post messaging intervention) minus value at baseline.

Time frame:
Post test completed < 1 hour post messaging intervention
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Change in Attitudes About HPV Vaccine
units on a scaleHPV MessagingControl Messaging
Change in Attitudes About HPV Vaccine.16 ± .92-.08 ± .91
Statistical analysis
  • HPV Messaging vs Control Messaging · t-test, 2 sided · p = .003
SecondaryBehavioral Intention to Vaccinate Their Child With HPV Vaccine

A sub-group of parents of 9-14 year old children who had not been vaccinated were asked on pre- and post-test: How likely is it that she/he will receive the HPV vaccine in the next 12 months? Responses range form 1 (very likely) to 5 (not very likely). HPV vaccination behavioral intent change scores were calculated by subtracting pre- and post- test values. It is a negative-value scale, in which smaller values indicate more positive attitude change after exposure to the viewed message.

Time frame:
Ore test immediately before viewing message and post- test immediately after viewing message. Approximately one hour.
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Behavioral Intention to Vaccinate Their Child With HPV Vaccine
units on a scaleHPV MessagingControl Message
Behavioral Intention to Vaccinate Their Child With HPV Vaccine-.022 ± .81-.06 ± .92
Statistical analysis
  • HPV Messaging vs Control Message · t-test, 2 sided · p = >.05

Adverse events

Collected over Adverse events not anticipated over the < 1 hour of the study for a participant which only collects survey data about views of HPV vaccine. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
HPV Messaging———
Control Message———

Baseline characteristics

1,713 participants initially recruited but 631 ineligible because no child leaving 1,043 eligible. Of eligibles 998 completed baseline survey.

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)HPV MessagingControl MessageTotal
Mean38.05 ± 10.7537.33 ± 10.8837.93 ± 10.77
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)HPV MessagingControl MessageTotal
Female52096616
Male31468382
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected(Participants)HPV MessagingControl MessageTotal
Count of participants——0
Prior knowledge of HPV
Prior knowledge of HPV(Participants)HPV MessagingControl MessageTotal
Count of participants730142872
HPV Vaccine in prevents Cervical Cancer
HPV Vaccine in prevents Cervical Cancer(units on a scale)HPV MessagingControl MessageTotal
Mean2.53 ± 1.582.48 ± 1.502.52 ± 1.56
HPV Vaccine in prevents Throat Cancer
HPV Vaccine in prevents Throat Cancer(units on a scale)HPV MessagingControl MessageTotal
Mean2.26 ± 1.802.08 ± 1.812.23 ± 1.80
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center
    Lebanon, New Hampshire 03756, United States
09

References and documents

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Feb 27, 2019
  • Informed consent form · Feb 27, 2019
  • Informed consent form · Dec 7, 2018

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Dec 2018 to primary completion in Sep 2019, 8 months.

Results were first posted in Sep 2022, 3 years after primary completion.

Of 235 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Behavior, half reached primary completion within 22 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 8 and three quarters within 51. This study's 8 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 241 studies reached it within 20 months; a quarter within 7 and three quarters within 50.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Nov 16, 2018
First posted
Nov 20, 2018
StartActual
Dec 12, 2018
Primary completionActual
Sep 9, 2019
CompletionActual
Sep 9, 2019
Results first posted
Sep 14, 2022
Last update
Sep 14, 2022
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 14, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03747302
Collaborators
National Cancer Institute (NCI), Norris Cotton Cancer Center
Responsible party
Ardis Olson, MD (Physician, Professor of Pediatrics, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center) — Principal investigator
First posted
Nov 20, 2018
Start date
Dec 12, 2018
Primary completion
Sep 9, 2019
Completion
Sep 9, 2019
Results posted
Sep 14, 2022
Last update
Sep 14, 2022

Study contacts

Ardis L Olson, MD
principal investigator · Trustees of Dartmouth College

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion