ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03746509SD-VTSUpdated May 4, 2025Results posted

Laryngeal Vibration for Spasmodic Dysphonia

An interventional study of Laryngeal Vibration (Treatment) and Laryngeal Vibration (Comparator) in Spasmodic Dysphonia, sponsored by University of Minnesota. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 75 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-05-04.

Sponsored by University of Minnesota · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
42
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 75 Years
Sex
All
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-12

Among 71 studies in Dysphonia with a site in United States — 20 open to participants now, 21 under way, 1 of them phase 3. Dysphonia · United States.

Enrollment
20th of 53
42 · median 32
Started
2019
with 1 other
No phase
31 of 71
12 open now
Registered
36th of 71
by date
Lead sponsor
6 of 71
University of Minnesota

Among the 71 studies in Dysphonia with a site in United States, this one is the 20th largest by enrollment of the 53 interventional ones, is one of 2 that started in 2019, is one of 31 with no phase, and was the 36th registered.

By phase

71 studies; the count open now beside each. This study's row is marked.

No phasethis study31 · 12 open
Observational18 · 4 open
Phase 1/25 · 0 open
Phase 45 · 1 open
Phase 14 · 2 open
Phase 24 · 0 open
Phase 2/32 · 0 open
Phase 32 · 1 open

By the year they started

First in 1992; this study’s year is marked. 2 started in 2019.

Size and results

Median enrollment 32 across the 53 interventional studies, 170 across the 18 observational. Of the 41 that completed or were terminated, 17 (41%) have results posted.

Was this useful?
Watch this landscapeDownload CSVWith an account: a weekly mail of what changed among 71 studies in Dysphonia with a site in United States, or all of them as a file.
02

Study summary

The general aim of the research is to provide scientific evidence that vibro-tactile stimulation (VTS) represents a non-invasive form of neuromodulation that can induce measurable improvements in the speech of people with spasmodic dysphonia (SD). This research addresses a clinical need to develop alternative or auxiliary treatments for a rare voice disorder with limited treatment options. A successful completion of the proposed work will be an important step in advancing laryngeal VTS as a therapeutic intervention for improving the voice symptoms in SD. Specifically, the scientific yield by achieving the specific aims is threefold: First, it will elucidate the unknown neurophysiological mechanism behind laryngeal VTS by documenting the neural changes associated with VTS. Second, it will establish that VTS can improve voice quality in SD. Third, by documenting that laryngeal VTS yields long-term benefits on voice quality in SD patients, it would provide a solid basis for a clinical trial that needs to address open questions on optimal dosage and duration of VTS-based voice therapy, the magnitude of the therapeutic effect across adductor and abductor SD and its long term efficacy.

Read the detailed description

Spasmodic dysphonia (SD) is a rare voice disorder that develops spontaneously during midlife. Patients with SD typically have a strained or choked speech and report that is takes an exhausting effort to speak. The involuntary spasms of the laryngeal musculature that give rise to these symptoms almost always occur during speech. Progression is gradual in the first year and then becomes chronic for life. The cause of spasmodic dysphonia is unknown, but SD is considered to be a form of task-specific focal dystonia (FD). More women than men are affected. Current therapeutic options are limited. SD does not respond to behavioral speech therapy. It is treated primarily with Botulinum toxin injections (Botox), which provides temporary symptom relief to some, but is not well tolerated by all SD patients. At present, there is no cure for SD.

There is convergent evidence that FD is associated with kinaesthetic deficits that are also manifest in non-dystonic musculature indicating that while the motor symptoms of dystonia are focal, the associated somatosensory deficit is general. Recent work from our group (NIH 1R21DC011841) confirmed upper limb proprioceptive deficits in SD demonstrating that an underlying somatosensory deficit is also a feature of SD. In our assessment this finding opens an avenue for a missing behavioral treatment for SD. Specifically, the investigators suggest that vibro-tactile stimulation (VTS) could be the suitable tool, given that it is known to alter afferent signals from the vibrated mechanoreceptors in muscles and skin. The approach seeks to show that VTS represents a non-invasive form of neuromodulation that induces measurable improvements in the speech of SD patients. Given that SD, like other FDs, is associated with abnormally increased cortical excitation and heightened levels of neuronal synchronization, the investigators put forward that VTS can reduce sensorimotor cortical excitation in SD by desynchronizing motor cortical neuron activity as has been shown in cervical dystonia. Technically, newly available light-weight, wearable low-voltage vibrators offer, for the first time, the possibility to apply laryngeal VTS outside a controlled laboratory environment, which would be imperative for the technology to be clinically useful. In general, one needs to demonstrate that a) VTS induces measurable improvements in voice quality, b) that it induces measurable changes in somatosensory and motor cortical activation that would provide insight into the underlying neural mechanism of its potential effectiveness. Thus, the proposal has the following specific aims:

  1. Demonstrate that a one-time, prolonged application of VTS produces acute improvements in SD voice quality that are retained up to 60 minutes past cessation of VTS. A pre- and post-training comparison showing significant voice improvements in the SD group as measured by self-report (Effort Scale), clinical assessment (Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice - CAPE-V), as the reduction in the number of voice breaks and determining cepstral peak prominence will realize this goal. The investigators' preliminary data show that VTS induces improvements in voice quality in SD patients as measured by these markers.
  2. Demonstrate that repeated prolonged VTS produces long lasting improvements in SD voice quality that are retained for up to 3 months. SD patients will participate in an 8-week in-home VTS training program. After randomization to either a treatment or sham group (ineffective low frequency VTS), patients will start in low or high intensity training group (1 vs. 3 sessions/wk) and cross-over after 4 weeks. Showing that significant long-term voice improvements in the VTS treatment group as assessed by objective measures of voice/speech production (see aim 1) will persist over a period of 11 weeks will realize this goal.
  3. Demonstrate that the application of VTS induces acute desynchronization of cortical activity in SD, which would provide neurophysiological evidence on the assumed effectiveness of VTS. Verifying that VTS is associated with short-latency characteristic changes in somatosensory and motor cortical processing as measured by electroencephalography (EEG) and documenting that these changes indicate decreased alpha and beta-band activity in sensorimotor cortical areas will achieve this goal. The investigators' preliminary data show that VTS suppresses low frequency neural activity at the somatosensory and motor cortices in healthy and SD participants. Obtaining longitudinal EEG data during VTS training (aim 2), will allow the investigators to monitor long-term changes in cortical activation due to laryngeal VTS and to associate them with changes in voice quality.

Impact. This is the first systematic study on the effect of VTS on SD voice symptoms. The proposal aligns with PA-14-236 (Advancing Research in Voice Disorders) with its emphasis on understanding voice disorders and improving diagnosis and treatment. If successful, the work of the proposal would lay the scientific foundation for a clinical trial to examine the usefulness of the approach in a larger patient sample. It would document the sensorimotor cortical activation patterns associated with SD and the longitudinal changes in cortical responses to VTS. It would promote development of wearable, user-programmable medical devices that could apply VTS while monitoring its effect on voice production in real-time. Ultimately, VTS would enlarge the available therapeutic arsenal by either augmenting existing Botox therapy or becoming an alternative intervention option for patients who do not tolerate Botox injections.

03

Conditions studied

  • Spasmodic Dysphonia

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Dystonia
  • Spasmodic dysphonia
  • Laryngeal dystonia
04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 75 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • diagnosis of adductor SD for a minimum of 6 months with documented symptom relief after botox injection

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • abductor SD
  • patients with other voice disorders such as muscle tension dysphonia that share some of the symptomology with SD
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
42 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Low-High Treatment

    Participants in the low-high treatment group will receive Laryngeal Vibration (Treatment) at 100Hz frequency once a week for a duration of 4 weeks (low intensity). Then they will switch and receive laryngeal vibration at 100Hz frequency every second day of the week (high intensity) for a duration of 4 weeks.

    Device: Laryngeal Vibration (Treatment)

  • Experimental
    High-Low Treatment

    Participants in the high-low treatment group will receive Laryngeal Vibration (Treatment) at 100Hz frequency every second day of the week for a duration of 4 weeks (high intensity). Then they will switch and receive laryngeal vibration at 100Hz frequency once a week for a duration of 4 weeks (low intensity).

    Device: Laryngeal Vibration (Treatment)

  • Active comparator
    Low-High Comparator

    Participants in the low-high comparator group will receive Laryngeal Vibration (Comparator) at 5Hz frequency once a week for a duration of 4 weeks (low intensity). Then they will switch and receive laryngeal vibration at 5Hz frequency every second day of the week (high intensity) for a duration of 4 weeks.

    Device: Laryngeal Vibration (Comparator)

  • Active comparator
    High-Low Comparator

    Participants in the high-low comparator group will receive Laryngeal Vibration (Comparator) at 5Hz frequency every second day of the week for a duration of 4 weeks (high intensity). Then they will switch and receive laryngeal vibration at 5Hz frequency once a week for a duration of 4 weeks (low intensity).

    Device: Laryngeal Vibration (Comparator)

Interventions

  • DeviceLaryngeal Vibration (Treatment)

    The strength of the vibration is similar to the vibration experienced from vibrating cell phones or gaming joysticks. Vibro-tactile stimulation at the applied frequency and amplitude is not known to cause pain or tissue damage. The participant may feel a mild tingling or vibrating sensation. Preliminary testing on healthy human subjects showed that at the given vibration parameters no adverse reactions occur.

  • DeviceLaryngeal Vibration (Comparator)

    The strength of the vibration is similar to the vibration experienced from vibrating cell phones or gaming joysticks. Vibro-tactile stimulation at the applied frequency and amplitude is not known to cause pain or tissue damage. The participant may feel a mild tingling or vibrating sensation. Preliminary testing on healthy human subjects showed that at the given vibration parameters no adverse reactions occur.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Voice Assessment During First Visit

    Smoothed Cepstral Peak Prominence (CPPS) is an indicator of voice quality. It is measured in decibels. CPPS was measured from the voice signals of each participant during each study visit, and relative CPPS was calculated before and after vibration was applied on the laryngeal muscles of the participants. An increase in CPPS value indicates an improvement in voice symptoms.

    Time frame: Testing performed in lab at Week 1

  2. Final Voice Assessment

    Smoothed Cepstral Peak Prominence (CPPS) which is an indicator of voice quality was measured in participants. CPPS was measured in participants during the first visit, and relative CPPS was calculated before and after vibration was applied on the laryngeal muscles of the participants.

    Time frame: Testing performed in lab at week 11

Secondary outcomes

  1. Measuring of Cortical Activity Using Electroencephalography (EEG) (Baseline)

    Cortical activity before, during, and after the vibration will be recorded via a a 64-channel EEG system at a sampling frequency of 512 Hz.

    Time frame: Testing performed in lab at Week 1

  2. Final Measuring of Cortical Activity Using Electroencephalography (EEG) to Measure Change From Baseline

    Cortical activity before, during, and after the vibration will be recorded via a a 64-channel EEG system at a sampling frequency of 512 Hz.

    Time frame: Testing performed in lab at Week 11

07

Results

Posted Mar 15, 2024
Limitations and caveats
Dosage was limited to apply vibro-tactile stimulation for one day or days per week for 20 min/day. It is unclear how a more frequent or longer application of the stimulation will affect voice outcome in people with laryngeal dystonia.

Participant flow

Participants were recruited from Fairview Voice Clinic at the University of Minnesota and through e-mail advertisements sent by the National Spasmodic Dysphonia Association as well as social media platforms. Recruitment began in the Fall of 2018.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneLow-High TreatmentHigh-Low TreatmentLow-High ComparatorHigh-Low Comparator
Started11101110
Completed7899
Not completed4221

Outcome measures

PrimaryVoice Assessment During First Visit

Smoothed Cepstral Peak Prominence (CPPS) is an indicator of voice quality. It is measured in decibels. CPPS was measured from the voice signals of each participant during each study visit, and relative CPPS was calculated before and after vibration was applied on the laryngeal muscles of the participants. An increase in CPPS value indicates an improvement in voice symptoms.

Time frame:
Testing performed in lab at Week 1
Reported as:
Median · decibel
Voice Assessment During First Visit
decibelLow-High TreatmentHigh-Low TreatmentLow-High ComparatorHigh-Low Comparator
Voice Assessment During First Visit0.045 (-0.79 to 1.28)0.17 (-0.91 to 1.05)0.13 (0.01 to 1.14)-0.47 (-0.64 to 0.56)
PrimaryFinal Voice Assessment

Smoothed Cepstral Peak Prominence (CPPS) which is an indicator of voice quality was measured in participants. CPPS was measured in participants during the first visit, and relative CPPS was calculated before and after vibration was applied on the laryngeal muscles of the participants.

Time frame:
Testing performed in lab at week 11
Reported as:
Median · decibel
Final Voice Assessment
decibelLow-High TreatmentHigh-Low TreatmentLow-High ComparatorHigh-Low Comparator
Final Voice Assessment0.96 (0.71 to 1.30)0.55 (-0.82 to 0.63)0.64 (0.21 to 1.37)0.23 (-0.01 to 0.38)
SecondaryMeasuring of Cortical Activity Using Electroencephalography (EEG) (Baseline)

Cortical activity before, during, and after the vibration will be recorded via a a 64-channel EEG system at a sampling frequency of 512 Hz.

Time frame:
Testing performed in lab at Week 1

Results for this outcome have not been posted.

SecondaryFinal Measuring of Cortical Activity Using Electroencephalography (EEG) to Measure Change From Baseline

Cortical activity before, during, and after the vibration will be recorded via a a 64-channel EEG system at a sampling frequency of 512 Hz.

Time frame:
Testing performed in lab at Week 11

Results for this outcome have not been posted.

Adverse events

Collected over 11 weeks. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Low-High Treatment0/11 (0%)0/11 (0%)0/11 (0%)
High-Low Treatment0/10 (0%)0/10 (0%)0/10 (0%)
Low-High Comparator0/11 (0%)0/11 (0%)0/11 (0%)
High-Low Comparator0/10 (0%)0/10 (0%)0/10 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Low-High TreatmentHigh-Low TreatmentLow-High ComparatorHigh-Low ComparatorTotal
<=18 years00000
Between 18 and 65 years444820
>=65 years767222
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Low-High TreatmentHigh-Low TreatmentLow-High ComparatorHigh-Low ComparatorTotal
Female757423
Male454619
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Low-High TreatmentHigh-Low TreatmentLow-High ComparatorHigh-Low ComparatorTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native00101
Asian00000
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander00000
Black or African American00022
White111010839
More than one race00000
Unknown or Not Reported00000
08

Study locations

1 site
  • University of Minnesota
    Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Khosravani S, Mahnan A, Yeh IL, Aman JE, Watson PJ, Zhang Y, Goding G, Konczak J. Laryngeal vibration as a non-invasive neuromodulation therapy for spasmodic dysphonia. Sci Rep. 2019 Nov 29;9(1):17955. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-54396-4. PubMed 31784618 ↗
  • Konczak J, Bhaskaran D, Elangovan N, Oh J, Goding GS, Watson PJ. Effects of an 11-week vibro-tactile stimulation treatment on voice symptoms in laryngeal dystonia. Front Neurol. 2024 May 30;15:1403050. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1403050. eCollection 2024. PubMed 38872829 ↗

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Apr 2019 to primary completion in Jul 2022, 39 months.

Results were first posted in Mar 2024, 1 year 7 months after primary completion.

Of 44 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Dysphonia, half reached primary completion within 26 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 11 and three quarters within 47. This study's 39 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 44 studies reached it within 26 months; a quarter within 11 and three quarters within 47.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Nov 14, 2018
First posted
Nov 19, 2018
StartActual
Apr 2, 2019
Primary completionActual
Jul 20, 2022
CompletionActual
Jul 20, 2022
Results first posted
Mar 15, 2024
Last update
May 4, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 4, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03746509
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Nov 19, 2018
Start date
Apr 2, 2019
Primary completion
Jul 20, 2022
Completion
Jul 20, 2022
Results posted
Mar 15, 2024
Last update
May 4, 2025

Study contacts

Juergen Konczak, PhD
principal investigator · University of Minnesota

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion