An interventional study of Laryngeal Vibration (Treatment) and Laryngeal Vibration (Comparator) in Spasmodic Dysphonia, sponsored by University of Minnesota. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 75 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-05-04.
Sponsored by University of Minnesota · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment
Among 71 studies in Dysphonia with a site in United States — 20 open to participants now, 21 under way, 1 of them phase 3. Dysphonia · United States.
Among the 71 studies in Dysphonia with a site in United States, this one is the 20th largest by enrollment of the 53 interventional ones, is one of 2 that started in 2019, is one of 31 with no phase, and was the 36th registered.
132 studies on the registry are indexed under Dysphonia; 38 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 42 is above the median of 30 across 87 interventional studies indexed under Dysphonia.
Browse Dysphonia studies →20 of the 71 studies in Dysphonia with a site in United States are open now, in 1 country. Each count lists the studies.
Of the 25 Dysphonia studies recruiting now, 8 (32%) set no upper age limit and 9 (36%) stop at 75 or younger; 7 take children under 18; 14 take healthy volunteers.
This study: 18 Years to 75 Years · all sexes · healthy volunteers too.
The full table on the hub →71 studies; the count open now beside each. This study's row is marked.
First in 1992; this study’s year is marked. 2 started in 2019.
Median enrollment 32 across the 53 interventional studies, 170 across the 18 observational. Of the 41 that completed or were terminated, 17 (41%) have results posted.
2 of 71 have an industry lead sponsor. The 10 most frequent:
University of Minnesota is the lead sponsor of 1,216 studies on the registry; 197 are open to participants now.
Of its 136 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 95 (70%) have results posted.
University of Minnesota has 6 studies filed under Dysphonia — fewer than ten, so there is no comparison to draw.
12 of the studies in Dysphonia with a site in United States that are under way reach primary completion within a year, 1 of them phase 3. Phase 3 first, then by date:
| Study | Primary completion |
|---|---|
| NCT07145086Phase 3Texas Christian UniversityTranslaryngeal Vibration for Hyperfunctional Voice Disorders | 2027-04-30 |
| NCT06830174Yale UniversitytDCS for Laryngeal Dystonia | 2026-12 |
| NCT03702322University of ArizonaImproving Voice Production for Adults With Age-related Dysphonia | 2026-12-30 |
| NCT05095740MGH Institute of Health ProfessionsEffects of Neuromodulation in Laryngeal Dystonia | 2026-12-31 |
| NCT07443891University of MinnesotaBrain Network Changes After Vibro-tactile Stimulation in Laryngeal Dystonia | 2027-02-28 |
Among the 71 studies in Dysphonia with a site in United States, from their registry updates:
The general aim of the research is to provide scientific evidence that vibro-tactile stimulation (VTS) represents a non-invasive form of neuromodulation that can induce measurable improvements in the speech of people with spasmodic dysphonia (SD). This research addresses a clinical need to develop alternative or auxiliary treatments for a rare voice disorder with limited treatment options. A successful completion of the proposed work will be an important step in advancing laryngeal VTS as a therapeutic intervention for improving the voice symptoms in SD. Specifically, the scientific yield by achieving the specific aims is threefold: First, it will elucidate the unknown neurophysiological mechanism behind laryngeal VTS by documenting the neural changes associated with VTS. Second, it will establish that VTS can improve voice quality in SD. Third, by documenting that laryngeal VTS yields long-term benefits on voice quality in SD patients, it would provide a solid basis for a clinical trial that needs to address open questions on optimal dosage and duration of VTS-based voice therapy, the magnitude of the therapeutic effect across adductor and abductor SD and its long term efficacy.
Spasmodic dysphonia (SD) is a rare voice disorder that develops spontaneously during midlife. Patients with SD typically have a strained or choked speech and report that is takes an exhausting effort to speak. The involuntary spasms of the laryngeal musculature that give rise to these symptoms almost always occur during speech. Progression is gradual in the first year and then becomes chronic for life. The cause of spasmodic dysphonia is unknown, but SD is considered to be a form of task-specific focal dystonia (FD). More women than men are affected. Current therapeutic options are limited. SD does not respond to behavioral speech therapy. It is treated primarily with Botulinum toxin injections (Botox), which provides temporary symptom relief to some, but is not well tolerated by all SD patients. At present, there is no cure for SD.
There is convergent evidence that FD is associated with kinaesthetic deficits that are also manifest in non-dystonic musculature indicating that while the motor symptoms of dystonia are focal, the associated somatosensory deficit is general. Recent work from our group (NIH 1R21DC011841) confirmed upper limb proprioceptive deficits in SD demonstrating that an underlying somatosensory deficit is also a feature of SD. In our assessment this finding opens an avenue for a missing behavioral treatment for SD. Specifically, the investigators suggest that vibro-tactile stimulation (VTS) could be the suitable tool, given that it is known to alter afferent signals from the vibrated mechanoreceptors in muscles and skin. The approach seeks to show that VTS represents a non-invasive form of neuromodulation that induces measurable improvements in the speech of SD patients. Given that SD, like other FDs, is associated with abnormally increased cortical excitation and heightened levels of neuronal synchronization, the investigators put forward that VTS can reduce sensorimotor cortical excitation in SD by desynchronizing motor cortical neuron activity as has been shown in cervical dystonia. Technically, newly available light-weight, wearable low-voltage vibrators offer, for the first time, the possibility to apply laryngeal VTS outside a controlled laboratory environment, which would be imperative for the technology to be clinically useful. In general, one needs to demonstrate that a) VTS induces measurable improvements in voice quality, b) that it induces measurable changes in somatosensory and motor cortical activation that would provide insight into the underlying neural mechanism of its potential effectiveness. Thus, the proposal has the following specific aims:
Impact. This is the first systematic study on the effect of VTS on SD voice symptoms. The proposal aligns with PA-14-236 (Advancing Research in Voice Disorders) with its emphasis on understanding voice disorders and improving diagnosis and treatment. If successful, the work of the proposal would lay the scientific foundation for a clinical trial to examine the usefulness of the approach in a larger patient sample. It would document the sensorimotor cortical activation patterns associated with SD and the longitudinal changes in cortical responses to VTS. It would promote development of wearable, user-programmable medical devices that could apply VTS while monitoring its effect on voice production in real-time. Ultimately, VTS would enlarge the available therapeutic arsenal by either augmenting existing Botox therapy or becoming an alternative intervention option for patients who do not tolerate Botox injections.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
Participants in the low-high treatment group will receive Laryngeal Vibration (Treatment) at 100Hz frequency once a week for a duration of 4 weeks (low intensity). Then they will switch and receive laryngeal vibration at 100Hz frequency every second day of the week (high intensity) for a duration of 4 weeks.
Device: Laryngeal Vibration (Treatment)
Participants in the high-low treatment group will receive Laryngeal Vibration (Treatment) at 100Hz frequency every second day of the week for a duration of 4 weeks (high intensity). Then they will switch and receive laryngeal vibration at 100Hz frequency once a week for a duration of 4 weeks (low intensity).
Device: Laryngeal Vibration (Treatment)
Participants in the low-high comparator group will receive Laryngeal Vibration (Comparator) at 5Hz frequency once a week for a duration of 4 weeks (low intensity). Then they will switch and receive laryngeal vibration at 5Hz frequency every second day of the week (high intensity) for a duration of 4 weeks.
Device: Laryngeal Vibration (Comparator)
Participants in the high-low comparator group will receive Laryngeal Vibration (Comparator) at 5Hz frequency every second day of the week for a duration of 4 weeks (high intensity). Then they will switch and receive laryngeal vibration at 5Hz frequency once a week for a duration of 4 weeks (low intensity).
Device: Laryngeal Vibration (Comparator)
The strength of the vibration is similar to the vibration experienced from vibrating cell phones or gaming joysticks. Vibro-tactile stimulation at the applied frequency and amplitude is not known to cause pain or tissue damage. The participant may feel a mild tingling or vibrating sensation. Preliminary testing on healthy human subjects showed that at the given vibration parameters no adverse reactions occur.
The strength of the vibration is similar to the vibration experienced from vibrating cell phones or gaming joysticks. Vibro-tactile stimulation at the applied frequency and amplitude is not known to cause pain or tissue damage. The participant may feel a mild tingling or vibrating sensation. Preliminary testing on healthy human subjects showed that at the given vibration parameters no adverse reactions occur.
Voice Assessment During First Visit
Smoothed Cepstral Peak Prominence (CPPS) is an indicator of voice quality. It is measured in decibels. CPPS was measured from the voice signals of each participant during each study visit, and relative CPPS was calculated before and after vibration was applied on the laryngeal muscles of the participants. An increase in CPPS value indicates an improvement in voice symptoms.
Time frame: Testing performed in lab at Week 1
Final Voice Assessment
Smoothed Cepstral Peak Prominence (CPPS) which is an indicator of voice quality was measured in participants. CPPS was measured in participants during the first visit, and relative CPPS was calculated before and after vibration was applied on the laryngeal muscles of the participants.
Time frame: Testing performed in lab at week 11
Measuring of Cortical Activity Using Electroencephalography (EEG) (Baseline)
Cortical activity before, during, and after the vibration will be recorded via a a 64-channel EEG system at a sampling frequency of 512 Hz.
Time frame: Testing performed in lab at Week 1
Final Measuring of Cortical Activity Using Electroencephalography (EEG) to Measure Change From Baseline
Cortical activity before, during, and after the vibration will be recorded via a a 64-channel EEG system at a sampling frequency of 512 Hz.
Time frame: Testing performed in lab at Week 11
Participants were recruited from Fairview Voice Clinic at the University of Minnesota and through e-mail advertisements sent by the National Spasmodic Dysphonia Association as well as social media platforms. Recruitment began in the Fall of 2018.
| Milestone | Low-High Treatment | High-Low Treatment | Low-High Comparator | High-Low Comparator |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Started | 11 | 10 | 11 | 10 |
| Completed | 7 | 8 | 9 | 9 |
| Not completed | 4 | 2 | 2 | 1 |
Smoothed Cepstral Peak Prominence (CPPS) is an indicator of voice quality. It is measured in decibels. CPPS was measured from the voice signals of each participant during each study visit, and relative CPPS was calculated before and after vibration was applied on the laryngeal muscles of the participants. An increase in CPPS value indicates an improvement in voice symptoms.
| decibel | Low-High Treatment | High-Low Treatment | Low-High Comparator | High-Low Comparator |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Voice Assessment During First Visit | 0.045 (-0.79 to 1.28) | 0.17 (-0.91 to 1.05) | 0.13 (0.01 to 1.14) | -0.47 (-0.64 to 0.56) |
Smoothed Cepstral Peak Prominence (CPPS) which is an indicator of voice quality was measured in participants. CPPS was measured in participants during the first visit, and relative CPPS was calculated before and after vibration was applied on the laryngeal muscles of the participants.
| decibel | Low-High Treatment | High-Low Treatment | Low-High Comparator | High-Low Comparator |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Final Voice Assessment | 0.96 (0.71 to 1.30) | 0.55 (-0.82 to 0.63) | 0.64 (0.21 to 1.37) | 0.23 (-0.01 to 0.38) |
Cortical activity before, during, and after the vibration will be recorded via a a 64-channel EEG system at a sampling frequency of 512 Hz.
Results for this outcome have not been posted.
Cortical activity before, during, and after the vibration will be recorded via a a 64-channel EEG system at a sampling frequency of 512 Hz.
Results for this outcome have not been posted.
Collected over 11 weeks. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.
| Group | Deaths | Serious | Other |
|---|---|---|---|
| Low-High Treatment | 0/11 (0%) | 0/11 (0%) | 0/11 (0%) |
| High-Low Treatment | 0/10 (0%) | 0/10 (0%) | 0/10 (0%) |
| Low-High Comparator | 0/11 (0%) | 0/11 (0%) | 0/11 (0%) |
| High-Low Comparator | 0/10 (0%) | 0/10 (0%) | 0/10 (0%) |
| Age, Categorical(Participants) | Low-High Treatment | High-Low Treatment | Low-High Comparator | High-Low Comparator | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| <=18 years | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Between 18 and 65 years | 4 | 4 | 4 | 8 | 20 |
| >=65 years | 7 | 6 | 7 | 2 | 22 |
| Sex: Female, Male(Participants) | Low-High Treatment | High-Low Treatment | Low-High Comparator | High-Low Comparator | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Female | 7 | 5 | 7 | 4 | 23 |
| Male | 4 | 5 | 4 | 6 | 19 |
| Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants) | Low-High Treatment | High-Low Treatment | Low-High Comparator | High-Low Comparator | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| American Indian or Alaska Native | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Asian | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Black or African American | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| White | 11 | 10 | 10 | 8 | 39 |
| More than one race | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unknown or Not Reported | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.
Plan to share: No
Ran from Apr 2019 to primary completion in Jul 2022, 39 months.
Results were first posted in Mar 2024, 1 year 7 months after primary completion.
Of 44 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Dysphonia, half reached primary completion within 26 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 11 and three quarters within 47. This study's 39 months is above that.
Counting every sponsor, half of 44 studies reached it within 26 months; a quarter within 11 and three quarters within 47.
How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.
This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.