ClinicalTrials.gg
WithdrawnNCT03743805Updated Oct 31, 2024

Rapid Reversal of CNS-Depressant Drug Effect Prior to Brain Death Determination

An Early Phase 1 interventional study of Flumazenil and Naloxone in Brain Death, Anoxic Brain Injury and Cardiac Arrest, sponsored by Prisma Health-Midlands. Withdrawn at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-10-31.

Sponsored by Prisma Health-Midlands · Early Phase 1, Interventional, and Diagnostic

Why this study was withdrawn
Insufficient patients
Phase
Early Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
0
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Current standard of care prior to determination of brain death in subjects with suspected anoxic brain injury is to exclude complicating medical conditions that may confound clinical assessment (such as severe electrolyte, acid base, endocrine or circulatory disturbance), achieve normothermia and normal systolic blood pressure over 100 mmHg (with or without vasopressor use), exclude the presence of neuromuscular blocking agents (with the presence of a train of 4 twitches with maximal ulnar nerve stimulation) as well as to exclude the presence of CNS depressant drug effects. At the present time the latter is done by history, drug screen and allowing enough time for paralytic and sedative drugs to be metabolized and cleared from the body. Clearance is calculated by using 5 times the drug's half-life assuming normal hepatic and renal functions. Half-life can also be prolonged in subjects who have been treated with induced hypothermia. Literature search revealed articles with general guidelines and approaches to brain death, but none addressed pharmacological reversal of sedative drugs

Read the detailed description

Question of proposed study is whether a subject's comatose state is secondary to delayed clearance of a previously administered CNS depressant. By using pharmacologic reversal agents of commonly used benzodiazepines and opioids, the investigators aim to identify participants that may likely improve after complete clearance of the drugs from their system.

Prospective trial with enrollment of 30 subjects in 2 intensive care units at Palmetto Health Richland from January 1st 2019 to June 30th 2020. Research procedures will be performed in the intensive care setting. If participants had undergone targeted temperature management (33-36 degrees Celsius for 24 hours via intravascular or surface control methods, with or without sedation or neuromuscular blockade, followed by rewarming actively or passively at 0.25-0.5 degrees per hour over 8-12 hours to 37 degrees) investigators will wait 24 hours after rewarming prior to testing. End point is to evaluate if pharmacological reversal agents would result in improved GCS scores or return of cerebral or brainstem functions in some comatose subjects, which will be considered a positive test result.

02

Conditions studied

  • Brain Death
  • Anoxic Brain Injury
  • Cardiac Arrest
  • Sedative Intoxication
  • Narcotic Intoxication

Keywords

  • brain
  • death
  • sedative
  • narcotic
03

In context

Brain Death

74 studies on the registry are indexed under Brain Death; 10 are open to participants now.

Browse Brain Death studies →

Lead sponsor

Prisma Health-Midlands is the lead sponsor of 11 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Adults with cardiac arrest who may have completed targeted temperature management (hypothermia protocol) and have had no neurological recovery after 24 hours of rewarming will be enrolled. Subjects will have a suspected diagnosis of anoxic brain injury secondary to cardiac arrest, and seizures ruled out with an EEG. All subjects are expected to be unable to consent and consent will be obtained from their legal authorized representative.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Spontaneous recovery of neurological functions, presence of seizures on EEG, individuals who are not yet adults, pregnant women and prisoners.
05

Study design

Phase
Early Phase 1
Primary purpose
Diagnostic
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
0 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Reversal drugs

    Flumazenil and naloxone

    Drug: Flumazenil · Drug: Naloxone

Interventions

  • 0.2 mg IV push, which may be repeated every 20 minutes for up to a total of 1 mg

    Also known as: Romazicon

  • 0.4 mg IV push, which may be repeated every 2 minutes for up to a total of 2 mg

    Also known as: Narcan, Evzio

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Improved GCS scores or return of cerebral or brainstem functions in comatosed subjects

    Subjects will be observed closely and tested before and after intervention for any signs of cerebral or brainstem function (1-Response to pain stimulus with earlobe pinching, trapezius squeezing and sternal rub or other brain-originating movements, e.g. seizures, decerebrate or decorticate posturing. 2-Pupillary light reflex with bright light. 3-Corneal reflexes with the use of cotton swab or tissue paper. 4-Gag reflex with a tongue depressor looking for bilateral palatal elevation. 5-Cough with tracheal suctioning at the carinal level) and GCS re-evaluated

    Time frame: Within 30 minutes post treatment

07

Study locations

1 site
  • PRISMA Health Midlands
    Columbia, South Carolina 29203, United States
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Varelas PN, Lewis A. Modern Approach to Brain Death. Semin Neurol. 2016 Dec;36(6):625-630. doi: 10.1055/s-0036-1592317. Epub 2016 Dec 1. PubMed 27907967 ↗
  • Wijdicks EF. Brain death guidelines explained. Semin Neurol. 2015 Apr;35(2):105-15. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1547532. Epub 2015 Apr 3. PubMed 25839719 ↗
  • Gardiner D, Shemie S, Manara A, Opdam H. International perspective on the diagnosis of death. Br J Anaesth. 2012 Jan;108 Suppl 1:i14-28. doi: 10.1093/bja/aer397. PubMed 22194427 ↗
  • Wijdicks EF. Brain death worldwide: accepted fact but no global consensus in diagnostic criteria. Neurology. 2002 Jan 8;58(1):20-5. doi: 10.1212/wnl.58.1.20. PubMed 11781400 ↗
  • Wijdicks EF. The diagnosis of brain death. N Engl J Med. 2001 Apr 19;344(16):1215-21. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200104193441606. No abstract available. PubMed 11309637 ↗
  • Wijdicks EF. Determining brain death in adults. Neurology. 1995 May;45(5):1003-11. doi: 10.1212/wnl.45.5.1003. No abstract available. PubMed 7746373 ↗
  • Wahlster S, Wijdicks EF, Patel PV, Greer DM, Hemphill JC 3rd, Carone M, Mateen FJ. Brain death declaration: Practices and perceptions worldwide. Neurology. 2015 May 5;84(18):1870-9. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000001540. Epub 2015 Apr 8. PubMed 25854866 ↗
  • Wijdicks EF, Varelas PN, Gronseth GS, Greer DM; American Academy of Neurology. Evidence-based guideline update: determining brain death in adults: report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology. 2010 Jun 8;74(23):1911-8. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181e242a8. PubMed 20530327 ↗
  • Greer DM, Varelas PN, Haque S, Wijdicks EF. Variability of brain death determination guidelines in leading US neurologic institutions. Neurology. 2008 Jan 22;70(4):284-9. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000296278.59487.c2. Epub 2007 Dec 12. PubMed 18077794 ↗
  • Shappell CN, Frank JI, Husari K, Sanchez M, Goldenberg F, Ardelt A. Practice variability in brain death determination: a call to action. Neurology. 2013 Dec 3;81(23):2009-14. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000436938.70528.4a. Epub 2013 Nov 6. PubMed 24198290 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Started Jan 2019 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Jul 2021, 30 months after the start.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Nov 8, 2018
First posted
Nov 16, 2018
StartActual
Jan 1, 2019
Primary completionEst.
Jul 20, 2021
CompletionActual
Jul 21, 2021
Last update
Oct 31, 2024
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 31, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03743805
Lead sponsor
Prisma Health-Midlands
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Nov 16, 2018
Start date
Jan 1, 2019
Primary completion
Jul 20, 2021 (estimated)
Completion
Jul 21, 2021
Last update
Oct 31, 2024

Study contacts

Sameh R Hanna, MD
principal investigator · Palmetto Health-University of South Carolina Medical Group

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is withdrawn, as verified in Oct 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drugs tested here: Flumazenil · Naloxone

Start the discussion