An interventional study of Laboratory-based gait retraining (LGR) and Sensor-based gait retraining (SGR) in Knee Osteoarthritis, sponsored by The Hong Kong Polytechnic University. Status unknown at 1 site in China. Open to participants aged 45 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-02-11.
Sponsored by The Hong Kong Polytechnic University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment
This study will establish a machine-learning algorithm to predict KAM using IMU sensors during stair ascent and descent; and then conduct a three-arm randomized controlled trial to compare the biomechanical and clinical difference between patients receiving a course of conventional laboratory-based stair retraining, sensor-based stair retraining, and walking exercise control (i.e., walking exercise without gait retraining). The investigators hypothesise that the wearable IMUs will accurately predict KAM during stair negotiation using machine-learning algorithm, with at least 80% measurement agreement with conventional calculation of KAM. The investigators also hypothesise that patients randomized to the laboratory-based and sensor-based stair retraining conditions would evidence similar (i.e., weak and non-significant differences) reduction in KAM (primary outcome) and an improvement of symptoms (secondary outcomes), but that these subjects would evidence larger reductions in KAM than subjects assigned to the walking exercise control condition.
Conventionally, gait retraining is necessarily implemented in a laboratory environment because evaluation of biomechanical markers, such as KAM, requires sophisticated motion capturing system and force plates. With advancement of wearable sensor technology, it is possible to measure gait biomechanics and provide real time biofeedback for gait retraining using inertial measurement unit (IMU), which is a lightweight and portable wireless device. In an ongoing government funded project, the investigators have developed IMU embedded footwear that measures KAM during level ground walking. The investigators have compared Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) regression and Random Forest in the prediction of KAM from IMU recordings. The investigators found that Random Forest could provide much higher KAM prediction accuracy than LASSO regression. The agreement between conventional laboratory-based and sensor-based measurement of KAM was approximately 90%. Based on investigators' previous research work, it is meaningful to extend the newly developed technology for KAM measurement during stair ascent and descent without the use of laboratory equipment. With the wearable sensors connected to the smartphones, gait retraining outside laboratory environment will become feasible but the effects of gait retraining using wearable sensors have not been directly verified.
Given these considerations, this project has two primary aims. The investigators will: (1) first establish a machine-learning algorithm to predict KAM using IMU sensors during stair ascent and descent; and then (2) conduct a three-arm randomized controlled trial to compare the biomechanical and clinical difference between patients receiving a course of conventional laboratory-based stair retraining, sensor-based stair retraining, and walking exercise control (i.e., walking exercise without gait retraining).
Primary hypothesis
Hypothesis 1: The wearable IMUs will accurately predict KAM during stair negotiation using machine-learning algorithm, with at least 80% measurement agreement with conventional calculation of KAM.
Hypothesis 2: Patients randomized to the laboratory-based and sensor-based stair retraining conditions would evidence similar (i.e., weak and non-significant differences) reduction in KAM (primary outcome) and an improvement of symptoms (secondary outcomes), but that these subjects would evidence larger reductions in KAM than subjects assigned to the walking exercise control condition.
4,398 studies on the registry are indexed under Osteoarthritis; 582 are open to participants now.
This study's planned enrollment of 57 is below the median of 70 across 3,440 interventional studies indexed under Osteoarthritis.
Browse Osteoarthritis studies →The Hong Kong Polytechnic University is the lead sponsor of 659 studies on the registry; 250 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion Criteria:
Subjects will attend 6 weekly sessions of stair ascent and descent exercise over six consecutive weeks. In each session, they walk at a self-selected speed on the instrumented staircase. The training time will be progressively increased from 15 to 30 minutes over the six sessions. The auditory feedback will be gradually removed in the last three sessions.
Behavioral: Laboratory-based gait retraining (LGR)
Subjects will receive training similar to LGR, except the KAM measurement is based solely on inputs from IMUs embedded in the shoes. The training schedule, duration, and intensity will be identical to those of the LGR group.
Behavioral: Sensor-based gait retraining (SGR)
Subjects will attend 6 weekly sessions of stair ascent and descent exercise over six consecutive weeks. In each session, they will walk on the same instrumented staircase at a self-selected pace without any guidance on gait modification. The training period and training time per session will be identical to the other two groups.
Behavioral: Walking exercise control (Ctrl)
Subjects in the LGR group will be encouraged to modify the gait pattern (e.g. adjusting foot progression angle, performing medial knee thrust, and/or lateral trunk lean) to lower their KAM to 80% of respective average baseline KAM obtained during normal unmodified gait. Real-time auditory feedback will be delivered using stereo speakers from both sides of the staircase. A middle C (261.6 Hz) tone and a high-pitched C (4186.0 Hz) of equal intensity will be generated at a footfall below and above the targeted 80% value, respectively. They will be advised to maintain their new gait pattern during their daily living after training.
Subjects in the SGR group will receive training similar to LGR, except the KAM measurement is based solely on inputs from IMUs embedded in the shoes. In addition, the auditory feedback will be delivered through a pair of earphones connected to a smartphone, which has been pre-installed with an app for KAM measurement. They will be advised to maintain their new gait pattern during their daily living after training.
Subjects in the Ctrl group will walk on the same instrumented staircase at a self-selected pace without any guidance on gait modification. The training period and training time per session will be identical to the other two groups. They will not be given any instructions for out-of-lab activities.
Change in knee adduction moment (KAM)
The surrogate marker of the medial compartment knee joint loading (i.e. KAM) will be measured by a 10-camera motion capture system (Vicon, Oxford Metrics Group, Oxford, UK) at 100 Hz and an instrumented staircase equipped with two force plates (Bertec, Columbus, OH, USA) at 1000Hz during stair ascent and descent at baseline assessment and after 6-week stair retraining.
Time frame: baseline and 7 weeks
Change in Chinese Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS)
The Chinese Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) will be used to assess knee pain, symptoms and physical function of the patients before and after stair retraining. This instrument contains 42 items addressing pain, symptoms, activities of daily living, sports and recreational function, and knee-related quality of life. The total score and sub-score for each domain (pain, symptoms, activities of daily living, sports/ recreational function, and knee-related quality of life) will be normalized from 0 to 100, with 100 indicating the worst possible state, 0 indicating no pain or loss of function.
Time frame: baseline and 7 weeks
Chnage in validated visual analogue scale (VAS)
The validated visual analogue scale (VAS) of 100 mm will be used to assess overall knee pain level after each stair negotiation session, with 0 mm at the left-most end of the 100 mm scale indicating"No pain at all" and 100 mm at the right-most end indicating"Worst imaginable pain".
Time frame: basleline, 1 week, 2 weeks, 3 weeks, 4 weeks, 5 weeks, 6 weeks and 7 weeks
Plan to share: No
This study is status unknown, as verified in Feb 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
The Hong Kong Polytechnic University