An interventional study of Cryobiopsy in Interstitial Lung Disease, sponsored by University Hospital, Essen. Status unknown at 1 site in Germany. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-11-02.
Sponsored by University Hospital, Essen · Not applicable, Interventional, and Diagnostic
Interstitial lung diseases (ILD) are a heterogeneous collection of more than 100 different pulmonary disorders. Surgical lung biopsie in combination with multidisciplinary discussion is recommend in combination to reach a consensus diagnosis when the initial clinical evaluation is inconclusive in the diagnosis of ILD. Cryobiopsy via bronchoscopy is approved for lung biopsies and allows harvesting of large tissue samples of excellent. This technique is not jet standardized. In this prospective randomised study the investigators want to evaluate the diagnostic yield comparing two different techniques of performing transbronchial cryobiopsy. In this study would be compared a shorter freezing time and more number of biopsies vs a longer freezing time and less number of biopsies.
Design:
The investigators design a prospective randomised multicenter study to assess the diagnostic value of cryobiopsy in patients with suspected Idiopathic Interstitial Pneumonia by comparing two different interventional methods.
Patients with suspected ILD in which the clinical, radiological and BAL-data are insufficient to establish a definitive clinical diagnosis, requiring then tissue specimen to determine a diagnosis would be included.
Therefore this all patients will undergo transbronchial cryobiopsy. If a definitive diagnosis even after cryobiopsy and MDD cannot be made, SLB will be recommended.
For the cryobiopsies the 1.9 mm cryoprobe and ERBECRYO®2 with carbon dioxide will be used. All transbronchial cryobiopsies have to be obtained of one or two lobes of the same lung and in at least two different segments. The bronchopulmonary segment for the cryobiopsy will be selected based on the radiological features shown on a high resolution computed tomography (HRCT) of the chest. The areas with exclusively fibrotic changes should be avoided. After having touched the pleura with the cryopobe, the probe is retracted one to two centimetres and then in this position the freezing process will be initiated. The flexible bronchoscope with the inserted cryoprobe will be removed through the rigid bronchoscope after the sample was obtained.
The cryobiopsies can be performed in rigid or flexible bronchoscopy. The use of a Fogarty occlusion balloon is left to the discretion of the bronchoscopist.
Experimental Groups:
Group nº1: A total of 3 samples with a freezing time of 7 seconds at least for the first biopsy and a freezing time from ≥5 seconds for the following biopsies.
Group nº 2: A total of 8 samples with a freezing time of 3 seconds at least for the first biopsy and a freezing time from \<5 seconds for the following biopsies.
Patient preselection:
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Bleeding risk:
Patient's recruitment:
The recruited patients who present all characteristics of the inclusion criteria and none of the exclusion criteria and who signed the inform consent undergo cryobiopsy. All patients undergo a clinical evaluation.
After the clinical evaluation a MDD will take place. In the first MDD a provisional clinical diagnose is proposed. If a transbronchial cryobiopsy is indicated by the MDD, patients are randomised to the groups 1 or 2 immediate before the bronchoscopy.
Once the histological result is achieved, another MDD including the pathologist for establishing the definitive clinical diagnose take place. As all local pathologists of the participating centres are experienced in ILD, the samples are evaluated by the respective pathologist. If case of uncertainty, the samples can be evaluated by a second pathologist in one of the participating centres.
3,303 studies on the registry are indexed under Lung Diseases; 355 are open to participants now.
This study's planned enrollment of 140 is above the median of 72 across 2,118 interventional studies indexed under Lung Diseases.
Browse Lung Diseases studies →University Hospital, Essen is the lead sponsor of 111 studies on the registry; 35 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion Criteria:
Bleeding risk:
Group nº1: A total of 3 samples with a freezing time of 7 seconds at least for the first biopsy and a freezing time from ≥5 seconds for the following biopsies.
Procedure: Cryobiopsy
Group nº 2: A total of 8 samples with a freezing time of 3 seconds at least for the first biopsy and a freezing time from \<5 seconds for the following biopsies.
Procedure: Cryobiopsy
In this study the investigators want to evaluate the diagnostic yield comparing 2 different techniques of performing cryobiopsy. A shorter freezing time and more number of biopsies vs a longer freezing time and less number of biopsies would be compared. Patients are randomised to the groups 1 or 2 immediate before the bronchoscopy. Group 1: a total of 3 samples with a freezing time of 7 seconds at least for the first biopsy and freezing time for 5 seconds or more for the followings biopsies Group 2: a total of 8 samples with a freezing time of 3 seconds at least for the first biopsy and freezing time for less than 5 seconds for the followings biopsies
Diagnostic yield
The investigator will assess the proportion of patients in which a definitive diagnosis is possible after Multi-Disciplinary Discussion
Time frame: 2 years
Complications
Number of pneumothorax, bleeding and acute exacerbation.
Time frame: 2 years
Number of diagnostic samples
Time frame: 2 years
Correlation between the suspected clinical diagnosis and the histological diagnosis
Time frame: 2 years
Correlation between between radiological pattern and final diagnosis
The investigator want to evaluate the patient rate in which the radiological pattern could be confirmed by histological finding
Time frame: 2 years
This study is status unknown, as verified in Oct 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
University Hospital, Essen