CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03702881Updated May 12, 2021

Anterior Open Bite Treatment With Bonded Spurs Associated With Build-ups Versus Conventional Bonded Spurs

An interventional study of Bonded Spurs associated with posterior build-ups and Conventional bonded spurs in Malocclusion and Open Bite, sponsored by University of Sao Paulo. Completed at 1 site in Brazil. Open to participants aged 7 Years to 11 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-05-12.

Sponsored by University of Sao Paulo · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
50
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
7 Years to 11 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study compares the dentoalveolar and skeletal effects of bonded spurs associated with build-ups versus conventional bonded spurs in the early treatment of anterior open bite patients. Half of participants will be treated with bonded spurs associated with build-ups, while the other half will be treated with conventional bonded spurs.

The null hypothesis to be tested is that there are no differences for the dentoalveolar and skeletal effects between the two protocols.

Read the detailed description

Anterior open bite is commonly related with lower anterior face height increase. Some early treatment protocols use appliances that control deleterious habits associated to appliances that produce control of the vertical dimension. Usually, these appliances (chincup, removable orthopedics) depend on patient's collaboration. Recently, the efficiency and stability of anterior open bite treatment with resin blocks bonded to the posterior teeth (build-ups) associated with fixed orthodontic appliances was described. They could be considered as a promissory alternative for vertical control during anterior open bite treatment. Then, it could be thought that the association of bonded spurs with posterior build-ups, instead of chincup, would produce vertical control during anterior open bite early treatment without the need of patient collaboration. Therefore, the aim of this study is to compare the dentoalveolar and skeletal effects of bonded spurs associated with build-ups versus conventional bonded spurs in the early treatment of anterior open bite patients.

For this, patients will be recruited at the Orthodontic Clinic of Bauru Dental School, University of São Paulo, Brazil. Fifty patients between 7 and 11 years old diagnosed with anterior open bite greater than 1 mm will be prospective and randomly allocated in one of the two study group. The experimental group will consist of 25 patients treated with bonded spurs associated with build-ups. Control group will consist of 25 patients treated with conventional bonded spurs.

Lateral radiographs and digital dental models will be obtained at the beginning (T1), 12 months after treatment (T2), and 24 months after treatment (T3). Dentoalveolar and skeletal variables will be evaluated from the lateral radiographs in the Dolphin® software. Dental casts will be analyzed with the Orthoanalyzer® software to evaluate dentoalveolar anterior vertical development, posterior teeth inclinations and arch dimensions. Superimposition of digital dental models will be performed to evaluate the relative three-dimensional dentoalveolar changes on the maxillary and mandibular arches. Discomfort, pain and quality of life will be evaluated using questionnaires.

After verifying the normal distribution, intergroup comparisons (T1 vs T2 and T1 vs T3) will be performed with t test and intragroup comparisons with dependent t test. Results will be considered statistically significant at P\<0.05.

The possible harms that could appear with these therapies are related to temporary tongue discomfort during the first days after the installation of the appliances. Patients and parents will be informed that is it normal. Although it has been reported that the discomfort is temporary and transitory and usually patients adapted to the treatment after 3-5 days, patients or parents will be able to stop the treatment at any moment.

02

Conditions studied

  • Malocclusion
  • Open Bite

Keywords

  • Open Bite
  • Orthodontic appliance
  • Cephalometry
  • Dental models
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
7 Years to 11 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients between 7 to 11 years old,
  • erupted permanent first permanent molars,
  • anterior open bite (AOB) greater than 1 mm,
  • maxillary and mandibular permanent central incisors fully erupted,
  • no or mild crowding,
  • without the need of maxillary expansion
  • Children in the first transitional period will be considered to be eligible for treatment when the maxillary lateral incisors are beginning to erupt and the maxillary central incisors still show an open bite

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • previous orthodontic treatment,
  • craniofacial anomalies or syndromes,
  • tooth agenesis,
  • loss of permanent teeth,
  • severe crowding,
  • maxillary constriction or posterior crossbite
04

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
50 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Bonded Spurs associated with posterior build-ups Group

    The experimental group will consist of 25 patients treated with bonded spurs associated with build-ups.

    Device: Bonded Spurs associated with posterior build-ups

  • Active comparator
    Conventional bonded spurs Group

    Active comparator group will consist of 25 patients treated with conventional bonded spurs

    Device: Conventional bonded spurs

Interventions

  • DeviceBonded Spurs associated with posterior build-ups

    Twenty-five patients will be treated with bonded spurs associated with posterior build-ups. The cervical portion of the palatal surfaces of the maxillary incisors and the incisal portion of the lingual surfaces of the mandibular incisors will be pumiced, rinsed, dried, and acid etched with 37% phosphoric acid. The etched surfaces will be subsequently rinsed and carefully dried. Then, the spurs will be bonded using Transbond primer/adhesive. The positions for the spurs will be chose to prevent possible future occlusal interferences The spurs will be sharpened with a carborundum disk before bonding. In addition, posterior build-ups (resin blocks) will be cemented on the functional cusps of all maxillary posterior teeth. The treatment time will be 12 months. After this time, the posterior build ups will be removed and the bonded spurs will be maintained for 12 months more, as active retention.

  • DeviceConventional bonded spurs

    Twenty-five patients will be treated only with bonded spurs. The bonding of the spurs will follow the same protocol described for the experimental group. The treatment time will be 12 months. After this time, the bonded spurs will be maintained for 12 months more, as active retention.

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Overbite (mm)

    Time frame: 12 months

  2. Gonial angle (º)

    Time frame: 12 months

  3. Mandibular plane angle (º)

    Time frame: 12 months

  4. Maxillary and mandibular molar vertical development (mm)

    Time frame: 12 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Overbite (mm)

    Time frame: 24 months

  2. Gonial angle (º)

    Time frame: 24 months

  3. Mandibular plane angle (º)

    Time frame: 24 months

  4. Maxillary and mandibular molar vertical development (mm)

    Time frame: 24 months

  5. Maxillary and mandibular position (º)

    Time frame: 12 months

  6. Maxillary and mandibular position (º)

    Time frame: 24 months

  7. Maxillary and mandibular length (mm)

    Time frame: 12 months

  8. Maxillary and mandibular length (mm)

    Time frame: 24 months

  9. Mandibular ramus height (mm)

    Time frame: 12 months

  10. Mandibular ramus height (mm)

    Time frame: 24 months

  11. Sagittal skeletal discrepancy (º)

    Time frame: 12 months

  12. Sagittal skeletal discrepancy (º)

    Time frame: 24 months

  13. Facial axis angle (º)

    Time frame: 12 months

  14. Facial axis angle (º)

    Time frame: 24 months

  15. Maxillomandibular divergence angle (º)

    Time frame: 12 months

  16. Maxillomandibular divergence angle (º)

    Time frame: 24 months

  17. Palatal plane inclination (º)

    Time frame: 12 months

  18. Palatal plane inclination (º)

    Time frame: 24 months

  19. Anterior face height (mm)

    Time frame: 12 months

  20. Anterior face height (mm)

    Time frame: 24 months

  21. Posterior face height (mm)

    Time frame: 12 months

  22. Posterior face height (mm)

    Time frame: 24 months

  23. Lower anterior face height (mm)

    Time frame: 12 months

  24. Lower anterior face height (mm)

    Time frame: 24 months

  25. Overjet (mm)

    Time frame: 12 months

  26. Overjet (mm)

    Time frame: 24 months

  27. Maxillary and mandibular incisors Inclination (º)

    Time frame: 12 months

  28. Maxillary and mandibular incisors Inclination (º)

    Time frame: 24 months

  29. Maxillary and mandibular incisors position (mm)

    Time frame: 12 months

  30. Maxillary and mandibular incisors position (mm)

    Time frame: 24 months

  31. Maxillary and mandibular incisors height (mm)

    Time frame: 12 months

  32. Maxillary and mandibular incisors height (mm)

    Time frame: 24 months

  33. Nasolabial angle (º)

    Time frame: 12 months

  34. Nasolabial angle (º)

    Time frame: 24 months

  35. Upper lip inclination (º)

    Time frame: 12 months

  36. Upper lip inclination (º)

    Time frame: 24 months

  37. Upper and lower lip position (mm)

    Time frame: 12 months

  38. Upper and lower lip position (mm)

    Time frame: 24 months

  39. Interlabial gap (mm)

    Time frame: 12 months

  40. Interlabial gap (mm)

    Time frame: 24 months

  41. Maxillary and mandibular anterior dentoalveolar vertical development (mm)

    Time frame: 12 months

  42. Maxillary and mandibular anterior dentoalveolar vertical development (mm)

    Time frame: 24 months

  43. Bucco-lingual inclinations of maxillary and mandibular permanent first molars (º)

    Time frame: 12 months

  44. Bucco-lingual inclinations of maxillary and mandibular permanent first molars (º)

    Time frame: 24 months

  45. Maxillary and mandibular inter-first permanent molar distances (mm)

    Time frame: 12 months

  46. Maxillary and mandibular inter-first permanent molar distances (mm)

    Time frame: 24 months

  47. Maxillary and mandibular inter-canine distances (mm)

    Time frame: 12 months

  48. Maxillary and mandibular inter-canine distances (mm)

    Time frame: 24 months

  49. Maxillary and mandibular arch perimeters (mm)

    Time frame: 12 months

  50. Maxillary and mandibular arch perimeters (mm)

    Time frame: 24 months

  51. Maxillary and mandibular arch lengths (mm)

    Time frame: 12 months

  52. Maxillary and mandibular arch lengths (mm)

    Time frame: 24 months

  53. Palatal depth (mm)

    Time frame: 12 months

  54. Palatal depth (mm)

    Time frame: 24 months

  55. Dentoalveolar displacements obtained from three-dimensional superimposition (mm)

    Time frame: 12 months

  56. Dentoalveolar displacements obtained from three-dimensional superimposition (mm)

    Time frame: 24 months

  57. Discomfort and pain intensity evaluated with questionnaires

    A 10-cm Visual Analog Scale will be used, where "0-cm" is the minimum score indicating nor discomfort or pain intensity and "10-cm" is the maximum score denoting the greatest discomfort or pain intensity.

    Time frame: 1 month

  58. Discomfort and pain intensity evaluated with questionnaires

    A 10-cm Visual Analog Scale will be used, where "0-cm" is the minimum score indicating nor discomfort or pain intensity and "10-cm" is the maximum score denoting the greatest discomfort or pain intensity.

    Time frame: 12 months

  59. Discomfort and pain intensity evaluated with questionnaires

    A 10-cm Visual Analog Scale will be used, where "0-cm" is the minimum score indicating nor discomfort or pain intensity and "10-cm" is the maximum score denoting the greatest discomfort or pain intensity.

    Time frame: 24 months

  60. Parent´s perception of children discomfort and pain intensity evaluated with questionnaires

    A 10-cm Visual Analog Scale will be used, where "0-cm" is the minimum score indicating nor discomfort or pain intensity and "10-cm" is the maximum score denoting the greatest discomfort or pain intensity.

    Time frame: 1 month

  61. Quality of life evaluation with questionnaires

    Oral health related-quality of life evaluation will be performed with the Child Perceptions Questionnaire (CPQ8-10). The questionnaire contains 25 items distributed in four domains: oral symptoms, functional limitations, emotional wellbeing and social wellbeing. The items assess the frequency of the events that occurs in the four weeks previous to the application of the questionnaire. A 5-point Likert scale is used with the options: Never (0), Once/twice (1), Sometimes (2), Often (3), and Every day/almost every day (4). The CPQ8-10 scores are obtained by summing all item scores. The total score ranges from "0" indicating no impact of oral condition on quality of life, to "100" indicating maximal impact of oral condition on quality of life.

    Time frame: 12 months

  62. Quality of life evaluation with questionnaires

    Oral health related-quality of life evaluation will be performed with the Child Perceptions Questionnaire (CPQ8-10). The questionnaire contains 25 items distributed in four domains: oral symptoms, functional limitations, emotional wellbeing and social wellbeing. The items assess the frequency of the events that occurs in the four weeks previous to the application of the questionnaire. A 5-point Likert scale is used with the options: Never (0), Once/twice (1), Sometimes (2), Often (3), and Every day/almost every day (4). The CPQ8-10 scores are obtained by summing all item scores. The total score ranges from "0" indicating no impact of oral condition on quality of life, to "100" indicating maximal impact of oral condition on quality of life.

    Time frame: 24 months

06

Study locations

1 site
  • Bauru Dental School, University of São Paulo
    Bauru, São Paulo 17012901, Brazil
07

References and documents

Publications

  • Aliaga-Del Castillo A, Janson G, Vilanova L, Cevidanes L, Yatabe M, Garib D, Arriola-Guillen LE, Miranda F, Massaro C, Bellini-Pereira SA, Ruellas AC. Three-dimensional dentoalveolar changes in open bite treatment in mixed dentition, spurs/posterior build-ups versus spurs alone: 1-year follow-up randomized clinical trial. Sci Rep. 2022 Jul 20;12(1):12378. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-15988-9. PubMed 35858941 ↗
  • Aliaga-Del Castillo A, Bellini-Pereira SA, Vilanova L, Miranda F, Massaro C, Arriola-Guillen LE, Garib D, Janson G. Dental arch changes after open bite treatment with spurs associated with posterior build-ups in the mixed dentition: A randomized clinical trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2021 Jun;159(6):714-723.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2020.11.036. Epub 2021 Mar 30. PubMed 33795189 ↗
  • Aliaga-Del Castillo A, Vilanova L, Miranda F, Arriola-Guillen LE, Garib D, Janson G. Dentoskeletal changes in open bite treatment using spurs and posterior build-ups: A randomized clinical trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2021 Jan;159(1):10-20. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2020.06.031. Epub 2020 Nov 18. PubMed 33221096 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

08

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03702881
Lead sponsor
University of Sao Paulo
Collaborators
Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior., Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo
Responsible party
Aron Aliaga-Del Castillo (DDS, MSc., PhD Student, University of Sao Paulo) — Principal investigator
First posted
Oct 11, 2018
Start date
Jun 9, 2017
Primary completion
Apr 15, 2019
Completion
Apr 15, 2020
Last update
May 12, 2021

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in May 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion