ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03692715APPEALUpdated Mar 28, 2025

Antibiotic Prophylaxis Before Shock Wave Lithotripsy

A Phase 4 interventional study of Ciprofloxacin and Placebo in Ureteral Stones, Ureteral Calculi and Nephrolithiasis, sponsored by Clinical Urology and Epidemiology Working Group. Completed at 10 sites in 9 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-03-28.

Sponsored by Clinical Urology and Epidemiology Working Group · Phase 4, Interventional, and Prevention

Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
1,732
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This is a two arm, double blind RCT comparing the use of a single dose ciprofloxacin prior to SWL to saline alone. The multicenter trial will be conducted with a pragmatic emphasis including both high volume and low volume sites internationally.

Read the detailed description

This is a two arm, double blind randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparing the use of a single dose ciprofloxacin prior to shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) to placebo. The multicenter trial will be conducted with a pragmatic emphasis including both high volume and low volume sites internationally.

Eligibility criteria include patients older than 18 years presenting for SWL who do not meet one of the pre-defined exclusion criteria (outlined below).

Eligible patients will provide written informed consent. Patients will undergo central randomization, which will be accessed by phone or internet. Un-blinding will occur only once statistical analysis is complete.

Patients will undergo SWL using standard procedures at the participating center. Participants will asked to provide a pre-procedure study questionnaire, a modified International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) questionnaire and a urine sample for analysis prior to SWL and follow-up. Follow-up questionnaires and a requisition for urine culture will be provided in a pre-stamped, self-addressed envelope along with instructions to return both culture and questionnaires to their participating center at 7-14 days post-SWL. If the follow-up questionnaire has not been received by post-operative day 10 patients will receive a reminder phone call. A second envelope will be sent containing a requisition for urine culture and follow-up questionnaire when necessary.

Alternatively, if a 2 week follow-up is conducted at the participating site then data-forms can be completed and collected at that time. In the event that a urine culture was not submitted 7 days post-operatively, one can be collected up to 14 days post-op. Additional clinical parameters such as presence of double J, stone characteristics and renal insufficiency will be recorded at the time of SWL by the dedicated research staff at the participating center. Data acquisition and occurrence of outcomes will be monitored continuously with scheduled audits.

Primary and secondary outcomes are outlined below.

The power calculation for this protocol was performed using Stata v.10.1 (StataCorp, College Station, TX). The investigators used the American Urological Association Best Practice Statement on antibiotic prophylaxis to estimate a 60% relative risk reduction with treatment arm. Therefore to achieve a power of 90% with a significance level of p\<0.05, 661 patients will need to be recruited in each arm for a total of 1,322 patients. Accounting for 10% loss to follow-up, the total required will be 1454, or approximately 1500 patients. Assuming that 25% of patients screened will either refuse to be randomized or will meet one of the pre-defined exclusion criteria, a minimum of 2000 patients will need to be screened in order to randomize 1500 patients.

02

Conditions studied

  • Ureteral Stones
  • Ureteral Calculi
  • Nephrolithiasis

Keywords

  • ureteral stones; ureteral calculi; shockwave lithotripsy
03

In context

Ureteral Calculi

50 studies on the registry are indexed under Ureteral Calculi; 14 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 1,732 is above the median of 100 across 42 interventional studies indexed under Ureteral Calculi.

Browse Ureteral Calculi studies →

Lead sponsor

Clinical Urology and Epidemiology Working Group is the lead sponsor of 4 studies on the registry; 2 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

Patients older than 18 years presenting for SWL who do not meet one of the pre-defined exclusion criteria.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pre-SWL urine analysis positive for nitrites
  • Pre-SWL urine culture reveals >10e5 Colony Forming Unit/ml of bacteria (positive urine culture)
  • Taking antibiotics for Urinary Tract Infection (UTI) or other cause
  • Suspected struvite stone (based on previous stone analysis, or partial staghorn)
  • Presence of nephrostomy tube
  • Requiring cystoscopy and ureteral stent insertion on the day of SWL
  • Presence of Foley catheter or patient on regular clean intermittent catheterization (CIC)
  • Presence of urinary diversion (ie: ileal conduit)
  • History of urosepsis prior to SWL
  • Known allergic reaction to trial antibiotic
  • Previous randomization in this trial
  • In the opinion of the independent treating urologist, it is not in the patient's best interest to participate
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
1,732 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    ciprofloxacin

    Single dose oral or intravenous ciprofloxacin prior to shockwave lithotripsy

    Drug: Ciprofloxacin

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo

    identical oral placebo if oral cipro was used, or intravenous saline alone in a blinded fashion if IV cipro was used prior to shockwave lithotripsy.

    Drug: Placebo

Interventions

  • Oral or intravenous ciprofloxacin prior to shockwave lithotripsy.

    Also known as: Cipro

  • DrugPlacebo

    identical oral placebo if oral cipro was used, or intravenous saline alone in a blinded fashion if IV cipro was used prior to shockwave lithotripsy.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Composite outcome including positive urine culture, symptoms of cystitis, pyelonephritis or urosepsis

    The composite outcome with be assessed as a dichotomous variable. The presence of Positive post-SWL urine culture (≥ 10e5 Colony Forming Unit/ ml), with either one or more of symptoms of cystitis (defined as new onset burning sensation or pain with voiding, frequency, urgency), or pyelonephritis or urosepsis (hospital admission with fever ≥38.5 C) will be considered as an event.

    Time frame: 7-14 days post-shockwave lithotripsy

Secondary outcomes

  1. Bacteriuria defined as ≥ 100000 Colony Forming Unit/ml

    Bacteriuria will be assessed as a dichotomous variable with presence of is ≥100000 Colony Forming Unit/ml will be considered as an event

    Time frame: 7-14 days post-shockwave lithotripsy

  2. Symptoms of cystitis defined as new onset burning sensation or pain with voiding, frequency, urgency

    Symptoms of cystitis will be considered as a dichotomous variable with new onset burning sensation or pain with voiding, frequency, urgency will be considered an event

    Time frame: 7-14 days post-shockwave lithotripsy

  3. Pyelonephritis or urosepsis defined as Hospital admission with fever ≥38.5 Celsius

    Pyelonephritis or urosepsis will be assessed as a dichotomous variable with Hospital admission with fever ≥38.5 Celsius will be considered as an event

    Time frame: 7-14 days post-shockwave lithotripsy

  4. Change in International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) total score (0-35, higher score indicates worse outcome)

    Change in total value of IPSS score will be assessed as a continuous variable with a range from 0-35 with higher scores indicating more severe symptoms. This score is calculated by summation of individual component scores (0-5) across 7 domains

    Time frame: 14 days post-shockwave lithotripsy

  5. Individual components of International Prostate Symptom Score (0-7 per domain, with higher score indicating worse outcome)

    Individual IPSS domains will be assessed as continuous variables and include incomplete emptying, frequency, intermittency, urgency, weak stream, straining and nocturia. Higher scores as considered as more severe symptoms

    Time frame: 14 days post-shockwave lithotripsy

  6. Pain scale determined on a range of 0-5 with higher score indicating worse outcome

    Pain scale will be assessed as a continuous variable. The scale will be elicited by asking In the past week, how often have you had burning or discomfort with urination? Higher score is considered as more severe symptoms

    Time frame: 14 days post-shockwave lithotripsy

07

Study locations

10 sites
  • Hospital Sao Luiz
    São Paulo, 05605-050, Brazil
  • Western University Hospital
    London, Ontario N6C 2V5, Canada
  • University of Sherbrooke
    Sherbrooke, Quebec J1H 5H3, Canada
  • Helsinki University Hospital
    Helsinki, 00029, Finland
  • Universitas Indonesia - Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital
    Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Tabriz University of Medical Science
    Tabriz, Iran, Islamic Republic of
  • Tallaght University Hospital
    Dublin, Ireland
  • St Petersburg State Pavlov Medical University
    Saint Petersburg, Russian Federation
  • King Abdulaziz University
    Jeddah, 22252, Saudi Arabia
  • Department of Urology, University Hospital Basel
    Basel, Switzerland
08

References and documents

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 28, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03692715
Lead sponsor
Clinical Urology and Epidemiology Working Group
Collaborators
University of Helsinki, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Western University, Canada, Centre de recherche du Centre hospitalier universitaire de Sherbrooke, King Abdulaziz University, Hospital Sao Luiz, St. Petersburg State Pavlov Medical University, University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland, Tallaght University Hospital, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Dr Cipto Mangunkusumo General Hospital
Responsible party
Kari Tikkinen (Professor of Urology, Clinical Urology and Epidemiology Working Group) — Principal investigator
First posted
Oct 2, 2018
Start date
Sep 27, 2018
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2024
Completion
Dec 31, 2024
Last update
Mar 28, 2025

Study contacts

Kari AO Tikkinen, MD PhD
principal investigator · University of Helsinki
Philippe D Violette, MD CM
principal investigator · McMaster University

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Ciprofloxacin

Start the discussion