ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07310797Updated Oct 1, 2026

Comparison of Mirabegron and Tamsulosin for Ureteral Stone Expulsion

A Phase 4 interventional study of Mirabegron and Tamsulosin in Ureteral Calculi, sponsored by Taipei Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation. Recruiting at 1 site in Taiwan. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 75 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-01.

Sponsored by Taipei Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Feb 2026; still recruiting 8 months later.
Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
500
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 75 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This randomized controlled trial compares the efficacy and safety of four treatment strategies for ureteral stone expulsion: Mirabegron alone, Tamsulosin alone, a combination of both, and standard conservative care. Participants diagnosed with ureteral stones will be randomly assigned to one of these four groups. The primary objective is to evaluate the stone expulsion rate within 4 weeks. The study also assesses time to expulsion, pain intensity, analgesic use, and potential side effects.

Read the detailed description

This study aims to compare the efficacy of Mirabegron, Tamsulosin, their combination, and standard conservative management in facilitating ureteral stone expulsion, as well as to evaluate their impact on clinical symptoms.

The primary objective is to analyze the differences in the stone expulsion rate within four weeks among four treatment groups:

Group A: Mirabegron 50 mg daily.

Group B: Tamsulosin 0.4 mg daily.

Group C: Combination of Mirabegron 50 mg and Tamsulosin 0.4 mg daily.

Group D: Standard of care (symptomatic control). For acute colic, Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs (NSAIDs) such as Ketorolac or Diclofenac are the first-line treatment. If patients have allergies or contraindications to NSAIDs, alternative analgesics such as Tramadol or Acetaminophen will be administered.

Secondary objectives include comparing the time to stone expulsion, changes in pain intensity (assessed by Visual Analog Scale), consumption of analgesic medication, and the impact of different treatments on patient fatigue (assessed by the Fatigue Symptom Inventory, FSI).

Additionally, the study will collect and analyze adverse events occurring during the treatment period, such as palpitations, blood pressure changes, and headaches, to evaluate the safety of each intervention. The results are expected to provide comprehensive options for Medical Expulsive Therapy (MET), offering alternative non-invasive strategies for patients intolerant to traditional alpha-blockers.

02

Conditions studied

  • Ureteral Calculi

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Mirabegron
  • Tamsulosin
  • Medical Expulsive Therapy
03

In context

Ureteral Calculi

50 studies on the registry are indexed under Ureteral Calculi; 14 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 500 is above the median of 100 across 42 interventional studies indexed under Ureteral Calculi.

Browse Ureteral Calculi studies →

Lead sponsor

Taipei Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation is the lead sponsor of 58 studies on the registry; 14 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 75 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Age and Sex: Adult patients aged 18 to 75 years, inclusive of both males and females.
  2. Diagnosis: Unilateral ureteral stone confirmed by Computed Tomography (CT), Renal Sonography, or Kidney-Ureter-Bladder (KUB) radiography.
  3. Stone Characteristics: Stone size between 4 mm and 10 mm; located in the upper (proximal), middle, or lower (distal) ureter.
  4. Symptoms and Renal Function: Presence of renal colic or hematuria, with no severe renal insufficiency ( > 60 mL/min/1.73m²).

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Urinary tract infection (UTI).
  2. Multiple or bilateral ureteral stones.
  3. Ureteral stones not visible on KUB radiography (radiolucent stones).
  4. Pregnant or lactating women.
  5. Severe hydronephrosis.
  6. Renal insufficiency (defined as \< 30 mL/min/1.73m² or Serum Creatinine > 2 mg/dL).
  7. Uncontrolled hypertension or major cardiovascular disease.
  8. Patients who refuse Medical Expulsive Therapy (MET).
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

GFR and eGFR (kidney filtering)

GFR (glomerular filtration rate) is how much blood the kidneys filter each minute. It is usually estimated from a blood test — eGFR, by formulas such as CKD-EPI or MDRD — and some studies ask for it to be measured directly instead. Usually given in mL/min/1.73 m².

Check the method, the units and the minimum the study states. A value of 90 or above is in the normal-or-high range, but kidney damage can show in other tests too.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
500 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Group A: Mirabegron

    Patients receive Mirabegron 50 mg daily.

    Drug: Mirabegron

  • Active comparator
    Group B: Tamsulosin

    Patients receive Tamsulosin 0.4 mg daily.

    Drug: Tamsulosin

  • Experimental
    Group C: Combination

    Patients receive Mirabegron 50mg and Tamsulosin 0.4mg daily.

    Drug: Mirabegron · Drug: Tamsulosin

  • No intervention
    Group D: Standard of Care

    Patients receive standard conservative management (symptomatic control with NSAIDs/analgesics on demand).

Interventions

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Stone Expulsion Rate

    The proportion of participants with complete stone expulsion confirmed by KUB or CT scan. Successful expulsion is defined as the absence of stone fragments or the presence of clinically insignificant fragments.

    Time frame: Up to 4 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Time to Stone Expulsion

    The number of days from randomization to the confirmation of complete stone expulsion.

    Time frame: Up to 4 weeks

  2. Change in Pain Intensity

    Assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain).

    Time frame: Baseline and up to 4 weeks

  3. Total Analgesic Consumption

    The total amount of analgesic medication (e.g., NSAIDs, Tramadol, Acetaminophen) consumed by the participant to control pain.

    Time frame: Up to 4 weeks

  4. Change in Fatigue Symptoms

    Assessed using the Fatigue Symptom Inventory (FSI) to measure the intensity and interference of fatigue.

    Time frame: Baseline and up to 4 weeks

  5. Incidence of Adverse Events

    Number of participants with treatment-related adverse events, such as palpitations, hypotension, dizziness, and headache.

    Time frame: Up to 4 weeks

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Individual participant data will not be shared to protect patient confidentiality. All relevant data will be reported in the final study publication in aggregate form.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Started Feb 2026 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Dec 2029, 46 months after the start.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Dec 16, 2025
First posted
Dec 30, 2025
StartActual
Feb 13, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Dec 31, 2029
CompletionEst.
Dec 31, 2030
Last update
Oct 1, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Minor edits
Nothing that changes what the study is or who can join. Edited: verification date
1 update, last Oct 1, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Oct 1, 2026
    Minor edits only
    + 1 other change: verification date

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07310797
Lead sponsor
Taipei Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation
Responsible party
Shu-Yu Wu (Attending Physician, Taipei Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation) — Principal investigator
First posted
Dec 30, 2025
Start date
Feb 13, 2026
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2029 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 31, 2030 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 1, 2026

Study contacts

Shu-Yu Wu, Doctor of Medicine
Contact
nobookrain2014@gmail.com
+886-2-6628-9779 ext. 60146
Shu-Yu Wu, MD
principal investigator · Taichung Tzu Chi Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drugs tested here: Mirabegron · Tamsulosin

Start the discussion