CClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT03689231VOLUNETUpdated Sep 28, 2018

Volumetric Imaging Follow up of Patients With Liver Metastases of Small Intestinal Neuroendocrine Tumors (NETs).

An observational study in Neuroendocrine Tumors and Liver Metastases, sponsored by Hospices Civils de Lyon. Status unknown at 1 site in France. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2018-09-28.

Sponsored by Hospices Civils de Lyon · Observational

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Sep 2018), so the status shown — last known as Active, not recruiting — may be out of date.
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
80
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

More than 50% of intestinal NETs are metastatic at the time of diagnosis, the liver being the main affected organ in 50-90% of cases.

Initial liver tumor burden and slope of the tumor growth rate are two major prognostic factors in patients with intestinal NETs, followed by tumor grade at pathology. They are used in routine practice by oncologists to adapt patient treatment.

Unlike other tumors, most NETs metastases are slow-growing tumors. Previous studies have shown that approximately half of the patients diagnosed with liver metastases showed no progression over a period of 3 to 6 months.

The aim of this non randomised retrospective cohort study is to investigate whether the volumetric monitoring of the total tumor burden compared to the RECIST 1.1 criteria (used in routine practice by radiologists) at baseline and early follow-up (3 to 6 months) is more suitable for NETs, making possible to predict the prognosis at the onset of the disease, and also allowing a better adaptation of the treatment.

The secondary objectives are to evaluate if the initial volume of the liver tumor is a prognostic factor of time to progression, to correlate the initial liver tumor volume and the number of liver lesions to the blood concentration of Chromogranin A (CgA), the presence of extra-abdominal disease and to correlate the tumor growth rate (TGR) and KI 67 (%) at base-line.

02

Conditions studied

  • Neuroendocrine Tumors
  • Liver Metastases
03

In context

Neoplasm Metastasis

3,517 studies on the registry are indexed under Neoplasm Metastasis; 885 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 80 is below the median of 121 across 594 observational studies indexed under Neoplasm Metastasis.

Browse Neoplasm Metastasis studies →

Lead sponsor

Hospices Civils de Lyon is the lead sponsor of 1,826 studies on the registry; 439 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Patients over 18 years old, with intestinal well differentiated intestinal neuroendocrine tumor and with at least one liver metastasis, without any invasive or systemic treatment for liver metastasis (Somatostatin analogues only allowed).

Inclusion criteria

  • Well differentiated intestinal neuroendocrine tumor with at least one liver metastasis
  • The liver metastasis must be visible and measurable on CT scans or MRI
  • Patients monitored without invasive liver treatment : surgery, RF ablation / Trans-arterial chemoembolization
  • Patients monitored without systemic treatment such as: Chemotherapy, Everolimus, Sunitinib (Somatostatin analogues allowed)
  • Surgery of the primary tumor allowed

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Other type of NETs
  • Absence of liver metastases
  • Liver metastases not visible on CT scans/MRI, poorly limited lesions and small target lesions ( less than 10mm) that are difficult to measure
  • Lesions visible only on diffusion-weighted imaging -MRI acquisitions, thus presenting poorly limited contours
  • Invasive liver treatment : surgery, Radio frequency / Trans-arterial chemoembolization
  • Systemic treatments: Chemotherapy / Everolimus / Sunitinib
  • Insufficient follow-up data
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
80 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Interventions

  • OtherVolumetric measurements of liver metastases

    Depending on the available data and to be reproducible, patients will be divided into 2 sub-groups of follow-up imaging: CT only or MRI only, combined evaluation being not reliable for tumor detection Patient follow-up at CT or MRI will be analyzed at baseline (date of discovery of hepatic metastatic disease), then 3-6 months after the start of the study, then annually. At each assessment, a radiologist will analyze: the total volume of liver metastases (mm3), the estimated volume of the two target lesions chosen for RECIST follow-up (mm3), the number of liver lesions, and the evolution according to the RECIST criteria based on uni-dimensional measurements. We will then correlate the following clinical data collected for patients: age, sex, presence of a carcinoid syndrome, Ki67 (%) and chromogranin A blood level (%) at diagnosis, number and location of other metastases, Octreoscan or Stereotactic Radio Surgery data if available.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Could the evolution of the initial liver tumor volume (on two follow-up CT scans / MRI over a period of 3 to 6 months) be predictive of progression-free survival according to the RECIST criteria?

    To assess if the evolution of the initial liver tumor volume compared to a follow-up CT scans / MRI over a period of 3 to 6 months is predictive of progression-free survival according to the RECIST criteria

    Time frame: 6 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Could the evolution of the initial liver tumor volume (on two follow-up CT scans / MRI over a period of 3 to 6 months) be predictive of progression-free survival according to the RECIST criteria?

    To evaluate whether the initial volume of the liver tumor is a prognostic factor of time to progression

    Time frame: 6 months

  2. Could the evolution of the initial liver tumor volume (on two follow-up CT scans / MRI over a period of 3 to 6 months) be predictive of progression-free survival according to the RECIST criteria?

    To determine the tumor growth rate

    Time frame: 6 months

  3. Could the evolution of the initial liver tumor volume (on two follow-up CT scans / MRI over a period of 3 to 6 months) be predictive of progression-free survival according to the RECIST criteria?

    To estimate the evolution of tumor volume as a function of time that may anticipate earlier than RECIST the tumor growth

    Time frame: 6 months

  4. Could the evolution of the initial liver tumor volume (on two follow-up CT scans / MRI over a period of 3 to 6 months) be predictive of progression-free survival according to the RECIST criteria?

    To correlate the initial liver tumor volume and the number of liver lesions to the blood concentration of Chromogranin A (CgA) and the presence of extra-abdominal disease.

    Time frame: 6 months

  5. Could the evolution of the initial liver tumor volume (on two follow-up CT scans / MRI over a period of 3 to 6 months) be predictive of progression-free survival according to the RECIST criteria?

    To correlate the tumor growth rate (TGR) and KI 67 (%) at base-line (on liver metastasis if available or on primary tumor)

    Time frame: 6 months

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Service de radiologie-Pavillon B-Cellule Recherche imagerie - Hôpital Edouard Herriot
    Lyon, 69003, France
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 28, 2018, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03689231
Lead sponsor
Hospices Civils de Lyon
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 28, 2018
Start date
Mar 1, 2018
Primary completion
Aug 30, 2018
Completion
Dec 30, 2018 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 28, 2018

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Sep 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion