CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03677063PANCADIPEUpdated Nov 28, 2023

Usefulness of Sterile Adhesive Dressing at the Exit-site of Peritoneal Dialysis Catheter

An interventional study of No dressing in Peritoneal Dialysis, sponsored by University Hospital, Caen. Completed at 1 site in France. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-11-28.

Sponsored by University Hospital, Caen · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
30
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Infection of peritoneal dialysis fluid is a major complication in patients treated with peritoneal dialysis (PD). The aim of catheter emergence care is to reduce bacterial contamination of the peritoneum. The recommendations of the International Society of Peritoneal Dialysis do not provide information on the frequency of care delivery or the usefulness of a sterile adhesive dressing. Thus each treatment center applies a protocol of its own. Dressing is common practice although its safety and interest are not demonstrated.

The usefulness of dressing is still to be demonstrated. On the other hand, the efficacy of the application in prevention of a cream of mupirocin at emergence on the reduction of the risk of infection with staphylococcus aureus (SA), the most frequent germ found in peritonitis, has been demonstrated. A Spanish study showed that during a peritoneal infection at SA the site most frequently colonized by a similar strain of SA was the emergence of the catheter.

It can be considered that an infection of the dialysis liquid in PD is not only related to the quality of emergency care but also to manipulations during exchanges.

Given the number of patients involved in PD in France, it is difficult to obtain sufficient power to formally demonstrate the non-inferiority of the absence of dressing.

Therefore, the investigators propose a descriptive, exploratory study of events that may occur in PD when a dressing is not applied. This is a step prior to performing a multicenter randomized comparative study that will aim to show the non-inferiority of the absence of dressing compared to the application of a dressing on the incidence of fluid infection. peritoneal dialysis.

02

Conditions studied

  • Peritoneal Dialysis

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • peritoneal dialysis
  • dressing
  • exit-site
  • catheter
  • infection
03

In context

Infertility

2,506 studies on the registry are indexed under Infertility; 407 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 30 is below the median of 120 across 1,698 interventional studies indexed under Infertility.

Browse Infertility studies →

Lead sponsor

University Hospital, Caen is the lead sponsor of 505 studies on the registry; 80 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • patient who has been informed and has given free and informed consent
  • patient affiliated to a social security scheme

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • inclusion of the patient in another biomedical research protocol that influences the risk of infection
  • burial of the catheter before the initiation of dialysis treatment second attempt at treatment with peritoneal dialysis following catheter removal and resection
  • patient under curatorq
  • pregnant woman
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
30 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • No intervention
    Dressing

    It is the historical cohort which is composed of patients over 18 years of age treated by peritoneal dialysis in the nephrology department of Universty Hospital of Caen Normandie. Patients with the same non-inclusion criteria as the experimental group will not be included. The data will be extracted from the Registry of Peritoneal Dialysis of French Language. The number of patients included from the register can not be fixed in advance; this number will correspond to the 4-year follow-up at the start date of the study to ensure at least two years of patient follow-up Usually care First dressing 5 or 10 days after the pose of the catheter : * Cleaning emergence with antiseptic soap * Rinsing with saline * Drying * Application of a hazelnut mupirocin on the exit-site * Application of an occlusive dressing on the exit-site Then, care is the same. Exit-site care is performed daily if the patient takes a shower or twice a week.

  • Experimental
    No dressing

    No application of sterile dressing at the exit-site of periotoneal dialysis catheter for all patients (30 days after the placement of the peritoneal dialysis catheter)

    Other: No dressing

Interventions

  • OtherNo dressing

    Then, care is the same and exit-site remains covered with an occlusive dressing to promote tunnel epithelialization and healing. The shower is forbidden during this period.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Infectious event

    Time until the occurrence of an infectious event: * Infection of Staphylococcus aureus peritoneal dialysis fluid (SA) within 24 months of follow-up * Infection of peritoneal dialysis fluid other than AS within 24 months of follow-up * Emergence infection during 24 months of follow-up * Peritonitis at SA and simultaneous presence of SA at emergence within 24 months of follow-up

    Time frame: 24 months

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Caen University Hospital
    Caen, 14033, France
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 28, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03677063
Lead sponsor
University Hospital, Caen
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 19, 2018
Start date
Jan 1, 2019
Primary completion
Jun 30, 2023
Completion
Aug 1, 2023
Last update
Nov 28, 2023

Study contacts

SONIA GUILLOUET, PhD's
principal investigator · University Hospital, Caen

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion