ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03670251MOVIDA-HepUpdated Apr 1, 2022

Evaluation of Hepatitis C Viral Load Quantification on DBS in Vietnam

An interventional study of Blood sampling in Hepatitis C and Dried Blood Spot, sponsored by Institut Pasteur. Completed at 2 sites in Vietnam. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-04-01.

Sponsored by Institut Pasteur · Not applicable, Interventional, and Diagnostic

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
315
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

In Vietnam, the prevalence of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is estimated between 0.4% and 5%, which is much higher than the prevalence in Europe or in the USA. After HCV diagnosis, HCV viral load quantification is crucial in order to distinguish recovered from active (on-going) HCV infection and hence identify those who need antiviral treatment to cure HCV infection. HCV viral load quantification is also important to assess treatment efficacy.

Currently, anti-HCV antibodies detection is available around the country. However, access to confirmation of HCV viremia remains scarce particularly in decentralized areas. One of the reason is the limited number of laboratories able to perform this complex biological measurement; moreover, these laboratories are situated only in large urban centres.

Blood sampling using DBS could help overcome this difficulty of access to a laboratory, and widen access to HCV viral load monitoring.

The present MOVIDA Hep study aims at validating the use of DBS to measure HCV viral load as compared to plasma (gold standard). A secondary objective is to evaluate the measurement of HCV core antigen on DBS. For this, 315 patients need to be enrolled form outpatient clinics in Hanoi. The laboratory in charge of these measurements would be the virology laboratory of the National Institute of Hygiene and Epidemiology (NIHE) in Hanoi (Vietnam).

Read the detailed description

The "Monitoring Of Viral load In Decentralised Area" (MOVIDA) project aims at giving access to viral load (VL) monitoring to the patients coming from remote areas using Dried Blood Spot as tool of sampling.

In resource-limited settings, many biological exams are not accessible to the entire population due to logistic and financial constraints. Regarding infection with hepatitis B and C viruses (HBV and HCV), serological screening tests are easy to perform and are available nationwide in either laboratory format or rapid diagnosis tests. However, hepatitis B DNA and C RNA assessment is not available in decentralised area as no laboratory is able to perform this complex biological measurement.

WHO, in their latest guidelines, recommends using dried blood spots (DBS) as an alternative to serum or plasma. Blood is easy to collect on DBS, either after veni- or capillary puncture. Capillary blood collection can be of great interest when venipuncture is complex, for example in injecting drug users (IDUs) in whom finding an accessible vein can be difficult. Then it is easily transferred, and at a low cost as it does not require a cold chain, to a laboratory able to perform the HCV VL quantification. As of today, little is known about the performance of standard commercial HCV diagnostic assays when using DBS and none of these studies were performed in routine setting in resource-limited setting.

In Vietnam, HCV seroprevalence in the general population is estimated between 0.4% and 5%, which is much higher than the prevalence in Europe or in the US. Genotype 1 is the more prevalent in Vietnam, genotype 6 that is only found in South East Asia is the second most frequent, but other genotypes are circulating . In Vietnam, HCV prevalence is much higher in the HIV-infected population and in injecting drug users (IDUs). Currently, anti-HCV antibodies detection is available around the country even if some difficulties remain. However, access to HCV HCV viral load measurement in routine remains scarce particularly in decentralized areas because the technique is complex, expensive and need well-trained personnel and high standard of equipment. Thus, HCV viral load measurement remains non accessible to the vast majority of patients diagnosed with HCV.

This study (MOVIDA Hep) aims at evaluating the quality of HCV VL monitoring when using DBS (collection of venous and capillary blood) as compared to plasma (gold standard), in routine condition and using the existing machines. This, to find out if DBS can be used for HCV viremia confirmation in Vietnam, in the virology laboratory of the National Institute of Hygiene and Epidemiology (NIHE) in Hanoi (Vietnam) where these measurements would be performed.

02

Conditions studied

  • Hepatitis C
  • Dried Blood Spot

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • HCV Viral Load, Dried Blood Spot, HCV Core Ag
03

In context

Hepatitis C

2,356 studies on the registry are indexed under Hepatitis C; 101 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 315 is above the median of 79 across 1,660 interventional studies indexed under Hepatitis C.

Browse Hepatitis C studies →

Lead sponsor

Institut Pasteur is the lead sponsor of 98 studies on the registry; 40 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • ≥18 years of age
  • Known HCV infection
  • Willing to participate to the study by giving his/her consent.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

None

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Diagnostic
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
315 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Other
    Blood sampling

    blood samples from venepuncture (10mL) and from fingertip (approximatively 0.4mL) on a dried blood spots

    Procedure: Blood sampling

Interventions

  • ProcedureBlood sampling

    Blood sample of 10 mL by venipuncture and 0,4 mL by finger prick

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Quantification of HCV RNA on DBS compared to plasma as gold standard

    Sensitivity and specificity of HCV RNA VL measured on DBS collected by venipuncture

    Time frame: Up to 4 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Quantification of HCV RNA measured on DBS using plasma as gold standard

    Sensitivity and specificity of HCV RNA VL measured on DBS collected by finger prick

    Time frame: Up to 4 weeks

  2. Correlation between HCV RNA VL measured on DBS and on plasma.

    Correlation between HCV RNA VL measured on DBS (collected by venipuncture and finger prick) and on plasma.

    Time frame: Up to 6 months

  3. Quantification of HCV core antigen using HCV RNA VL as gold standard

    Sensitivity and specificity of HCV core antigen using HCV RNA VL as gold standard

    Time frame: Up to 8 weeks

  4. Correlation between HCV core antigen and HCV RNA VL on plasma

    Correlation between HCV core antigen and HCV RNA VL, both measured on plasma.

    Time frame: Up to 6 months

  5. Quantification of HCV core antigen measured on DBS using HCV RNA VL measured on plasma as gold standard.

    Sensitivity and specificity of HCV core antigen measured on DBS collected by venipuncture using HCV RNA VL measured on plasma as gold standard.

    Time frame: Up to 8 weeks

  6. Correlation between HCV core antigen measured on DBS and HCV RNA VL measured on plasma.

    Correlation between HCV core antigen measured on DBS collected by venipuncture and HCV RNA VL measured on plasma.

    Time frame: Up to 6 months

07

Study locations

2 sites
  • Dong Da Hospital
    Hanoi, Vietnam
  • Nam Tu Liem Hospital
    Hanoi, Vietnam
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Taieb F, Tran Hong T, Ho HT, Nguyen Thanh B, Pham Phuong T, Viet Ta D, Le Thi Hong N, Ba Pham H, Nguyen LTH, Nguyen HT, Nguyen TT, Tuaillon E, Delaporte E, Le Thi H, Tran Thi Bich H, Nguyen TA, Madec Y. First field evaluation of the optimized CE marked Abbott protocol for HIV RNA testing on dried blood spot in a routine clinical setting in Vietnam. PLoS One. 2018 Feb 9;13(2):e0191920. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0191920. eCollection 2018. PubMed 29425216 ↗
  • Taieb F, Tram TH, Ho HT, Pham VA, Nguyen L, Pham BH, Tong LA, Tuaillon E, Delaporte E, Nguyen AT, Bui DD, Do N, Madec Y. Evaluation of Two Techniques for Viral Load Monitoring Using Dried Blood Spot in Routine Practice in Vietnam (French National Agency for AIDS and Hepatitis Research 12338). Open Forum Infect Dis. 2016 Jul 7;3(3):ofw142. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofw142. eCollection 2016 Sep. PubMed 27704001 ↗
  • Soulier A, Poiteau L, Rosa I, Hezode C, Roudot-Thoraval F, Pawlotsky JM, Chevaliez S. Dried Blood Spots: A Tool to Ensure Broad Access to Hepatitis C Screening, Diagnosis, and Treatment Monitoring. J Infect Dis. 2016 Apr 1;213(7):1087-95. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiv423. Epub 2015 Sep 2. PubMed 26333945 ↗
  • Tran TH, Nguyen BT, Nguyen TA, Pham TTP, Nguyen TTT, Mai HTB, Pham HB, Nguyen TM, Phan HTT, Do NT, Ait-Ahmed M, Taieb F, Madec Y. Dried blood spots perform well to identify patients with active HCV infection in Vietnam. J Viral Hepat. 2020 May;27(5):514-519. doi: 10.1111/jvh.13263. Epub 2020 Feb 11. PubMed 31981287 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from May 2019 to primary completion in Jul 2019, 2 months.

Of 166 interventional studies with no phase under Hepatitis C, half reached primary completion within 25 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 15 and three quarters within 42. This study's 2 months is below that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Sep 10, 2018
First posted
Sep 13, 2018
StartActual
May 9, 2019
Primary completionActual
Jul 11, 2019
CompletionActual
Jul 11, 2019
Last update
Apr 1, 2022
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 1, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03670251
Lead sponsor
Institut Pasteur
Collaborators
National Institute of Hygiene and Epidemiology, Vietnam, Hanoi University of Public Health
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 13, 2018
Start date
May 9, 2019
Primary completion
Jul 11, 2019
Completion
Jul 11, 2019
Last update
Apr 1, 2022

Study contacts

Fabien TAIEB, MD, PhD, MPH
principal investigator · Institut Pasteur
Tuan Anh NGUYEN, MD, PhD
principal investigator · National Institute of Hygiene and Epidemiology (NIHE)

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion