An observational study in Hearing Impaired (Partially), sponsored by Institut Pasteur. Not yet recruiting. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-07-01.
Sponsored by Institut Pasteur · Observational
This study aims to optimize music listening quality for 66 hearing aid users (33 musicians and 33 non-musician music enthusiasts) by developing a dedicated "Music Program" based on individual frequency preference profiles. We will evaluate the program's efficacy by comparing listening quality and emotional response scores against standard settings, while also investigating correlations with music reward sensitivity. We hypothesize that the customized program will yield significant improvements, with a more pronounced benefit observed in the musician group.
796 studies on the registry are indexed under Hearing Loss; 193 are open to participants now.
This study's planned enrollment of 66 is below the median of 100 across 192 observational studies indexed under Hearing Loss.
Browse Hearing Loss studies →Institut Pasteur is the lead sponsor of 99 studies on the registry; 41 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Hearing-impaired musicians or music enthusiasts who have been using hearing aids for at least 6 months.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
For all participants:
For musician participants:
For non-musician participants:
Exclusion Criteria:
Other: Musical listening quality preference test
Other: Musical listening quality preference test
Preference test to determine their Preferred Frequency Profile (PFP). The gain characteristics of the PFP will be added to the hearing aids' Main Program, thereby creating a dedicated Music Program.
Comparison of scores obtained using the Davies-Venn validated quality ranking questionnaire between the Main Program and the Music Program.
scale from 0 (bad listening quality) to 10 (best listening quality)
Time frame: for 4 months
Comparison of listening improvement scores on the Davies-Venn validated quality ranking questionnaire between hearing aid users categorized as "musicians" and "non-musicians."
scale from 0 (bad listening quality) to 10 (best listening quality)
Time frame: for 4 months
Comparison of Filtering Patterns (PFP) obtained during the preference test between Session 1 and Session 2 for the same musical excerpt.
Time frame: for 4 months
Comparison of Filtering Patterns across two musical excerpts of different styles.
Time frame: Day 2
Comparison of scores on the Davies-Venn validated quality ranking questionnaire between two musical excerpts of different styles.
scale from 0 (bad listening quality) to 10 (best listening quality)
Time frame: Day 2
Determination of a correlation between the improvement associated with the Music Program and Barcelona Music Reward Questionnaire (BMRQ) scores, analyzed separately for musicians and non-musicians.
Time frame: for 4 months
Comparison of emotional listening quality scores between the Main Program and the Music Program.
Time frame: for 4 months
No study locations are listed for this record.
Start is estimated for Sep 2026; primary completion for May 2028, 20 months later.
Of 98 observational studies under Hearing Loss, half reached primary completion within 42 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 15 and three quarters within 83. This study's planned 20 months is below that.
How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.
This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Jun 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.