CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03658642EMBEDUpdated Jun 28, 2022Results posted

Clinical Decision Support to Implement ED-initiated Buprenorphine for OUD

An interventional study of Clinical Decision Support (CDS) in Clinical Decision Support, Buprenorphine and Opioid-use Disorder, sponsored by Yale University. Completed at 22 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-06-28.

Sponsored by Yale University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
5,047
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Emergency Departments (EDs) frequently care for individuals with Opioid Use Disorder (OUD). Buprenorphine (BUP) is an effective treatment option for patients with OUD that can safely be initiated in the ED. At present, BUP is rarely initiated as a part of routine ED care. Clinical decision support (CDS) represents a potential approach to accelerate adoption of this best practice into routine emergency care. The goal of this trial is to determine whether implementation of a user-centered clinical decision support (CDS) system can increase adoption of initiation of BUP into the routine emergency care of individuals with OUD.

Read the detailed description

The study design is an 18-month pragmatic, parallel, cluster randomized, superiority trial using constrained randomization of clusters to arms. The unit of randomization (i.e. cluster) is the ED. EDs will be randomly allocated with an allocation ratio of 1:1. Adequate lead time will be allotted to install the intervention in the electronic health records (EHR) at all intervention sites--including a three month implementation and washout phase. The intervention will then begin at the same time across all sites with the CDS intervention fully implemented in the intervention sites' EHRs at the start of the trial. Clinicians at control sites will retain all control of their practice and practice as usual without the CDS intervention installed in their EHR.

Pragmatic trials study an intervention under the usual conditions in which it will be applied; as opposed to an explanatory trial which would test an intervention under ideal conditions. In cluster randomized trials, treatment intervention is allocated to clusters (i.e. groups of individuals) rather than individuals. This is done to manipulate the physical or social environment of the intervention when an individual intervention would likely result in contamination between intervention and control participants at the group level. The parallel cluster randomized design was chosen over a stepped wedge design due to the high likelihood of confounding by temporal trends from ongoing efforts to mitigate the opioid epidemic. A major challenge of the cluster randomized design is from potential confounding due to a limited number of heterogeneous groups. Constrained randomization offers a solution to this source of confounding by balancing key cluster-level prognostic factors across the study to avoid distorting estimates of treatment effect due to the confounding factors. This allocation technique more evenly distributes potential confounders between intervention arms by specifying the confounding factors, characterizing each cluster in terms of these factors, identifying a subset of randomization combinations of clusters that adequately balance confounding factors between intervention arms and randomly selecting one of these combinations as the allocation scheme. Potential confounders that will be used for this trial are: EHR vendor, ED annual volume, ED type (e.g., academic, community, urban, rural, etc), ratio of ED clinicians who have a waiver to prescribe BUP, current rate of ED BUP prescribing, resources in ED to facilitate management of patients with OUD, and willingness of staff to adopt the practice of ED-initiation of BUP.

Intervention:

The intervention for this study includes the user-centered CDS as well as education of ED clinicians practicing at all study sites.

The need for flexibility in the graphical user interface of the intervention resulted in the decision to develop the CDS as a web application. This provides the ability to access the tool both embedded within the EHR or directly over the Internet. The web application was developed as a single-page application (SPA) based on React JavaScript library. The CDS is a user-initiated, Substitutable Medical Applications and Reusable Technologies (SMART) on Fast Health Interoperability Resources (FHIR) application that streamlines a flow diagram of the clinical protocol for ED-initiated BUP.

The intervention's graphical user interface is an intuitive, simple layout presenting four care pathways in columns based on the patient's diagnosis of OUD, the severity of withdrawal, and readiness to start treatment. There is additional, optional decision support available for guidance to: 1) evaluate OUD severity based on diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM)-5 criteria, 2) assess withdrawal severity using the clinical opiate withdrawal scale (COWS) score, and 3) motivate patient willingness and readiness to initiate medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD) treatment with a brief motivational interview. These materials are also available to share with other members of the care team via a web address, text messaging, or Quick Response (QR) code. The interface also includes a toggle switch for the user based on whether or not they have a waiver to prescribe BUP. Clinicians without a waiver cannot prescribe BUP but can administer a one-time dose of BUP in the ED for up to 72-hours. When integrated into the local EHR system, launching a care pathway enables the user to: place orders, refer for ongoing MOUD treatment, and update clinical notes.

The educational plan will be site-specific and tailored to the usual care at that institution. It will be administered within three months of the study start date. The details of the plan will be developed in partnership with local champions who self-identify an interest in helping to implement an ED-initiated BUP protocol at their site. Specifically, the education plan will be required to include:

  1. A didactic on opioid use disorder, its diagnosis, assessment of withdrawal severity, and local resources for referral for ongoing MOUD treatment, 2)Circulation and posting in each study site ED of the flow diagram of the study's clinical protocol for ED-initiated BUP. Since this protocol is considered best practice, clinicians at control sites will retain all control of their practice and be encouraged to follow this protocol even though the CDS will not be available to them. 3) Intervention sites will include strategies to increase use of the intervention by training clinicians on how to launch and use the CDS. Use of the intervention will be tracked with site-specific audit and feedback that is consistent with typical quality improvement initiatives at that site.

Given the ongoing and escalating opioid epidemic and wide scope of this trial, the investigators anticipate that there may be concomitant interventions to stem OUD at study sites during the trial. The investigators plan to permit these interventions as long as they are: (1) implemented before randomization so that they can be tracked and accounted for in the constrained randomization process, and (2) they are not a health IT intervention targeted at clinicians to initiate BUP in the ED.

02

Conditions studied

  • Clinical Decision Support
  • Buprenorphine
  • Opioid-use Disorder

Keywords

  • Opioid Use Disorder
  • Buprenorphine
  • Opioid-use Disorder
  • Health IT
03

In context

Opioid-Related Disorders

1,411 studies on the registry are indexed under Opioid-Related Disorders; 290 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 5,047 is above the median of 63 across 1,123 interventional studies indexed under Opioid-Related Disorders.

Browse Opioid-Related Disorders studies →

Lead sponsor

Yale University is the lead sponsor of 1,724 studies on the registry; 298 are open to participants now.

Of its 210 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 126 (60%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Clinicians

  • All clinicians working in Emergency Departments in the selected sites

Patients

  • 18 years or older
  • Will meet an EHR-derived phenotype suggesting possible OUD will be included in the analysis
  • Will be discharged from the ED
  • Not pregnant
  • Not currently taking any medication for Opioid Use Disorder

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

Patients

  • Have a medical or psychiatric condition that requires hospitalization during the ED visit
  • Have prior enrollment in the current study
  • Currently in addiction treatment
  • Be a prisoner or in police custody at the time of ED visit

Note: The CDS will also be available for physicians to use when patients do not meet the EHR phenotype. These patients will be excluded from the primary analyses

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
5,047 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Clinical Decision Support for BUP

    The Clinical Decision Support (CDS) will be available for clinician use for Emergency Department (ED)-initiated buprenorphine/naloxone (BUP) with referral for ongoing medication assisted treatment (MAT) if: ED chief complaint or urine drug screen indicate opioid use. The clinician will then be prompted to complete DSM-5 checklist for OUD. If DSM-5 OUD Score\>5 and urine drug screen is positive for opioids, then the clinician is prompted to complete COWS scale. If COWS score \>12, then the clinician is prompted to order BUP. Regardless of COWS score, the clinician will be prompted to schedule an MAT appointment with BUP provider. The CDS will interface with outside MAT facilities so that making an appointment is easy and to capture data on whether an appointment has been scheduled.

    Behavioral: Clinical Decision Support (CDS)

  • No intervention
    Usual Care

    The CDS will not be activated and patients will receive care as usual.

Interventions

  • BehavioralClinical Decision Support (CDS)

    This clinical decision support tool will improve the clinician's ability to identify those with OUD, initiate BUP and refer the patient to ongoing Medication Assisted Treatment (MAT)

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Count of Initiating BUP in the ED With Referral for Ongoing MOUD With User-centered CDS Compared With Usual Care

    The primary outcome will be Buprenorphine (BUP) initiation in the Emergency Department (ED), defined as whether or not an eligible patient is administered BUP in the ED and/or prescribed BUP upon discharge from the ED. Although this is not a patient-centered outcome, it is a pragmatic and meaningful surrogate that will serve as a lead indicator of the CDS intervention's effect on engaging more OUD patients in treatment. Medications for Opioid Use Disorder (MOUD)

    Time frame: Upon discharge (Up to 1 day)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Count of Those With Referral to Follow-up for Ongoing MOUD Treatment (Patient Level)

    The count of enrolled patients who receive an Medication Assisted Therapy (MAT) appointment. Medications for Opioid Use Disorder (MOUD)

    Time frame: Upon discharge (Up to 1 day)

  2. Rates Receiving a MAT Appointment Who go to the Appointment

    Data will be collected in the aggregate for the percentage of patients that attended the referral MAT appointment

    Time frame: 18 months

  3. Number of Clinicians Providing ED-initiated BUP

    Number of clinicians providing ED-initiated BUP regardless of CDS

    Time frame: 18 months

  4. Number of Clinicians Providing Referral of Any Ongoing MOUD Treatment

    Number of clinicians that refer patients with OUD regardless of CDS

    Time frame: 18 months

  5. Number of Clinicians Who Have Received Drug Addiction Treatment Act (DATA) of 2000 Training

    Number of clinicians that obtained DATA waiver

    Time frame: 18 months

07

Results

Posted Jun 28, 2022

Participant flow

Physicians in the study were not "enrolled" but rather were found in the electronic health record data used in the study.

Patients
Participant flow — Patients
MilestoneClinical Decision Support for BUPUsual Care
Started27872260
Completed27872260
Not completed00
Physicians
Participant flow — Physicians
MilestoneClinical Decision Support for BUPUsual Care
Started340259
Completed340259
Not completed00

Outcome measures

PrimaryCount of Initiating BUP in the ED With Referral for Ongoing MOUD With User-centered CDS Compared With Usual Care

The primary outcome will be Buprenorphine (BUP) initiation in the Emergency Department (ED), defined as whether or not an eligible patient is administered BUP in the ED and/or prescribed BUP upon discharge from the ED. Although this is not a patient-centered outcome, it is a pragmatic and meaningful surrogate that will serve as a lead indicator of the CDS intervention's effect on engaging more OUD patients in treatment. Medications for Opioid Use Disorder (MOUD)

Time frame:
Upon discharge (Up to 1 day)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Count of Initiating BUP in the ED With Referral for Ongoing MOUD With User-centered CDS Compared With Usual Care
ParticipantsClinical Decision Support for BUPUsual Care
Count of Initiating BUP in the ED With Referral for Ongoing MOUD With User-centered CDS Compared With Usual Care347271
Statistical analysis
  • Clinical Decision Support for BUP vs Usual Care · GEE · p = 0.58 · Odds ratio (or): 1.22 · 95% CI 0.61 to 2.43Obtained from a GEE model accounting for clustering by site and multiple covariates.
SecondaryCount of Those With Referral to Follow-up for Ongoing MOUD Treatment (Patient Level)

The count of enrolled patients who receive an Medication Assisted Therapy (MAT) appointment. Medications for Opioid Use Disorder (MOUD)

Time frame:
Upon discharge (Up to 1 day)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Count of Those With Referral to Follow-up for Ongoing MOUD Treatment (Patient Level)
ParticipantsClinical Decision Support for BUPUsual Care
Count of Those With Referral to Follow-up for Ongoing MOUD Treatment (Patient Level)367226
Statistical analysis
  • Clinical Decision Support for BUP vs Usual Care · GEE · p = 0.95 · Odds ratio (or): 1.03 · 95% CI 0.43 to 2.47Obtained from a GEE model accounting for clustering by site.
SecondaryRates Receiving a MAT Appointment Who go to the Appointment

Data will be collected in the aggregate for the percentage of patients that attended the referral MAT appointment

Time frame:
18 months

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

SecondaryNumber of Clinicians Providing ED-initiated BUP

Number of clinicians providing ED-initiated BUP regardless of CDS

Time frame:
18 months
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Clinicians Providing ED-initiated BUP
ParticipantsClinical Decision Support for BUPUsual Care
Number of Clinicians Providing ED-initiated BUP15188
Statistical analysis
  • Clinical Decision Support for BUP vs Usual Care · GEE · p = 0.01 · Odds ratio (or): 1.55 · 95% CI 1.11 to 2.16Obtained from a GEE model accounting for clustering by site.
SecondaryNumber of Clinicians Providing Referral of Any Ongoing MOUD Treatment

Number of clinicians that refer patients with OUD regardless of CDS

Time frame:
18 months
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Clinicians Providing Referral of Any Ongoing MOUD Treatment
ParticipantsClinical Decision Support for BUPUsual Care
Number of Clinicians Providing Referral of Any Ongoing MOUD Treatment141100
Statistical analysis
  • Clinical Decision Support for BUP vs Usual Care · GEE · p = 0.48 · Odds ratio (or): 1.13 · 95% CI 0.91 to 1.57Obtained from a GEE model accounting for clustering by site.
SecondaryNumber of Clinicians Who Have Received Drug Addiction Treatment Act (DATA) of 2000 Training

Number of clinicians that obtained DATA waiver

Time frame:
18 months
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Clinicians Who Have Received Drug Addiction Treatment Act (DATA) of 2000 Training
ParticipantsClinical Decision Support for BUPUsual Care
Number of Clinicians Who Have Received Drug Addiction Treatment Act (DATA) of 2000 Training5030
Statistical analysis
  • Clinical Decision Support for BUP vs Usual Care · GEE · p = 0.27 · Odds ratio (or): 1.32 · 95% CI 0.81 to 2.14Obtained from a GEE model accounting for clustering by site.

Adverse events

Collected over 1 day. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Clinical Decision Support for BUP0/2,787 (0%)0/2,787 (0%)0/2,787 (0%)
Usual Care0/2,260 (0%)0/2,260 (0%)0/2,260 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

There were 5047 patients included in this study. The 599 physicians were not considered enrolled.

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Clinical Decision Support for BUPUsual CareTotal
<=18 years000
Between 18 and 65 years305203508
>=65 years9716
Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Clinical Decision Support for BUPUsual CareTotal
Median36 (29 to 48)36 (29 to 46)36 (29 to 47)
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Clinical Decision Support for BUPUsual CareTotal
Patients — Female9178131730
Patients — Male187014473317
Physician — Female10469173
Physician — Male210141351
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Clinical Decision Support for BUPUsual CareTotal
Hispanic or Latino505196701
Not Hispanic or Latino216619344100
Unknown or Not Reported116130246
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Clinical Decision Support for BUPUsual CareTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native000
Asian000
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander000
Black or African American452406858
White204815653613
More than one race196219415
Unknown or Not Reported9170161
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Clinical Decision Support for BUPUsual CareTotal
United States312725195646
08

Study locations

22 sites
  • UAB Medicine Highlands - Highlands ED, (HED)
    Birmingham, Alabama 35205, United States
  • UAB - University Hospital ED (UED)
    Birmingham, Alabama 35233, United States
  • UAB Freestanding Emergency Department of Gardendale (GED)
    Gardendale, Alabama 35071, United States
  • UCHealth Anschutz Medical Campus (AMC)
    Aurora, Colorado 80045, United States
  • UCHealth Memorial Hospital Central
    Colorado Springs, Colorado 80909, United States
  • UCHealth Memorial Hospital North (MHN)
    Colorado Springs, Colorado 80920, United States
  • UCHealth Poudre Valley Hospital (PVH)
    Fort Collins, Colorado 80524, United States
  • UCHealth Medical Center of the Rockies
    Loveland, Colorado 80538, United States
  • Bridgeport Hospital ED (BPT), YNHHS
    Bridgeport, Connecticut 06610, United States
  • Greenwich Hospital ED (GH), YNHHS
    Greenwich, Connecticut 06830, United States
  • St Raphael's Campus (SRC), YNHHS
    New Haven, Connecticut 06410, United States
  • Lawrence + Memorial Hospital ED (L&M), YNHHS
    New London, Connecticut 06320, United States
  • Baystate Franklin
    Greenfield, Massachusetts 01301, United States
  • Baystate Wing Hospital ED
    Palmer, Massachusetts 01069, United States
  • Baystate Springfield Hospital ED
    Springfield, Massachusetts 01199, United States
  • Baystate Mary Lane Hospital ED
    Ware, Massachusetts 01082, United States
  • Baystate Noble
    Westfield, Massachusetts 01085, United States
  • UNC Hospitals Emergency Department, UNCHS
    Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27514, United States
  • REX Healthcare Emergency Department, UNCHS
    Raleigh, North Carolina 27607, United States
  • Emergency Care Center at Nash General Hospital, UNCHS
    Rocky Mount, North Carolina 27804, United States
  • Chatham Hospital ED, UNCHS
    Siler City, North Carolina 27344, United States
  • Johnston Health ED, UNCHS
    Smithfield, North Carolina 27577, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Melnick ER, Nath B, Dziura JD, Casey MF, Jeffery MM, Paek H, Soares WE 3rd, Hoppe JA, Rajeevan H, Li F, Skains RM, Walter LA, Patel MD, Chari SV, Platts-Mills TF, Hess EP, D'Onofrio G. User centered clinical decision support to implement initiation of buprenorphine for opioid use disorder in the emergency department: EMBED pragmatic cluster randomized controlled trial. BMJ. 2022 Jun 27;377:e069271. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2021-069271. PubMed 35760423 ↗
  • Melnick ER, Nath B, Ahmed OM, Brandt C, Chartash D, Dziura JD, Hess EP, Holland WC, Hoppe JA, Jeffery MM, Katsovich L, Li F, Lu CC, Maciejewski K, Maleska M, Mao JA, Martel S, Michael S, Paek H, Patel MD, Platts-Mills TF, Rajeevan H, Ray JM, Skains RM, Soares WE 3rd, Deutsch A, Solad Y, D'Onofrio G. Progress Report on EMBED: A Pragmatic Trial of User-Centered Clinical Decision Support to Implement EMergency Department-Initiated BuprenorphinE for Opioid Use Disorder. J Psychiatr Brain Sci. 2020;5:e200003. doi: 10.20900/jpbs.20200003. Epub 2020 Feb 21. PubMed 32309637 ↗
  • Melnick ER, Jeffery MM, Dziura JD, Mao JA, Hess EP, Platts-Mills TF, Solad Y, Paek H, Martel S, Patel MD, Bankowski L, Lu C, Brandt C, D'Onofrio G. User-centred clinical decision support to implement emergency department-initiated buprenorphine for opioid use disorder: protocol for the pragmatic group randomised EMBED trial. BMJ Open. 2019 May 30;9(5):e028488. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028488. PubMed 31152039 ↗

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Aug 22, 2018

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 28, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03658642
Lead sponsor
Yale University
Collaborators
National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA), University of North Carolina, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Mayo Clinic, The Cooper Health System, University of California, Davis
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 5, 2018
Start date
Nov 15, 2019
Primary completion
May 14, 2021
Completion
Sep 15, 2021
Results posted
Jun 28, 2022
Last update
Jun 28, 2022

Study contacts

Edward Melnick, MD, MHS
principal investigator · Yale University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jun 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion