An interventional study of Clinical Decision Support (CDS) in Clinical Decision Support, Buprenorphine and Opioid-use Disorder, sponsored by Yale University. Completed at 22 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-06-28.
Sponsored by Yale University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment
Emergency Departments (EDs) frequently care for individuals with Opioid Use Disorder (OUD). Buprenorphine (BUP) is an effective treatment option for patients with OUD that can safely be initiated in the ED. At present, BUP is rarely initiated as a part of routine ED care. Clinical decision support (CDS) represents a potential approach to accelerate adoption of this best practice into routine emergency care. The goal of this trial is to determine whether implementation of a user-centered clinical decision support (CDS) system can increase adoption of initiation of BUP into the routine emergency care of individuals with OUD.
The study design is an 18-month pragmatic, parallel, cluster randomized, superiority trial using constrained randomization of clusters to arms. The unit of randomization (i.e. cluster) is the ED. EDs will be randomly allocated with an allocation ratio of 1:1. Adequate lead time will be allotted to install the intervention in the electronic health records (EHR) at all intervention sites--including a three month implementation and washout phase. The intervention will then begin at the same time across all sites with the CDS intervention fully implemented in the intervention sites' EHRs at the start of the trial. Clinicians at control sites will retain all control of their practice and practice as usual without the CDS intervention installed in their EHR.
Pragmatic trials study an intervention under the usual conditions in which it will be applied; as opposed to an explanatory trial which would test an intervention under ideal conditions. In cluster randomized trials, treatment intervention is allocated to clusters (i.e. groups of individuals) rather than individuals. This is done to manipulate the physical or social environment of the intervention when an individual intervention would likely result in contamination between intervention and control participants at the group level. The parallel cluster randomized design was chosen over a stepped wedge design due to the high likelihood of confounding by temporal trends from ongoing efforts to mitigate the opioid epidemic. A major challenge of the cluster randomized design is from potential confounding due to a limited number of heterogeneous groups. Constrained randomization offers a solution to this source of confounding by balancing key cluster-level prognostic factors across the study to avoid distorting estimates of treatment effect due to the confounding factors. This allocation technique more evenly distributes potential confounders between intervention arms by specifying the confounding factors, characterizing each cluster in terms of these factors, identifying a subset of randomization combinations of clusters that adequately balance confounding factors between intervention arms and randomly selecting one of these combinations as the allocation scheme. Potential confounders that will be used for this trial are: EHR vendor, ED annual volume, ED type (e.g., academic, community, urban, rural, etc), ratio of ED clinicians who have a waiver to prescribe BUP, current rate of ED BUP prescribing, resources in ED to facilitate management of patients with OUD, and willingness of staff to adopt the practice of ED-initiation of BUP.
Intervention:
The intervention for this study includes the user-centered CDS as well as education of ED clinicians practicing at all study sites.
The need for flexibility in the graphical user interface of the intervention resulted in the decision to develop the CDS as a web application. This provides the ability to access the tool both embedded within the EHR or directly over the Internet. The web application was developed as a single-page application (SPA) based on React JavaScript library. The CDS is a user-initiated, Substitutable Medical Applications and Reusable Technologies (SMART) on Fast Health Interoperability Resources (FHIR) application that streamlines a flow diagram of the clinical protocol for ED-initiated BUP.
The intervention's graphical user interface is an intuitive, simple layout presenting four care pathways in columns based on the patient's diagnosis of OUD, the severity of withdrawal, and readiness to start treatment. There is additional, optional decision support available for guidance to: 1) evaluate OUD severity based on diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM)-5 criteria, 2) assess withdrawal severity using the clinical opiate withdrawal scale (COWS) score, and 3) motivate patient willingness and readiness to initiate medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD) treatment with a brief motivational interview. These materials are also available to share with other members of the care team via a web address, text messaging, or Quick Response (QR) code. The interface also includes a toggle switch for the user based on whether or not they have a waiver to prescribe BUP. Clinicians without a waiver cannot prescribe BUP but can administer a one-time dose of BUP in the ED for up to 72-hours. When integrated into the local EHR system, launching a care pathway enables the user to: place orders, refer for ongoing MOUD treatment, and update clinical notes.
The educational plan will be site-specific and tailored to the usual care at that institution. It will be administered within three months of the study start date. The details of the plan will be developed in partnership with local champions who self-identify an interest in helping to implement an ED-initiated BUP protocol at their site. Specifically, the education plan will be required to include:
Given the ongoing and escalating opioid epidemic and wide scope of this trial, the investigators anticipate that there may be concomitant interventions to stem OUD at study sites during the trial. The investigators plan to permit these interventions as long as they are: (1) implemented before randomization so that they can be tracked and accounted for in the constrained randomization process, and (2) they are not a health IT intervention targeted at clinicians to initiate BUP in the ED.
1,411 studies on the registry are indexed under Opioid-Related Disorders; 290 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 5,047 is above the median of 63 across 1,123 interventional studies indexed under Opioid-Related Disorders.
Browse Opioid-Related Disorders studies →Yale University is the lead sponsor of 1,724 studies on the registry; 298 are open to participants now.
Of its 210 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 126 (60%) have results posted.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Clinicians
Patients
Exclusion Criteria:
Patients
Note: The CDS will also be available for physicians to use when patients do not meet the EHR phenotype. These patients will be excluded from the primary analyses
The Clinical Decision Support (CDS) will be available for clinician use for Emergency Department (ED)-initiated buprenorphine/naloxone (BUP) with referral for ongoing medication assisted treatment (MAT) if: ED chief complaint or urine drug screen indicate opioid use. The clinician will then be prompted to complete DSM-5 checklist for OUD. If DSM-5 OUD Score\>5 and urine drug screen is positive for opioids, then the clinician is prompted to complete COWS scale. If COWS score \>12, then the clinician is prompted to order BUP. Regardless of COWS score, the clinician will be prompted to schedule an MAT appointment with BUP provider. The CDS will interface with outside MAT facilities so that making an appointment is easy and to capture data on whether an appointment has been scheduled.
Behavioral: Clinical Decision Support (CDS)
The CDS will not be activated and patients will receive care as usual.
This clinical decision support tool will improve the clinician's ability to identify those with OUD, initiate BUP and refer the patient to ongoing Medication Assisted Treatment (MAT)
Count of Initiating BUP in the ED With Referral for Ongoing MOUD With User-centered CDS Compared With Usual Care
The primary outcome will be Buprenorphine (BUP) initiation in the Emergency Department (ED), defined as whether or not an eligible patient is administered BUP in the ED and/or prescribed BUP upon discharge from the ED. Although this is not a patient-centered outcome, it is a pragmatic and meaningful surrogate that will serve as a lead indicator of the CDS intervention's effect on engaging more OUD patients in treatment. Medications for Opioid Use Disorder (MOUD)
Time frame: Upon discharge (Up to 1 day)
Count of Those With Referral to Follow-up for Ongoing MOUD Treatment (Patient Level)
The count of enrolled patients who receive an Medication Assisted Therapy (MAT) appointment. Medications for Opioid Use Disorder (MOUD)
Time frame: Upon discharge (Up to 1 day)
Rates Receiving a MAT Appointment Who go to the Appointment
Data will be collected in the aggregate for the percentage of patients that attended the referral MAT appointment
Time frame: 18 months
Number of Clinicians Providing ED-initiated BUP
Number of clinicians providing ED-initiated BUP regardless of CDS
Time frame: 18 months
Number of Clinicians Providing Referral of Any Ongoing MOUD Treatment
Number of clinicians that refer patients with OUD regardless of CDS
Time frame: 18 months
Number of Clinicians Who Have Received Drug Addiction Treatment Act (DATA) of 2000 Training
Number of clinicians that obtained DATA waiver
Time frame: 18 months
Physicians in the study were not "enrolled" but rather were found in the electronic health record data used in the study.
| Milestone | Clinical Decision Support for BUP | Usual Care |
|---|---|---|
| Started | 2787 | 2260 |
| Completed | 2787 | 2260 |
| Not completed | 0 | 0 |
| Milestone | Clinical Decision Support for BUP | Usual Care |
|---|---|---|
| Started | 340 | 259 |
| Completed | 340 | 259 |
| Not completed | 0 | 0 |
The primary outcome will be Buprenorphine (BUP) initiation in the Emergency Department (ED), defined as whether or not an eligible patient is administered BUP in the ED and/or prescribed BUP upon discharge from the ED. Although this is not a patient-centered outcome, it is a pragmatic and meaningful surrogate that will serve as a lead indicator of the CDS intervention's effect on engaging more OUD patients in treatment. Medications for Opioid Use Disorder (MOUD)
| Participants | Clinical Decision Support for BUP | Usual Care |
|---|---|---|
| Count of Initiating BUP in the ED With Referral for Ongoing MOUD With User-centered CDS Compared With Usual Care | 347 | 271 |
The count of enrolled patients who receive an Medication Assisted Therapy (MAT) appointment. Medications for Opioid Use Disorder (MOUD)
| Participants | Clinical Decision Support for BUP | Usual Care |
|---|---|---|
| Count of Those With Referral to Follow-up for Ongoing MOUD Treatment (Patient Level) | 367 | 226 |
Data will be collected in the aggregate for the percentage of patients that attended the referral MAT appointment
No measurements were reported for this outcome.
Number of clinicians providing ED-initiated BUP regardless of CDS
| Participants | Clinical Decision Support for BUP | Usual Care |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Clinicians Providing ED-initiated BUP | 151 | 88 |
Number of clinicians that refer patients with OUD regardless of CDS
| Participants | Clinical Decision Support for BUP | Usual Care |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Clinicians Providing Referral of Any Ongoing MOUD Treatment | 141 | 100 |
Number of clinicians that obtained DATA waiver
| Participants | Clinical Decision Support for BUP | Usual Care |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Clinicians Who Have Received Drug Addiction Treatment Act (DATA) of 2000 Training | 50 | 30 |
Collected over 1 day. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.
| Group | Deaths | Serious | Other |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clinical Decision Support for BUP | 0/2,787 (0%) | 0/2,787 (0%) | 0/2,787 (0%) |
| Usual Care | 0/2,260 (0%) | 0/2,260 (0%) | 0/2,260 (0%) |
There were 5047 patients included in this study. The 599 physicians were not considered enrolled.
| Age, Categorical(Participants) | Clinical Decision Support for BUP | Usual Care | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| <=18 years | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Between 18 and 65 years | 305 | 203 | 508 |
| >=65 years | 9 | 7 | 16 |
| Age, Continuous(years) | Clinical Decision Support for BUP | Usual Care | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Median | 36 (29 to 48) | 36 (29 to 46) | 36 (29 to 47) |
| Sex: Female, Male(Participants) | Clinical Decision Support for BUP | Usual Care | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Patients — Female | 917 | 813 | 1730 |
| Patients — Male | 1870 | 1447 | 3317 |
| Physician — Female | 104 | 69 | 173 |
| Physician — Male | 210 | 141 | 351 |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants) | Clinical Decision Support for BUP | Usual Care | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hispanic or Latino | 505 | 196 | 701 |
| Not Hispanic or Latino | 2166 | 1934 | 4100 |
| Unknown or Not Reported | 116 | 130 | 246 |
| Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants) | Clinical Decision Support for BUP | Usual Care | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| American Indian or Alaska Native | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Asian | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Black or African American | 452 | 406 | 858 |
| White | 2048 | 1565 | 3613 |
| More than one race | 196 | 219 | 415 |
| Unknown or Not Reported | 91 | 70 | 161 |
| Region of Enrollment(participants) | Clinical Decision Support for BUP | Usual Care | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 3127 | 2519 | 5646 |
Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.
Plan to share: No
This study is completed, as verified in Jun 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Yale University