ClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT03657654Updated May 9, 2022

Voice Outcomes Following Thyroidectomy

An observational study in Thyroid Cancer and Thyroid Nodule, sponsored by University of Virginia. Status unknown at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-05-09.

Sponsored by University of Virginia · Observational

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified May 2022), so the status shown — last known as Recruiting — may be out of date.
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
45
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This is an observational study of voice outcomes in participants following thyroidectomy or another head and neck surgery that does not involve risk to the larynx other than risks incurred due to intubation alone. These comparative (non-thyroidectomy) surgeries would not be expected to interfere with the primary nerves involved with voice production, so they would help to better understand the effect of intubation alone on voice outcomes.

Read the detailed description

Voice difficulty is a common complaint following thyroidectomy, and while the procedure risks injury to laryngeal nerves involved in voice production, voice difficulty is common even in the absence of evident injury to these nerves. The cause of voice change in these situations is not well defined, and multiple mechanisms have been suggested. Some potential mechanisms include trauma to the laryngeal skeleton from intraoperative manipulation of the strap muscles, cricothyroid muscle, thyroid, cartilage, or trachea. However, it is also possible that irritation due to intubation and edema to the neck and oral or pharyngeal soft tissues that develops after the surgery as a result of intubation plays a role in postoperative voice change. These mechanisms can occur in any operation requiring general endotracheal anesthesia even when the laryngeal nerves are not specifically at risk of injury.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate voice outcomes after thyroidectomy (both objective and subjective patient and clinician reported) and compare those to voice outcomes after other surgeries that do not put the recurrent or superior laryngeal nerves at risk or traumatize the laryngeal skeleton, but do require general endotracheal anesthesia. The primary assessment tool will be the Voice Handicap Index-10 (VHI-10), which is a questionnaire that asks about the patient's interpretation of his/her voice quality and the impact it is having on daily activities. Data analysis will be done to see if participants have a significant change in their pre-operation VHI-10 score at approximately 1 week and 3 months post-operation. Additional assessments tools will include nasolaryngoscopy and nasolaryngeal stroboscopy to assess global vocal fold function, Consensus Auditory Perceptual Evaluation of Voice (CAPE-V) and computerized speech lab (CSL) acoustics to assess voice quality, and vocal aerodynamic analysis to determine air flow through the larynx.

02

Conditions studied

  • Thyroid Cancer
  • Thyroid Nodule

Keywords

  • Thyroidectomy
  • Laryngeal Nerves
  • Voice problems
03

In context

Thyroid Neoplasms

819 studies on the registry are indexed under Thyroid Neoplasms; 216 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 45 is below the median of 160 across 267 observational studies indexed under Thyroid Neoplasms.

Browse Thyroid Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Virginia is the lead sponsor of 673 studies on the registry; 139 are open to participants now.

Of its 60 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 41 (68%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Adults that have been clinically referred for thyroidectomy or another surgery requiring intubation but without risk to the laryngeal nerves or dissection adjacent to the larynx.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Provision of signed and dated informed consent form
  2. Stated willingness to comply with all study procedures and availability for the duration of the study
  3. Age ≥ 18 years
  4. Subject must be clinically referred for a thyroidectomy for known or potential cancer, or subject must be clinically referred for a surgery requiring intubation, but without risk to the laryngeal nerves or dissection adjacent to the larynx for the control group
  5. As the VHI-10 is not available and validated in all languages, participants must be able to comprehend a validated version of the VHI-10 in their language

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Plan to include neck dissection in upcoming surgery (control group/non-thyroidectomy patients only)
  2. Known to be pregnant
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
45 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Thyroidectomy

    Patients that are clinically referred for a thyroidectomy for known or potential cancer.

    Other: No intervention: observational only

  • Other surgeries

    Patients must be clinically referred for a surgery requiring intubation, but without risk to the laryngeal nerves or dissection adjacent to the larynx

    Other: No intervention: observational only

Interventions

  • OtherNo intervention: observational only

    No intervention: observational only

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Voice Handicap Index-10 (VHI-10) score before and after surgery

    This is a VHI-10 is a questionnaire that asks about the patient's interpretation of his/her voice quality and the impact it is having on daily activities.

    Time frame: Baseline, 1 week following surgery, 3 months following surgery

Secondary outcomes

  1. Video flexible nasolaryngoscopy

    This procedure is endoscopic and allows for visualization and audio/video recording of the vocal folds at rest and during speech

    Time frame: Within 24 hours following surgery

  2. Video nasolaryngeal stroboscopy

    This imaging is another form of nasolaryngoscopy but has the addition of a strobe light. The strobe light provides an optical illusion in which the vocal cords appear to be moving in slow motion on the video, even though its movement is unaltered.

    Time frame: Baseline, 1 week following surgery, 3 months following surgery

  3. Vocal Aerodynamics Analysis

    This assessment is performed by fitting the participant with a mask that is attached to a tube that goes just inside the participant's lips. This positioning allows for the participant to close his/her lips around the tube without occluding it. The participant is asked to produce repeated syllables like pi-pi-pi-pi-pi, which allows for airflow and air pressure to be measured and reflects vocal fold function.

    Time frame: Baseline, 1 week following surgery, 3 months following surgery

  4. CAPE-V

    The CAPE-V is a tool used for clinical auditory-perceptual assessment of voice. It is intended to describe the severity of various auditory attributes of a voice problem, and it is determined by the clinician's auditory assessment of the patient's voice.

    Time frame: Baseline, 1 week following surgery, 3 months following surgery

  5. CSL acoustics

    This assessment involves having the participant speak into a microphone. The patient says a few scripted sentences, as well as repeated sounds, which is then analyzed by the computer software. The assessment allows for determination of vocal loudness, pitch, and voice quality. Voice quality is determined based on measures including vocal shimmer, vocal jitter, and background noise in the voice. Shimmer measures variation in voice amplitude and jitter measures variation in frequency.

    Time frame: Baseline, 1 week following surgery, 3 months following surgery

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • University of Virginia
    Charlottesville, Virginia 22908, United States
    • Bette F Ghamandi, MHA, CCRP · Contact · bjf8j@hscmail.mcc.virginia.edu · 434-243-1558
    • James Daneiro, MD · Sub investigator
    • Bethany Horton, PhD · Sub investigator
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Apr 2019 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Dec 2023, 55 months after the start.

Of 102 non-industry observational studies under Thyroid Neoplasms, half reached primary completion within 72 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 24 and three quarters within 311. This study's planned 55 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 113 studies reached it within 63 months; a quarter within 26 and three quarters within 311.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Aug 29, 2018
First posted
Sep 5, 2018
StartActual
Apr 23, 2019
Primary completionEst.
Dec 15, 2023
CompletionEst.
Dec 15, 2023
Last update
May 9, 2022
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 9, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03657654
Responsible party
David Shonka, MD (Associate Professor, University of Virginia) — Principal investigator
First posted
Sep 5, 2018
Start date
Apr 23, 2019
Primary completion
Dec 15, 2023 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 15, 2023 (estimated)
Last update
May 9, 2022

Study contacts

Bette F Ghamandi
Contact
bjf8j@hscmail.mcc.virginia.edu
434-243-1558
David C Shonka, MD
principal investigator · University of Virginia

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in May 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion