CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03643640OPTIMUNEUpdated Oct 8, 2020

Evaluating a Novel Web-based Intervention for Breast Cancer Survivors

An interventional study of Optimune and Care-As-Usual in Breast Cancer, sponsored by Technical University of Dortmund. Completed at 2 sites in Germany. Open to female participants aged 30 Years to 70 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-10-08.

Sponsored by Technical University of Dortmund · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
360
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
30 Years to 70 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

The trial aims to evaluate the effectiveness of a novel web-based intervention (Optimune), which was designed to introduce relevant cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) techniques to women with breast cancer who are past the active eradication phase. The present study will test the hypothesis that Optimune has an impact on lifestyle parameters and psychometric outcomes. Therefore, 360 woman with breast cancer will be recruited and randomized to two groups: (1) a control group, in which they may engage with any treatment (Care-as-Usual, CAU) and receive access to Optimune after a delay of 3 months (i.e., CAU/wait list control group), or (2) to a treatment group that immediately receives 12-month access to Optimune and may also use CAU. The primary outcome measure is the effect on quality of life, physical activity and diet three month post-baseline.

Read the detailed description

Depression and fatigue is common in breast cancer survivors and its presence is associated with personal suffering, increased inflammatory activity, and worse prognosis. While in the phase of acute treatment many women receive short-term psychological support to better cope with the situation, this is not standard of care in the years following. Web-based psychological interventions are easily accessible and preliminary evidence suggests that such interventions can be effective. However, no trial has yet examined whether a CBT-based internet intervention designed to meet the needs of breast cancer survivors can achieve effects on lifestyle parameters and psychometric outcomes, when offered as adjunct to care as usual.

In this study, the investigators will investigate treatment effects of the novel web-based program Optimune when added to treatment as usual. Beyond established CBT techniques targeting depression, anxiety, and fatigue, this intervention specifically includes elements that have shown effects on markers of immune status and inflammation, including sleep and stress management (e.g., mindfulness-based techniques) and lifestyle optimization (dietary and physical activity advice). The delivery and training of content is continuously individualized to match users' preferences and needs, based on responses within the program. The intervention is delivered via the internet and protected by individually assigned passwords. The program can be accessed for 365 days after registration.

This randomized controlled trial will include 360 women with breast cancer who are past the active eradication phase. Participants will be recruited from various settings, including web-based advertisement and internet forums/groups. Participants will be randomly assigned to either (1) a control group, in which they receive care as usual (CAU) and are given access to the web-based intervention (Optimune) after a delay of 3 months (i.e., CAU/wait list control group), or (2) a treatment group that may also use CAU and in addition immediately receives 12-month access to the web-based intervention (Optimune). Measurements are collected at pre-treatment (T0) three months (T1) and six months (T2).

02

Conditions studied

  • Breast Cancer

Browse trials for

03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
30 Years to 70 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Eligibility criteria

Eligible are women who

  • had breast cancer diagnosed less than 5 years ago
  • completed acute treatment for breast cancer at least 1 month ago. This applies for surgery, chemotherapy or radiation, whichever occurred last. (Prophylactic treatment with anti-hormones like tamoxifene, aromatase-inhibitors or bisphosphonates is allowed).
  • are competent in German language
  • provide written consent to study procedures
  • are willing to provide the discharge letter from oncology (to verify diagnosis and therapies)
04

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
360 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Optimune

    Optimune is an web-based psychological intervention for women with breast cancer. Beyond established CBT techniques targeting depression, anxiety, and fatigue, this intervention specifically includes elements that have shown effects on markers of immune status and inflammation, including sleep, stress management (e.g., mindfulness-based techniques) and lifestyle optimization (dietary and physical activity advice). Content is continuously adapted to users' concerns and needs. It contains interactive dialogues that can be accessed via computer or smart-phone, illustrations, audio files and motivating text messages. Optional daily text messages with motivational content accompany the program. The program can be accessed for 365 days after registration.

    Behavioral: Optimune

  • Active comparator
    Care-as-Usual

    As in the experimental arm, participants are free to continue to engage with any treatment they require (i.e., CAU). However, they will receive access to Optimune six months post-baseline (i.e., wait list with respect to Optimune access).

    Other: Care-As-Usual

Interventions

  • BehavioralOptimune

    Optimune is a web-based psychological intervention developed for women with breast cancer.

  • OtherCare-As-Usual

    Participants are free to continue to engage with any treatment they require (i.e., CAU).

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Determination of Quality of Life using the WHOQOL-BREF

    Quality of Life will be measured using the World Health Organization Quality of Life Questionnaire (WHOQOL-BREF), which is a shorter version of the original instrument. Scale Range: 26 to 130. The WHOQOL-BREF is a 26-item, 5-point rating scale. It measures the following broad domains: physical health, psychological health, social relationships, and environment. Response options range from 1, indicating "very dissatisfied" to 5, indicating "very satisfied" and relate to the last two weeks. Higher scores on the WHOQOL-BREF correspond to higher self-reported levels of quality of life.

    Time frame: Change from baseline to 3 months (also assessed at 6 months post-baseline)

  2. Determination of Physical Activity using the International Physical Activity Questionnaire

    Physical Activity will be measured using the short version of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ - short). The short version of the IPAQ is a 7-item questionnaire that assesses the types of intensity of physical activity and sitting time that people do as part of their daily lives. Open-ended questions surrounding individuals' last 7-day recall of physical activity are considered to estimate total physical activity min/week and time spent sitting. Interpretation: Three levels (categories) of physical activity are proposed: low, moderate and high.

    Time frame: Change from baseline to 3 months (also assessed at 6 months post-baseline)

  3. Determination of Diet Quality using the Food Quality Questionnaire

    Diet Quality will be measured using the Food Quality Questionnaire (FQQ). Scale Range: 0 to 39. The FQQ is a 10-item, 5-point rating scale. The FQQ is a short food frequency questionnaire, which includes 10 food items on a 5-point rating scale. It focuses on fruit, vegetables, high-sugar foods, processed food, meat and drinks. The aim of the tool is to measure diet quality. Response options range from 0, indicating "daily" to 3" indicating, "once or never". Interpretation: A global diet quality score can be obtained by averaging all the items on the FQQ.

    Time frame: Change from baseline to 3 months (also assessed at 6 months post-baseline)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Determination of cancer-related fatigue using the Brief Fatigue Inventory Questionnaire

    Fatigue will be measured using the Brief Fatigue Inventory Questionnaire (BFI-9) questionnaire. Scale Range: 0 to 90. The BFI is a 9-item, 11-point rating scale. The first three questions measure fatigue severity from 0, indicating "no fatigue," to 10, indicating "as bad as you can imagine," at current, usual, and worst levels. The following six questions assess fatigue interference with daily activities. Response options range from 0, indicating "does not interfere," to 10, indicating, "completely interferes." Interpretation: A global fatigue score can be obtained by averaging all the items on the BFI. Higher scores on the BFI correspond to greater self-reported levels of fatigue

    Time frame: Change from baseline to 3 months (also assessed at 6 months post-baseline)

  2. Determination of cancer-related emotional stress

    Cancer-related emotional stress will be measured using the standardized IES-R (Impact of Event Scale) Questionnaire. Scale Range: 0 to 88 The IES-R is a 22-item self-report measure that assesses subjective distress caused by traumatic events. Items are rated on a 5-point scale ranging from 0 ("not at all") to 4 ("extremely"). The IES-R yields a total score (ranging from 0 to 88) and subscale scores can also be calculated for the Intrusion, Avoidance, and Hyperarousal subscales. Interpretation: Higher scores correspond to greater self-reported levels of post-traumatic stress.

    Time frame: Change from baseline to 3 months (also assessed at 6, 9 and 12 months post-baseline)

  3. Determination of depression

    Depression will be measured using the standardized PHQ-9 (Patient Health Questionnaire). Scale Range: 0 to 27 The PHQ-9 is a multipurpose instrument for screening, diagnosing, monitoring and measuring the severity of depression. PHQ-9 scores of 5, 10, 15, and 20 represents mild, moderate, moderately severe and severe depression. Interpretation: Higher scores correspond to greater self-reported levels of depression.

    Time frame: Change from baseline to 3 months (also assessed at 6 months post-baseline)

  4. Determination of anxiety

    Anxiety will be measured using the standardized GAD-7 (Generalized Anxiety Disorder) questionnaire. Scale Range: 0 to 21 The GAD-7 is an instrument for screening, diagnosing, monitoring and measuring the severity of anxiety. GAD-7 scores of 5, 10, and 15 represents mild, moderate, and severe anxiety. Interpretation: Higher scores correspond to greater self-reported levels of anxiety.

    Time frame: Change from baseline to 3 months (also assessed at 6 months post-baseline)

  5. Determination of fear of progression

    Fear of progression will be measured using the standardized PA-F12 (Fear of progression) questionnaire. Scale Range: 12 - 60 The PAF-12 items are scored on a five-point Likert Scale ranging from 1 ('never') to 5 ('very often'), higher values indicating higher levels of anxiety. Interpretation: Higher scores correspond to greater self-reported levels of fear of progression.

    Time frame: Change from baseline to 3 months (also assessed at 6 months post-baseline)

  6. Determination of insomnia

    Insomnia will be measured using the standardized - ISI (Insomnia Severity Index), Scale Range: 0 - 28, higher values indicating increasing severity of insomnia

    Time frame: Change from baseline to 3 months (also assessed at 6 months post-baseline)

  7. Determination of usefulness of the program

    Usefulness of the program will be measured by a questionnaire

    Time frame: Assessed at 3 and 6 months

  8. Determination of Negative Effects

    Negative Effects will be measured using the standardized INEP (Inventory for the Assessment of Negative Effects of Psychotherapy) questionnaire.

    Time frame: Assessed at 3 and 6 months

Other outcomes

  1. Determination of recurrence of breast cancer (local relapse or remote metastasis)

    Recurrence of breast cancer (local relapse or remote metastasis) will be determined by a questionnaire

    Time frame: Change from baseline to 3 months (also assessed at 6 months post-baseline)

  2. Frequency of common cold or virus flu

    Frequency of common cold or virus flu will be determined by a questionnaire

    Time frame: Change from baseline to 3 months (also assessed at 6 months post-baseline)

  3. Frequency of unscheduled medical encounters

    Frequency of unscheduled medical encounters will be determined by a questionnaire

    Time frame: Change from baseline to 3 months (also assessed at 6 months post-baseline)

  4. Body Mass Index

    Height and weight will be determined by a questionnaire

    Time frame: Change from baseline to 3 months (also assessed at 6 months post-baseline)

  5. Psychotherapy

    A questionnaire will determine if a psychotherapy has started during the trial

    Time frame: Change from baseline to 3 months (also assessed at 6 months post-baseline)

06

Study locations

2 sites
  • Technical University of Dortmund, Leibniz Research Centre for Working Environment and Human Factors
    Dortmund, 44139, Germany
  • University Medical Center Leipzig, Department of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, Section Psychosocial Oncology
    Leipzig, 04103, Germany
07

References and documents

Publications

  • Holtdirk F, Mehnert A, Weiss M, Mayer J, Meyer B, Brode P, Claus M, Watzl C. Results of the Optimune trial: A randomized controlled trial evaluating a novel Internet intervention for breast cancer survivors. PLoS One. 2021 May 7;16(5):e0251276. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0251276. eCollection 2021. PubMed 33961667 ↗
  • Holtdirk F, Mehnert A, Weiss M, Meyer B, Watzl C. Protocol for the Optimune trial: a randomized controlled trial evaluating a novel Internet intervention for breast cancer survivors. Trials. 2020 Jan 29;21(1):117. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3987-y. PubMed 31996235 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Anonymized individual participant data shall be made available upon request for projects such as meta-analyses after completion of the study

08

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03643640
Lead sponsor
Technical University of Dortmund
Collaborators
University of Leipzig, Gaia AG
Responsible party
Carsten Watzl (Scientific Director, IfADo, Technical University of Dortmund) — Principal investigator
First posted
Aug 23, 2018
Start date
Sep 1, 2018
Primary completion
Jun 1, 2020
Completion
Sep 1, 2020
Last update
Oct 8, 2020

Study contacts

Carsten Watzl, PhD
principal investigator · Leibniz Research Center (IfADo), TU Dortmund

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion