ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03627741Updated Aug 25, 2022

A Pilot Study of Intralesional Injection of Triamcinolone Acetonide for Desmoid Tumors

A Phase 1 interventional study of Triamcinolone Acetonide in Fibromatosis, sponsored by Mayo Clinic. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 89 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-08-25.

Sponsored by Mayo Clinic · Phase 1, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was Jul 2022, 4 years 4 months ago, and no results have been posted to the registry.
Phase
Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
10
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years to 89 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

There is research supporting treatment of superficial fibromatoses (palmar fibromatosis and keloids) with triamcinolone acetonide injections. These lesions are histologically similar to deep fibromatoses (desmoid tumors). Currently there is little literature evaluating the response of desmoid tumors to injections of triamcinolone acetonide. The investigators aim to perform a pilot study evaluating the response of desmoid tumors to intralesional triamcinolone. If positive results are observed (based on RECIST criteria), then a phase II study will be initiated.

Read the detailed description

Desmoid tumors are proliferations of fibroblasts and myofibroblasts, intermixed with abundant dense collagen. Histologically they are similar to superficial fibromatoses such as palmar (Dupuytren's disease) and plantar fibromatoses, as well as keloids. Unlike the superficial fibromatoses, desmoid tumors are located in the deep tissue and stratified based on an abdominal or extra-abdominal location.

There are currently many treatment options for desmoid tumors. Historically, wide surgical resection was the treatment of choice. This often resulted in a disfiguring appearance and recurrence was common, with rates between 30 - 40% following resection. Additionally, radiation and systemic therapies are performed, with an approximate 26% rate of objective response, based on RECIST. These therapies are however not without side effects. Observation initially is also a reasonable approach as a recent study reported up to 60% of desmoids demonstrating stable disease and 18% spontaneously regressing over a five year period. Longer follow-up studies are needed to determine the true natural history of desmoid tumors, but there currently is a need for an alternative treatment strategy with increased efficacy and fewer side-effects once observation has failed.

Corticosteroids, such as triamcinolone acetonide, have long been used in the treatment of hypertrophic scars and keloids in order to decrease the size of the lesion. Proposed mechanisms of action of corticosteroids on keloids and hypertrophic scars include a decrease in the production of collagen, dissolution of insoluble collagen (collagenolysis), a decrease in the local inflammatory process, and an increased rate of apoptosis of fibroblast and inflammatory cells. Recently, reports have evaluated the use of triamcinolone acetonide in Dupuytren's disease, a superficial fibromatosis. A randomized controlled trial evaluated range of motion in patients following needle aponeurotomy alone and in combination with serial triamcinolone injections. They found improved range of motion in the triamcinolone cohort up to 24 months following treatment. Similarly, Ketchum et al reported that 97% of Dupuytren's nodules showed clinical regression following an average of 3.2 intralesional injections with triamcinolone acetonide, although half of these patients did experience reactivation of the disease at 1-3 years following treatment.

Currently there is limited reported experience with treatment of desmoid tumors by steroid therapy. Rhee et al reported a case of a chest wall desmoid tumor that recurred after two surgical resections and postoperative radiation therapy. They treated the lesion with weekly intralesional injections of 120 mg of triamcinolone acetonide for 4 weeks. At six months they noted a reduction in the size of the lesion. Similarly, Umemoto et al. reported a case of a 37 year old male with familial polyposis coli and intra-abdominal desmoid tumors. He was treated with oral prednisolone therapy with gradual regression of the lesions. At one year and six months following his last operation, the patient had no signs of recurrence of the desmoid tumors.

Based on this background information we aim to perform a pilot study of 10 patients with a histologically confirmed diagnosis of extra-abdominal aggressive fibromatosis (desmoid tumor) in order to determine the response rate of intralesional injections of triamcinolone acetonide. Response will be evaluated using the World Health Organization (WHO) response criteria, total volume of the tumor, T2 signal hyperintensity, and RECIST.

02

Conditions studied

  • Fibromatosis

Browse trials for

03

In context

Fibroma

19 studies on the registry are indexed under Fibroma; 4 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 10 is below the median of 62 across 13 interventional studies indexed under Fibroma.

Browse Fibroma studies →

Lead sponsor

Mayo Clinic is the lead sponsor of 3,269 studies on the registry; 672 are open to participants now.

Of its 452 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 321 (71%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 89 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Patients with confirmed diagnosis of extra-abdominal aggressive fibromatosis (desmoid tumor).
  2. At least one of the following: Desmoid tumor that has shown stability in size over consecutive axial imaging (CT or MRI) at least 3 months apart AND presence of any tumor-related symptoms OR an increase in size based on consecutive axial imaging (CT or MRI). Additionally, for patients with a desmoid tumor which has been irradiated, at least a 10% increase in size by volume since receiving radiotherapy is required.
  3. Performance status of \< 1.
  4. Able to participate in three guided injection procedures.
  5. Able to undergo a MRI with and without contrast of the tumor site.
  6. Age > 18 years and ≤ 89 years.
  7. Willing to sign an form.
  8. Willing to comply with protocol procedures including required 21 month follow up after last injection.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria

  1. Allergy to the test drug or a component of its formulation
  2. Patients with a desmoid tumor which has been stable in size and without symptoms or decreased in size over the prior three months utilizing axial imaging according to the following criteria; (a) 10% when comparing a prior CT scan to a current MRI, or (b) more than 5% when comparing a prior MRI to a current MRI.
  3. The patient must not be on anticoagulation (Aspirin okay)
  4. The patient should not be pregnant or trying to become pregnant, and willing to use adequate during study participation to avoid pregnancy
  5. The patient should not be breastfeeding
  6. Active infection that in the opinion of the investigator compromises the patient's participation (i.e., a UTI is ok)
  7. A diagnosis of idiopathic thrombocytopenia purpura
  8. Undergoing concomitant treatment (including radiation, systemic treatment, surgery, or other tumor directed therapy). The patient must be off of the systemic therapy for a period of at least 5 drug half-lives prior to enrolling in the study.
  9. Uncontrolled or poorly controlled diabetes mellitus
  10. Has an uncontrolled illness including, but not limited to, uncontrolled infection, or psychiatric illness/social situations that in the opinion of the investigator would limit compliance with study requirements
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(4)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Histologically or cytologically confirmed

The diagnosis was confirmed by looking at a sample under a microscope: tissue from a biopsy or surgery (histology), or cells from a fluid or needle sample (cytology).

Your pathology report is the document that shows this.

ECOG performance status

A scale of how much an illness limits everyday activity. For people being assessed to join a study, scores run from 0 (fully active) to 4; lower is more active.

0
Fully active, no restrictions.
1
Limited in strenuous activity, but walking and able to do light work, such as housework or office work.
2
Walking and able to look after yourself, but unable to work; up and about more than half of waking hours.
3
Able to look after yourself only in part; in bed or a chair more than half of waking hours.
4
Unable to look after yourself at all; in bed or a chair all day.

Studies most often ask for 0–1 or 0–2. Your doctor gives the score; the WHO scale uses the same steps. The full scale also has 5, which records death.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 1
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
10 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Triamcinolone arm

    A concentration of 40 mg/ml of Triamcinolone Acetonide will be used for injections with a total dose of 120 mg of Triamcinolone given per injection. The injections will be performed under ultrasound guidance by a fellowship-trained musculoskeletal radiologist. The injection locations will be left to the discretion of the radiologist with the request to attempt to distribute the drug throughout the tumor. A total of three injections will be performed at six week intervals.

    Drug: Triamcinolone Acetonide

Interventions

  • A concentration of 40 mg/ml of Triamcinolone Acetonide will be used for injections with a total dose of 120 mg of Triamcinolone given per injection. The injections will be performed under ultrasound guidance by a fellowship-trained musculoskeletal radiologist. The injection locations will be left to the discretion of the radiologist with the request to attempt to distribute the drug throughout the tumor. A total of three injections will be performed at six week intervals.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Response rate of desmoid tumors to serial triamcinolone injections based on WHO criteria.

    Based on MRI imaging

    Time frame: 2 years

  2. Response rate of desmoid tumors to serial triamcinolone injections based on change in tumor volume.

    Based on MRI imaging

    Time frame: 2 years

  3. Response rate of desmoid tumors to serial triamcinolone injections based on change in T2 signaling hyperintensity.

    Based on MRI imaging

    Time frame: 2 years

  4. Response rate of desmoid tumors to serial triamcinolone injections based on RECIST.

    Based on MRI imaging

    Time frame: 2 years

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number patients experiencing a non-serious adverse event following triamcinolone injections.

    Defined as any untoward or undesirable experience associated with the use of a medical product.

    Time frame: 6 months following initial administration of triamcinolone injections

  2. Number of patients experiencing a serious adverse event following triamcinolone injections.

    Including hospitalization, prolonged disability/incapacity, life-threatening adverse experience, birth defect, and death.

    Time frame: 6 months following initial adminstration of triamcinolone injections.

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Mayo Clinic in Florida
    Jacksonville, Florida 32224, United States
08

References and documents

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Jun 2018 to primary completion in Jul 2022, 48 months.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jul 26, 2018
First posted
Aug 13, 2018
StartActual
Jun 7, 2018
Primary completionActual
Jul 5, 2022
CompletionActual
Jul 5, 2022
Last update
Aug 25, 2022
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 25, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03627741
Lead sponsor
Mayo Clinic
Responsible party
Benjamin K. Wilke (Principal Investigator, Mayo Clinic) — Principal investigator
First posted
Aug 13, 2018
Start date
Jun 7, 2018
Primary completion
Jul 5, 2022
Completion
Jul 5, 2022
Last update
Aug 25, 2022

Study contacts

Benjamin K Wilke, MD
principal investigator · Mayo Clinic

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Triamcinolone Acetonide

Start the discussion