CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03614923Updated Jan 24, 2022Results posted

Etokimab in Adults With Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Nasal Polyps (CRSwNP)

A Phase 2 interventional study of Etokimab and Placebo in Chronic Rhinosinusitis, sponsored by AnaptysBio, Inc.. Completed at 28 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 70 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-01-24.

Sponsored by AnaptysBio, Inc. · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
105
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 70 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

A study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of multiple doses of etokimab in adults with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps.

Read the detailed description

This study is a randomized, placebo controlled, double-blind, multi-dose study to assess the efficacy of two different dose regimens of etokimab compared to placebo in adults with moderate-to-severe chronic sinusitis with nasal polyposis (CRSwNP).

During the screening period, all subjects will undergo evaluation for eligibility. A centralized reader will be used to confirm the diagnosis of CRSwNP as assessed by nasal endoscopy, computed tomography (CT) scan of sinuses, and symptom scoring to reduce the risk of interpretation variation.

Participants will also be provided mometasone furoate nasal spray (MFNS) for use during the trial and are required to undergo a minimum run-in period of 20 days prior to Day 1 with approximately 80% compliance.

Participants will be randomly assigned on Day 1 to one of the three treatment arms in a 1:1:1 ratio.

02

Conditions studied

  • Chronic Rhinosinusitis

Keywords

  • ANB020
  • Etokimab
  • CRSwNP
03

In context

Rhinosinusitis

330 studies on the registry are indexed under Rhinosinusitis; 55 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 105 is above the median of 60 across 227 interventional studies indexed under Rhinosinusitis.

Browse Rhinosinusitis studies →

Lead sponsor

AnaptysBio, Inc. is the lead sponsor of 7 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 70 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Clinically confirmed diagnosis of CRSwNP
  • Nasal polyp score (NPS) ≥ 4 out of a maximum score for both nostrils (with at least a score of 1 for each nostril).
  • 22 Item Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) score > 15.
  • Presence of at least two of the following symptoms prior to screening: nasal blockade/obstruction/congestion or nasal discharge (anterior/posterior nasal drip); facial pain/pressure; reduction or loss of smell
  • Body mass index (BMI) of 18 to 42 kg/m\^2 (inclusive) and total body weight > 50 kg (110 lb). BMI=weight (kg)/(height [m\^2]).

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Use of investigational drugs or prohibited therapy for this study within 8 weeks before screening or 5 half-lives, whichever is longer.
  • Have experienced severe life threatening anaphylactic reactions.
  • Participation in any interventional study for the treatment of CRSwNP in the 3 months before screening.
  • If female, is pregnant or lactating, or intend to become pregnant during the study period.
  • History (or suspected history) of alcohol or substance abuse.
  • Current smokers or former smokers with a smoking history of ≥ 10 pack years. If a patient has less than 10 pack years smoking history, he or she should have quit smoking at least 2 months before screening to enroll in the study.

Note: Other protocol defined Inclusion/Exclusion criteria may apply.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Care provider, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
105 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Etokimab 300 mg + 150 mg Q4W

    Participants received a 300 mg loading dose of etokimab administered by subcutaneous injection at Week 0 then 150 mg etokimab by subcutaneous injection every 4 weeks (Q4W) up to Week 12 (Weeks 4, 8, and 12). Participants also used mometasone furoate nasal spray (MFNS) of 2 actuations (50 μg/actuation) in each nostril twice daily (BID).

    Biological: Etokimab · Drug: Mometasone Furoate Nasal Spray

  • Experimental
    Etokimab 300 mg + 150 mg Q8W

    Participants received a 300 mg loading dose of etokimab administered by subcutaneous injection at Week 0 then etokimab 150 mg by subcutaneous injection every 8 weeks (Q8W) up to Week 12 and placebo at Weeks 4 and 12. Participants also used MFNS of 2 actuations (50 μg/actuation) in each nostril BID.

    Biological: Etokimab · Biological: Placebo · Drug: Mometasone Furoate Nasal Spray

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo

    Participants received placebo subcutaneous injection once every 4 weeks up to Week 12. Participants also used MFNS of 2 actuations (50 μg/actuation) in each nostril BID.

    Biological: Placebo · Drug: Mometasone Furoate Nasal Spray

Interventions

  • BiologicalEtokimab

    Administered by subcutaneous injection

    Also known as: ANB020

  • BiologicalPlacebo

    Administered by subcutaneous injection

  • DrugMometasone Furoate Nasal Spray

    Mometasone Furoate Nasal Spray (MFNS) was used from 4 weeks prior to Day 1 (Run-in period) through the end of the study. Participants used 2 actuations (50 μg/actuation) in each nostril BID, total daily dose of 400 μg. Participants intolerant to BID intranasal corticosteroids (INCS) could use the lower dose regimen of 1 actuation in each nostril BID, total daily dose of 200 μg.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change From Baseline in Nasal Polyp Score (NPS) to Week 16

    Nasal polyps were evaluated by nasal endoscopy using centralized imaging data assessments scored by an independent reviewer. Each nostril was scored on a scale from 0 to 4, where a score of 0 means no polyps, and a score of 4 means the presence of polyps causing complete obstruction of the inferior nasal cavity. The bilateral NPS score is the sum of the right and left nostril scores, and hence the total NPS value is between 0 and 8 (worst). A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement.

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 16

  2. Change From Baseline in Sino-Nasal Outcome Test-22 (SNOT-22) Score at Week 16

    SNOT-22 is a 22-item outcome measure on a 5-category scale that assesses symptoms and social/emotional consequences of rhinosinusitis. Each item is scored from 0 (No problem at all) to 5 (Problem as bad as it can be), and the total score ranges from 0 to 110. Higher SNOT-22 scores are indicative of greater impact of rhinosinusitis on quality of life. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement.

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 16

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change From Baseline in Eosinophil Count

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 16, and Week 24

07

Results

Posted Jan 24, 2022

Participant flow

This study was conducted at 26 sites in the United States.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneEtokimab 300 mg + 150 mg Q4WEtokimab 300 mg + 150 mg Q8WPlacebo
Started353535
Completed303030
Not completed555
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject211
Withdrew: Adverse event021
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up101
Withdrew: Lack of efficacy201
Withdrew: Non-compliance010
Withdrew: Other011

Outcome measures

PrimaryChange From Baseline in Nasal Polyp Score (NPS) to Week 16

Nasal polyps were evaluated by nasal endoscopy using centralized imaging data assessments scored by an independent reviewer. Each nostril was scored on a scale from 0 to 4, where a score of 0 means no polyps, and a score of 4 means the presence of polyps causing complete obstruction of the inferior nasal cavity. The bilateral NPS score is the sum of the right and left nostril scores, and hence the total NPS value is between 0 and 8 (worst). A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement.

Time frame:
Baseline and Week 16
Reported as:
Least squares mean · score on a scale
Change From Baseline in Nasal Polyp Score (NPS) to Week 16
score on a scaleEtokimab 300 mg + 150 mg Q4WEtokimab 300 mg + 150 mg Q8WPlacebo
Change From Baseline in Nasal Polyp Score (NPS) to Week 16-0.87 ± 0.225-0.89 ± 0.221-0.49 ± 0.225
Statistical analysis
  • Etokimab 300 mg + 150 mg Q4W vs Placebo · General linear MMRM · p = 0.2364 (Testing was conducted in a hierarchical manner such that the comparison of etokimab Q4W versus placebo was conducted first. If the results of this comparison were statistically significant, the etokimab Q8W treatment arm would be compared to placebo.) · Least squares (ls) mean difference: -0.38 · 95% CI -1.01 to 0.25
  • Etokimab 300 mg + 150 mg Q8W vs Placebo · General linear MMRM · p = 0.2024 (Testing was conducted in a hierarchical manner such that the comparison of etokimab Q4W versus placebo was conducted first. If the results of this comparison were statistically significant, the etokimab Q8W treatment arm would be compared to placebo.) · Ls mean difference: -0.41 · 95% CI -1.03 to 0.22
PrimaryChange From Baseline in Sino-Nasal Outcome Test-22 (SNOT-22) Score at Week 16

SNOT-22 is a 22-item outcome measure on a 5-category scale that assesses symptoms and social/emotional consequences of rhinosinusitis. Each item is scored from 0 (No problem at all) to 5 (Problem as bad as it can be), and the total score ranges from 0 to 110. Higher SNOT-22 scores are indicative of greater impact of rhinosinusitis on quality of life. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement.

Time frame:
Baseline and Week 16
Reported as:
Least squares mean · score on a scale
Change From Baseline in Sino-Nasal Outcome Test-22 (SNOT-22) Score at Week 16
score on a scaleEtokimab 300 mg + 150 mg Q4WEtokimab 300 mg + 150 mg Q8WPlacebo
Change From Baseline in Sino-Nasal Outcome Test-22 (SNOT-22) Score at Week 16-22.97 ± 3.084-18.34 ± 3.077-16.32 ± 3.112
Statistical analysis
  • Etokimab 300 mg + 150 mg Q4W vs Placebo · General linear MMRM · p = 0.1330 (Testing was conducted in a hierarchical manner such that the comparison of etokimab Q4W versus placebo was conducted first. If the results of this comparison were statistically significant, the etokimab Q8W treatment arm would be compared to placebo.) · Ls mean difference: -6.64 · 95% CI -15.34 to 2.06
  • Etokimab 300 mg + 150 mg Q8W vs Placebo · General linear MMRM · p = 0.6464 (Testing was conducted in a hierarchical manner such that the comparison of etokimab Q4W versus placebo was conducted first. If the results of this comparison were statistically significant, the etokimab Q8W treatment arm would be compared to placebo.) · Ls mean difference: -2.01 · 95% CI -10.70 to 6.67
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Eosinophil Count
Time frame:
Baseline, Week 16, and Week 24
Reported as:
Mean · 10^9 cells/L
Change From Baseline in Eosinophil Count
10^9 cells/LEtokimab 300 mg + 150 mg Q4WEtokimab 300 mg + 150 mg Q8WPlacebo
Baseline0.437 ± 0.25460.350 ± 0.20380.434 ± 0.2490
Change from Baseline at Week 16-0.162 ± 0.1717-0.117 ± 0.1718-0.020 ± 0.1843
Change from Baseline at Week 24-0.038 ± 0.2451-0.029 ± 0.16740.019 ± 0.2151

Adverse events

Collected over From first dose of study medication on Day 1 until Week 16, or up to 28 days after the last dose of study medication for participants who discontinued treatment earlier than Week 16.. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Etokimab 300 mg + 150 mg Q4W0/35 (0%)2/35 (5.7%)8/35 (22.9%)
Etokimab 300 mg + 150 mg Q8W0/35 (0%)0/35 (0%)8/35 (22.9%)
Placebo0/35 (0%)0/35 (0%)6/35 (17.1%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventEtokimab 300 mg + 150 mg Q4WEtokimab 300 mg + 150 mg Q8WPlacebo
Urinary tract infectionInfections and infestations1/350/350/35
HydronephrosisRenal and urinary disorders1/350/350/35
UreterolithiasisRenal and urinary disorders1/350/350/35
Pneumonia aspirationRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders1/350/350/35
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventEtokimab 300 mg + 150 mg Q4WEtokimab 300 mg + 150 mg Q8WPlacebo
SinusitisInfections and infestations2/355/354/35
HeadacheNervous system disorders1/353/351/35
Upper respiratory tract infectionInfections and infestations2/351/351/35
Injection site erythemaGeneral disorders2/351/350/35
HypertensionVascular disorders2/350/350/35

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Etokimab 300 mg + 150 mg Q4WEtokimab 300 mg + 150 mg Q8WPlaceboTotal
Mean49.1 ± 14.8248.2 ± 10.2849.5 ± 12.6849.0 ± 12.62
Age, Customized
Age, Customized(Participants)Etokimab 300 mg + 150 mg Q4WEtokimab 300 mg + 150 mg Q8WPlaceboTotal
<65 years32353198
>=65 years3047
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Etokimab 300 mg + 150 mg Q4WEtokimab 300 mg + 150 mg Q8WPlaceboTotal
Female812929
Male27232676
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Etokimab 300 mg + 150 mg Q4WEtokimab 300 mg + 150 mg Q8WPlaceboTotal
Hispanic or Latino62513
Not Hispanic or Latino29333092
Unknown or Not Reported0000
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Etokimab 300 mg + 150 mg Q4WEtokimab 300 mg + 150 mg Q8WPlaceboTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native0101
Asian0000
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander0000
Black or African American25512
White33293092
More than one race0000
Unknown or Not Reported0000
Nasal Polyp Score (NPS)
Nasal Polyp Score (NPS)(score on a scale)Etokimab 300 mg + 150 mg Q4WEtokimab 300 mg + 150 mg Q8WPlaceboTotal
Mean5.4 ± 1.585.2 ± 2.015.7 ± 1.865.4 ± 1.83
Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) Score
Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) Score(score on a scale)Etokimab 300 mg + 150 mg Q4WEtokimab 300 mg + 150 mg Q8WPlaceboTotal
Mean51.4 ± 19.7353.9 ± 23.6756.9 ± 21.6954.1 ± 21.78
08

Study locations

28 sites
  • Asthma & Allergy Institute
    Little Rock, Arkansas 72209, United States
  • Alliance Research Institute
    Canoga Park, California 91304, United States
  • DaVinci Research
    Roseville, California 95661, United States
  • Sacramento Ear Nose and Throat Surgical and Medical Group Inc. - SacENT
    Sacramento, California 95815, United States
  • Allergy & Asthma Medical Group and Research Center
    San Diego, California 92123, United States
  • Colorado Allergy Asthma Centers
    Denver, Colorado 80230, United States
  • Intermed Medical Research Center
    Miami, Florida 33175, United States
  • Advanced Research Institute, Inc.
    New Port Richey, Florida 34653, United States
  • Clinical Research Consultants of Atlanta
    Suwanee, Georgia 30024, United States
  • Treasure Valley Medical Research
    Boise, Idaho 83706, United States
  • Chicago ENT
    Chicago, Illinois 60657, United States
  • Advanced ENT and Allergy
    Louisville, Kentucky 40213, United States
  • Chesapeake Clinical Research Inc.
    Baltimore, Maryland 21236, United States
  • ENT and Allergy Associates ENTA LLP
    New York, New York 10016, United States
  • University of North Carolina Hospitals
    Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599, United States
  • Charlotte Eye Ear Nose and Throat Associates
    Matthews, North Carolina 28105, United States
  • Ohio Sinus Institute
    Dublin, Ohio 43016, United States
  • Allergy Asthma Clinical Research Center
    Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73120, United States
  • Allergy Asthma and Immunology Center P.C.
    Tulsa, Oklahoma 74136, United States
  • Central States Research, LLC
    Tulsa, Oklahoma 74136, United States
  • National Allergy and Asthma Research
    North Charleston, South Carolina 29420, United States
  • Fort Worth ENT Berkson Medical
    Fort Worth, Texas 76109, United States
  • Ear Nose and Throat Associates of Texas
    McKinney, Texas 75070, United States
  • Intermountain Ear Nose Throat Specialist
    Draper, Utah 84020, United States
  • Chrysalis Clinical Research
    Saint George, Utah 84790, United States
  • Eastern Virginia Medical School EVMS Medical Group
    Norfolk, Virginia 23507, United States
  • Bellingham Asthma Allergy Immunology Clinic
    Bellingham, Washington 98225, United States
  • Allergy, Asthma Sinus Center, SC
    Greenfield, Wisconsin 53228, United States
09

References and documents

Study documents

  • Study protocol · Feb 6, 2020
  • Statistical analysis plan · Apr 7, 2020

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 24, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03614923
Lead sponsor
AnaptysBio, Inc.
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Aug 3, 2018
Start date
Nov 29, 2018
Primary completion
Sep 2, 2020
Completion
Oct 26, 2020
Results posted
Jan 24, 2022
Last update
Jan 24, 2022

Study contacts

SM_ANB020-006@syneoshealth.com
study director · AnaptysBio, Inc.

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion