ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03613038Updated May 17, 2022

A Systematic Investigation of Phonetic Complexity Effects on Articulatory Motor Performance in Progressive Dysarthria

An interventional study of Phonetic complexity effects on speech motor performance in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis and Parkinson Disease, sponsored by University of Missouri-Columbia. Completed at 2 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 19 Years to 90 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-05-17.

Sponsored by University of Missouri-Columbia · Not applicable, Interventional, and Basic science

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 11 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Jul 2017, registered Jul 2018).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
100
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
19 Years to 90 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal is to improve the fundamental knowledge about articulatory motor performance in people with Lou Gehrig's disease (also known as ALS) and Parkinson's disease (PD), in order to develop more sensitive assessments for progressive speech loss, which may lead to the improved timing of speech therapies.

Read the detailed description

The long-term goal is to optimize dysarthria assessment by improving the early detection and tracking of articulatory performance in progressive dysarthrias. The short-term goal of the proposed cross-sectional study is to focus on ALS and PD and quantify articulatory kinematic performance as a function of phonetic complexity, which is experimentally manipulated based on theoretical principles of speech motor development. The research strategy is to use 3D electromagnetic articulography to examine phonetic complexity effects of single word stimuli at the articulatory kinematic level in 15 talkers each with preclinical, mild, and moderate dysarthria, relative to 45 controls. The central hypothesis is that as dysarthria severity increases the discrepancy in articulatory performance, indexed by movement speed, distance, coordination, and variability, between people with dysarthria and typical controls will significantly increase at a lower phonetic complexity level.

02

Conditions studied

  • Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis
  • Parkinson Disease

Keywords

  • Dysarthria
  • Speech motor performance
  • Speech motor control
  • Speech kinematics
03

In context

Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis

978 studies on the registry are indexed under Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis; 277 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 100 is above the median of 38 across 662 interventional studies indexed under Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis.

Browse Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Missouri-Columbia is the lead sponsor of 365 studies on the registry; 69 are open to participants now.

Of its 43 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 29 (67%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
19 Years to 90 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. May or may not have a neurological impairment.
  2. Age range of 19-90 years.
  3. Male or female.
  4. Provide written consent before any study specific procedures are performed.
  5. Have ability to comply with basic instructions.
  6. Monolingual English speaker.
  7. Have ability to partake in a 90 minute data collection.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Any speech, language, cognition, or hearing impairment prior to diagnosis of a neurodegenerative disease.
  2. Anyone not appropriate for study participation, as deemed by the principal investigator.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Basic science
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
100 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Other
    Phonetic complexity effects

    Conduct a comprehensive kinematic assessment using state-of-the art 3D speech tracking technology on individuals with ALS and PD as well as healthy talkers to identify articulatory motor disturbances as a function of phonetic complexity and dysarthria severity. Phonetic complexity will be experimentally manipulated using the consonant and vowel complexity classification system proposed by Kent (1992) that takes into account the underlying articulatory motor adjustments required to produce various speech sounds.

    Behavioral: Phonetic complexity effects on speech motor performance

Interventions

  • BehavioralPhonetic complexity effects on speech motor performance

    Use of 3D electromagnetic articulography to examine phonetic complexity effects of single word stimuli at the articulatory kinematic level in talkers each with preclinical, mild, and moderate dysarthria, relative to healthy controls.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Peak movement speed

    Peak speed (millimeters/second) for each articulatory marker is the maximum value of the first-order derivative of each marker's Euclidean distance time-history.

    Time frame: Up to 3 months after enrollment

  2. Range of movement

    The convex hull represents the smallest convex set containing all the points in the 3D motion path.

    Time frame: Up to 3 months after enrollment

  3. Duration

    Word duration (seconds) is the time between onset and offset of movement for each word.

    Time frame: Up to 3 months after enrollment

  4. Spatiotemporal movement variability (STI)

    STI is the most widely used metric to capture movement pattern variability during speech. To determine STI, the pattern of articulatory movements and the variability of that pattern over several repetitions of an utterance are examined.

    Time frame: Up to 3 months after enrollment

  5. Inter-articulator coordination

    Spatiotemporal coupling relations between articulators will be derived from vertical movements of the articulators using a covariance measure.

    Time frame: Up to 3 months after enrollment

07

Study locations

2 sites
  • University of Kansas Medical Center
    Fairway, Kansas 66205, United States
  • University of Missouri-Columbia
    Columbia, Missouri 65211, United States
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — The data collected during this study, especially from people with ALS, cannot be easily duplicated so it will be readily shared with other researchers conducting motor speech research. In addition, few investigators have access to tongue tracking technology; therefore, making the tongue kinematic data available will allow other investigators to answer pertinent questions related to speech decline in progressive dysarthrias. Both the raw data and processed data will be made available to interested investigators but will be devoid of identifiers in order to protect the privacy of the participants. Data documentation such as descriptors and units will also be shared to prevent misinterpretation or confusion. Besides the data itself, the PI is willing to share the stimuli as requested by other investigators.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan

Time frame: Data will be ensured as soon as the study starts and even after the study ends.

Access criteria: Data will only be shared for research purposes.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Jul 2017 to primary completion in Feb 2022, 55 months.

Of 134 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis, half reached primary completion within 40 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 24 and three quarters within 60. This study's 55 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 154 studies reached it within 35 months; a quarter within 23 and three quarters within 60.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jul 10, 2018
First posted
Aug 2, 2018
StartActual
Jul 15, 2017
Primary completionActual
Feb 28, 2022
CompletionActual
Feb 28, 2022
Last update
May 17, 2022
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 17, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03613038
Responsible party
Mili Kuruvilla (Assistant Professor, University of Missouri-Columbia) — Principal investigator
First posted
Aug 2, 2018
Start date
Jul 15, 2017
Primary completion
Feb 28, 2022
Completion
Feb 28, 2022
Last update
May 17, 2022

Study contacts

Mili Kuruvilla-Dugdale, PhD
principal investigator · University of Missouri-Columbia

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in May 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion