ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07910266Updated Nov 2, 2026

Impact of Egg-Based and Cell-Based Vaccine Platforms on Immune Responses to Repeated Influenza Vaccination

A Phase 4 interventional study of Egg-Based Inactivated Influenza Vaccine and Cell-Based Inactivated Influenza Vaccine in Immunology, sponsored by University of Missouri-Columbia. Recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-11-02.

Sponsored by University of Missouri-Columbia · Phase 4, Interventional, and Basic science

Updated Nov 2, 2026Newly registeredGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
220
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn how different types of influenza (flu) vaccines affect the body's immune response over time. Researchers want to understand whether receiving egg-based flu vaccines, cell-based flu vaccines, or a combination of both influences how the immune system responds to future flu vaccinations.

The main questions this study aims to answer are:

  1. Does a person's previous flu vaccine type affect their immune response to a later flu vaccine?
  2. Do repeated vaccinations with the same vaccine platform or switching between vaccine platforms produce different antibody responses?
  3. How do different vaccination histories affect flu-specific immune cells and protection against different influenza strains?

Participants will be randomly assigned to receive one of four vaccine combinations:

  • Egg-based vaccine followed by egg-based vaccine
  • Egg-based vaccine followed by cell-based vaccine
  • Cell-based vaccine followed by cell-based vaccine
  • Cell-based vaccine followed by egg-based vaccine Researchers will compare immune responses among these groups.

Participants will:

  • Complete a baseline survey about demographics, vaccination history, medical history, and household information.
  • Receive a first seasonal influenza vaccination (egg-based or cell-based, depending on random assignment).
  • Provide blood samples before vaccination and several times afterward to measure immune responses.
  • Receive a second study influenza vaccination approximately 3 months after the first vaccination.
  • Continue providing blood samples after the second vaccination.
  • Complete brief follow-up surveys about health changes, additional vaccinations, and influenza-like illness during the study.

Blood samples will be collected up to eight times during each study year:

  1. Before or on the day of the first vaccination
  2. About 1 week after the first vaccination
  3. About 1 month after the first vaccination
  4. About 3 months after the first vaccination (the second vaccination will be given at this visit)
  5. About 1 week after the second vaccination
  6. About 1 month after the second vaccination
  7. About 3 months after the second vaccination
  8. About 6 months after the second vaccination

Participants may be observed for approximately 15 minutes after vaccination, consistent with routine vaccination practices.

Prior to the second vaccination, participants will be evaluated for any reasons that might make vaccination unsafe or require postponement. Participants who are able to become pregnant will complete a urine pregnancy test before the second vaccination. Participants who are pregnant or have a positive pregnancy test will not receive the second study vaccination but may continue study follow-up activities, including blood collection and surveys.

Participation in each study year lasts up to 10 months. Participants may choose to continue participating annually for up to 7 years.

Blood samples and related study data may be stored in a secure research biorepository for future studies related to infectious diseases, immunology, vaccine responses, and other health conditions. Stored samples will be coded to protect participant privacy, and identifying information will not be shared without appropriate approvals and participant authorization

Read the detailed description

Blood samples will be collected up to 8 times in the annual flu season starting in the fall:

  1. prior to or day of being vaccinated;
  2. about one week after being vaccinated;
  3. about one month after being vaccinated;
  4. about three months after being vaccinated and 2nd vaccination shot will be given on the same day as providing the 3-month blood sample.

    Following standard clinical practice, participants will be offered the opportunity to remain in the clinic for approximately 15 minutes after vaccination for observation. Observation is not a study-specific requirement but may be conducted consistent with routine vaccine administration practices at the clinical site.

  5. about one week after 2nd vaccination;
  6. about one month after 2nd vaccination;
  7. about three months after 2nd vaccination;
  8. about six months after 2nd vaccination

The egg-based inactivated trivalent (FluLaval) and cell-based inactivated trivalent (Flucelvax) vaccinations will be given. Participants will be randomized into one of 4 groups:

  1. Egg-based then 2nd shot Egg-based
  2. Egg-based then 2nd shot Cell-based
  3. Cell-based then 2nd shot Cell-based
  4. Cell-based then 2nd shot Egg-based Participants will receive a $20 Amazon e-gift card for each blood specimen collection completed.
02

Conditions studied

  • Immunology

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Influenza vaccination
  • egg-based vaccine
  • cell-based vaccine
03

In context

Influenza, Human

2,356 studies on the registry are indexed under Influenza, Human; 184 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 220 is close to the median of 227 across 1,957 interventional studies indexed under Influenza, Human.

Browse Influenza, Human studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Missouri-Columbia is the lead sponsor of 365 studies on the registry; 69 are open to participants now.

Of its 43 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 29 (67%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Did NOT receive a flu shot last year
  • Planning to get flu shot this year;
  • 18 years of age or older;
  • English speaking
  • Willing to be randomized to receive either FDA-approved cell-based or egg-based flu vaccination
  • Willing to get a second flu shot about 3 months after the first one

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Received a flu shot last year
  • Less than 18 years old
  • Not willing to be directed to get a certain type of vaccination
  • Not willing to get a flu vaccination or a second vaccination during the study period
  • Does not speak English
  • History of severe allergic reaction (e.g., anaphylaxis) following a previous influenza vaccine or to a component of the study vaccine.
  • Have a history of Guillain-Barré Syndrome within 6 weeks of a previous influenza vaccination.
  • Women who are pregnant or may be pregnant will not receive the second study vaccination
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Basic science
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
220 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Egg-Based → Egg-Based (E-E)

    E-E: Participants receive an egg-based inactivated influenza vaccine at the first vaccination and an egg-based inactivated influenza vaccine approximately 3 months later.

    Drug: Egg-Based Inactivated Influenza Vaccine

  • Experimental
    Egg-Based → Cell-Based (E-C)

    Participants receive an egg-based inactivated influenza vaccine at the first vaccination and a cell-based inactivated influenza vaccine approximately 3 months later.

    Drug: Egg-Based Inactivated Influenza Vaccine · Drug: Cell-Based Inactivated Influenza Vaccine

  • Experimental
    Cell-Based → Cell-Based (C-C)

    Participants receive a cell-based inactivated influenza vaccine at the first vaccination and a cell-based inactivated influenza vaccine approximately 3 months later.

    Drug: Cell-Based Inactivated Influenza Vaccine

  • Experimental
    Cell-Based → Egg-Based (C-E)

    Participants receive a cell-based inactivated influenza vaccine at the first vaccination and an egg-based inactivated influenza vaccine approximately 3 months later.

    Drug: Egg-Based Inactivated Influenza Vaccine · Drug: Cell-Based Inactivated Influenza Vaccine

Interventions

  • DrugEgg-Based Inactivated Influenza Vaccine

    Participants receive a licensed egg-based inactivated influenza vaccine at one or both study vaccination visits.

  • DrugCell-Based Inactivated Influenza Vaccine

    Participants receive a licensed cell-based inactivated influenza vaccine at one or both study vaccination visits.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change from Baseline in Hemagglutination Inhibition (HAI) Antibody Geometric Mean Titers at 1 Month After the Second Vaccination

    Hemagglutination inhibition (HAI) antibody titers against the prespecified influenza vaccine strains will be measured in serum samples using the HAI assay. Changes in HAI antibody geometric mean titers from baseline before the first vaccination to 1 month after the second vaccination will be compared among participants receiving four vaccination regimens: egg-egg, egg-cell, cell-egg, and cell-cell.

    Time frame: Before the first vaccination and 1 month after the second vaccination.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change from Baseline in Hemagglutination Inhibition (HAI) Antibody Geometric Mean Titers at 1 Month After the First Vaccination

    Hemagglutination inhibition (HAI) antibody titers against the prespecified influenza vaccine strains will be measured in serum samples using the HAI assay. Changes in HAI antibody geometric mean titers from baseline before the first vaccination to 1 month after the first vaccination will be compared among participants in the four vaccination regimens, as appropriate to their assigned vaccination sequence.

    Time frame: Before the first vaccination and 1 month after the first vaccination.

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • University of Missouri Systems
    Columbia, Missouri 65212, United States
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Stein AN, Thanataveerat A, McDermott KW, Dean A, Wall S, Pack C, Sullivan SG, McGovern I, Haag MDM. Estimated Relative Effectiveness and Public Health Impact of Cell-Based Versus Egg-Based Influenza Vaccines During the 2022-2023 Season in the United States. Influenza Other Respir Viruses. 2025 Nov;19(11):e70180. doi: 10.1111/irv.70180. PubMed 41185937 ↗
  • Rayens E, Ku JH, Sy LS, Qian L, Ackerson BK, Luo Y, Tubert JE, Lee GS, Modha PP, Park Y, Sun T, Anderson EJ, Tseng HF. Comparative Effectiveness of Cell-Based Versus Egg-Based Influenza Vaccines in Prevention of Influenza Hospitalization During the 2022-2023 Season Among Adults 18-64 Years. Influenza Other Respir Viruses. 2024 Dec;18(12):e70025. doi: 10.1111/irv.70025. PubMed 39696975 ↗
  • Stein AN, Mills CW, McGovern I, McDermott KW, Dean A, Bogdanov AN, Sullivan SG, Haag MDM. Relative Vaccine Effectiveness of Cell- vs Egg-Based Quadrivalent Influenza Vaccine Against Test-Confirmed Influenza Over 3 Seasons Between 2017 and 2020 in the United States. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2024 May 2;11(5):ofae175. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofae175. eCollection 2024 May. PubMed 38698895 ↗
  • Boyce TG, Levine MZ, McClure DL, King JP, Flannery B, Nguyen HQ, Belongia EA. Antibody response to sequential vaccination with cell culture, recombinant, or egg-based influenza vaccines among U.S. adults. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2024 Dec 31;20(1):2370087. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2024.2370087. Epub 2024 Jul 9. PubMed 38982712 ↗
  • Jordan K, Murchu EO, Comber L, Hawkshaw S, Marshall L, O'Neill M, Teljeur C, Harrington P, Carnahan A, Perez-Martin JJ, Robertson AH, Johansen K, Jonge J, Krause T, Nicolay N, Nohynek H, Pavlopoulou I, Pebody R, Penttinen P, Soler-Soneira M, Wichmann O, Ryan M. Systematic review of the efficacy, effectiveness and safety of cell-based seasonal influenza vaccines for the prevention of laboratory-confirmed influenza in individuals >/=18 years of age. Rev Med Virol. 2023 May;33(3):e2332. doi: 10.1002/rmv.2332. Epub 2022 Feb 8. PubMed 35137512 ↗
  • Coleman BL, Gutmanis I, McGovern I, Haag M. Effectiveness of Cell-Based Quadrivalent Seasonal Influenza Vaccine: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Vaccines (Basel). 2023 Oct 17;11(10):1607. doi: 10.3390/vaccines11101607. PubMed 37897009 ↗
  • Puig-Barbera J, Tamames-Gomez S, Plans-Rubio P, Eiros-Bouza JM. Relative Effectiveness of Cell-Cultured versus Egg-Based Seasonal Influenza Vaccines in Preventing Influenza-Related Outcomes in Subjects 18 Years Old or Older: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jan 12;19(2):818. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19020818. PubMed 35055642 ↗
  • Boikos C, Fischer L, O'Brien D, Vasey J, Sylvester GC, Mansi JA. Relative Effectiveness of the Cell-derived Inactivated Quadrivalent Influenza Vaccine Versus Egg-derived Inactivated Quadrivalent Influenza Vaccines in Preventing Influenza-related Medical Encounters During the 2018-2019 Influenza Season in the United States. Clin Infect Dis. 2021 Aug 2;73(3):e692-e698. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa1944. PubMed 33400775 ↗
  • Boikos C, Sylvester GC, Sampalis JS, Mansi JA. Relative Effectiveness of the Cell-Cultured Quadrivalent Influenza Vaccine Compared to Standard, Egg-derived Quadrivalent Influenza Vaccines in Preventing Influenza-like Illness in 2017-2018. Clin Infect Dis. 2020 Dec 17;71(10):e665-e671. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa371. PubMed 32253431 ↗
  • Izurieta HS, Chillarige Y, Kelman J, Wei Y, Lu Y, Xu W, Lu M, Pratt D, Chu S, Wernecke M, MaCurdy T, Forshee R. Relative Effectiveness of Cell-Cultured and Egg-Based Influenza Vaccines Among Elderly Persons in the United States, 2017-2018. J Infect Dis. 2019 Sep 13;220(8):1255-1264. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiy716. PubMed 30561688 ↗
  • Bruxvoort KJ, Luo Y, Ackerson B, Tanenbaum HC, Sy LS, Gandhi A, Tseng HF. Comparison of vaccine effectiveness against influenza hospitalization of cell-based and egg-based influenza vaccines, 2017-2018. Vaccine. 2019 Sep 16;37(39):5807-5811. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.08.024. Epub 2019 Aug 22. PubMed 31445771 ↗
  • Gaglani M, Raiyani C, Murthy K, Smith M, da Graca B, Dubrocq G, Beeram M, Martin ET, Monto AS, Zimmerman RK, Nowalk MP, Kiniry E, Phillips CH, Nguyen HQ, King JP, Kim SS, Chung JR, Flannery B. Absolute and Relative Effectiveness of Cell Culture-Based and Egg-Based Quadrivalent Inactivated Influenza (Flu) Vaccine Products From the 2014-2015 to 2018-2019 Seasons, US Flu VE Network. Clin Infect Dis. 2026 Sep 2;83(2):289-302. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaf579. PubMed 41102880 ↗
  • Stein AN, Thanataveerat A, McDermott K, Dean A, Wall S, Pack C, McGovern I, Sullivan SG, Haag M. Superior Effectiveness and Estimated Public Health Impact of Cell- Versus Egg-Based Influenza Vaccines in Children and Adults During the US 2023-2024 Season. Infect Dis Ther. 2025 Dec;14(12):2693-2718. doi: 10.1007/s40121-025-01230-2. Epub 2025 Oct 3. PubMed 41042449 ↗
  • Liu F, Gross FL, Joshi S, Gaglani M, Naleway AL, Murthy K, Groom HC, Wesley MG, Edwards LJ, Grant L, Kim SS, Sambhara S, Gangappa S, Tumpey T, Thompson MG, Fry AM, Flannery B, Dawood FS, Levine MZ. Redirecting antibody responses from egg-adapted epitopes following repeat vaccination with recombinant or cell culture-based versus egg-based influenza vaccines. Nat Commun. 2024 Jan 4;15(1):254. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-44551-x. PubMed 38177116 ↗
  • Imran M, Ortiz JR, McLean HQ, Fisher L, O'Brien D, Bonafede M, Mansi JA, Boikos C. Relative Effectiveness of Cell-Based Versus Egg-Based Quadrivalent Influenza Vaccines in Adults During the 2019-2020 Influenza Season in the United States. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2022 Oct 12;9(10):ofac532. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofac532. eCollection 2022 Oct. PubMed 36320195 ↗
  • DeMarcus L, Shoubaki L, Federinko S. Comparing influenza vaccine effectiveness between cell-derived and egg-derived vaccines, 2017-2018 influenza season. Vaccine. 2019 Jul 9;37(30):4015-4021. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.06.004. Epub 2019 Jun 11. PubMed 31201055 ↗
  • Skowronski DM, Janjua NZ, De Serres G, Sabaiduc S, Eshaghi A, Dickinson JA, Fonseca K, Winter AL, Gubbay JB, Krajden M, Petric M, Charest H, Bastien N, Kwindt TL, Mahmud SM, Van Caeseele P, Li Y. Low 2012-13 influenza vaccine effectiveness associated with mutation in the egg-adapted H3N2 vaccine strain not antigenic drift in circulating viruses. PLoS One. 2014 Mar 25;9(3):e92153. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0092153. eCollection 2014. PubMed 24667168 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — De-identified individual participant data supporting published study findings may be shared with qualified researchers upon reasonable request, subject to institutional approval and applicable data-sharing policies.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan

Time frame: Data will be available beginning 6 months after publication of the primary study results and for a period of 5 years.

Access criteria: Qualified researchers may request access by submitting a research proposal describing the intended analyses. Requests will be reviewed by the study investigators and relevant institutional authorities. Approved requests may require a data-use agreement to protect participant confidentiality.

09

Updates

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
Registered
First appeared on the registry. No changes since
Nov 2, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Nov 2, 2026
    First appeared on the registry

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07910266
Responsible party
Xiufeng Wan (Professor Molecular Biology & Immunology, University of Missouri-Columbia) — Principal investigator
First posted
Nov 2, 2026
Start date
Oct 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Feb 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Sep 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Nov 2, 2026

Study contacts

Anna Zakrzewicz, PhD
Contact
annazakrzewicz@umsystem.edu
573-882-3202
Jane A McElroy, PhD
Contact
mcelroyja@umsystem.edu
573-882-4993
Xiu-Feng Wan, PhD
principal investigator · University of Missouri Systems

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion