ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03610750PRIDE-sSAUpdated Oct 6, 2025

Training Providers to Conduct PRIDES-sSA

An interventional study of psychiatric medications and evidence-based psychotherapies in Common Mental Disorders and Severe Mental Disorder, sponsored by New York State Psychiatric Institute. Completed at 1 site in Mozambique. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-10-06.

Sponsored by New York State Psychiatric Institute · Not applicable, Interventional, and Health services research

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
901
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Global mental health (MH) and substance use disorders prevention, treatment and research gaps require that efficacious treatments be scaled-up, leveraging existing platforms. In tandem, participation of Ministries ready to apply evidence-inform policies must sustain them over time. PRIDE SSA may generate templates for other low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) by conducting a state of the art scale up study in Mozambique and by establishing a collaborative research network of nascent research "Seed Teams." Such "Seed Teams," trained by the capacity building component, may work across the region to build capacity and conduct implementation research to sustainably scale-up MH services. Scale Up Research (Mozambique) in MH and substance use disorders will evaluate strategies and costs of scaling up an innovative, integrated, sustainable, stepped-care community approach. The scale up study will leverage: (1) Mozambique's task-shifting strategy of training psychiatric technicians (PsyTs) to provide MH care, (2) the WHO-funded epilepsy community care program successfully implemented in 5 Provinces, now primed for scale-up by the Health Ministry. The cost-effective approach redefines work roles without requiring new human resources. Importantly, it comports with the Health Ministry's plan to implement prevention and treatment for all MH conditions, rather than single disorders. The model employs evidence-based practices (EBPs; e.g. Psychopharmacology; Interpersonal Therapy), already in use by PsyTs to: a) establish a sustainable program delivered and supervised by non-MH professionals, overseen by MH specialists; b) provide community screening, care and/or referrals for all MH disorders; and c) use implementation tools to monitor sustainability. This collaborative network will scale-up a cost-effective, sustainable program and inform policy.

Read the detailed description

Working in three geographically separate Mozambican provinces and in rural (N=24), peri-urban (i.e., rural urban transition zone; N=6), and urban (N=6) clinics, the scale-up study first will conduct a two-year (12 months implementation, 12 months sustainability), cluster-randomized, three-arm hybrid effectiveness-implementation type 1 trial, guided by Proctor's implementation framework. The delivery pathway showing the highest overall effectiveness after this two-year trial in 36 clinics will then be implemented in clinics from the other two arms for two additional "cross-over" years. Throughout the trial and the "cross-over" years, qualitative and other process data will complement structured assessments to examine implementation, sustainability, and scale-up.

Scale-up PRIDES Mozambique has the following Specific Aims:

Aim 1. To determine the most effective delivery pathway in terms of 1) implementation outcomes (reach, retention, pathway fidelity, cost-effectiveness); 2) service-level outcomes (efficiency); and 3) patient-level outcomes (function/disability, comprehensive MH screener, patient satisfaction). As an Exploratory Sub-Aim: To assess the impact of: pre-implementation stage factors (acceptability, adoption); mediators (work self-efficacy, MH literacy); and moderators (clinic characteristics: rural, peri-urban, urban, epilepsy program implementation) on implementation, services, and patient outcomes.

Aim 2. To evaluate implementation, sustainability, and scale-up requirements of the most effective pathway (determined in Aim 1) in order to inform regional policies. A rigorous process evaluation mixed-methods approach will identify barriers and facilitators to implementing, sustaining, and scaling-up the most effective pathway in all clinics during the "cross-over" two years using purposive sampling for mixed-methods evaluation in a subset of 18 clinics (6 per Province).

Aim 3. To develop an implementation tool-kit for low-cost, feasible, and sustainable system-wide implementation of the most effective WHO Mental Health Gap Action Programme (mhGAP) delivery pathway in Sub-Saharan Africa (sSA) with collaboration of Members of the PRIDES sSA Five-Country Council, External Advisory Board and the WHO.

02

Conditions studied

  • Common Mental Disorders
  • Severe Mental Disorder

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Community Mental Health Care
  • Task-shifting
03

In context

Mental Disorders

1,740 studies on the registry are indexed under Mental Disorders; 348 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 901 is above the median of 100 across 1,301 interventional studies indexed under Mental Disorders.

Browse Mental Disorders studies →

Lead sponsor

New York State Psychiatric Institute is the lead sponsor of 435 studies on the registry; 27 are open to participants now.

Of its 51 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 45 (88%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Staff in one of the 36 clinics - Clinic directors, trainers, supervisors, providers of participating clinics: Community Health Workers; Nurses; and Medicine, Preventive Medicine andPsychiatric Technicians.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Other clinic staff besides clinic directors, trainers, supervisors, providers of participating clinics: Community Health Workers; Nurses; and Medicine, Preventive Medicine andPsychiatric Technicians.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Health services research
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Investigator)
Enrollment
901 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Specialty Care

    Psychiatric medications and evidence-based psychotherapies to be provided at a specialty mental clinic facilitated by psychiatric technicians, the mental health specialty workforce already in place in Mozambique.

    Other: psychiatric medications and evidence-based psychotherapies

  • Experimental
    Integrated Care

    Psychiatric medications and evidence-based psychotherapies to be provided by primary care providers.

    Other: psychiatric medications and evidence-based psychotherapies

  • Experimental
    Community Clinic Stepped Care

    Psychiatric medications and evidence-based psychotherapies to be provided by primary care providers and community health workers, respectively.

    Other: psychiatric medications and evidence-based psychotherapies

Interventions

  • Otherpsychiatric medications and evidence-based psychotherapies

    Patients who screen positive with any psychiatric condition are referred for evaluation and treatment according to the treatment arm. This may combine psychiatric medications or evidence based psychotherapies according to treatment.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Reach (implementation)

    Number of people who access mental health care from those who need care

    Time frame: Change from Baseline in Reach at 12 months

  2. Cost

    Cost of Implementing each arm through the Stages of Implementation Completion (SIC) measure together with the Cost of Implementing New Strategies (COINS) method

    Time frame: Cost of implementing each arm will be calculated through study completion, an average of 2 years

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in Retention (implementation)

    Number of people who receive mental health care from those who need care

    Time frame: Change from Baseline in Retention at 12 months

  2. Change in Clinical symptoms

    Symptom reduction using a newly validated tool - the Comprehensive Mental Health Tool (CmhTool) to monitor symptoms of common and severe mental disorders as well as substance use disorders

    Time frame: Change from Baseline CmhTool at 12 months

07

Study locations

1 site
  • MIHER: Mozambique Institute for Health Education and Research
    Maputo, Cidade de Maputo 1101, Mozambique
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Wainberg ML, Scorza P, Shultz JM, Helpman L, Mootz JJ, Johnson KA, Neria Y, Bradford JE, Oquendo MA, Arbuckle MR. Challenges and Opportunities in Global Mental Health: a Research-to-Practice Perspective. Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2017 May;19(5):28. doi: 10.1007/s11920-017-0780-z. PubMed 28425023 ↗
  • Dos Santos PF, Wainberg ML, Caldas-de-Almeida JM, Saraceno B, Mari Jde J. Overview of the mental health system in Mozambique: addressing the treatment gap with a task-shifting strategy in primary care. Int J Ment Health Syst. 2016 Jan 4;10:1. doi: 10.1186/s13033-015-0032-8. eCollection 2016. PubMed 26734070 ↗
  • Wainberg ML, Lovero KL, Duarte CS, Fiks Salem A, Mello M, Bezuidenhout C, Mootz J, Feliciano P, Suleman A, Fortunato Dos Santos P, Weissman MM, Cournos F, Marques AH, Fumo W, Mabunda D, Alves-Bradford JE, Mello M, Mari JJ, Ngwepe P, Cidav Z, Mocumbi AO, Medina-Marino A, Wall M, Gouveia L, Oquendo MA. Partnerships in Research to Implement and Disseminate Sustainable and Scalable Evidence-Based Practices (PRIDE) in Mozambique. Psychiatr Serv. 2021 Jul 1;72(7):802-811. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.202000090. Epub 2020 Dec 18. PubMed 33334157 ↗
09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Dec 2018 to primary completion in Aug 2025, 80 months.

Of 666 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Mental Disorders, half reached primary completion within 29 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 13 and three quarters within 45. This study's 80 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 680 studies reached it within 29 months; a quarter within 13 and three quarters within 45.

Mental Disorders covers many different conditions, not one, so the studies compared here vary widely. Read these figures as a rough guide.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Mar 13, 2018
First posted
Aug 1, 2018
StartActual
Dec 1, 2018
Primary completionActual
Aug 30, 2025
CompletionActual
Aug 30, 2025
Last update
Oct 6, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 6, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03610750
Responsible party
Milton L. Wainberg, MD (Professor of Clinical Psychiatrist, New York State Psychiatric Institute) — Principal investigator
First posted
Aug 1, 2018
Start date
Dec 1, 2018
Primary completion
Aug 30, 2025
Completion
Aug 30, 2025
Last update
Oct 6, 2025

Study contacts

Milton L Wainberg, MD
principal investigator · NYSPI

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion