An interventional study of active intervention and Control Intervention in Amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment - aMCI and Insomnia, sponsored by New York State Psychiatric Institute. Not yet recruiting. Open to participants aged 60 Years to 85 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-11-03.
Sponsored by New York State Psychiatric Institute · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention
Study Description As most clinical trials in Alzheimer's disease (AD) have been unsuccessful to date, it has become increasingly crucial to focus on treating earlier stages of the disease. Compelling evidence indicates that sleep disruption is associated with accumulation of Alzheimer's biomarkers, including amyloid-beta (Aβ) and tau pathology. Slow-wave activity (SWA) during sleep is particularly important for the clearance of Aβ and sleep-dependent memory consolidation, and sleep disturbance could reduce the amount of time spent in slow-wave sleep. Together, these findings suggest that treating sleep disruption in older adults may help reduce the level of adverse brain aging.
The goal of this study is to better understand the effect of sleep interventions on improving sleep and building cognitive resilience in older adults with amnestic mild cognitive impairment (aMCI), and to assess the feasibility of relevant study protocols. Fifty older adults (ages 60-85) with aMCI and sleep disturbance (Insomnia Severity Index score of 8 or greater) will be randomized 1:1 to one of two treatment arms: Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Insomnia only (CBT-I + Sham), or CBT-I combined with acoustic slow-wave activity enhancement (CBT-I + SWAE). CBT-I is a psychotherapy intervention designed to address maladaptive cognitive and behavioral patterns associated with sleep and bedtime. SWAE is administered through non-invasive earbuds (Smartbuds, NextSense Inc.) that detect and amplify endogenous slow-wave activity using acoustic pulses during sleep.
Each participant will complete 3 visits over approximately 6 months: a baseline visit, a post-treatment visit (approximately 12 weeks after baseline), and a 6-month follow-up visit. Group differences will be compared on changes in cognitive performance and plasma biomarkers of AD (phosphorylated tau [pTau-217]) across these time points. The study will also explore potential mechanisms behind the relationship between sleep and cognition/biomarkers by investigating a range of objectively measured sleep metrics (e.g., sleep architecture, sleep duration, arousals) along with depressive symptoms.
Hypotheses:
CBT-I will be associated with more favorable outcomes (i.e., less decline or greater improvement) in frontal network functioning (sustained attention/target detection, executive functions), while SWAE will be associated with better outcomes in measures of episodic memory (word-list learning and story recall). Improvements in total sleep time and insomnia symptoms at 8 weeks are hypothesized to mediate the relationship between CBT-I and performance on attention and executive functions over 6 months, while improvements in slow-wave non-rapid eye movement (NREM) sleep at 12 weeks are hypothesized to mediate the relationship between SWAE and episodic memory measures. Additionally, CBT-I is hypothesized to be associated with increased scores on the Visuospatial Abilities, Planning, Organization, and Divided Attention subscales of the Everyday Cognition (ECog) questionnaire after 6 months, while SWAE is hypothesized to be associated with a significant increase in the Everyday Memory subscale.
Objectives:
Aim 1: To determine if CBT-I and SWAE have different neuropsychological outcomes in aMCI.
Aim 2: To examine the impact of sleep treatments on cognitively mediated everyday functioning.
Exploratory Aim: To assess whether CBT-I and/or SWAE are associated with changes in plasma pTau and whether pTau moderates the association between sleep and cognition.
Results from this study will determine whether sleep interventions can build brain and cognitive resilience in the context of aging, and will inform the design of a future, larger-scale R01 study rigorously examining the association between targeted sleep modifications and markers of AD pathophysiology as a potentially modifiable risk factor for dementia.
2,722 studies on the registry are indexed under Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders; 726 are open to participants now.
This study's planned enrollment of 50 is below the median of 68 across 2,350 interventional studies indexed under Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders.
Browse Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders studies →New York State Psychiatric Institute is the lead sponsor of 435 studies on the registry; 27 are open to participants now.
Of its 51 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 45 (88%) have results posted.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Short tests of memory and thinking, each scored out of 30. Lower scores suggest more difficulty; criteria give a range, either to include people with memory problems or to leave them out.
Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.
You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.
The American Psychiatric Association’s manual of mental health diagnoses. DSM-5 (2013, revised as DSM-5-TR in 2022) replaced DSM-IV, and some studies still name the older edition. “Meets DSM criteria for …” means diagnosed by that edition’s diagnostic criteria, usually by a clinician in an interview.
MMSE and MoCA
Short tests of memory and thinking, each scored out of 30. Lower scores suggest more difficulty; criteria give a range, either to include people with memory problems or to leave them out.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Informed consent
Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.
You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
DSM diagnostic criteria
The American Psychiatric Association’s manual of mental health diagnoses. DSM-5 (2013, revised as DSM-5-TR in 2022) replaced DSM-IV, and some studies still name the older edition. “Meets DSM criteria for …” means diagnosed by that edition’s diagnostic criteria, usually by a clinician in an interview.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
This sham condition includes the device being worn without any active pink noise engagement
Device: Control Intervention
Slow wave enhancement via NextSense SmartBuds
Device: active intervention
slow wave sleep enhancement vi NextSense Smart buds
Sham condition (device worn without active enhancement)
Change in Attention/Executive Function Composite Score
Composite of performance on the No Practice Effect (NPE) test battery measures of frontal network functioning, including N-back (target detection/working memory), Letter-Number Span (executive function), Symbol Coding (processing speed), and Verbal Fluency. Change reflects Hypothesis 1a (CBT-I predicted to show greater improvement on this domain).
Time frame: 8 weeks and 6 months
Change in Everyday Cognition (ECog) Subscale Scores
Informant-rated change on ECog subscales, including Everyday Memory, Visuospatial Abilities, Planning, Organization, and Divided Attention, assessing cognitively mediated everyday functioning (Aim 2/Hypothesis 2).
Time frame: Baseline and 6 months
No study locations are listed for this record.
Plan to share: Yes
Start is estimated for Jan 2027; primary completion for Jun 2029, 29 months later.
Of 1,207 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders, half reached primary completion within 15 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 6 and three quarters within 35. This study's planned 29 months is above that.
Counting every sponsor, half of 1,285 studies reached it within 15 months; a quarter within 6 and three quarters within 34.
How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.
From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Oct 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders →
New York State Psychiatric Institute →