CClinicalTrials.gg
Active, not recruitingNCT03607370ST812Updated Nov 8, 2023

Timing for Rectal Surgery After Chemoradiotherapy

An interventional study of Surgery after 12 weeks of delay after chemoradiotherapy. in Rectal Cancer, sponsored by National Cancer Center Affiliate of Vilnius University Hospital Santaros Klinikos. Active, not recruiting at 1 site in Lithuania. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 99 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-11-08.

Sponsored by National Cancer Center Affiliate of Vilnius University Hospital Santaros Klinikos · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
142
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 99 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The aim of this study is to determine whether greater rectal cancer downstaging and regression occurs when surgery is delayed to 12 weeks after completion of radiotherapy/chemotherapy compared to 8 weeks.

Hypothesis: Greater down-staging and tumor regression is observed when surgery is delayed to 12 weeks after completion of chemoradiotherapy compared to 8 weeks.

02

Conditions studied

  • Rectal Cancer

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Rectal cancer
  • Chemoradiotherapy
  • Surgery
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 99 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Over 18 years old
  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) 0-1,
  • American Society of Anesthesiologists' (ASA) score I-III
  • Histological confirmation of adenocarcinoma of rectum
  • T3 or T4 N0, T any N positive cancer on MRI, without metastasis on CT scan
  • Undergoing preoperative radiotherapy/ chemotherapy
  • Curative total mesorectal excision intended
  • Written informed consent
  • Patients undergoing preoperative radiotherapy should not be excluded

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with distant metastasis
  • T1 or T2, N0 cancer on MRI
  • Rectal cancer 12 cm above the dentate line
  • Contraindications to MRI
  • Patients previously treated of pelvic organ cancer
  • Medical or psychiatric conditions that compromise the patients ability to give informed consent
04

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
142 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • No intervention
    Group 1

    The cancer surgery is practice 8 weeks after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy

  • Experimental
    Group 2

    The cancer surgery will be performed in 12 weeks after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy

    Procedure: Surgery after 12 weeks of delay after chemoradiotherapy.

Interventions

  • ProcedureSurgery after 12 weeks of delay after chemoradiotherapy.

    Surgery consists oncologic resection of the rectal cancer with total excision of the mesorectum after 12 weeks of delay after the end of chemoradiotherapy.

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Complete pathologic response assessed by pathologist Dworak scale

    Dworak scale assesses the response: 0. No regression; 1. Predominantly tumor with significant fibrosis and/or vasculopathy; 2. Predominantly fibrosis with scattered tumor cells (slightly recognizable histologically); 3. Only scattered tumor cells in the space of fibrosis with/without acellular mucin; 4. No vital tumor cells detectable

    Time frame: 6 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Clinical response assessed using MRi

    Rates of clinical response to chemoradiotherapy before surgery, comparison between the two groups

    Time frame: 8 weeks (2 months)

  2. Pathological response assessed by pathologist using Dworak scale

    Dworak scale assesses the response: 0. No regression; 1. Predominantly tumor with significant fibrosis and/or vasculopathy; 2. Predominantly fibrosis with scattered tumor cells (slightly recognizable histologically); 3. Only scattered tumor cells in the space of fibrosis with/without acellular mucin; 4. No vital tumor cells detectable

    Time frame: 6 months

  3. Incidence of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events as assessed by Clavien-Dindo scale

    Rates of operative morbidity at 30 days, comparison between the two groups. Grade I Any deviation from the normal postoperative course without the need for pharmacological treatment or surgical, endoscopic and radiological interventions Allowed therapeutic regimens are: drugs as antiemetics, antipyretics, analgetics, diuretics and electrolytes and physiotherapy. This grade also includes wound infections opened at the bedside. Grade II Requiring pharmacological treatment with drugs other than such allowed for grade I complications. Blood transfusionsand total parenteral nutritionare also included. Grade III Requiring surgical, endoscopic or radiological intervention * IIIa Intervention not under general anesthesia * IIIb Intervention under general anesthesia Grade IV Life-threatening complication (including CNS complications)\* requiring IC/ICU-management * IVa single organ dysfunction (including dialysis) * IVb multiorgan dysfunction

    Time frame: 30 days

  4. Incidence of Mortality assessed by Clavien-Dindo scale

    Rates of operative mortality at 30 days, comparison between the two groups. Grade V Death of a patient

    Time frame: 30 days

  5. Total mesorectal excision (TME) quality assessed by TME completeness scale (by P.Quircke)

    Quality of mesorectum resection assessed by TME completeness scale: 1. Mesorectal resection (MRR)/good/complete: intact mesorectum and smooth mesorectal surface with only minor irregularities; no defects deeper than 5 mm; no coning of the specimen towards the distal margin; and smooth macro-circular resection margin (CRM) on slicing. 2. Intramesorectal resection (IMR)/intermediate/nearly complete: intermediate bulk of the mesorectum with an irregular surface; a defect deeper than 5 mm, and no visible muscularis propria other than inserted levator; intermediate coning; intermediate irregularity of macro-CRM on slicing. 3. Muscularis propria resection (MPR)/poor/incomplete: small bulk of the mesorectum with a very irregular surface; defect down to the muscularis propria; severe coning; severe irregularity of macro-CRM on slicing.

    Time frame: 8-12 weeks

  6. Distant recurrence assessed by CT scan

    Distant recurrence rates, comparison between the two groups

    Time frame: 5 years

  7. Local recurrence assessed by CT scan/MRI/endoscopy

    Local recurrence rates, comparison between the two groups

    Time frame: 5 years

  8. Oncological outcome - overall survival

    Overall survival rates, comparison between the two groups

    Time frame: 5 years

  9. Oncological outcome - disease-free survival

    Disease-free survival rates, comparison between the two groups

    Time frame: 5 years

  10. Radiotherapy skin toxicity assessed by EORTC scale

    Radiotherapy related toxicity rates: skin reactions will be assessed using EORTC radiotherapy toxicity scale: Skin Grade 1 follicular, faint or dull erythema / epilation / dry desquamation / decreased sweating; Grade 2 tender or bright erythema, patchy moist desquamation / moderate edema; Grade 3 confluent, moist desquamation other than skin folds, pitting edema; Grade 4 - ulceration, hemorrhage, necrosis

    Time frame: 5 years

  11. Radiotherapy toxicity assessed by EORTC scale

    Radiotherapy related toxicity rates: gastrointestinal reactions will be assessed using EORTC radiotherapy toxicity scale: Grade 1 increased frequency or change in quality of bowel habits not requiring medication / rectal discomfort not requiring analgesics; Grade 2 diarrhea requiring parasympatholytic drugs (e.g. Lomotil) / mucous discharge not necessitating sanitary pads / rectal or abdominal pain requiring analgesics; Grade 3 diarrhea requiring parenteral support / severe mucous or blood discharge necessitating sanitary pads / abdominal distention (flat plate radiograph demonstrates distended bowel loops); Grade 4 acute or subacute obstruction, fistula or perforation; GI bleeding requiring transfusion; abdominal pain or tenesmus requiring tube decompression or bowel diversion

    Time frame: 5 years

  12. Quality of Life assessed by Low anterior resection syndrome score

    The Low anterior resection syndrome score (LARS) score consists of five items concerning the following: incontinence for flatus, incontinence for liquid stool, frequency of bowel movements, clustering of stools, and urgency. Each symptom of bowel dysfunction is weighed according to its impact on the quality of life. The calculated score ranges from 0 to 42, with a score of 0-20 representing no ARS, a score of 21-29 representing minor ARS, and a score of 30-42 representing major ARS.

    Time frame: 1 year

  13. Immune response assessed

    We have assessed the immune response before chemoradiotherapy and 8 weeks following the treatment. IL1B, IL6, IL8, IL10, IL2R, TNF alfa are assessed and will be correlated with the response to treatment.

    Time frame: 1 year

  14. Urinary catheter removal timing

    All the patients will have there urinary catheters removed on day 1. Some patients will get Urorec (adrenomimetic for prevention of urinary retention). The patients will be randomized 2:1

    Time frame: 3 months

06

Study locations

1 site
  • National Cancer Institute
    Vilnius, 08406, Lithuania
07

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03607370
Lead sponsor
National Cancer Center Affiliate of Vilnius University Hospital Santaros Klinikos
Responsible party
Audrius Dulskas (Assoc. profesor, National Cancer Center Affiliate of Vilnius University Hospital Santaros Klinikos) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jul 31, 2018
Start date
Jul 1, 2017
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2023 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 31, 2025 (estimated)
Last update
Nov 8, 2023

Study contacts

Audrius Dulskas, MD, PhD
principal investigator · National Cancer Institute (NCI)

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is active, not recruiting, as verified in Nov 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion