CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06565052Updated Sep 30, 2026

The Impact of PReOPerative Exercise and NutritionaL Optimization on Perioperative Outcomes for Patients Undergoing Treatment for Rectal Cancer: The PROPEL Trial

An interventional study of Prehabilitation Program in Rectal Cancer, Colorectal Cancer and Rectal Cancer Stage II, sponsored by Dana-Farber Cancer Institute. Recruiting at 2 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-30.

Sponsored by Dana-Farber Cancer Institute · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
40
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to determine the feasibility of a prehabilitation program for participants diagnosed with rectal cancer undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy and/or radiation, followed by surgical resection.

The names of the groups in this research study are:

  • Group A: Prehabilitation program
  • Group B: Usual Care
Read the detailed description

This is a non-blinded, randomized control trial to determine the feasibility of a hybrid-model, prehabilitation program for participants diagnosed with rectal cancer undergoing neoadjuvant therapy (chemotherapy and/or radiation) before surgical resection. Investigators hope that prehabilitation will result in improved outcomes after surgery.

Participants will be randomized into one of the study groups: Group A: prehabilitation program, or Group B: usual care. Randomization means that a participant is placed into a group by chance.

The research study procedures include screening for eligibility, in-clinic visits, physical exams, exercise training, blood tests, and questionnaires.

It is expected that about 40 participants will take part in this research study.

02

Conditions studied

  • Rectal Cancer
  • Colorectal Cancer
  • Rectal Cancer Stage II
  • Rectal Cancer Stage III

Keywords

  • Rectal Cancer
  • Colorectal Cancer
  • Rectal Cancer Stage II
  • Rectal Cancer Stage III
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Age greater than or equal to 18 years at time of enrollment.
  • English-Speaking.
  • Diagnosis of clinical stage II-III rectal cancer.
  • Planned, ongoing or just completed neoadjuvant treatment, including either 1) chemoradiation, 2) total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT), or 3) chemotherapy only; and anticipated surgical resection to follow.
  • Able to understand the study procedures, agree to participate in the study program, and voluntarily provide informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Distant metastatic disease known at the time of diagnosis.
  • Functional incapacity (i.e., incapable of performing exercise testing).
  • Comorbid conditions or cognitive/physical impairments that contraindicate exercise.
  • Currently undergoing treatment for a secondary primary tumor, in addition to primary rectal cancer.
  • Currently enrolled in a separate clinical trial that would prohibit them from performing the tasks instructed in this trial.
  • Currently participating in more than 60 minutes of moderate-to-vigorous aerobic exercise per week over the past month. This study targets insufficiently active persons to assess the effect of the described intervention, where additional exercise done regularly will contaminate the intervention effects.
04

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Investigator)
Enrollment
40 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Group A: Prehabilitation Program

    Participants will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio using a permuted blocked design and stratified by neoadjuvant therapy received. Participants will complete the following: * In-clinic baseline visit with assessments * Virtual exercise sessions 3 days per week for 4 weeks. * IMN supplementation and daily multivitamin starting at 4 weeks of the preoperative phase. * Resection surgery per standard of care * In-clinic 30 day postoperative visit.

    Behavioral: Prehabilitation Program

  • No intervention
    Group B: Usual Care

    Participants will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio using a permuted blocked design and stratified by neoadjuvant therapy received. Participants will complete the following: * In-clinic baseline visit with assessments * Resection surgery per standard of care * In-clinic 30 day postoperative visit * After completion of the study period, participants will be offered exercise equipment with an exercise instruction booklet.

Interventions

  • BehavioralPrehabilitation Program

    A hybrid-based, prehabilitation regimen comprised of nutritional optimization (multivitamin and protein supplement shake) and virtual, aerobic and resistance exercise sessions with clinical exercise physiologists. Virtual exercise sessions will be performed via a HIPAA-compliant videoconferencing platform or by phone call. Mini-exercise cycle ergometer, dumbbells, and resistance bands will be provided and delivered to participant. Heart rate monitors and wi-fi enable tablet will be provided if needed.

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Enrollment Rate

    The proportion of eligible individuals that are enrolled to the study. Feasibility of the intervention is defined as an enrollment rate of greater than 10% of approached, eligible participants.

    Time frame: Baseline

Secondary outcomes

  1. Adherence Rate to the Prehabilitation Program

    The number of intervention assessments completed by participants in Group A. Feasibility of the intervention is defined as at least 50% of participants adhering to at least 50% of the prescribed assessments of the prehabilitation program.

    Time frame: At post-intervention (approximately Week 4)

  2. Completion Rate of Physical Function Testing (Group A)

    Defined as the number of testing assessments (resting blood pressure, measure of cardiorespiratory fitness, Short Physical Performance Battery, muscular strength, and anthropometric measures) completed by participants.

    Time frame: At post-intervention (approximately Week 4)

  3. Completion Rate of Physical Function Testing (Group B)

    Defined as the number of testing assessments (resting blood pressure, measure of cardiorespiratory fitness, Short Physical Performance Battery, muscular strength, and anthropometric measures) completed by participants.

    Time frame: At post-intervention (approximately Week 4)

  4. Completion Rate of Questionnaire Assessments

    Defined as the number of questionnaires completed by all participants.

    Time frame: At baseline and the postoperative visit (approximately Week 9)

  5. Participant Fall Rate (Group A)

    Defined as the number of falls attributable to the exercise and nutrition components of the intervention.

    Time frame: At post-intervention (approximately Week 4)

  6. Participant Fall Rate (Group B)

    Defined as the number of falls attributable to the exercise and nutrition components of the intervention.

    Time frame: At post-intervention (approximately Week 4)

  7. Rate of Hospitalization (Group A)

    Defined as the number of hospitalizations attributable to the exercise and nutrition components of the intervention.

    Time frame: At post-intervention (approximately Week 4)

  8. Rate of Hospitalization (Group B)

    Defined as the number of hospitalizations attributable to the exercise and nutrition components of the intervention.

    Time frame: At post-intervention (approximately Week 4)

  9. Rate of Musculoskeletal Injury (Group A)

    Defined as the number of musculoskeletal injuries attributable to the exercise and nutrition components of the intervention.

    Time frame: At post-intervention (approximately Week 4)

  10. Rate of Musculoskeletal Injury (Group B)

    Defined as the number of musculoskeletal injuries attributable to the exercise and nutrition components of the intervention.

    Time frame: At post-intervention (approximately Week 4)

  11. Change in Resting Blood Pressure from Baseline to Post-Intervention

    Assessed by resting blood pressure. The average systolic blood pressure (of two measurements from each arm) will be recorded.

    Time frame: From baseline to post-operative visit (approximately week 9)

  12. Change in Cardiorespiratory Fitness from Baseline to Post-Intervention

    Assessed by VO2peak by a graded maximal (or submaximal if equipment is unavailable) cycle exercise stress test. VO2peak is defined as the highest values of oxygen uptake averaged among every 30-second interval during the test. VO2peak will be reported in both relative (ml·kg-1·min-1) and absolute (L/min) terms.

    Time frame: From baseline to post-operative visit (approximately week 9)

  13. Change in Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) Score from Baseline to Post-Intervention

    Assessed by the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) which is comprised of three sections: 1) balance with feet together, semi tandem, and full tandem is held for up to 10 seconds with no support and measure in seconds. Scores are summed for the measure of balance for a range of 0 to 30 seconds; 2) usual gait speed over four meters is timed (seconds); and 3) chair stand where the time(s) to complete five chair sit-to-stands is recorded. Each of the three performance measures is assigned a score ranging from 0 to 4, with 4 indicating highest level of performance and 0 indicating inability to complete test. A summary score ranging from 0 (worst performers) to 12 (best performers) is calculated by adding walking speed, chair stands and balance scores.

    Time frame: From baseline to post-operative visit (approximately week 9)

  14. Change in Muscle Strength from Baseline to Post-Intervention

    The 1RM (repetition maximum) will be estimated from 10RM muscle strength tests on two exercises: 1) leg press, 2) chest press. 1RM values will be calculated and reported using validated equations.

    Time frame: From baseline to post-operative visit (approximately week 9)

  15. Change in Height from Baseline to Post-Intervention

    Height will be measured using a stadiometer, rounding up to the nearest 0.1 cm

    Time frame: From baseline to post-operative visit (approximately week 9)

  16. Change in Weight from Baseline to Post-Intervention

    Assessed by weight, rounding up to the nearest 0.1 kg.

    Time frame: From baseline to post-operative visit (approximately week 9)

  17. Change in Waist Circumference from Baseline to Post-Intervention

    Waist circumference will be measured, rounding up to the nearest 0.1cm.

    Time frame: From baseline to post-operative visit (approximately week 9)

  18. Change in Hip Circumference from Baseline to Post-Intervention

    Hip circumference will be measured, rounding up to the nearest 0.1cm.

    Time frame: From baseline to post-operative visit (approximately week 9)

  19. Change in Body Mass Index from Baseline to Post-Intervention

    Body composition will be assessed via bioelectrical impedance using a validated device. The device will estimate body fat using an algorithm based on participant age, sex, height, and body weight.

    Time frame: From baseline to post-operative visit (approximately week 9)

  20. Change in Nutritional Status from Baseline to Post-Surgery (Group A)

    Assessed by the Perioperative Nutrition Score (PONS), a validated screening questionnaire that assists in determining risk of malnutrition in the perioperative setting. This is assessed via 1) Body mass index (BMI), which can be calculated through the participant's anthropomorphic measurements, 2) self-reported unplanned changes in weight or decrease in dietary intake, or 3) preoperative albumin level.

    Time frame: From baseline to postoperative visit, up to 9 weeks

  21. Change in Nutritional Status from Baseline to Post-Surgery (Group B)

    Assessed by the Perioperative Nutrition Score (PONS), a validated screening questionnaire that assists in determining risk of malnutrition in the perioperative setting. This is assessed via 1) Body mass index (BMI), which can be calculated through the participant's anthropomorphic measurements, 2) self-reported unplanned changes in weight or decrease in dietary intake, or 3) preoperative albumin level.

    Time frame: From baseline to postoperative visit, up to 9 weeks

  22. Change in Quality of Life from Baseline to Post-Surgery (Group A)

    Assessed by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer's (EORTC's) Quality of Life (QOL) core questionnaire (QLQ C-30), a validated, 30-item instrument designed to quantify and measure QOL in cancer participants. Questions are rated on a four point scale from 1 "Not at all" to 4 "Very much. All items have a score range from 0 to 100 points. A higher score represents better function and a higher quality of life.

    Time frame: From baseline to postoperative visit, up to 9 weeks

  23. Change in Quality of Life from Baseline to Post-Surgery (Group B)

    Assessed by the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), a 19 question measure of 7 domains of sleep quality and patterns of sleep. The 19 self-rated items are combined to form 7 component scores, each of which has a range of 0 to 3 points with a 0 indicating no difficulty and 3 indicating severe difficulty. The 7 component scores are added to yield a total score with a range of 0 to 21 points. A total score of 5 or greater is indicative of poor sleep quality.

    Time frame: From baseline to postoperative visit, up to 9 weeks

  24. Change in Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) Score from Baseline to Post-Surgery (Group A)

    Assessed by the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), a 19 question measure of 7 domains of sleep quality and patterns of sleep. The 19 self-rated items are combined to form 7 component scores, each of which has a range of 0 to 3 points with a 0 indicating no difficulty and 3 indicating severe difficulty. The 7 component scores are added to yield a total score with a range of 0 to 21 points. A total score of 5 or greater is indicative of poor sleep quality.

    Time frame: From baseline to postoperative visit, up to 9 weeks

  25. Change in PSQI Score from Baseline to Post-Surgery (Group B)

    Assessed by the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), a 19 question measure of 7 domains of sleep quality and patterns of sleep. The 19 self-rated items are combined to form 7 component scores, each of which has a range of 0 to 3 points with a 0 indicating no difficulty and 3 indicating severe difficulty. The 7 component scores are added to yield a total score with a range of 0 to 21 points. A total score of 5 or greater is indicative of poor sleep quality.

    Time frame: From baseline to postoperative visit, up to 9 weeks

  26. Change in Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) Score from Baseline to Post-Surgery (Group A)

    Assessed by the Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS), which consists of 9 questions assessing specific domains including comorbidity, function, and cognition to generate a frailty score ranging from 1 (very fit) to 9 (terminally ill).

    Time frame: From baseline to postoperative visit, up to 9 weeks

  27. Change in Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) Score from Baseline to Post-Surgery (Group B)

    Assessed by the Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS), which consists of 9 questions assessing specific domains including comorbidity, function, and cognition to generate a frailty score ranging from 1 (very fit) to 9 (terminally ill).

    Time frame: From baseline to postoperative visit, up to 9 weeks

  28. Length of Hospitalization Post-Surgery (Group A)

    Defined as the number of days of hospitalization post-surgery.

    Time frame: 30 Days

  29. Length of Hospitalization Post-Surgery (Group B)

    Defined as the number of days of hospitalization post-surgery.

    Time frame: 30 Days

  30. Time To Return of Bowel Function Post-Surgery (Group A)

    Defined as the number of days to a return of bowl function post-surgery.

    Time frame: 30 Days

  31. Time To Return of Bowel Function Post-Surgery (Group B)

    Defined as the number of days to a return of bowl function post-surgery.

    Time frame: 30 Days

  32. Discharge Disposition (Group B)

    Defined as participant disposition post-surgery: discharge to home, inpatient rehabilitation facility, or other. Data will be summarized using descriptive statistics.

    Time frame: 30 Days

  33. Discharge Disposition (Group A)

    Defined as participant disposition post-surgery: discharge to home, inpatient rehabilitation facility, or other. Data will be summarized using descriptive statistics.

    Time frame: 30 Days

06

Study locations

2 of 2 sites recruiting
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
    Boston, Massachusetts 02115, United States
    Recruiting
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital
    Boston, Massachusetts 02215, United States
    Recruiting
07

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — The Dana-Farber / Harvard Cancer Center encourages and supports the responsible and ethical sharing of data from clinical trials. De-identified participant data from the final research dataset used in the published manuscript may only be shared under the terms of a Data Use Agreement. Requests may be directed to: \[contact information for Sponsor Investigator or designee\]. The protocol and statistical analysis plan will be made available on Clinicaltrials.gov only as required by federal regulation or as a condition of awards and agreements supporting the research.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Sap

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

08

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06565052
Lead sponsor
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
Responsible party
Jeffrey A. Meyerhardt, MD (Principal Investigator, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute) — Principal investigator
First posted
Aug 21, 2024
Start date
Dec 15, 2024
Primary completion
Jul 1, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 30, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 30, 2026

Study contacts

Jeffrey Meyerhardt, MD, MPH
Contact
jeffrey_meyerhardt@dfci.harvard.edu
617-632-6855
Jeffrey Meyerhardt, MD, MPH
principal investigator · Dana-Farber Cancer Institute

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion