CClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT03575975Updated May 28, 2021Results posted

3D X-ray Motion Analysis of Ankle-foot Motion After Total Ankle Arthroplasty

An observational study in Ankle Arthroplasty, Prosthesis User and Joint Disease, sponsored by Georgia Institute of Technology. Terminated at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 79 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-05-28.

Sponsored by Georgia Institute of Technology · Observational

Why this study was terminated
Study was terminated due to lack of funding and unforeseen delays.
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrollment
9
Ages
18 Years to 79 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Patients who have had a total ankle joint replacement surgery typically have limited movement in their ankles possibly due to the fact that commonly used ankle joint prosthetic devices only allow limited axes of motion.

This study will evaluate the ability of a Scandinavian Total Ankle Replacement (STAR) mobile-bearing prosthesis and INBONE 2 fixed-bearing prosthesis to restore triplanar motion in the tibiotalar (ankle) joint following a surgical arthroplasty (total joint replacement) procedure.

3D X-ray video motion analysis will be utilized to quantify range of motion measurements in two groups of ankle prosthesis users and a group of matched control participants.

Read the detailed description

15 study participants will include those using a Stryker STAR prosthesis and a Wright Medical INBONE 2 prosthesis and a group of matched control subjects.

CT scans of lower limb anatomy (ankle-foot complex) will be obtained for all subjects to be converted into 3D bone surface models for use in the joint motion tracking software.

Each participant will participate in one day of data collection with an X-Ray Motion Analysis (XMA) system. High-speed biplanar XMA system will capture video images of the skeletal motions within the foot-ankle complex during normal movement. Subjects will walk and perform controlled movements in the capture volume within the XMA system.

Following data collection, the 3D bone surface models will be mapped to the sagittal (side view), coronal (front view), and axial (top view) plane skeletal motions demonstrated in the collected x-ray videos. Motion tracking data will then be used to accurately animate the 3D bone models to demonstrate the active range of ankle-foot joint motions during voluntary movement and gait.

Resulting range of motion measurements in dorsiflexion/plantarflexion, internal/external rotation, and inversion/eversion will be used to determine the extent to which normal motion in the ankle-foot complex has been restored in ankle prosthesis users.

02

Conditions studied

  • Ankle Arthroplasty
  • Prosthesis User
  • Joint Disease

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • x-ray motion analysis
  • joint kinematics
  • functional range of motion
03

In context

Joint Diseases

712 studies on the registry are indexed under Joint Diseases; 127 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 9 is below the median of 100 across 216 observational studies indexed under Joint Diseases.

Browse Joint Diseases studies →

Lead sponsor

Georgia Institute of Technology is the lead sponsor of 24 studies on the registry; 5 are open to participants now.

Of its 9 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 7 (78%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 79 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Study participants meeting the eligibility criteria will be convenience-sampled from within the metro-Atlanta area. Eligible participants with either a STAR or INBONE 2 prosthesis will be identified from among clinical populations treated at the Emory University Hospital. Control group participants will be convenience-sampled from within the metro-Atlanta area.

Inclusion criteria

  • Between 18 to 79 years of age.

Additional Inclusion criteria for mobile-bearing ankle prosthesis user group:

  • Able to walk independently with their prosthesis at different self-selected speeds
  • Implanted with Stryker Scandinavian Total Ankle Replacement (STAR) prosthesis at least one year prior to enrollment
  • Pain free and radiologically normal
  • Able to walk at preferred walking speed without an assistive device (e.g., cane, crutches, etc.)

Additional Inclusion criteria for control group:

  • Within 3 years of age of one of the mobile-bearing ankle prosthesis user participants
  • Same gender as the matched mobile-bearing ankle prosthesis user participant
  • Not have a history of major musculoskeletal injuries
  • Not have a history of major neuromuscular injuries

Additional Inclusion criteria for fixed-bearing ankle prosthesis users:

  • Able to walk independently with their prosthesis at different self-selected speeds
  • Implanted with INBONE 2 prosthesis at least one year prior to enrollment
  • Pain free and radiologically normal
  • Able to walk at preferred walking speed without an assistive device (cane, crutches, etc.)

Exclusion criteria

EXCLUSION CRITERIA:

  • Have dementia or an inability to give informed consent
  • Have significant or chronic loss of hip or knee joint motion
  • Have any subtalar or hindfoot fusion
  • Have a history of dizziness and/or balance problems
  • Have had any additional x-ray exposures in the past year that would put beyond the recommended annual dose for the study
  • Are pregnant
  • Exhibit evidence of polysubsidence (implant loosening)
  • Exhibit evidence of a broken implant
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrollment
9 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Mobile-bearing ankle prosthesis user

    Users of the Stryker Scandinavian Total Ankle Replacement (STAR) mobile-bearing prosthesis.

    Device: Total Ankle Replacement Prosthesis

  • Control

    Healthy individual age- and gender-matched to a participant in the mobile-bearing prosthesis user group.

  • Fixed-bearing ankle prosthesis user

    Users of the INBONE II Total Ankle Replacement fixed-bearing prosthesis.

    Device: Total Ankle Replacement Prosthesis

Interventions

  • DeviceTotal Ankle Replacement Prosthesis

    Comparison of functional range of motion in users of Stryker Scandinavian Total Ankle Replacement (STAR) prosthesis to users of INBONE 2 Total Ankle Replacement prosthesis and to matched controls with intact ankle joints.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Tibiotalar Joint Angle Kinematics

    3D range of motions of the tibiotalar (upper ankle) joint were recorded and analyzed using a biplanar x-ray motion analysis system. In particular, joint ranges of motion were tested in terms of dorsiflexion-plantarflexion, internal-external rotation, and inversion-eversion angles.

    Time frame: 1 year

Secondary outcomes

  1. Tibiotalar Joint Linear Translation Kinematics

    3D range of linear motions of the tibiotalar (upper ankle) joint were recorded and analyzed using a biplanar x-ray motion analysis system. In particular, linear joint ranges of motion were tested in terms of the anteroposterior, mediolateral, and superior-inferior axes.

    Time frame: 1 year

07

Results

Posted May 28, 2021
Limitations and caveats
An early termination of the study led to a smaller number of subjects enrolled/analyzed than originally planned.

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneMobile-bearing Ankle Prosthesis UserFixed-bearing Ankle Prosthesis UserControl
Started450
Completed350
Not completed100
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up100

Outcome measures

PrimaryTibiotalar Joint Angle Kinematics

3D range of motions of the tibiotalar (upper ankle) joint were recorded and analyzed using a biplanar x-ray motion analysis system. In particular, joint ranges of motion were tested in terms of dorsiflexion-plantarflexion, internal-external rotation, and inversion-eversion angles.

Time frame:
1 year
Reported as:
Mean · degrees
Tibiotalar Joint Angle Kinematics
degreesMobile-bearing Ankle Prosthesis UserFixed-bearing Ankle Prosthesis User
Dorsiflexion-Plantarflexion Angle6.74 ± 2.047.47 ± 4.05
Internal-External Rotation Angle6.28 ± 4.517.39 ± 3.63
Inversion-Eversion Angle5.68 ± 2.814.51 ± 2.13
SecondaryTibiotalar Joint Linear Translation Kinematics

3D range of linear motions of the tibiotalar (upper ankle) joint were recorded and analyzed using a biplanar x-ray motion analysis system. In particular, linear joint ranges of motion were tested in terms of the anteroposterior, mediolateral, and superior-inferior axes.

Time frame:
1 year
Reported as:
Mean · mm
Tibiotalar Joint Linear Translation Kinematics
mmMobile-bearing Ankle Prosthesis UserFixed-bearing Ankle Prosthesis User
Antero-posterior axis0.68 ± 1.441.47 ± 2.07
Medio-Lateral axis0.60 ± 1.411.13 ± 1.49
Superior-Inferior axis0.28 ± 0.300.20 ± 0.13

Adverse events

Collected over Adverse event data were collected only during the period of study participation (typically less than 1 week).. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Mobile-bearing Ankle Prosthesis User0/3 (0%)0/3 (0%)0/3 (0%)
Fixed-bearing Ankle Prosthesis User0/5 (0%)0/5 (0%)0/5 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Control group participants were not enrolled due to early termination of the study.

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Mobile-bearing Ankle Prosthesis UserFixed-bearing Ankle Prosthesis UserControlTotal
Mean67.8 ± 12.670.0 ± 7.5—69.0 ± 9.5
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Mobile-bearing Ankle Prosthesis UserFixed-bearing Ankle Prosthesis UserControlTotal
Female33—6
Male12—3
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Mobile-bearing Ankle Prosthesis UserFixed-bearing Ankle Prosthesis UserControlTotal
Hispanic or Latino00—0
Not Hispanic or Latino00—0
Unknown or Not Reported45—9
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Mobile-bearing Ankle Prosthesis UserFixed-bearing Ankle Prosthesis UserControlTotal
United States45—9
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Georgia Institute of Technology
    Atlanta, Georgia 30332-0356, United States
09

References and documents

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Jan 3, 2018
  • Informed consent form · Nov 18, 2019

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 28, 2021, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03575975
Lead sponsor
Georgia Institute of Technology
Collaborators
Emory University, Stryker Orthopaedics
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jul 3, 2018
Start date
May 30, 2018
Primary completion
Apr 16, 2020
Completion
Apr 16, 2020
Results posted
May 28, 2021
Last update
May 28, 2021

Study contacts

Young-Hui Chang, PhD
principal investigator · Georgia Institute of Technology

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in May 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion