CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03574961eSupportUpdated Sep 1, 2020

E-Support Groups in Multiple Sclerosis

An interventional study of e-Support group and e-Journaling placebo in Multiple Sclerosis, sponsored by Columbia University. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-09-01.

Sponsored by Columbia University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
30
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Primary objectives:

  • To determine the feasibility of program (80% retained with 75% overall attendance, and completed immediate follow-up questionnaires from 75% of participants).
  • To determine the efficacy of program (evaluated by decreased loneliness, operationalized as decreased total score on the UCLA Loneliness Scale from pre to post intervention).

Secondary objective:

  • To determine whether program will affect depression and quality of life.
Read the detailed description

This study involves prospective data collection from an intervention to investigate the impact of participation by MS patients in a 12-week guided online social support group. All outcomes will be compared to active control group. At the completion of a 12-week interval, all participants (placebo and treatment) will complete follow-up questionnaires. Three months after completing, participants will be sent follow-up questionnaires that will be evaluated as a 6-month follow-up, to assess retention of benefits.

Social support has been linked to better health outcomes in many clinical populations. Multiple sclerosis (MS), a chronic neurological disease that affects over 400,000 people in the United States, involves physical and cognitive disability that can have negative consequences on social integration. This can lead to social isolation, which may be dynamically related to depression, fatigue, and disease progression. The aim of the present study is to investigate the impact of support group involvement on persons with MS. Outcomes of interest include mood, loneliness, and quality of life (QOL). Many people with MS feel isolated and are unable to participate in support groups that meet in locations that may be far from home, difficult to travel to (due to physical disability or lack of resources), or may not be convenient for their schedules. Another hindrance is the apprehension that MS patients sometimes experience when they encounter patients with severe physical disability, or worse impairment than their own. For these reasons, the study is introducing remote support groups to be conducted via the internet, "e-Support." Attending a remote, internet based support group may be more appealing to patients with MS as it obviates the need to travel, thereby reducing cost, time, and energy.

02

Conditions studied

  • Multiple Sclerosis

Keywords

  • depression
  • social isolation
03

In context

Multiple Sclerosis

3,460 studies on the registry are indexed under Multiple Sclerosis; 661 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 30 is below the median of 50 across 2,342 interventional studies indexed under Multiple Sclerosis.

Browse Multiple Sclerosis studies →

Lead sponsor

Columbia University is the lead sponsor of 1,103 studies on the registry; 193 are open to participants now.

Of its 172 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 142 (83%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Diagnosis of MS (any disease type)
  • Age 18 or over
  • Willingness to sign informed consent document

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Unable to obtain access to the internet
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
30 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    e-Support Group

    Participants in this arm will receive the treatment, 12 weeks of 1-hr weekly moderated e-Support sessions.

    Behavioral: e-Support group

  • Placebo comparator
    e-Journaling Placebo

    Participants in this arm will complete 12 weeks of 1-hr weekly online journaling activities.

    Behavioral: e-Journaling placebo

Interventions

  • Behaviorale-Support group

    Online (remote), web-based support group via private video link.

    Also known as: e-Support

  • Behaviorale-Journaling placebo

    Online journaling activity.

    Also known as: e-Journaling

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Percentage of enrolled participants who completed follow-up questionnaires

    Assess feasibility of the program: to retain and obtain completed questionnaires at immediate follow-up from 80% of enrolled participants (meeting the criteria of 75% attendance).

    Time frame: 12 weeks

  2. Change in UCLA Loneliness Scale total score (please note that the official name of the scale is the UCLA Loneliness Scale).

    Assess efficacy of the program to decrease loneliness as defined by a significant decrease in total score on UCLA Loneliness Scale. This name never appears as anything other than UCLA Loneliness Scale, i.e. Russell 1996)

    Time frame: Baseline, 12 weeks (immediate follow-up)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in overall depression [Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9)] total score

    Assess efficacy of the program to decrease depression as defined by a significant decrease in total score on Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9): an efficient tool for depression screening. The scale ranges from 0-27, with higher scores indicating worse depression.

    Time frame: Baseline, 12 weeks

  2. Change in overall Functional Assessment of Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life (FAMS QoL) score

    Assess efficacy of the program to improve quality of life. The Functional Assessment of Multiple Sclerosis (FAMS) quality of life (QoL) instrument is a disease-specific, self-report questionnaire. It includes 7 subscales. The total score is generated by summing scores across all subscales, and ranges from 0-232, with higher scores reflective or worse overall function. In addition to considering a significant decrease in the total score as an indication of better overall function, we will separately examine each subscale to see whether decreases in score (indicating improvements in function) are shown. This includes the following subscales: mobility, symptoms, emotional well-being, general contentment, thinking and fatigue, family/social well-being, and additional concerns scales.

    Time frame: Baseline, 12 weeks

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Columbia University Medical Center (MS Center)
    New York, New York 10032, United States
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 1, 2020, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03574961
Lead sponsor
Columbia University
Collaborators
National Multiple Sclerosis Society
Responsible party
Victoria M. Leavitt (Assistant Professor of Neuropsychology (in Neurology and Gertrud, Dept of Neur Neuropsychology, Columbia University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jul 2, 2018
Start date
May 10, 2018
Primary completion
Apr 30, 2019
Completion
Jun 30, 2019
Last update
Sep 1, 2020

Study contacts

Victoria M Leavitt, PhD
principal investigator · Columbia University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion