ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03567109Schem-TMSUpdated Jun 11, 2024

Body Schema Alterations in Musculoskeletal Disorders : Effect of Laterality

An observational study in Musculoskeletal Disorder, Rotator Cuff Tendinitis and Chronic Low Back Pain, sponsored by University Hospital, Angers. Completed at 1 site in France. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-06-11.

Sponsored by University Hospital, Angers · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Case-control
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
71
Ages
18 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study assess ocular movements in a hand laterality judgment task in a population of musculoskeletal disorders. Reaction time, error rate and visual strategy are compared between musculoskeletal disorders and healthy patients, and between the different locations of the disorder.

Read the detailed description

Musculoskeletal disorders are a major public health issue. Recent studies showed that body schema alterations are involved in the chronification of those disorders. Those alterations bring the opportunity for new exploration or therapeutic solutions. Our hypothesis is that musculoskeletal disorders lead to motor imagery alterations relative to body schema disorders. Reaction time extension et error rate increase in a hand laterality judgment task would confirm that hypothesis. It is assumed that body schema alterations of patients suffering from musculoskeletal disorders could change with localisation, dependant on disorder's laterality and distality.

It is a monocentric, prospective, case-control trial, with 4 subgroups of 30 patients : shoulder rotator cuff tendinopathy, carpal tunnel syndrome, chronic low back pain, healthy subjects. We compare reaction time and error rate on a hand laterality judgement task. In that task, participants are asked to identify hand right or left laterality, when those hand is presented on a computer screen, by answering with the keyboard. Hands are shown on palmar or dorsal view and with 12 different angles of rotation. An eye-tracking device register participant eye movements during the task.

02

Conditions studied

  • Musculoskeletal Disorder
  • Rotator Cuff Tendinitis
  • Chronic Low Back Pain
  • Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
03

In context

Musculoskeletal Diseases

668 studies on the registry are indexed under Musculoskeletal Diseases; 161 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 71 is below the median of 132 across 208 observational studies indexed under Musculoskeletal Diseases.

Browse Musculoskeletal Diseases studies →

Lead sponsor

University Hospital, Angers is the lead sponsor of 477 studies on the registry; 119 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

patients refered to the Hospital University of Angers or the Hand Center in Trelazé for one of the musculoskeletal disorders meeting the inclusion criterias.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • normal visual acuity
  • social security affiliation
  • signing consent
  • rotator cuff tendinopathy, chronic low back pain, carpal tunnel syndrome or healthy subject

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • recent trauma or surgery
  • psychiatric or neurological disorder
  • psychotropic consumption
  • previous experience with motor imagery
  • bad french comprehension
  • protected persons
  • other painful affection than the inclusion criteria
05

Study design

Observational model
Case-control
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
71 participants (actual)
Target follow-up
1 Day
Patient registry
Yes

Groups and cohorts

  • Shoulder rotator cuff tendinopathy

    unilateral rotator cuff tendinopathy, 3 months or more duration, confirmed by imagery,

    Other: hand laterality judgment task

  • chronic low back pain

    non specific chronic (3 months) low back pain

    Other: hand laterality judgment task

  • carpal tunnel syndrome

    unilateral carpal tunnel syndrome, confirmed by electromyogram, 3 months or more duration

    Other: hand laterality judgment task

  • control

    healthy subjects

    Other: hand laterality judgment task

Interventions

  • Otherhand laterality judgment task

    participants are asked to identify laterality of the hand presented on the screen

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. error rate at the hand laterality judgment task

    number of errors divided by the total number of hands presented

    Time frame: 1 hour

  2. reaction time

    time to press on the keyboard the answer "Right" or "Left" after the hand was presented

    Time frame: 1 hour

Secondary outcomes

  1. visual strategy

    assessment of the image's areas most fixed with the eyes

    Time frame: 1 hour

07

Study locations

1 site
  • CHU Angers
    Angers, 49100, France
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 11, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03567109
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jun 25, 2018
Start date
Jul 13, 2018
Primary completion
Jul 12, 2022
Completion
Jul 12, 2022
Last update
Jun 11, 2024

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jun 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion