CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03560739Updated Oct 8, 2021Results posted

A 12 Week Randomized Open Label Parallel Group Multicenter Study to Evaluate Bioequivalence of 20 mg Subcutaneous Ofatumumab Injected by Pre-filled Syringe or Autoinjector in Adult RMS Patients

A Phase 2 interventional study of ofatumumab with PRF and ofatumumab with AI in Multiple Sclerosis, sponsored by Novartis Pharmaceuticals. Completed at 41 sites in 9 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 55 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-10-08.

Sponsored by Novartis Pharmaceuticals · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
284
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 55 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The primary purpose of this study is to demonstrate pharmacokinetic bioequivalence of ofatumumab injected by Pre-filled Syringe (PFS) versus Auto-Injector (AI) devices and thereby establish a bridge between the ongoing Phase 3 program and the to-be-marketed drug-device combinations

Read the detailed description

Characterization of the pharmacokinetics of ofatumumab administered via the PFS used inclinical trials and the to-be-marketed autoinjector at the clinical dose of 20 mg will be conducted after an initial depletion of CD20 positive B-cells. Comparing the ofatumumab pharmacokinetics between the two drug-device combinations only after the induction period is expected to reduce initial high variability due to target-mediated clearance. This ensures a more stable baseline for PK comparison in a parallel group study design and reflects the clinical situation where systemic concentrations are at steady-state. In order to justify the resulting longterm B-cell depletion, a PK comparability study between the PFS and the AI can only be conducted in MS patients rather than in healthy subjects to balance the risk/benefit and to obtain PK data from the relevant patient population. In order for patients to obtain a clinical benefit from participation in the study, continued treatment with ofatumumab will be offered to all eligible patients through enrollment into the open-label Phase 3 extension study (separate protocol, COMB157G2399).

A secondary objective of the study is to characterize the pharmacokinetics following subcutaneous administration of ofatumumab to either the abdominal region or the thigh which are two injections sites allowed in the Phase 3 study and planned for inclusion in the label. Another secondary objective is assessment of immunogenicity during the 12 weeks duration of the study addressing potential differences in ofatumumab anti-drug antibody formation between the PFS and AI devices as well as between abdomen and thigh injection sites.

This was a randomized, open-label, multi-center, parallel group 12-week study to evaluate the pharmacokinetic bioequivalence of ofatumumab injected by pre-filled syringe (PFS) or autoinjector (AI) devices. The study design included four parallel groups of relapsing multiple sclerosis (RMS) patients. Assessment of the primary and secondary endpoints was based on data collected through the dosing interval between Week 8 and Week 12 where approximate steady-state pharmacokinetics was anticipated.

All patients received open-label ofatumumab 20 mg sc every 4 weeks (after an initial loading regimen of three weekly 20 mg doses in the first 14 days) and were randomized (5:5:1:1) into 4 groups dependent on device and location of injection. Randomization was not blinded. Groups: 1: PFS, abdomen, 2: AI, abdomen 3: PFS, thigh 4: AI, thigh.

The study had 3 Parts. Part 1 was a 30 day screening period. Part 2 was a treatment period which had an induction period of 4 weeks, followed by 4 weeks to ensure steady state was reached and a 4 week pharmacokinetics phase for a total of 12 weeks.

Part 3 was a safety follow-up period for patients who completed the study but did not enter the extension study and patients who prematurely discontinued the study. This period was 9 months for patients who had repleted their B-cells (back to baseline value). For patients who had not repleted their B-cells, 3 month assessments were done until their B-cells were repleted or patients had initiated other disease modifying/immunosuppressive thereapy.

02

Conditions studied

  • Multiple Sclerosis

Keywords

  • Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis
  • Relapsing-remitting Multiple Sclerosis
  • Secondary progressive Multiple Sclerosis
  • Bioequivalence
  • Pharmacokinetics
  • Neurofilament light chain
  • Pre-filled Syringe
  • Auto-injector
  • adult
  • AI
  • PFS
  • OMB157
03

In context

Multiple Sclerosis

3,460 studies on the registry are indexed under Multiple Sclerosis; 661 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 284 is above the median of 50 across 2,342 interventional studies indexed under Multiple Sclerosis.

Browse Multiple Sclerosis studies →

Lead sponsor

Novartis Pharmaceuticals is the lead sponsor of 2,673 studies on the registry; 228 are open to participants now.

Of its 576 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 431 (75%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 55 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Diagnosis of multiple sclerosis (MS)
  • Relapsing MS: relapsing-remitting course (RRMS), or Secondary progressive (SPMS) course
  • EDSS score of 0 to 5.5
  • Documentation of at least: 1 relapse during the previous year OR 2 relapses during the previous 2 years prior to Screening OR a positive Gd-enhancing MRI scan during the year prior to randomization.
  • Neurologically stable within 1 month prior to randomization

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with primary progressive MS or SPMS without disease activity
  • Disease duration of more than 10 years in patients with EDSS score of 2 or less
  • Patients with an active chronic disease of the immune system other than MS
  • Patients with active systemic bacterial, viral or fungal infections, or known to have AIDS or to test positive for HIV antibody at Screening
  • Patients with neurological findings consistent with Progressive Multifocal Leukoencephalopathy (PML), or confirmed PML
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
284 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Other
    OMB 20mg PFS abdomen

    ofatumumab 20 mg subcutaneous (sc.) injection with pre-filled syringes (PFS) administrated on abdomen

    Combination Product: ofatumumab with PRF

  • Other
    OMB 20mg AI abdomen

    ofatumumab 20 mg subcutaneous (sc.) injection with autoinjector (AI) administrated on abdomen

    Combination Product: ofatumumab with AI

  • Other
    OMB 20mg PFS thigh

    ofatumumab 20 mg subcutaneous (sc.) injection with pre-filled syringes (PFS) administrated on thigh

    Combination Product: ofatumumab with PRF

  • Other
    OMB 20mg AI thigh

    ofatumumab 20 mg subcutaneous (sc.) injection with autoinjector (AI) administrated on thigh

    Combination Product: ofatumumab with AI

Interventions

  • Combination productofatumumab with PRF

    ofatumumab 20 mg subcutanious injection administered with pre-filled syringe (PRF)

  • Combination productofatumumab with AI

    ofatumumab 20 mg subcutaneous injection administered with autoinjector (AI)

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Bioequivalence of 20 mg Ofatumumab Injected by Pre-filled Syringe (PFS) vs Autoinjector (AI) to Abdomen as Measured by AUCtau

    Bioequivalence of AUCtau ) will be measured over the time period of Week 8 to Week 12 dosing interval comparing the pre-filled syringe (PFS) and autoinjector (AI) devices both administered to the abdomen. Bioequivalence established if both measures meet the corresponding criterion specified by the reference-scaled average bioequivalence (RSABE) approach

    Time frame: Week 8 to Week 12 dosing interval

  2. Bioequivalence of 20 mg Ofatumumab Injected by Pre-filled Syringe (PFS) vs Autoinjector (AI) to Abdomen as Measured by Cmax

    Bioequivalence of Cmax will be measured over the time period of Week 8 to Week 12 dosing interval comparing the pre-filled syringe (PFS) and autoinjector (AI) devices both administered to the abdomen. Bioequivalence established if both measures meet the corresponding criterion specified by the reference-scaled average bioequivalence (RSABE) approach

    Time frame: Week 8 to Week 12 dosing interval

Secondary outcomes

  1. Pharmacokinetics of the Study Drug as Measured by AUCtau for PFS and AI Devices When Administered to Abdomen or Thigh

    Pharmacokinetics following subcutaneous administration of ofatumumab to either the abdominal region or the thigh as measured by the area under the concentration-time curve over the Week 8 - Week 12 dosing interval (AUCtau)

    Time frame: Week 8 to Week 12 dosing interval

  2. Pharmacokinetics of the Study Drug as Measured by Cmax for PFS and AI Devices When Administered to Abdomen or Thigh

    Pharmacokinetics following subcutaneous administration of ofatumumab to either the abdominal region or the thigh as measured by the maximum concentration (Cmax)

    Time frame: Week 8 to Week 12 dosing interval

  3. Plasma Concentrations of the Study Drug for PFS and AI Devices When Administered to Abdomen or Thigh

    Plasma concentrations following subcutaneous administration of ofatumumab via PFS or AI to either the abdominal region or the thigh

    Time frame: Days 4, 7, 14, 28, 42, 56, 57, 59, 63, 70, 77, 84

  4. Percentage of Patients With Anti-ofatumumab Antibodies

    Anti-drug antibodies (ADA) were assessed to evaluate the immunogenicity potential of ofatumumab. Samples for ADA assessment were taken prior to dosing at the visit. Samples were analyzed as per laboratory's SOPs by a Meso Scale Discovery (MSD) electrochemiluminescense assay. All samples confirmed to be positive for the presence of anti-ofatumumab antibodies were assessed to evaluate their ability to neutralize the ofatumumab biologic effect.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 4, 8, 12 and Overall

07

Results

Posted Oct 9, 2020

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneOMB 20mg AI AbdomenOMB 20mg PFS AbdomenOMB 20mg AI ThighOMB 20mg PFS Thigh
Started1281301313
Completed1281291313
Not completed0100
Withdrew: Adverse event0100

Outcome measures

PrimaryBioequivalence of 20 mg Ofatumumab Injected by Pre-filled Syringe (PFS) vs Autoinjector (AI) to Abdomen as Measured by AUCtau

Bioequivalence of AUCtau ) will be measured over the time period of Week 8 to Week 12 dosing interval comparing the pre-filled syringe (PFS) and autoinjector (AI) devices both administered to the abdomen. Bioequivalence established if both measures meet the corresponding criterion specified by the reference-scaled average bioequivalence (RSABE) approach

Time frame:
Week 8 to Week 12 dosing interval
Reported as:
Geometric mean · h×µg/mL
Bioequivalence of 20 mg Ofatumumab Injected by Pre-filled Syringe (PFS) vs Autoinjector (AI) to Abdomen as Measured by AUCtau
h×µg/mLOMB 20mg AI AbdomenOMB 20mg PFS Abdomen
Bioequivalence of 20 mg Ofatumumab Injected by Pre-filled Syringe (PFS) vs Autoinjector (AI) to Abdomen as Measured by AUCtau487.7 ± 103.5474.1 ± 79.7
Statistical analysis
  • OMB 20mg AI Abdomen vs OMB 20mg PFS Abdomen · Geo-mean ratio: 1.03 · 90% CI .8 to 1.25The confidence interval reported in the Point Estimate section below is the one from the criterion, not the estimated confidence interval.
  • OMB 20mg AI Abdomen vs OMB 20mg PFS Abdomen · 95% upper bound of the linearized criter: -.3131The upper limit reported in the Point Estimate section below is the limit on the 95% upper bound from the criterion, not the estimated upper limit of the 95% upper bound of the linearized criterion
PrimaryBioequivalence of 20 mg Ofatumumab Injected by Pre-filled Syringe (PFS) vs Autoinjector (AI) to Abdomen as Measured by Cmax

Bioequivalence of Cmax will be measured over the time period of Week 8 to Week 12 dosing interval comparing the pre-filled syringe (PFS) and autoinjector (AI) devices both administered to the abdomen. Bioequivalence established if both measures meet the corresponding criterion specified by the reference-scaled average bioequivalence (RSABE) approach

Time frame:
Week 8 to Week 12 dosing interval
Reported as:
Geometric mean · µg/mL
Bioequivalence of 20 mg Ofatumumab Injected by Pre-filled Syringe (PFS) vs Autoinjector (AI) to Abdomen as Measured by Cmax
µg/mLOMB 20mg AI AbdomenOMB 20mg PFS Abdomen
Bioequivalence of 20 mg Ofatumumab Injected by Pre-filled Syringe (PFS) vs Autoinjector (AI) to Abdomen as Measured by Cmax1.409 ± 89.21.409 ± 67.9
Statistical analysis
  • OMB 20mg AI Abdomen vs OMB 20mg PFS Abdomen · Geo-mean ratio: 1.00 · 90% CI .8 to 1.25The confidence interval reported in the Point Estimate section below is the one from the criterion, not the estimated confidence interval.
  • OMB 20mg AI Abdomen vs OMB 20mg PFS Abdomen · 95% upper bound of the linearized criter: -0.2446The upper limit reported in the Point Estimate section below is the limit on the 95% upper bound from the criterion, not the estimated upper limit of the 95% upper bound of the linearized criterion.
SecondaryPharmacokinetics of the Study Drug as Measured by AUCtau for PFS and AI Devices When Administered to Abdomen or Thigh

Pharmacokinetics following subcutaneous administration of ofatumumab to either the abdominal region or the thigh as measured by the area under the concentration-time curve over the Week 8 - Week 12 dosing interval (AUCtau)

Time frame:
Week 8 to Week 12 dosing interval
Reported as:
Geometric mean · h×µg/mL
Pharmacokinetics of the Study Drug as Measured by AUCtau for PFS and AI Devices When Administered to Abdomen or Thigh
h×µg/mLOMB 20mg AI AbdomenOMB 20mg PFS AbdomenOMB 20mg AI ThighOMB 20mg PFS Thigh
Pharmacokinetics of the Study Drug as Measured by AUCtau for PFS and AI Devices When Administered to Abdomen or Thigh487.7 ± 103.5474.1 ± 79.7476.0 ± 73.1544.1 ± 93.8
SecondaryPharmacokinetics of the Study Drug as Measured by Cmax for PFS and AI Devices When Administered to Abdomen or Thigh

Pharmacokinetics following subcutaneous administration of ofatumumab to either the abdominal region or the thigh as measured by the maximum concentration (Cmax)

Time frame:
Week 8 to Week 12 dosing interval
Reported as:
Geometric mean · µg/mL
Pharmacokinetics of the Study Drug as Measured by Cmax for PFS and AI Devices When Administered to Abdomen or Thigh
µg/mLOMB 20mg AI AbdomenOMB 20mg PFS AbdomenOMB 20mg AI ThighOMB 20mg PFS Thigh
Pharmacokinetics of the Study Drug as Measured by Cmax for PFS and AI Devices When Administered to Abdomen or Thigh1.409 ± 89.21.409 ± 67.91.563 ± 71.31.635 ± 50.7
SecondaryPlasma Concentrations of the Study Drug for PFS and AI Devices When Administered to Abdomen or Thigh

Plasma concentrations following subcutaneous administration of ofatumumab via PFS or AI to either the abdominal region or the thigh

Time frame:
Days 4, 7, 14, 28, 42, 56, 57, 59, 63, 70, 77, 84
Reported as:
Geometric mean · µg/mL
Plasma Concentrations of the Study Drug for PFS and AI Devices When Administered to Abdomen or Thigh
µg/mLOMB 20mg AI AbdomenOMB 20mg PFS AbdomenOMB 20mg AI ThighOMB 20mg PFS Thigh
Day 4 n=128,127,13,130.43076 ± 147.5913190.40075 ± 119.3303760.86747 ± 24.4813500.55704 ± 105.432315
Day 7 n=128, 130,13,130.33544 ± 133.2050870.30511 ± 119.5113210.36750 ± 94.0077620.29662 ± 119.353006
Day 14 n=128, 130,12,111.07408 ± 105.5667070.96359 ± 105.7359630.89788 ± 125.7264581.30586 ± 83.153962
Day 28 Week 4 n=127, 130,13,130.95571 ± 113.5100350.95774 ± 117.8528221.11008 ± 66.7800451.41434 ± 117.959678
Day 42 Week 6 n=128, 130,13,130.97327 ± 125.4210641.12006 ± 113.1371641.12006 ± 86.3906391.18239 ± 133.082660
Day 56 Week 8 n=128, 130,13,130.28358 ± 142.7601370.24644 ± 133.0569130.23874 ± 98.0412870.45529 ± 143.614763
Day 57 Week 8 n=127, 127,12,130.89424 ± 121.3573100.80986 ± 107.9296580.96356 ± 122.2229911.04905 ± 54.771002
Day 59 Week 8 n=127, 127,13,131.24143 ± 103.2743141.23458 ± 81.7370631.34837 ± 82.5966951.52705 ± 52.253239
Day 63 Week 9 n=126, 128,13,131.27031 ± 84.6100141.23163 ± 77.2942221.28263 ± 67.0762491.43075 ± 66.345270
Day 70 Week 10 n=128, 127,13,130.78732 ± 97.4401310.74111 ± 82.8709740.67151 ± 82.7690870.95821 ± 83.645358
Day 77 Week 11 n=127, 127,13,130.40249 ± 109.5818770.33720 ± 114.3738870.40173 ± 52.4793380.54085 ± 97.862609
Early Exit n=0,1,0,0—0.1870——
EOS Week 12 n=126, 118,12,130.20290 ± 113.8124160.17862 ± 102.5074840.17361 ± 63.8990860.27276 ± 98.256573
SecondaryPercentage of Patients With Anti-ofatumumab Antibodies

Anti-drug antibodies (ADA) were assessed to evaluate the immunogenicity potential of ofatumumab. Samples for ADA assessment were taken prior to dosing at the visit. Samples were analyzed as per laboratory's SOPs by a Meso Scale Discovery (MSD) electrochemiluminescense assay. All samples confirmed to be positive for the presence of anti-ofatumumab antibodies were assessed to evaluate their ability to neutralize the ofatumumab biologic effect.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 4, 8, 12 and Overall
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Patients With Anti-ofatumumab Antibodies
percentage of participantsOMB 20mg AI AbdomenOMB 20mg PFS AbdomenOMB 20mg AI ThighOMB 20mg PFS Thigh
Baseline n= 128,130,13,130.83.10.07.7
Week 4 n= 128,130,13,130.80.00.00.0
Week 8 n= 124,126,13,130.00.80.00.0
Week 12 n= 125,121, 12,130.80.00.00.0
Overall n= 128,130,13,130.83.80.07.7

Adverse events

Collected over Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until last administration of study treatment plus 100 days post treatment, up to maximum duration of 226 days. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
OMB 20mg AI (ABD)0/128 (0%)2/128 (1.6%)61/128 (47.7%)
OMB 20mg PFS Abdomen0/130 (0%)4/130 (3.1%)53/130 (40.8%)
OMB 20mg AI (THI)0/13 (0%)0/13 (0%)7/13 (53.8%)
OMB 20mg PFS (THI)0/13 (0%)0/13 (0%)7/13 (53.8%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventOMB 20mg AI (ABD)OMB 20mg PFS AbdomenOMB 20mg AI (THI)OMB 20mg PFS (THI)
Gastrointestinal motility disorderGastrointestinal disorders1/1280/1300/130/13
Burns second degreeInjury, poisoning and procedural complications1/1280/1300/130/13
VertigoEar and labyrinth disorders0/1281/1300/130/13
AppendicitisInfections and infestations0/1281/1300/130/13
PneumoniaInfections and infestations0/1281/1300/130/13
MenometrorrhagiaReproductive system and breast disorders0/1281/1300/130/13
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 30
Most frequent other events
EventOMB 20mg AI (ABD)OMB 20mg PFS AbdomenOMB 20mg AI (THI)OMB 20mg PFS (THI)
Injection related reactionInjury, poisoning and procedural complications41/12829/1305/136/13
Injection site reactionGeneral disorders11/12817/1300/131/13
HeadacheNervous system disorders13/1287/1300/131/13
LeukopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disorders3/1280/1301/130/13
LymphopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disorders1/1282/1300/131/13
DiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disorders6/1284/1301/130/13
NauseaGastrointestinal disorders1/1280/1300/131/13
AstheniaGeneral disorders2/1281/1300/131/13
FatigueGeneral disorders3/1285/1301/130/13
Injection site painGeneral disorders0/1280/1300/131/13

Baseline characteristics

Age, Customized
Age, Customized(participants)OMB 20mg AI AbdomenOMB 20mg PFS AbdomenOMB 20mg AI ThighOMB 20mg PFS ThighTotal
18 to 30 years32295268
31 to 40 years4253310108
41 to 55 years544851108
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)OMB 20mg AI AbdomenOMB 20mg PFS AbdomenOMB 20mg AI ThighOMB 20mg PFS ThighTotal
Female929098199
Male36404585
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(participants)OMB 20mg AI AbdomenOMB 20mg PFS AbdomenOMB 20mg AI ThighOMB 20mg PFS ThighTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native10001
Black or African American24006
White1251251312275
Mixed01012
08

Study locations

41 sites
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Fullerton, California 92835, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Aurora, Colorado 80045, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Basalt, Colorado 81621, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Boulder, Colorado 80301, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Miami, Florida 33136, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Tampa, Florida 33609, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Tampa, Florida 33612, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    West Palm Beach, Florida 33407, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Indianapolis, Indiana 46256, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Ozark, Missouri 65721, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Knoxville, Tennessee 37922, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Round Rock, Texas 78681, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Sherman, Texas 75092, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Vienna, 1010, Austria
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Vienna, 1090, Austria
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Sofia, 1113, Bulgaria
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Sofia, 1309, Bulgaria
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Sofia, 1413, Bulgaria
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Sofia, 1431, Bulgaria
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Brno, Czech Republic 656 91, Czechia
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Havirov, Czech Republic 736 01, Czechia
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Teplice, Czech Republic 415 01, Czechia
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Hradec Kralove, CZE 500 05, Czechia
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Pardubice, 532 03, Czechia
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Tallinn, 10617, Estonia
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Tartu, 51014, Estonia
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Riga, LV LV-1005, Latvia
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Riga, LV 1002, Latvia
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Riga, LV-1038, Latvia
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Kaunas, LTU LT 50161, Lithuania
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Vilnius, LT-08661, Lithuania
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Kazan, 420021, Russian Federation
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Krasnoyarsk, 660049, Russian Federation
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Moscow, 127015, Russian Federation
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Novosibirsk, 630007, Russian Federation
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Saint Petersburg, 197022, Russian Federation
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    St Petersburg, 190000, Russian Federation
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Barcelona, Catalunya 08035, Spain
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Pozuelo de Alarcon, Madrid 28223, Spain
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    El Palmar, Murcia 30120, Spain
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Castilleja de la cuesta, Sevilla 41950, Spain
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Jones B, Li B, Bagger M, Goodyear A, Ludwig I. Statistical methodology for highly variable compounds: A novel design approach for the ofatumumab Phase 2 bioequivalence study. Pharm Stat. 2022 Nov;21(6):1357-1365. doi: 10.1002/pst.2233. Epub 2022 May 23. PubMed 35604539 ↗
  • Bar-Or A, Wiendl H, Montalban X, Alvarez E, Davydovskaya M, Delgado SR, Evdoshenko EP, Giedraitiene N, Gross-Paju K, Haldre S, Herrman CE, Izquierdo G, Karelis G, Leutmezer F, Mares M, Meca-Lallana JE, Mickeviciene D, Nicholas J, Robertson DS, Sazonov DV, Sharlin K, Sundaram B, Totolyan N, Vachova M, Valis M, Bagger M, Haring DA, Ludwig I, Willi R, Zalesak M, Su W, Merschhemke M, Fox EJ. Rapid and sustained B-cell depletion with subcutaneous ofatumumab in relapsing multiple sclerosis: APLIOS, a randomized phase-2 study. Mult Scler. 2022 May;28(6):910-924. doi: 10.1177/13524585211044479. Epub 2021 Oct 4. PubMed 34605319 ↗

Study documents

  • Study protocol · Mar 30, 2018
  • Statistical analysis plan · May 8, 2020

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Novartis is committed to sharing with qualified external researchers, access to patient-level data and supporting clinical documents from eligible studies. These requests are reviewed and approved by an independent review panel on the basis of scientific merit. All data provided is anonymized to respect the privacy of patients who have participated in the trial in line with applicable laws and regulations. This trial data availability is according to the criteria and process described on www.clinicalstudydatarequest.com

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 8, 2021, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03560739
Lead sponsor
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jun 18, 2018
Start date
Sep 11, 2018
Primary completion
Aug 26, 2019
Completion
May 5, 2020
Results posted
Oct 9, 2020
Last update
Oct 8, 2021

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion