ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03547180Updated May 1, 2020

Mechanisms of Treatment Change in Panic Disorder and Agoraphobia

An interventional study of Cognitive Therapy and Capnometry-Assisted Respiratory Training in Panic Disorder With Agoraphobia, sponsored by Southern Methodist University. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-05-01.

Sponsored by Southern Methodist University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
41
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The primary goal of the present study is to identify mechanisms of therapeutic change of two theoretically contrasting therapeutic procedures: The first phase consists of comparing the outcome of the capnometry-assisted breathing therapy (BRT) with cognitive restructuring (CT). During the second phase participants of both interventions will undergo in-vivo exposure.

Read the detailed description

The primary goal of the present study is to identify mechanisms of therapeutic change of two theoretically contrasting therapeutic procedures: While the rationale of breathing training is based on the assumption that hypocapnea (lower than normal levels of pCO2) is responsible for the development and maintenance of panic disorder, the rationale of cognitive interventions is that the primary mechanism in PD is the cognitive misinterpretation of benign bodily sensations. Further, while breathing training should induce a low-anxiety state (through parasympathetic activation) and, therefore, facilitate habituation to fearful situations, voluntary increases in arousal through hyperventilation (sympathetic activation) has been suggested to facilitate cognitive restructuring during exposure.

In order to study mechanisms that potentially produce clinical improvement, the investigators propose a 2-phase therapeutic intervention: The first phase consists of comparing the outcome of the capnometry-assisted respiratory training (CART) with cognitive restructuring (CT). During the second phase participants of both interventions will undergo in-vivo exposure therapy.

With the data collected from the study, the investigators will test the following hypotheses: (a) CART will produce more reduction in psycho-physiologically relevant measures of panic symptoms compared to CT, while cognitive restructuring will produce more reduction in cognitive parameters of panic symptoms; (b) CART will influence the response to voluntary hyperventilation tests by leading to faster recovery compared to CT. Improvement in respiratory psychophysiology will be correlated with improvement in panic symptom severity; (c) Breathing techniques during exposure will lead to a lower-anxiety state, facilitating but not inhibiting fear extinction as suggested by the safety aid theory

02

Conditions studied

  • Panic Disorder With Agoraphobia

Keywords

  • Respiration panic
  • Cognitions
  • Panic
  • Treatment
  • Mediators
  • Moderators
03

In context

Agoraphobia

65 studies on the registry are indexed under Agoraphobia; 12 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 41 is below the median of 78 across 61 interventional studies indexed under Agoraphobia.

Browse Agoraphobia studies →

Lead sponsor

Southern Methodist University is the lead sponsor of 22 studies on the registry; 1 is open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • A current diagnosis of panic disorder with agoraphobia that is designated by the patient as the most important source of current distress
  • Patients must be willing to engage in exposure to fearful situations and sensations

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • A history of bipolar disorder, psychosis or delusional disorders, current substance abuse or dependence

Medical Exclusion Factors:

  • Patients with severe unstable medical illness, or serious medical illness for which hospitalization may be likely within the next three months
  • Patients with a history of seizures, angina, myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure, arrhythmias, , cerebrovascular accidents, diabetes mellitus, significant asthma, emphysema, or
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(4)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

DSM diagnostic criteria

The American Psychiatric Association’s manual of mental health diagnoses. DSM-5 (2013, revised as DSM-5-TR in 2022) replaced DSM-IV, and some studies still name the older edition. “Meets DSM criteria for …” means diagnosed by that edition’s diagnostic criteria, usually by a clinician in an interview.

Clinically significant

Judged by the study doctor to matter for your health or for the study. It is a doctor’s decision, so ask the study team if you are unsure whether something counts.

TIA (transient ischaemic attack)

A “mini-stroke”: temporary stroke-like symptoms caused by reduced blood flow to part of the brain, spinal cord or eye, without signs of a new stroke on a scan.

Stroke symptoms need emergency care at once, even if they go away.

COPD

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: long-term lung disease that makes it hard to breathe out, including emphysema and chronic bronchitis.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
41 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Cognitive Therapy

    The training included four components: (a) educating patients about exacerbating panic symptoms through catastrophic thoughts (vicious cycle), (b) identifying negative cognitions associated with physical sensation triggers of recent panic attacks, (c) practicing replacement of maladaptive cognitions with non catastrophic explanations, and (d) instructing patients in between session exercises during Phase I.

    Behavioral: Cognitive Therapy

  • Active comparator
    Capnometry-Assisted Respiratory Training

    The training included four components: (a) educating patients about the exacerbation of panic symptoms through hypocapnia; (b) directing patients' attention to potentially detrimental respiratory patterns; (c) teaching patients techniques to control their respiration, in particular end-tidal PCO2; and (d) instructing patients in between-session exercises. Between-session exercises using a portable capnometer were to be performed twice a day for 17 min at home or elsewhere during Phase I.

    Behavioral: Capnometry-Assisted Respiratory Training

  • Other
    In-vivo exposure therapy

    In this two-phase intervention, patients were randomized (within each site) to first receive five individual, weekly, 1-hr sessions of respiratory skill training (CART) or cognitive skill training (CT; Phase I, Skill Acquisition Training), followed by three weekly sessions of in-vivo exposure (Phase II, Application Training) plus a fourth session at 2-month follow-up.

    Behavioral: In-vivo exposure

Interventions

  • BehavioralCognitive Therapy

    The training included four components: (a) educating patients about exacerbating panic symptoms through catastrophic thoughts (vicious cycle), (b) identifying negative cognitions associated with physical sensation triggers of recent panic attacks, (c) practicing replacement of maladaptive cognitions with non catastrophic explanations, and (d) instructing patients in between session exercises during Phase I.

    Also known as: CT

  • BehavioralCapnometry-Assisted Respiratory Training

    The training included four components: (a) educating patients about the exacerbation of panic symptoms through hypocapnia; (b) directing patients' attention to potentially detrimental respiratory patterns; (c) teaching patients techniques to control their respiration, in particular end-tidal PCO2; and (d) instructing patients in between-session exercises. Between-session exercises using a portable capnometer were to be performed twice a day for 17 min at home or elsewhere during Phase I.

    Also known as: CART

  • BehavioralIn-vivo exposure

    In this two-phase intervention, patients were randomized (within each site) to first receive five individual, weekly, 1-hr sessions of respiratory skill training (CART) or cognitive skill training (CT; Phase I, Skill Acquisition Training), followed by three weekly sessions of in-vivo exposure (Phase II, Application Training) plus a fourth session at 2-month follow-up.

    Also known as: EXP

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in panic symptom severity assessed by the Panic Disorder Severity Scale/CGI

    Clinician administered; 7 items rated on 0 - 4 scale; scores over 9 suggest the need for formal diagnostic assessment

    Time frame: Pre (Week 0), Mid (Week 5), Post (Week 9), Follow-Up (Week 17)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Cortisol assessments collecting 8 saliva samples per day

    was administered to subset of patients for exposure and non exposure days

    Time frame: Phase II (Weeks 7 - 9)

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Southern Methodist University, Department of Psychology
    Dallas, Texas 75205, United States
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Meuret AE, Seidel A, Rosenfield B, Hofmann SG, Rosenfield D. Does fear reactivity during exposure predict panic symptom reduction? J Consult Clin Psychol. 2012 Oct;80(5):773-85. doi: 10.1037/a0028032. Epub 2012 Apr 9. PubMed 22486408 ↗
  • Meuret AE, Rosenfield D, Seidel A, Bhaskara L, Hofmann SG. Respiratory and cognitive mediators of treatment change in panic disorder: evidence for intervention specificity. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2010 Oct;78(5):691-704. doi: 10.1037/a0019552. PubMed 20873904 ↗
  • Meuret AE, Hofmann SG, Rosenfield D. Catastrophic Appraisal and Perceived Control as Moderators of Treatment Response in Panic Disorder. Int J Cogn Ther. 2010 Sep 1;3:262-277. doi: 10.1521/ijct.2010.3.3.262. PubMed 21088704 ↗
  • Meuret AE, Trueba AF, Abelson JL, Liberzon I, Auchus R, Bhaskara L, Ritz T, Rosenfield D. High cortisol awakening response and cortisol levels moderate exposure-based psychotherapy success. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2015 Jan;51:331-40. doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2014.10.008. Epub 2014 Oct 16. PubMed 25462905 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Data is available upon request

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
Not marked actual or estimatedDates not marked actual or estimated

The record gives a start of Jan 2004, a primary completion of Jan 2008 and a completion of Mar 2008. It does not say whether these dates are actual or estimated.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Feb 1, 2016
First posted
Jun 6, 2018
Start
Jan 2004
Primary completionActual
Jan 2008
CompletionActual
Mar 2008
Last update
May 1, 2020
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 1, 2020, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03547180
Lead sponsor
Southern Methodist University
Responsible party
Heather McClary (Director of Research Compliance, Southern Methodist University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jun 6, 2018
Start date
Jan 2004
Primary completion
Jan 2008
Completion
Mar 2008
Last update
May 1, 2020

Study contacts

Alicia E Meuret, Ph.D.
principal investigator · Southern Methodist University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion