ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06942429Updated Feb 27, 2026

Stepped Versus Stratified Care for Anxiety Disorders in Youth

An interventional study of Internet-delivered cognitive-behavioral therapy and Personalized in-person cognitive-behavioral therapy in Social Anxiety Disorder, Separation Anxiety Disorder and Specific Phobia, sponsored by Region Skane. Recruiting at 1 site in Sweden. Open to participants aged 8 Years to 17 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-02-27.

Sponsored by Region Skane · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Jun 2025; still recruiting 1 year 4 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
556
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
8 Years to 17 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to compare stepped care to stratified care as overall healthcare models for children and adolescents aged 8-17 with anxiety disorders. It addresses one main question:

  • Is stepped care non-inferior to stratified care in supporting participants to achieve a treatment response?

Researchers will compare two care models:

  • Stepped care, where all participants begin with 14 weeks of internet-delivered cognitive behavioral therapy (ICBT) and receive an additional 14 weeks of personalized in-person CBT if needed.
  • Stratified care, where participants are assigned to either 14 weeks of ICBT or 14 weeks of in-person CBT based on clinical complexity, and may also receive additional 14 weeks of in-person CBT if necessary.

Participants will:

  • Be randomly assigned to one of the two care models.
  • Complete a wide range of assessments at baseline, during treatment, and at 4, 8, 12, and 24 months, with the 8-month point as the primary endpoint.
  • Receive either ICBT, in-person CBT, or both, depending on their care model and response to treatment.
  • Participate in ancillary studies involving DNA sampling, cognitive testing, and national registry linkages to help predict treatment response and long-term outcomes.
Read the detailed description

A detailed description is available in the full study protocol. All study protocol versions can be accessed at the Open Science Framework (https://osf.io/a9qhw/).

02

Conditions studied

  • Social Anxiety Disorder
  • Separation Anxiety Disorder
  • Specific Phobia
  • Panic Disorder
  • Generalized Anxiety Disorder
  • Agoraphobia

Keywords

  • anxiety disorders
  • children
  • adolescents
  • cognitive behavioral therapy
  • non-inferiority
  • care models
  • stepped care
  • stratified care
03

In context

Phobia, Social

367 studies on the registry are indexed under Phobia, Social; 58 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 556 is above the median of 76 across 338 interventional studies indexed under Phobia, Social.

Browse Phobia, Social studies →

Lead sponsor

Region Skane is the lead sponsor of 386 studies on the registry; 122 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
8 Years to 17 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Aged 8.0 to 17.5 years. Confirmed by the child and/or caregiver.
  2. Principal anxiety disorder of social anxiety disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, panic disorder, separation anxiety disorder, specific phobia, or agoraphobia. Confirmed by the structured diagnostic interview (DIAMOND-KID). "Principal" indicates that the anxiety disorder is judged by the clinician to be in most urgent need of treatment (among potential co-occurring disorders).
  3. Available caregiver who can support the child in treatment. Confirmed by the caregiver.
  4. Child and at least one caregiver can read, write, and communicate in Swedish. Confirmed by the child and/or caregiver.
  5. Child (≥13 years) and caregiver have access to a Swedish electronic identification (BankID or Freja eID).
  6. Access to the internet. Confirmed by the child and/or caregiver.
  7. Ability to attend in-person CBT sessions at the clinic. Confirmed by the child and/or caregiver.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Principal anxiety disorder of specific phobia concerning the domain of blood-injection-injury (due to the ICBT program not including relevant information on applied-tension techniques to avoid fainting during exposure exercises). Confirmed by a specific phobia of this sort being classified as the most functionally impairing anxiety disorder during the structured diagnostic interview (DIAMOND-KID).
  2. Ongoing psychological treatment for an anxiety disorder. Confirmed by the child and/or caregiver.
  3. Social/familial/educational difficulties in more immediate need of management than an anxiety disorder. Confirmed by the assessor through information from the child and/or caregiver and/or other available sources.
  4. Immediate risk to self or others that require urgent attention, such as suicidality. Confirmed by the assessor through information from the child and/or caregiver and other available sources.
  5. The potential participant has a relative (e.g., sibling, cousin) included in the study. Confirmed by the assessor through information from the caregiver and other available sources.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

DSM diagnostic criteria

The American Psychiatric Association’s manual of mental health diagnoses. DSM-5 (2013, revised as DSM-5-TR in 2022) replaced DSM-IV, and some studies still name the older edition. “Meets DSM criteria for …” means diagnosed by that edition’s diagnostic criteria, usually by a clinician in an interview.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
556 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Stepped Care

    All participants in stepped care will receive internet-delivered cognitive-behavioral therapy (ICBT) in the first Treatment course (A). Participants who have not responded to treatment or continue to exhibit clinical levels of anxiety severity will be offered personalized in-person CBT in the second Treatment course (B).

    Behavioral: Internet-delivered cognitive-behavioral therapy · Behavioral: Personalized in-person cognitive-behavioral therapy

  • Active comparator
    Stratified Care

    In stratified care, Treatment course A aims to allocate approximately half of the participants to internet-delivered cognitive-behavioral therapy (ICBT) and the other half to personalized in-person CBT, based on their algorithm-generated clinical complexity score. Identical to stepped care, those who have not responded to treatment or continue to exhibit clinical levels of anxiety severity after Treatment course A will be offered personalized in-person CBT in Treatment course B.

    Behavioral: Internet-delivered cognitive-behavioral therapy · Behavioral: Personalized in-person cognitive-behavioral therapy

Interventions

  • BehavioralInternet-delivered cognitive-behavioral therapy

    Internet-delivered cognitive behavioral therapy (ICBT) is a 12-module intervention delivered over a maximum of 14 weeks. Two age-specific versions are available: \[1\] for children aged 8-12 years and \[2\] for adolescents aged 13-17 years. Both versions share the same core content, but the texts, illustrations, videos, and exercises are adapted to be developmentally appropriate. Each version focuses on exposure, along with psychoeducation, coping strategies, and relapse prevention. Caregivers have access to a parallel program that mirrors the structure of the youth program. Both patients and caregivers engage with a therapist through a secure digital platform, communicating via text messages similar to emails. Two scheduled telephone or videoconference calls are conducted approximately 3-4 and 7-8 weeks into treatment, respectively, to follow up on adherence and address questions related to the intervention. Additional telephone support will be available on demand.

  • BehavioralPersonalized in-person cognitive-behavioral therapy

    Personalized in-person cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) follows a manual drawing on previously published protocols and meta-analyses on effective components of CBT for pediatric anxiety disorders and results from our pilot study. It consists of 12 weekly one-hour sessions delivered over a maximum of 14 weeks. It follows a disorder-specific CBT approach, with a strong emphasis on therapist-led exposure tailored to the patient's principal anxiety disorder. Participants receive workbooks containing information on anxiety disorders, the treatment rationale, and the rationale for exposure therapy. The intervention has three phases: \[1\] 1-2 sessions of psychoeducation and symptom identification, \[2\] 8-10 sessions of therapist-led exposure with homework, and \[3\] 1-2 sessions of relapse prevention planning. Caregiver involvement is tailored to the individual needs of each participant, with a maximum of 2 additional hours allocated for caregivers beyond the standard treatment time.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Clinical Global Impressions - Improvement Scale

    The Clinical Global Impressions - Improvement (CGI-I) Scale is a 1-item measure where a trained interviewer uses all available information about the patient to rate improvement on a 7-point scale: 1 = Very much improved, 2 = Much improved, 3 = Minimally improved, 4 = No change, 5 = Minimally worse, 6 = Much worse, 7 = Very much worse. In this study, improvement on the CGI-I is assessed by comparing the current status of the participant to their baseline condition. In line with previous studies, a score of 1 or 2 on the CGI-I is classified as a treatment response and scores of 3 to 7 as non-response. This binary variable is the primary outcome of the trial.

    Time frame: 4 months (17-20 weeks post-randomization); 8 months (35-40 weeks post-randomization, primary endpoint); 12 months (53-60 weeks post-randomization, observational follow-up); 24 months (105-116 weeks post-randomization, observational follow-up)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Pediatric Anxiety Rating Scale

    The Pediatric Anxiety Rating Scale (PARS) is a clinician-rated measure of overall anxiety severity. It includes seven items assessing the number of anxiety symptoms, their frequency, anxiety-related avoidance, anxiety-related distress, physical symptoms of anxiety, family interference, and social interference. In the current study, in accordance with other trials for youth anxiety disorders, the 6-item version of PARS is used which excludes the item assessing number of symptoms. The resulting 6-item scale yields a score of 0 to 30, with higher scores indicating more severe anxiety.

    Time frame: Baseline; 4 months (17-20 weeks post-randomization); 8 months (35-40 weeks post-randomization, primary endpoint); 12 months (53-60 weeks post-randomization, observational follow-up); 24 months (105-116 weeks post-randomization, observational follow-up)

  2. Diagnostic Interview for Anxiety, Mood, and OCD and Related Neuropsychiatric Disorders - Child and Adolescent Version

    The Diagnostic Interview for Anxiety, Mood, and OCD and Related Neuropsychiatric Disorders - Child and Adolescent Version (DIAMOND-KID) is a semi-structured interview that assesses the most common mental disorders in children and adolescents, including all the anxiety disorders used for inclusion in the present study. The full interview is conducted at baseline and at the 12- and 24-month post-randomization assessments. A shortened version that includes anxiety disorders and major depression is conducted at the 4- and 8-month post-randomization assessments. Data from the DIAMOND-KID will be used to evaluate the proportion who no longer meet diagnostic criteria for \[1\] their principal baseline anxiety disorder and \[2\] any anxiety disorder.

    Time frame: Baseline; 4 months (17-20 weeks post-randomization); 8 months (35-40 weeks post-randomization, primary endpoint); 12 months (53-60 weeks post-randomization, observational follow-up); 24 months (105-116 weeks post-randomization, observational follow-up)

  3. Clinical Global Impressions Scale-Severity

    The Clinical Global Impressions Scale-Severity (CGI-S) is a single-item measure where a trained assessor makes an overall severity rating of a specific disorder accounting for all available information about the patient, including but not limited to current symptoms, impairment, and general functioning. In this study, in line with previous trials of youth anxiety disorders, the CGI-S is used to rate the overall severity of the patient's anxiety symptoms, irrespective of their association with a specific anxiety disorder.

    Time frame: Baseline; 4 months (17-20 weeks post-randomization); 8 months (35-40 weeks post-randomization, primary endpoint); 12 months (53-60 weeks post-randomization, observational follow-up); 24 months (105-116 weeks post-randomization, observational follow-up)

  4. Children's Global Assessment Scale

    The Children's Global Assessment Scale (CGAS) is a clinician-rated one-item scale of psychosocial functioning/impairment, ranging from 1 to 100 with higher scores indicating better functioning.

    Time frame: Baseline; 4 months (17-20 weeks post-randomization); 8 months (35-40 weeks post-randomization, primary endpoint); 12 months (53-60 weeks post-randomization, observational follow-up); 24 months (105-116 weeks post-randomization, observational follow-up)

  5. Revised Children's Anxiety and Depression Scale

    The Revised Children's Anxiety and Depression Scale (RCADS) is a patient- and caregiver-reported questionnaire assessing specific anxiety symptoms and their frequency. The original version includes 47 items. In the present study, we use the 30-item version, which maintains the factor structure of the original version and demonstrates conserved psychometric properties. The RCADS has shown adequate psychometric properties in several studies, including in Swedish youth, and is an internationally recommended measure for the assessment of internalizing symptoms in children and adolescents. Both patient- and caregiver-reported versions are used in the study. We will use the subscale that sums all the anxiety symptoms, which ranges from 0 to 60, with higher scores indicating more frequent anxiety symptoms.

    Time frame: Baseline; 4 months (17-20 weeks post-randomization); 8 months (35-40 weeks post-randomization, primary endpoint); 12 months (53-60 weeks post-randomization, observational follow-up); 24 months (105-116 weeks post-randomization, observational follow-up)

  6. Child Anxiety Life Interference Scale-Revised

    The Child Anxiety Life Interference Scale-Revised (CALIS-R) is a patient- and caregiver-reported measure of interference associated with youth anxiety. The measure is an internationally recommended tool for the assessment of interference stemming from anxiety in children and adolescents. The patient-reported version consists of 9 items, each rated on a 0-4 response scale, resulting in a total score of 0 to 36, with higher overall scores indicating more interference. The caregiver-reported version consists of two sub-scales, where one sub-scale assesses interference for the child (9 items; range: 0 to 36) and the other interference for the family (8 items; range: 0 to 32), with higher scores indicating more interference. For the caregiver-reported version, the two sub-scales will be reported separately.

    Time frame: Baseline; 4 months (17 to 20 weeks post-randomization); 8 months (35 to 40 weeks post-randomization, primary endpoint); 12 months; 24 months

  7. Proportion of participants who do not adhere to the assigned treatment/s

    Non-adherence to treatment is defined as completing fewer than six modules of ICBT, attending fewer than six sessions of personalized in-person CBT, or discontinuing/refusing treatment despite clinical judgment indicating it is warranted. An exception to the six-module/session rule is made if treatment is discontinued due to substantial symptom improvement to non-clinical levels, with therapist agreement that further treatment is unnecessary. At 4 months, non-adherence is assessed based on the first course of treatment. At 8 months, it is assessed based on overall adherence across both treatment courses: \[0\] complete adherence (adhering to all assigned treatments), \[1\] partial adherence (adhering to one but not all assigned treatments), or \[2\] full non-adherence (adhering to no assigned treatment).

    Time frame: 4 months (17-20 weeks post-randomization); 8 months (35-40 weeks post-randomization, primary endpoint)

  8. Adverse events

    Adverse events are continuously screened, recorded, and monitored by study personnel and through the patient- and caregiver-reported Adverse Events Questionnaire, which includes 22 predefined events and an open-ended option. Events will be reported as the total number of documented events, ranging from 0 with no defined upper limit.

    Time frame: 4 months (17-20 weeks post-randomization); 8 months (35-40 weeks post-randomization, primary endpoint)

Other outcomes

  1. Health economic outcomes

    Health economic evaluations, including the calculation of Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratios (ICER) and assessment of willingness-to-accept thresholds, will be performed. The details will be specified in a separate Health Economic Analysis Plan (HEAP) and the planned approach is available in the full study protocol at Open Science Framework (https://osf.io/a9qhw/). These measures will not be used to make inference about the non-inferiority RCT regarding anxiety outcomes.

    Time frame: Baseline; 4 months (17-20 weeks post-randomization); 8 months (35-40 weeks post-randomization, primary endpoint); 12 months (53-60 weeks post-randomization, observational follow-up); 24 months (105-116 weeks post-randomization, observational follow-up)

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided — The data are pseudonymized according to national (Swedish) and European Union legislation and cannot be anonymized and published in an open repository. Participants in the study consent for their data to be shared with other international researchers for research purposes. The data can be made available upon reasonable request on a case-by-case basis according to the current legislation and ethical permits.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Jun 2025 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Nov 2029, 52 months after the start.

Of 142 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Phobia, Social, half reached primary completion within 28 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 15 and three quarters within 44. This study's planned 52 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 148 studies reached it within 28 months; a quarter within 14 and three quarters within 43.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Apr 9, 2025
First posted
Apr 24, 2025
StartActual
Jun 19, 2025
Primary completionEst.
Nov 5, 2029
CompletionEst.
Mar 5, 2031
Last update
Feb 27, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 27, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06942429
Lead sponsor
Region Skane
Collaborators
Lund University
Responsible party
Matti Cervin (Associate Professor, Senior Clinical Psychologist, Region Skane) — Principal investigator
First posted
Apr 24, 2025
Start date
Jun 19, 2025
Primary completion
Nov 5, 2029 (estimated)
Completion
Mar 5, 2031 (estimated)
Last update
Feb 27, 2026

Study contacts

Matti Cervin, PhD
Contact
matti.cervin@med.lu.se
0046(0)737199700
Eva Serlachius, MD, PhD
Contact
eva.serlachius@med.lu.se
0046(0)707155232
Matti Cervin, PhD
principal investigator · Lund University & CAMHS Skåne
Eva Serlachius, MD, PhD
principal investigator · Lund University & CAMHS Skåne

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion