CClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT03528512Updated Aug 24, 2021Results posted

IN Ketamine vs IN Midazolam and Fentanyl for Laceration Repair

A Phase 4 interventional study of Ketamine and Midazolam and fentanyl in Laceration of Skin, sponsored by William Beaumont Hospitals. Terminated at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 6 Months to 10 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-08-24.

Sponsored by William Beaumont Hospitals · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

Why this study was terminated
Staffing for study was eliminated
Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
5
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
6 Months to 10 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Often, repair of the cuts (laceration repair) proves to be traumatic for the children and the parents. Nasal spray (Intranasal/IN) approaches for procedural pain reduction, such as during dental work, have been demonstrated to make drug administration painless and well tolerated. We are comparing IN ketamine to IN midazolam and fentanyl for pain and reducing anxiety during repair of cuts in children.

Read the detailed description

Children frequently present to pediatric emergency center (PEC) with cuts of different body parts. Often, repair of the cuts (laceration repair) proves to be traumatic for the children and the parents alike. Ideally, repair of the cuts should be as painless and free from anxiety as possible. To work towards this goal, different analgesic (pain drugs) and sedative ( to calm patients down) management strategies use intravenous (into the vein), intramuscular ( into the muscle) and, more recently, intranasal (into the nostrils) routes. Unfortunately, intravenous access is hard to establish and may be painful for the child. The intramuscular route is often similarly painful. Due to the rich blood supply and large surface area of the nasal vestibule, intranasally (IN) administered medications are highly absorbed. IN approaches for procedural pain reduction, such as during dental work, have been demonstrated to make drug administration painless and well tolerated, making it an attractive potential alternative to commonly used intravenous and intramuscular approaches. In several small research studies, high doses of intranasal ketamine (9 mg/kg) produce adequate sedation during laceration repair with minimal side effects. A recent study compared IN ketamine, midazolam, fentanyl or combination of these drugs for pain management and urgent analgesia sedation, and demonstrated that they are effective and safe, reporting that \~60% of study participants sustained mild to moderate sedation. Unfortunately, there are not enough studies done to evaluate the sedation effect of IN ketamine for laceration repair. Small studies (Tsze and Nemeth) showed that IN ketamine is an effective alternative but no studies are done to compare combination IN midazolam and fentanyl to IN ketamine. Our null hypothesis is that there is no difference in sedation scores during laceration repair when comparing the use of IN ketamine to IN midazolam and IN fentanyl.

We will recruit a total of 30 pediatric patients (6 months - 10 y age) in a randomized double-blinded pilot study of IN ketamine alone or combined IN midazolam and IN fentanyl for laceration repair, comparing levels of pain and sedation scores using validated pediatric metrics as the primary outcomes. In addition, we will assess comparative nurse and physician satisfaction in each of these two groups. Understanding the relative effectiveness of these two approaches will help us identify a safe, effective, and easily administrable method to manage pain and anxiety, thereby, improving patient experience and outcomes during the often traumatic laceration repair procedure.

02

Conditions studied

  • Laceration of Skin

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Pediatric
  • analgesia
  • pain control
  • sedation
  • intranasal ketamine
  • intranasal midazolam
  • intranasal fentanyl
03

In context

Lacerations

133 studies on the registry are indexed under Lacerations; 29 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 5 is below the median of 79 across 106 interventional studies indexed under Lacerations.

Browse Lacerations studies →

Lead sponsor

William Beaumont Hospitals is the lead sponsor of 111 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Of its 30 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 30 (100%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
6 Months to 10 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Pediatric patients 6 months to 10 years who required laceration repair in the pediatric emergency center.
  • Laceration should be less than 5 cm long, require 2 or more sutures and no consult subspeciality consult for repair.
  • Topical anesthetic (lidocaine-epinephrine-tetracaine topical solution/XAP) will be applied to all lacerations for 20 minutes duration before giving the intranasal medications.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Age \< 6 months
  • Documented allergy or adverse effect to ketamine, midazolam or fentanyl
  • Epistaxis
  • Partial upper airway obstruction
  • Oxygen requirement via nasal cannula
  • Acute mental status changes (e.g. obtunded or somnolent)
  • Documented increased intracranial pressure or increased ocular pressure
  • Documented porphyria
  • Previously involved in the study
  • Parent or patient refusal
  • Acutely compromised vitals (hypotension, desaturations, respiratory distress)
  • Any known heart disease
  • If any previous opioid use for analgesia during the visit
  • Need for staples
  • Scalp wounds
  • General trauma requiring additional sedation
  • Patients who received pain medications (acetaminophen or ibuprofen) before laceration repair
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
5 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    IN ketamine

    Intranasal ketamine 3mg/kg (max 100 mg) + saline 0.03 ml/kg (max 2ml)

    Drug: Ketamine

  • Active comparator
    IN midazolam and fentanyl

    Intranasal midazolam 0.3 mg/kg (max 10 mg) + fentanyl 1.5mcg/kg (max 100 mcg)

    Drug: Midazolam and fentanyl

Interventions

  • DrugKetamine

    Intranasal ketamine 3mg/kg (max 100 mg) + saline 0.03 ml/kg (max 2ml)

  • DrugMidazolam and fentanyl

    Intranasal midazolam 0.3 mg/kg (max 10 mg) + fentanyl 1.5mcg/kg (max 100 mcg)

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Sedation Score

    The primary outcome variable is the maximum sedation score as measured by the University of Michigan Sedation Scale. This scale consists of an ordinal scale from 0 being awake and alert and 4 being unarousable. Medians will be calculated for each group.

    Time frame: up to 30 minutes

  2. Proportion of Children With Maximum Sedation Score

    The proportion of children who receive a maximum sedation score of either 1 or 2 (without distinguishing between those values)

    Time frame: Up to 30 minutes

Secondary outcomes

  1. Pain Scores During Laceration Repair

    The effect of IN ketamine vs IN midazolam + IN fentanyl on pain scores during laceration repair using either Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability (FLACC) Scale or Faces Scale pain scale depending for patient age, each a Likert scale from 0 being no pain to 10 being worst pain, median scores for each group

    Time frame: Up to 30 minutes

  2. Nurse and Physician Satisfaction

    Nurse and physician satisfaction will be assessed by a survey which will be filled in the end of the sedation. Response to overall experience question score on Likert scale where 1 is poor and 5 is Excellent. Proportion of responders giving answers of 4 or 5 will be calculated.

    Time frame: Up to 30 minutes

  3. Rates of Failure

    Rates of failure to repair laceration due to agitation or intolerable pain with the switch to intravenous medications will be compared between two groups. Percentage failure will be reported.

    Time frame: Up to 30 minutes

  4. Change in Vitals

    Proportion of children who have any significant change in vitals during analgosedation (any desaturation - Oxygen saturation \< 90, and hypotension per age-related norms) will be compared between the two groups.

    Time frame: up to 30 minutes

07

Results

Posted Aug 24, 2021
Limitations and caveats
Study terminated early because staffing was eliminated. No results analyzed due to population size.

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneIN KetamineIN Midazolam and Fentanyl
Started32
Completed32
Not completed00

Outcome measures

PrimarySedation Score

The primary outcome variable is the maximum sedation score as measured by the University of Michigan Sedation Scale. This scale consists of an ordinal scale from 0 being awake and alert and 4 being unarousable. Medians will be calculated for each group.

Time frame:
up to 30 minutes
Reported as:
Median · units on a scale
Sedation Score
units on a scaleIN KetamineIN Midazolam and Fentanyl
Sedation Score1 (.5 to 1)1 (1 to 1)
PrimaryProportion of Children With Maximum Sedation Score

The proportion of children who receive a maximum sedation score of either 1 or 2 (without distinguishing between those values)

Time frame:
Up to 30 minutes
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Proportion of Children With Maximum Sedation Score
ParticipantsIN KetamineIN Midazolam and Fentanyl
Proportion of Children With Maximum Sedation Score22
SecondaryPain Scores During Laceration Repair

The effect of IN ketamine vs IN midazolam + IN fentanyl on pain scores during laceration repair using either Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability (FLACC) Scale or Faces Scale pain scale depending for patient age, each a Likert scale from 0 being no pain to 10 being worst pain, median scores for each group

Time frame:
Up to 30 minutes
Reported as:
Median · units on a scale
Pain Scores During Laceration Repair
units on a scaleIN KetamineIN Midazolam and Fentanyl
Pain Scores During Laceration Repair4 (4 to 4.5)0 (0 to 0)
SecondaryNurse and Physician Satisfaction

Nurse and physician satisfaction will be assessed by a survey which will be filled in the end of the sedation. Response to overall experience question score on Likert scale where 1 is poor and 5 is Excellent. Proportion of responders giving answers of 4 or 5 will be calculated.

Time frame:
Up to 30 minutes
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Nurse and Physician Satisfaction
ParticipantsIN KetamineIN Midazolam and Fentanyl
Nurse and Physician Satisfaction14
SecondaryRates of Failure

Rates of failure to repair laceration due to agitation or intolerable pain with the switch to intravenous medications will be compared between two groups. Percentage failure will be reported.

Time frame:
Up to 30 minutes
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Rates of Failure
ParticipantsIN KetamineIN Midazolam and Fentanyl
Rates of Failure00
SecondaryChange in Vitals

Proportion of children who have any significant change in vitals during analgosedation (any desaturation - Oxygen saturation \< 90, and hypotension per age-related norms) will be compared between the two groups.

Time frame:
up to 30 minutes
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Change in Vitals
ParticipantsIN KetamineIN Midazolam and Fentanyl
Change in Vitals00

Adverse events

Collected over 30-45 minutes. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
IN Ketamine0/3 (0%)0/3 (0%)0/3 (0%)
IN Midazolam and Fentanyl0/2 (0%)0/2 (0%)0/2 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)IN KetamineIN Midazolam and FentanylTotal
Mean2 ± 0.872 ± 02 ± 0.61
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)IN KetamineIN Midazolam and FentanylTotal
Female022
Male303
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)IN KetamineIN Midazolam and FentanylTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native000
Asian000
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander000
Black or African American000
White213
More than one race000
Unknown or Not Reported112
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)IN KetamineIN Midazolam and FentanylTotal
United States325
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Beaumont Hospital - Royal Oak
    Royal Oak, Michigan 48073, United States
09

References and documents

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Nov 21, 2018

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 24, 2021, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03528512
Lead sponsor
William Beaumont Hospitals
Responsible party
Margaret J Menoch, MD (Pediatric ER Medical Clinical Faculty, William Beaumont Hospitals) — Principal investigator
First posted
May 18, 2018
Start date
Sep 4, 2018
Primary completion
Feb 6, 2019
Completion
Feb 6, 2019
Results posted
Aug 24, 2021
Last update
Aug 24, 2021

Study contacts

Kelly Levasseur, DO
principal investigator · William Beaumont Hospitals

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in Jul 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion