ClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT05422625PTNS-MSUpdated Oct 9, 2024Results posted

PTNS for Female Patients Suffering From Multiple Sclerosis

An interventional study of PTNS Treatment and Sham PTNS Treatment in Multiple Sclerosis and Overactive Bladder, sponsored by William Beaumont Hospitals. Terminated at 1 site in United States. Open to female participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-10-09.

Sponsored by William Beaumont Hospitals · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Why this study was terminated
Lack of patients
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
2
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

This is a pilot, single blind, randomized, sham-controlled trial to assess the benefit of Percutaneous Tibial Nerve Stimulation (PTNS) in treating bladder overactivity (OAB) symptoms in multiple sclerosis (MS) patients. The data generated by this study would provide support for a future multi-institutional, randomized prospective trial.

Read the detailed description

Multiple Sclerosis (MS) is a chronic, progressive inflammatory disorder of the central nervous system. It is caused by loss of myelin, the outer protective layer of the neuron, resulting in a disruption of the signal potentials that flow through the neurons. This can lead to a variety of sensory, visual, and motor disturbances. MS affects almost 1 million people in the United States with the prevalence being two to three times higher in women than in men. Over 80% of MS patients suffer from lower urinary tract symptoms, with OAB and urinary incontinence (UI) being the predominant bladder dysfunctions. OAB is characterized by sudden feeling of urgency, frequent urination, and urge incontinence. PTNS is an FDA approved treatment for OAB and is recommended as third line treatment for OAB by the American Urological Association (AUA) and Society of Urodynamics, Female Pelvic Medicine and Urogenital Reconstruction (SUFU). However, it is not approved for MS and as such these treatments are not covered by insurance.

Here the investigators propose a pilot, double blind, randomized, sham-controlled trial to assess the benefit of PTNS in treating OAB symptoms in MS patients. The data generated by this study would provide support for a future multi-institutional, randomized prospective trial.

02

Conditions studied

  • Multiple Sclerosis
  • Overactive Bladder

Keywords

  • Multiple Sclerosis
  • MS
  • Overactive bladder
  • OAB
03

In context

Multiple Sclerosis

3,264 studies on the registry are indexed under Multiple Sclerosis; 659 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 2 is below the median of 50 across 2,201 interventional studies indexed under Multiple Sclerosis.

Browse Multiple Sclerosis studies →

Lead sponsor

William Beaumont Hospitals is the lead sponsor of 111 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Of its 30 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 30 (100%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Women with diagnosis for Multiple Sclerosis (Clinically isolated syndrome (CIS), relapsing remitting (RRMS), secondary progressive (SPMS), and/or primary progressive (PPMS)), 18 years of age or older
  • Self-reported bladder symptoms > 3 months
  • Discontinued antimuscarinics/beta-3 agonists for > 2 weeks, and remain off for the duration of the study
  • Capable of giving
  • Ambulatory and able to use toilet independently without difficulty
  • Capable and willing to follow all study-related procedures
  • If of childbearing age, agree to practice approved birth-control methods (oral , condom barrier, injection, diaphragm or cervical cap, vaginal contraceptive ring, intrauterine device (IUD), implantable contraceptive, surgical sterilization (bilateral tubal ligation), vasectomized partner(s))
  • Subject agrees not to start any new treatments for urinary symptoms (medication or otherwise) during the treatment and follow-up periods.
  • Subject agrees to maintain a stable dose on all current medications throughout the treatment and follow-up period.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnant or planning to become pregnant during study duration
  • Botox (BTX) use in bladder or pelvic floor muscles within past 6 months
  • Pacemakers or implantable defibrillators
  • Current urinary tract infection
  • Active use of neuromodulation in any other form. If patient has InterStim, must be turned off for 2 weeks for a and remain off during the entirety of the study.
  • Current use of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) in pelvic region, back or legs
  • Previous PTNS treatment
  • Participation in any clinical investigation involving or impacting gynecologic, urinary, or renal function within past 4 weeks

Note: For the sake of preserving scientific integrity, one or more of the eligibility criteria have been left off the list posted while the trial is ongoing. A full list of eligibility criteria will be posted upon completion of the trial.

Terms in these criteria, in plain language(3)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

Washout period

A planned gap after a treatment, so that its effects can lessen before the study treatment or a study assessment. Ask the study team and the doctor who prescribed it before changing any medicine.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
2 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Active PTNS

    Once a week induction consisting of active PTNS treatments for 30 minutes for 12 consecutive weeks.

    Device: PTNS Treatment

  • Placebo comparator
    Sham PTNS

    Once a week induction consisting of Sham PTNS treatments for 30 minutes for 12 consecutive weeks.

    Device: Sham PTNS Treatment

Interventions

  • DevicePTNS Treatment

    Patients will be placed in a comfortable position, sitting or supine. The treatment leg will be propped up comfortably on a footrest but draped and out of view from the patient. A 34-gauge needle electrode will be inserted at a 60-degree angle 5 cm cephalad to the medial malleolus and slightly posterior to the tibia. A PTNS surface electrode will be placed on the ipsilateral calcaneus as well as 2 inactive sham surface electrodes, 1 under the little toe and 1 on the top of the foot. When the PTNS lead set is connected to the Urgent PC stimulator, a current level of 0.5 to 9 mA at 20 Hz is selected based on each patient's foot and plantar motor and sensory responses. Treatment lasts 30 minutes and given once weekly for 12 consecutive weeks.

    Also known as: Urgent PC Neuromodulation System

  • DeviceSham PTNS Treatment

    Patients will be positioned similarly as PTNS patients. A Streitberger needle will be used at the tibial nerve insertion site as described above to simulate needle placement. Three electrodes will be placed on the patient's foot, two active TENS electrodes and one inactive TENS electrode. The TENS "grounding pad" will be a gel electrode pad from a TENS unit device that is placed on the bottom of the foot just below the smallest toe. Another gel electrode will be placed on the top of the foot just above the small toe for conduction. These two electrodes will be connected to the TENS unit lead wires for sham stimulation. A third, inactive, gel electrode, will be placed near the medial aspect of the calcaneus to mimic the PTNS treatment. The TENS electrode will be connected by lead wires to the TENS unit set at 20 HZ. The TENS unit will be turned on and stimulation slowly increased to the patient's first sensory level and then turned off.

    Also known as: Biostim Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) Unit

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. The Overall Patient Reported Change of Bladder Overactivity (OAB) Symptoms in MS Patients as Reported on the Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) Questionnaire

    The PGI-I is a self-reported measure of symptom change after treatment completion. This is a validated 1-question tool. Subjects score their urinary condition now compared to how it was before starting treatment. The score ranges from 1-7. 1= very much better, 2 = much better, 3 = a little better, 4=no change, 5= a little worse, 6= much worse, 7 = very much worse. A higher score indicates a worse outcome. Only one participant completed the primary outcome, thus that subject score will be reported.

    Time frame: One week after completing all 12 treatments

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in Urinary Voids in Response to the Treatment Using a 3-day Voiding Diary

    Study participants will complete a 3-day voiding diary to record number of voids. Investigators will analyze the change in urinary voids from before to after treatment. A positive number indicates more voids, and a negative number indicates fewer voids.

    Time frame: At baseline and one week after completing all 12 treatments, Visit 13

  2. Change in Urinary Incontinence Episodes in Response to the Treatment Using a 3-day Voiding Diary

    Study participants will complete a 3-day voiding diary to record number of urinary incontinence episodes over a 3-day period. Investigators will analyze the change in urinary incontinence episodes from before to after treatment. A positive number indicates more episodes, and a negative number indicates fewer episodes.

    Time frame: At baseline and one week after completing all 12 treatments, Visit 13

  3. Change in Urinary Urgency Episodes in Response to the Treatment Using a 3-day Voiding Diary

    Study participants will complete a 3-day voiding diary to record the number of urgency episodes over a 3-day period. Investigators will analyze the change in urinary urgency episodes from before to after treatment. A positive number indicates more episodes, and a negative number indicates fewer episodes.

    Time frame: At baseline and one week after completing all 12 treatments, Visit 13

  4. Change in Overactive Bladder Symptoms in Response to the Treatment Using the Overactive Bladder Quality of Life Short Form Questionnaire.

    The Overactive Bladder quality of life questionnaire measures the impact of PTNS treatment on patient quality of life. Patients score symptom severity and impact on quality of life on a scale 1-6, with 1=not at all, 2=a little bit, 3=somewhat, 4=quite a bit, 5=a great deal, and 6=a very great deal. Symptom severity raw score is calculated from questions 1-6; the lowest possible raw score is 6, the highest score is 36. The health-related quality of life (HRQL) raw score is calculated similarly from questions 1-13; the lowest possible score is 13 and highest score is 78. The formula (actual raw score - lowest possible raw score)/highest possible raw score times 100 is applied to each raw score, which are added to give a final score in the range 0 to 166.6, with low scores indicating fewer symptoms and impact, and high scores indicating more symptoms and impact. Change from baseline is reported, with a positive number indicating worsening and a negative number indicating improvement.

    Time frame: At baseline and one week after completing all 12 treatments, Visit 13

07

Results

Posted Oct 9, 2024
Limitations and caveats
Early termination leading to small numbers of subjects analyzed. Recruiting challenges.

Participant flow

Subjects were recruited from December 2022 through December 2023.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneActive PTNSSham PTNS
Started20
Completed10
Not completed10
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject10

Outcome measures

PrimaryThe Overall Patient Reported Change of Bladder Overactivity (OAB) Symptoms in MS Patients as Reported on the Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) Questionnaire

The PGI-I is a self-reported measure of symptom change after treatment completion. This is a validated 1-question tool. Subjects score their urinary condition now compared to how it was before starting treatment. The score ranges from 1-7. 1= very much better, 2 = much better, 3 = a little better, 4=no change, 5= a little worse, 6= much worse, 7 = very much worse. A higher score indicates a worse outcome. Only one participant completed the primary outcome, thus that subject score will be reported.

Time frame:
One week after completing all 12 treatments
Reported as:
Number · score
The Overall Patient Reported Change of Bladder Overactivity (OAB) Symptoms in MS Patients as Reported on the Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) Questionnaire
scoreActive PTNSSham PTNS
The Overall Patient Reported Change of Bladder Overactivity (OAB) Symptoms in MS Patients as Reported on the Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) Questionnaire4—
SecondaryChange in Urinary Voids in Response to the Treatment Using a 3-day Voiding Diary

Study participants will complete a 3-day voiding diary to record number of voids. Investigators will analyze the change in urinary voids from before to after treatment. A positive number indicates more voids, and a negative number indicates fewer voids.

Time frame:
At baseline and one week after completing all 12 treatments, Visit 13
Reported as:
Mean · number of voids
Change in Urinary Voids in Response to the Treatment Using a 3-day Voiding Diary
number of voidsActive PTNSSham PTNS
Change in Urinary Voids in Response to the Treatment Using a 3-day Voiding Diary1 ± 0—
SecondaryChange in Urinary Incontinence Episodes in Response to the Treatment Using a 3-day Voiding Diary

Study participants will complete a 3-day voiding diary to record number of urinary incontinence episodes over a 3-day period. Investigators will analyze the change in urinary incontinence episodes from before to after treatment. A positive number indicates more episodes, and a negative number indicates fewer episodes.

Time frame:
At baseline and one week after completing all 12 treatments, Visit 13
Reported as:
Mean · number of urgency incontinence episodes
Change in Urinary Incontinence Episodes in Response to the Treatment Using a 3-day Voiding Diary
number of urgency incontinence episodesActive PTNSSham PTNS
Change in Urinary Incontinence Episodes in Response to the Treatment Using a 3-day Voiding Diary-3 ± 0—
SecondaryChange in Urinary Urgency Episodes in Response to the Treatment Using a 3-day Voiding Diary

Study participants will complete a 3-day voiding diary to record the number of urgency episodes over a 3-day period. Investigators will analyze the change in urinary urgency episodes from before to after treatment. A positive number indicates more episodes, and a negative number indicates fewer episodes.

Time frame:
At baseline and one week after completing all 12 treatments, Visit 13
Reported as:
Mean · number of urgency episodes
Change in Urinary Urgency Episodes in Response to the Treatment Using a 3-day Voiding Diary
number of urgency episodesActive PTNSSham PTNS
Change in Urinary Urgency Episodes in Response to the Treatment Using a 3-day Voiding Diary1 ± 0—
SecondaryChange in Overactive Bladder Symptoms in Response to the Treatment Using the Overactive Bladder Quality of Life Short Form Questionnaire.

The Overactive Bladder quality of life questionnaire measures the impact of PTNS treatment on patient quality of life. Patients score symptom severity and impact on quality of life on a scale 1-6, with 1=not at all, 2=a little bit, 3=somewhat, 4=quite a bit, 5=a great deal, and 6=a very great deal. Symptom severity raw score is calculated from questions 1-6; the lowest possible raw score is 6, the highest score is 36. The health-related quality of life (HRQL) raw score is calculated similarly from questions 1-13; the lowest possible score is 13 and highest score is 78. The formula (actual raw score - lowest possible raw score)/highest possible raw score times 100 is applied to each raw score, which are added to give a final score in the range 0 to 166.6, with low scores indicating fewer symptoms and impact, and high scores indicating more symptoms and impact. Change from baseline is reported, with a positive number indicating worsening and a negative number indicating improvement.

Time frame:
At baseline and one week after completing all 12 treatments, Visit 13
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Change in Overactive Bladder Symptoms in Response to the Treatment Using the Overactive Bladder Quality of Life Short Form Questionnaire.
score on a scaleActive PTNSSham PTNS
Change in Overactive Bladder Symptoms in Response to the Treatment Using the Overactive Bladder Quality of Life Short Form Questionnaire.-47.69 ± 0—

Adverse events

Collected over Approximately 14 weeks. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Active PTNS0/2 (0%)0/2 (0%)0/2 (0%)
Sham PTNS———

Baseline characteristics

There were zero patients randomized to the sham PTNS group.

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Active PTNSSham PTNSTotal
<=18 years000
Between 18 and 65 years202
>=65 years000
Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Active PTNSSham PTNSTotal
Mean47 ± 12—47 ± 12
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Active PTNSSham PTNSTotal
Female202
Male000
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Active PTNSSham PTNSTotal
Hispanic or Latino000
Not Hispanic or Latino202
Unknown or Not Reported000
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Active PTNSSham PTNSTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native000
Asian000
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander000
Black or African American000
White202
More than one race000
Unknown or Not Reported000
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Active PTNSSham PTNSTotal
United States2—2
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Beaumont Hospital - Royal Oak
    Royal Oak, Michigan 48073, United States
09

References and documents

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Jan 2023 to primary completion in Apr 2023, 3 months.

Results were first posted in Oct 2024, 1 year 5 months after primary completion.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jun 13, 2022
First posted
Jun 16, 2022
StartActual
Jan 9, 2023
Primary completionActual
Apr 10, 2023
CompletionActual
Aug 3, 2023
Results first posted
Oct 9, 2024
Last update
Oct 9, 2024
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 9, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05422625
Responsible party
Priya Padmanabhan (Fellowship Director, Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery, William Beaumont Hospitals) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jun 16, 2022
Start date
Jan 9, 2023
Primary completion
Apr 10, 2023
Completion
Aug 3, 2023
Results posted
Oct 9, 2024
Last update
Oct 9, 2024

Study contacts

Priya Padmanabhan, MD
principal investigator · Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in Sep 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion