ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03504085OPTYMUpdated Feb 17, 2023Results posted

Overcoming Pain Through Yoga in the Military

An interventional study of Yoga: Active Hatha and Yoga: Restorative in Chronic Low Back Pain and Chronic Neck Pain, sponsored by University of California, San Diego. Completed at 2 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-02-17.

Sponsored by University of California, San Diego · Not applicable, Interventional, and Health services research

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
49
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Our primary aim is to assess the feasibility of conducting yoga research among active-duty military personnel with Chronic Low Back Pain (CLBP) and/or Chronic Neck Pain (CNP). In addition, we will evaluate the yoga intervention preferences and refine an existing yoga intervention to address those needs. The study will prepare us for a R01 funded pragmatic clinical trial of yoga for CLBP and CNP in active-duty military.

Read the detailed description

In preparation for a full-scale study via a subsequent R01 proposal, our study objective is to examine the feasibility and acceptability of conducting a yoga RCT among active-duty military personnel with CLBP/CNP in military and community settings. The study will be conducted in two phases: Phase 1 (completed) involved obtaining IRB approval to conduct research in military settings, collecting qualitative data from stakeholders on attitudes and preferences for yoga interventions, and refining the existing Yoga for CLBP intervention for the needs of active-duty military and persons with CNP. Phase 2 will recruit and randomize 50 military personnel with CLBP or CNP to either active hatha or restorative yoga. Pain interference, pain severity, physical function, opioid medication use, and mental health outcomes are of primary interest. Mechanisms will also be studied.

The specific aims are as follows:

Aim 1: Evaluate and navigate barriers and facilitators for obtaining IRB approval to conduct randomized controlled intervention studies with active-duty military personnel.

Aim 2: Evaluate the acceptability of and preferences for yoga interventions among active-duty military personnel with CLBP/CNP.

Aim 3: Refine and modify the existing Yoga for CLBP intervention to address CNP, and the needs of active-duty military personnel.

Aim 4: Evaluate the feasibility of recruitment of active-duty military personnel with CLBP/CNP into a yoga RCT.

Aim 5: Evaluate the adherence of this population to the two yoga interventions. Aim 6: Obtain effect size estimates to inform power analyses for a full-scale RCT.

Accomplishing these aims will prepare us for an R01 proposal to study the efficacy of yoga for military personnel with CLBP/CNP in a full-scale randomized, controlled trial. To be successful and maximize the scientific knowledge obtained from an R01 study, it is crucial to first establish working relationships with military researchers, ensure that recruitment and randomized assignment are feasible, pilot test measurement strategies, and ensure that both interventions will be well-attended and have been optimally chosen.

02

Conditions studied

  • Chronic Low Back Pain
  • Chronic Neck Pain

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Chronic Low Back Pain
  • CLBP
  • Chronic Neck Pain
  • CNP
  • Chronic Pain
  • Military
  • Active Duty
  • Yoga
  • Mindbody
03

In context

Chronic Pain

2,998 studies on the registry are indexed under Chronic Pain; 706 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 49 is below the median of 60 across 2,209 interventional studies indexed under Chronic Pain.

Browse Chronic Pain studies →

Lead sponsor

University of California, San Diego is the lead sponsor of 975 studies on the registry; 196 are open to participants now.

Of its 111 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 71 (64%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Diagnosis of CLBP or CNP > 6 months
  • Willing to attend a yoga program for 12 weeks
  • Willing to complete 3 assessments
  • English literacy
  • Have had no changes in pain treatments in the past month
  • Willing to not change pain treatments during study unless medically necessary
  • Have not practiced yoga more than 2x in the last 12 months

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Back or neck surgery within the last year
  • Back or neck pain due to specific systemic problem (e.g., lupus, scoliosis)
  • Severe vertebral disk problems,
  • Persistent sciatica or nerve compression > 3 months
  • Coexisting chronic pain problem (e.g., migraine headaches, fibromyalgia)
  • Serious or unstable psychiatric illness (e.g., psychosis, mania, episode, or substance dependence)
  • Major coexisting medical illness (e.g., cancer, COPD, morbid obesity)
  • Positive Romberg test (with or without sensory neuropathy)
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Health services research
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
49 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Hatha Yoga

    This arm will receive the active Hatha yoga intervention. Instructors lead participants through various yoga poses for 60-minutes, 1-2x weekly for 12 weeks, and daily home practice is recommended.

    Other: Yoga: Active Hatha

  • Active comparator
    Restorative Yoga

    This arm will receive a restorative yoga intervention. Instructors guide participants through relaxation exercises, typically with eyes closed, laying down, and minimal movement 60-minutes, 1-2x weekly for 12 weeks.

    Other: Yoga: Restorative

Interventions

  • OtherYoga: Active Hatha

    Classical Hatha yoga with influences from Viniyoga and Iyengar yoga. Both Viniyoga and Iyengar yoga styles emphasize modifications and adaptations including the use of props such as straps and blocks in order to minimize the risk of injury and make the poses accessible to people with health problems and limitations

    Also known as: Active

  • OtherYoga: Restorative

    Restorative Yoga is a slow-paced yoga style that emphasizes relaxation and includes very little movement.

    Also known as: Non-Active

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Pain Interference

    Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) : Self-Report measure of pain interference and pain severity consisting of 14 items. The measure includes front and back body diagrams to describe areas of pain, four pain severity items and seven pain interference items rated on 0-10 scales, and one question about percentage of pain relief by analgesics. The pain interference score is the mean of the 7 interference items. The pain severity score is the mean of 4 severity items. Scale scores are the mean of relevant items. Thus, scores range from 0-10 with higher scores indicating more pain interference.

    Time frame: assessed at baseline, 12 weeks, and 6 months; baseline and 12 weeks reported

Secondary outcomes

  1. Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire

    Self-report measure consisting of 23 questions that ask about limitations experienced for a variety of daily activities. Scale scores are the sum of items endorsed, thus scores range from 0-23 with higher scores indicating more back pain-related disability.

    Time frame: assessed at baseline, 12 weeks, and 6 months; baseline and 12 weeks reported

  2. BPI Pain Severity

    Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) : Self-Report measure of pain severity consisting of 4 items. The measure includes front and back body diagrams to describe areas of pain, four pain severity items and seven pain interference items rated on 0-10 scales, and one question about percentage of pain relief by analgesics. The pain severity score is the mean of 4 severity items. Scale scores are the mean of relevant items. Thus, scores range from 0-10 with higher scores indicating greater pain severity.

    Time frame: assessed at baseline, 12 weeks, and 6 months; baseline and 12 weeks reported

  3. Neck Disability Index

    Ten-item self-report measure to assess neck pain interference in daily life activities. Each of the 10 items is scored from 0 - 5. The items are summed and scores range from 0-50 with higher scores indicating greater disability due to neck pain.

    Time frame: assessed at baseline, 12 weeks, and 6 months; baseline and 12 weeks reported

Other outcomes

  1. Health Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) Short-form 12 (SF12) - Physical

    12-Item self-report measure on individual's views about their physical health. Scores are scaled to range from 0-100 with higher scores indicating better physical quality of life.

    Time frame: assessed at baseline, 12 weeks, and 6 months; baseline and 12 weeks reported

  2. HRQOL - SF12 - Mental Health

    Mental Component Score for the SF12 Scores are scaled to range from 0-100 with higher scores indicating better mental quality of life.

    Time frame: assessed at baseline, 12 weeks, and 6 months; baseline and 12 weeks reported

  3. The Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS)

    The Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS) assesses the impact and severity of fatigue with 9 items. A score of \> 4.0 constitutes severe fatigue.The measure has good psychometrics for pain disorders. This is a 9-item questionnaire with questions related to how fatigue interferes with certain activities and severity according to a self-report scale. The items are scored on a 7 point scale with 1 = strongly disagree and 7= strongly agree. The minimum score = 9 and maximum score possible = 63. Higher the score indicate greater fatigue severity.

    Time frame: assessed at baseline, 12 weeks, and 6 months; baseline and 12 weeks reported

  4. CES-D 10

    Ten-item self-report measure on the frequency of mood symptoms. Scores greater than or equal to 10 indicate depression. The 10 items are rated on a Likert scale from 0-3. Thus the total score ranges from 0-30 with higher scores indicating more depression.

    Time frame: assessed at baseline, 12 weeks, and 6 months; baseline and 12 weeks reported

  5. AUDIT-C

    The AUDIT-C is a 3-item alcohol screen that reliably identifies patients who are hazardous drinkers or have alcohol use disorders. The AUDIT-C is a modified version of the 10 question AUDIT instrument.

    Time frame: baseline, 12-weeks, 6-months

  6. Dimensions of Anger Reactions (DAR)

    Developed by Forbes et al., The Dimensions of Anger Reactions questionnaire consists of 7 items and has demonstrated strong internal reliability and concurrent validity with other existing measures of anger.

    Time frame: baseline, 12-weeks, 6-months

  7. The Brief Resilience Scale (BRS)

    The Brief Resilience Scale (BRS) assesses and individuals ability to recover from stress or trauma. The measure consists of six items and has good reliability and validity. The score is the mean of the 6 items, which are rated from 1 to 5. Scores range from 1-5.0 and higher scores indicate greater resilience.

    Time frame: baseline, 12-weeks, 6-months

  8. Self Efficacy for Chronic Low Back Pain Scale

    A 6-item self-report measure of an individual's confidence in performing certain activities. Items range from 1 (not at all confident) to 10 (totally confident). The score is the mean of the items and ranges from 1-10 with higher scores indicating greater self-efficacy.

    Time frame: baseline, 12-weeks, 6-months

  9. Physical Measures: Grip Strength

    Grip strength will be measured with a hydraulic dynamometer. Two trials will be performed for each hand and the best performance will be taken for each side. The average of both hands is used for analysis.

    Time frame: baseline, 12-weeks, 6-months

  10. Physical Measures: Core Stabilization

    Prone and supine bridge positions will assess core stabilization. Participants begin on their elbows in the prone position with shoulders, hips, and ankles aligned. The supine position is tested next, with knees flexed 90 degrees and pelvis raised from the floor with shoulders, hips, and knees aligned. Assessors record length of time (120 seconds max) that each position is held in proper form.

    Time frame: baseline, 12-weeks, 6-months

  11. Physical Measures: Balance

    Balance will be measures performance on a one-leg stand on each side. Assessors record length of time (2 minutes max) that each one-leg stand is held in proper form.

    Time frame: baseline, 12-weeks, 6-months

  12. PROMIS - Pain Intensity

    PROMIS (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System) measure - Pain Intensity The PROMIS Pain Intensity instrument consists of three items with 5 response options ranging from 1 ("had no pain") to 5 ("very severe") addressing how much pain the person experiences now and in the past 7 days. The raw score is the sum of the three questions, with a minimum of 3 and a maximum score of 15, with higher scores indicating greater pain intensity.

    Time frame: assessed at baseline, 12 weeks, and 6 months; baseline and 12 weeks reported

07

Results

Posted Feb 17, 2023

Participant flow

End of Intervention - 12 Weeks
Participant flow — End of Intervention - 12 Weeks
MilestoneHatha YogaRestorative Yoga
Started2425
Completed2121
Not completed34
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up34
Final Assessment - 6 Months
Participant flow — Final Assessment - 6 Months
MilestoneHatha YogaRestorative Yoga
Started2425
Completed1920
Not completed55
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up55

Outcome measures

PrimaryPain Interference

Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) : Self-Report measure of pain interference and pain severity consisting of 14 items. The measure includes front and back body diagrams to describe areas of pain, four pain severity items and seven pain interference items rated on 0-10 scales, and one question about percentage of pain relief by analgesics. The pain interference score is the mean of the 7 interference items. The pain severity score is the mean of 4 severity items. Scale scores are the mean of relevant items. Thus, scores range from 0-10 with higher scores indicating more pain interference.

Time frame:
assessed at baseline, 12 weeks, and 6 months; baseline and 12 weeks reported
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Pain Interference
score on a scaleHatha YogaRestorative Yoga
Baseline4.2 ± 2.24.0 ± 2.4
12 weeks3.9 ± 2.43.2 ± 2.5
SecondaryRoland-Morris Disability Questionnaire

Self-report measure consisting of 23 questions that ask about limitations experienced for a variety of daily activities. Scale scores are the sum of items endorsed, thus scores range from 0-23 with higher scores indicating more back pain-related disability.

Time frame:
assessed at baseline, 12 weeks, and 6 months; baseline and 12 weeks reported
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire
score on a scaleHatha YogaRestorative Yoga
Baseline10.8 ± 5.210.0 ± 5.6
12 weeks10.1 ± 6.37.6 ± 6.1
SecondaryBPI Pain Severity

Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) : Self-Report measure of pain severity consisting of 4 items. The measure includes front and back body diagrams to describe areas of pain, four pain severity items and seven pain interference items rated on 0-10 scales, and one question about percentage of pain relief by analgesics. The pain severity score is the mean of 4 severity items. Scale scores are the mean of relevant items. Thus, scores range from 0-10 with higher scores indicating greater pain severity.

Time frame:
assessed at baseline, 12 weeks, and 6 months; baseline and 12 weeks reported
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
BPI Pain Severity
score on a scaleHatha YogaRestorative Yoga
Baseline4.7 ± 1.74.7 ± 1.8
12 weeks4.0 ± 2.33.7 ± 1.9
SecondaryNeck Disability Index

Ten-item self-report measure to assess neck pain interference in daily life activities. Each of the 10 items is scored from 0 - 5. The items are summed and scores range from 0-50 with higher scores indicating greater disability due to neck pain.

Time frame:
assessed at baseline, 12 weeks, and 6 months; baseline and 12 weeks reported
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Neck Disability Index
score on a scaleHatha YogaRestorative Yoga
Baseline14.3 ± 9.312.1 ± 9.0
12 weeks14.0 ± 10.710.0 ± 8.9
Other pre-specifiedHealth Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) Short-form 12 (SF12) - Physical

12-Item self-report measure on individual's views about their physical health. Scores are scaled to range from 0-100 with higher scores indicating better physical quality of life.

Time frame:
assessed at baseline, 12 weeks, and 6 months; baseline and 12 weeks reported
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Health Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) Short-form 12 (SF12) - Physical
score on a scaleHatha YogaRestorative Yoga
Baseline33.1 ± 7.336.5 ± 10.5
12 weeks37.0 ± 8.139.2 ± 9.6
Other pre-specifiedHRQOL - SF12 - Mental Health

Mental Component Score for the SF12 Scores are scaled to range from 0-100 with higher scores indicating better mental quality of life.

Time frame:
assessed at baseline, 12 weeks, and 6 months; baseline and 12 weeks reported
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
HRQOL - SF12 - Mental Health
score on a scaleHatha YogaRestorative Yoga
Baseline47.1 ± 11.649.5 ± 9.5
12 weeks45.2 ± 12.547.1 ± 10.6
Other pre-specifiedThe Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS)

The Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS) assesses the impact and severity of fatigue with 9 items. A score of \> 4.0 constitutes severe fatigue.The measure has good psychometrics for pain disorders. This is a 9-item questionnaire with questions related to how fatigue interferes with certain activities and severity according to a self-report scale. The items are scored on a 7 point scale with 1 = strongly disagree and 7= strongly agree. The minimum score = 9 and maximum score possible = 63. Higher the score indicate greater fatigue severity.

Time frame:
assessed at baseline, 12 weeks, and 6 months; baseline and 12 weeks reported
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
The Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS)
score on a scaleHatha YogaRestorative Yoga
Baseline4.0 ± 1.44.0 ± 1.5
12 weeks4.4 ± 1.63.8 ± 1.6
Other pre-specifiedCES-D 10

Ten-item self-report measure on the frequency of mood symptoms. Scores greater than or equal to 10 indicate depression. The 10 items are rated on a Likert scale from 0-3. Thus the total score ranges from 0-30 with higher scores indicating more depression.

Time frame:
assessed at baseline, 12 weeks, and 6 months; baseline and 12 weeks reported

Results for this outcome have not been posted.

Other pre-specifiedAUDIT-C

The AUDIT-C is a 3-item alcohol screen that reliably identifies patients who are hazardous drinkers or have alcohol use disorders. The AUDIT-C is a modified version of the 10 question AUDIT instrument.

Time frame:
baseline, 12-weeks, 6-months

Results for this outcome have not been posted.

Other pre-specifiedDimensions of Anger Reactions (DAR)

Developed by Forbes et al., The Dimensions of Anger Reactions questionnaire consists of 7 items and has demonstrated strong internal reliability and concurrent validity with other existing measures of anger.

Time frame:
baseline, 12-weeks, 6-months

Results for this outcome have not been posted.

Other pre-specifiedThe Brief Resilience Scale (BRS)

The Brief Resilience Scale (BRS) assesses and individuals ability to recover from stress or trauma. The measure consists of six items and has good reliability and validity. The score is the mean of the 6 items, which are rated from 1 to 5. Scores range from 1-5.0 and higher scores indicate greater resilience.

Time frame:
baseline, 12-weeks, 6-months

Results for this outcome have not been posted.

Other pre-specifiedSelf Efficacy for Chronic Low Back Pain Scale

A 6-item self-report measure of an individual's confidence in performing certain activities. Items range from 1 (not at all confident) to 10 (totally confident). The score is the mean of the items and ranges from 1-10 with higher scores indicating greater self-efficacy.

Time frame:
baseline, 12-weeks, 6-months

Results for this outcome have not been posted.

Other pre-specifiedPhysical Measures: Grip Strength

Grip strength will be measured with a hydraulic dynamometer. Two trials will be performed for each hand and the best performance will be taken for each side. The average of both hands is used for analysis.

Time frame:
baseline, 12-weeks, 6-months

Results for this outcome have not been posted.

Other pre-specifiedPhysical Measures: Core Stabilization

Prone and supine bridge positions will assess core stabilization. Participants begin on their elbows in the prone position with shoulders, hips, and ankles aligned. The supine position is tested next, with knees flexed 90 degrees and pelvis raised from the floor with shoulders, hips, and knees aligned. Assessors record length of time (120 seconds max) that each position is held in proper form.

Time frame:
baseline, 12-weeks, 6-months

Results for this outcome have not been posted.

Other pre-specifiedPhysical Measures: Balance

Balance will be measures performance on a one-leg stand on each side. Assessors record length of time (2 minutes max) that each one-leg stand is held in proper form.

Time frame:
baseline, 12-weeks, 6-months

Results for this outcome have not been posted.

Other pre-specifiedPROMIS - Pain Intensity

PROMIS (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System) measure - Pain Intensity The PROMIS Pain Intensity instrument consists of three items with 5 response options ranging from 1 ("had no pain") to 5 ("very severe") addressing how much pain the person experiences now and in the past 7 days. The raw score is the sum of the three questions, with a minimum of 3 and a maximum score of 15, with higher scores indicating greater pain intensity.

Time frame:
assessed at baseline, 12 weeks, and 6 months; baseline and 12 weeks reported
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
PROMIS - Pain Intensity
score on a scaleHatha YogaRestorative Yoga
Baseline9.8 ± 1.79.5 ± 2.3
12 weeks9.0 ± 2.48.6 ± 2.5

Adverse events

Collected over 6 months. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Hatha Yoga0/24 (0%)0/24 (0%)2/24 (8.3%)
Restorative Yoga0/25 (0%)0/25 (0%)4/25 (16%)
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventHatha YogaRestorative Yoga
leg surgeryMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders1/240/25
Broken foot or ankleMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders1/241/25
Back surgeryMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders0/241/25
Unspecified surgerySurgical and medical procedures0/241/25
Shoulder injuryMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders0/241/25

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Hatha YogaRestorative YogaTotal
Mean34 ± 9.132 ± 8.133 ± 8.5
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Hatha YogaRestorative YogaTotal
Female81220
Male161329
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Hatha YogaRestorative YogaTotal
Hispanic or Latino3811
Not Hispanic or Latino211738
Unknown or Not Reported000
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Hatha YogaRestorative YogaTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native101
Asian437
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander000
Black or African American3710
White161531
More than one race000
Unknown or Not Reported000
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Hatha YogaRestorative YogaTotal
United States242549
08

Study locations

2 sites
  • UCSD's Health Services Research Center
    San Diego, California 92121, United States
  • Navy Medical Center San Diego
    San Diego, California 92134, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Groessl EJ, Casteel D, McKinnon S, McCarthy A, Schmalzl L, Chang DG, Fowler IM, Park CL. Comparing Types of Yoga for Chronic Low Back and Neck Pain in Military Personnel: A Feasibility Randomized Controlled Trial. Glob Adv Health Med. 2022 Jun 16;11:2164957X221094596. doi: 10.1177/2164957X221094596. eCollection 2022. PubMed 35734420 ↗

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Mar 1, 2019

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 17, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03504085
Collaborators
United States Naval Medical Center, San Diego, National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (NCCIH)
Responsible party
Erik Groessl (Associate Professor, University of California, San Diego) — Principal investigator
First posted
Apr 20, 2018
Start date
May 1, 2018
Primary completion
May 31, 2020
Completion
May 31, 2020
Results posted
Feb 17, 2023
Last update
Feb 17, 2023

Study contacts

Erik Groessl, Ph.D.
principal investigator · University of California, San Diego
Ian Fowler, MD
principal investigator · Navy Medical Center San Diego

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion