ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03494920Updated Jun 16, 2022

DIRECT-SAFE: A Randomized Controlled Trial of DIRECT Endovascular Clot Retrieval Versus Standard Bridging Thrombolysis With Endovascular Clot Retrieval

A Phase 3 interventional study of Direct endovascular clot retrieval and Bridging thrombolysis followed by ECR in Ischemic Stroke, sponsored by Neuroscience Trials Australia. Completed at 33 sites in 4 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-06-16.

Sponsored by Neuroscience Trials Australia · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
295
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The study will be a multicentre, prospective, randomized, open label, blinded endpoint (PROBE) phase 3 trial (2 arm with 1:1 randomization) in ischemic stroke patients within 4.5 hours of stroke onset. Randomised patients will be stratified for site of baseline arterial occlusion into one of three groups: 1. internal carotid artery (ICA) 2. middle cerebral artery (MCA) 3. basilar artery (BA). Patients will be randomised to either bridging intravenous thrombolysis with endovascular clot retrieval (ECR), or direct endovascular clot retrieval.

Read the detailed description

The DIRECT-SAFE trial will include patients with acute ischemic stroke, who are ≥18 years of age and are eligible for standard intravenous tPA therapy within 4.5 hours of stroke onset. Patients will be assessed for large vessel occlusion to determine their eligibility for randomization into the trial. Eligible vessel occlusions include the internal carotid artery, basilar artery or middle cerebral artery (M1 or M2). Patients will be consented after large vessel occlusion is confirmed based on standard care multimodal imaging.

Patients will be recruited in Australia, New Zealand, China, Taiwan, Vietnam, Singapore and Europe. Randomisation either direct to ECR or standard thrombolytic therapy and ECR shall be in a 1:1 ratio.

All patients will have a multimodal MR (or CT/CTP at investigator's discretion if MRI not possible) at 18 to 30 hours post treatment to assess reperfusion, recanalization, ischemic core growth and hemorrhagic transformation. Final follow up will occur at Day 90.

02

Conditions studied

  • Ischemic Stroke

Keywords

  • Stroke
  • Ischemia
  • Cerebral Infarction
  • Cerebrovascular Disorders
  • Brain Diseases
  • Central Nervous System Diseases
  • Nervous System Diseases
  • Vascular Diseases
  • Cardiovascular Diseases
  • Pathologic Processes
  • Brain Infarction
  • Brain Ischemia
  • Tissue Plasminogen Activator
  • Plasminogen
  • Fibrinolytic Agents
  • Fibrin Modulating Agents
  • Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action
03

In context

Ischemic Stroke

2,612 studies on the registry are indexed under Ischemic Stroke; 971 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 295 is above the median of 120 across 1,776 interventional studies indexed under Ischemic Stroke.

Browse Ischemic Stroke studies →

Lead sponsor

Neuroscience Trials Australia is the lead sponsor of 12 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Patients presenting with acute ischemic stroke eligible using standard criteria to receive IV thrombolysis within 4.5 hours of stroke onset
  2. Patient's age is ≥18 years
  3. Intra-arterial clot retrieval treatment can commence (groin puncture) within 6 hours of stroke onset.
  4. Arterial occlusion on CTA or MRA of the ICA, M1, M2 or basilar artery

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) identified by CT or MRI
  2. Rapidly improving symptoms at the discretion of the investigator
  3. Pre-stroke mRS score of ≥ 4 (indicating previous disability)
  4. Hypodensity in >1/3 MCA territory on non-contrast CT
  5. Contra indication to imaging with contrast agents
  6. Any terminal illness such that patient would not be expected to survive more than 1 year
  7. Any condition that, in the judgment of the investigator could impose hazards to the patient if study therapy is initiated or affect the participation of the patient in the study.
  8. Pregnant women
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
295 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Other
    Direct endovascular clot retrieval

    Endovascular clot retrieval (ECR) within 4.5 hours stroke

    Other: Direct endovascular clot retrieval

  • Other
    Bridging thrombolysis followed by ECR

    Intravenous tPA (at the standard licensed dose of 0.9 mg/kg up to a maximum of 90mg, 10% as bolus and the remainder over 1 hour) followed by ECR

    Other: Bridging thrombolysis followed by ECR

Interventions

  • OtherDirect endovascular clot retrieval

    Direct endovascular clot retrieval within 4.5 hours of stroke onset

  • OtherBridging thrombolysis followed by ECR

    Bridging thrombolysis followed by ECR within 4.5 hours of stroke onset

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Modified Rankin Scale (mRS)- ordinal analysis

    Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) 0-2 or no change from baseline

    Time frame: 3 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. modified Rankin Scale (mRS)- ordinal analysis

    mRS 0-1 or no change from baseline

    Time frame: 3 months

  2. Death

    Death due to any cause

    Time frame: 3 months

  3. Angiographic reperfusion

    Proportion of patients with good angiographic reperfusion (mTICI 2b-3)

    Time frame: Baseline

  4. Symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage (sICH)

    Proportion of patients with sICH

    Time frame: 24 hours

07

Study locations

33 sites
  • Liverpool Hospital
    Liverpool, New South Wales 2170, Australia
  • John Hunter Hospital
    New Lambton, New South Wales 2305, Australia
  • Royal North Shore Hospital
    St Leonards, New South Wales 2605, Australia
  • Royal Brisbane & Women's Hospital
    Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
  • Gold Coast University Hospital
    Gold Coast, Queensland 4215, Australia
  • Princess Alexandra Hospital
    Woolloongabba, Queensland 4102, Australia
  • Royal Adelaide Hospital
    Adelaide, South Australia 5000, Australia
  • Monash Medical Centre
    Clayton, Victoria 3168, Australia
  • Mobile Stroke Unit
    Melbourne, Victoria 3050, Australia
  • Royal Melbourne Hospital
    Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
  • Fiona Stanley Hospital
    Murdoch, Western Australia 6150, Australia
  • Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital
    Nedlands, Western Australia 6009, Australia
  • Shantou Central Hospital
    Shantou, Guangdong, China
  • Cangzhou Central Hospital
    Cangzhou, Hebei, China
  • Wuhan Central Hospital
    Wuhan, Hubei, China
  • The 4th Affiliated Hospital of CMU
    Shenyang, Liaoning, China
  • Linyi People's Hospital
    Linyi, Shandong, China
  • Shanxi People's Hospital
    Shanxi, Taiyuan, China
  • Beijing Fengtai Youanmen Hospital
    Beijing, China
  • Beijing Tiantin Hospital
    Beijing, China
  • Yunfu People's Hospital
    Guangdong, China
  • Shiyan Taihe Hospital
    Hubei, China
  • Ningxiang People's Hospital
    Hunan, China
  • China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University
    Jilin, China
  • Maoming People's Hospital
    Maoming, China
  • Binzhou People's Hospital
    Shandong, China
  • Shunde Hospital of Southern Medical University
    Shunde, China
  • Jingjiang People's Hospital
    Taizhou, China
  • Tianjin TEDA Hospital
    Tianjin, China
  • Singapore General Hospital
    Singapore, 169608, Singapore
  • Bach Mai Hospital
    Hanoi, Vietnam
  • Military Hospital 103
    Hanoi, Vietnam
  • 115 People's Hospital
    Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Mitchell PJ, Yan B, Churilov L, Dowling RJ, Bush SJ, Bivard A, Huo XC, Wang G, Zhang SY, Ton MD, Cordato DJ, Kleinig TJ, Ma H, Chandra RV, Brown H, Campbell BCV, Cheung AK, Steinfort B, Scroop R, Redmond K, Miteff F, Liu Y, Duc DP, Rice H, Parsons MW, Wu TY, Nguyen HT, Donnan GA, Miao ZR, Davis SM; DIRECT-SAFE Investigators. Endovascular thrombectomy versus standard bridging thrombolytic with endovascular thrombectomy within 4.5 h of stroke onset: an open-label, blinded-endpoint, randomised non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2022 Jul 9;400(10346):116-125. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)00564-5. PubMed 35810757 ↗
  • Mitchell PJ, Yan B, Churilov L, Dowling RJ, Bush S, Nguyen T, Campbell BCV, Donnan GA, Miao Z, Davis SM; DIRECT-SAFE Investigators. DIRECT-SAFE: A Randomized Controlled Trial of DIRECT Endovascular Clot Retrieval versus Standard Bridging Therapy. J Stroke. 2022 Jan;24(1):57-64. doi: 10.5853/jos.2021.03475. Epub 2022 Jan 31. PubMed 35135060 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 16, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03494920
Lead sponsor
Neuroscience Trials Australia
Collaborators
The Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Apr 11, 2018
Start date
Apr 27, 2018
Primary completion
Sep 8, 2021
Completion
Sep 8, 2021
Last update
Jun 16, 2022

Study contacts

Peter Mitchell, MD
principal investigator · Melbourne Health
Bernard Yan, MD
principal investigator · Melbourne Health

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion