CClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT03287076TEXAISUpdated Sep 14, 2021

Trial of EXenatide in Acute Ischaemic Stroke

A Phase 2 interventional study of Exenatide Injection in Acute Ischemic Stroke, sponsored by Neuroscience Trials Australia. Status unknown at 15 sites in 3 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-09-14.

Sponsored by Neuroscience Trials Australia · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Sep 2021), so the status shown — last known as Active, not recruiting — may be out of date.
Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
350
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

A multicentre, randomised controlled Trial of Exenatide versus standard care in Acute Ischemic Stroke

Read the detailed description

Overview: Elevated blood glucose levels are common in many acute diseases, resulting in worse clinical outcomes. Hyperglycaemia in acute ischaemic stroke (post-stroke hyperglycaemia [PSH]) occurs in up to 50% patients, reduces the efficacy of stroke thrombolysis with increased risk of haemorrhage, increases infarct size, and results in worse clinical outcomes and death. Insulin-based therapies have not proved beneficial in treating PSH: they are difficult to implement and maintain, cause frequent hypoglycaemia, may cause increased infarct size, and do not reduce mortality or improve clinical outcomes. An alternative, simple to use, treatment for PSH may therefore have a significant impact not only for acute stroke care, but in other acute diseases.

Pilot data: Exenatide is a commonly used diabetes drug (a synthetic glucagon- like peptide-1 receptor agonist) that increases insulin secretion. Importantly, this action is glucose dependent - as blood glucose levels decrease, its stimulatory effect on insulin secretion subsides, with a very low risk of hypoglycaemia. A small randomised pilot study of 17 consecutive, unselected patients (ie. regardless of their admission glucose level) with acute ischaemic stroke compared subcutaneous exenatide 5μg for 5 days with routine standard of care. Overall, blood glucose levels remained consistently lower (and less variable) in the exenatide group, and most noticeably in those stroke patients with known diabetes. Exenatide was safe and well tolerated by all patients, with no symptomatic hypoglycaemia.

Trial design: TEXAIS is a 3 year Phase 2, multi centre, prospective, randomised, open label, blinded end-point (PROBE) trial comparing Exenatide to Standard of Care. The sample size is 528 patients (264 in each arm).

Intervention: Treatment arm will receive Exenatide (Byetta) 5μg subcutaneously twice daily for five days, commencing within 9 hours of symptom onset. Stroke onset time for wake-up strokes is taken as mid-point between going to bed, and waking up. Antiemetic therapy (metoclopramide or ondansetron) will be commenced with the first dose of Exenatide. In patients receiving tPA, Exenatide will be given alongside, or as soon as possible, following tPA administration (within 60 minutes). Diabetic patients already on oral agents and/or insulin may continue these (as per standard practice) in addition to Exenatide. Continuous glucose monitors (CGMs) will track the intra-day dynamic variability of glucose in acute stroke.

Translation: TEXAIS is a simple, practical, study that can enrol all patients with ischaemic stroke, regardless of admission blood glucose level, regardless of stroke severity, with no target glucose level, and with low risk of hypoglycaemia.

02

Conditions studied

  • Acute Ischemic Stroke

Keywords

  • stroke
  • glucose
  • exenatide
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Males and females 18 years or older
  • Acute Ischaemic Stroke - CT brain exclusion of haemorrhagic stroke
  • Blood glucose level on admission ≥ 4mmol/L
  • First trial treatment possible within 9 hours of stroke onset
  • Pre-morbid /mRS score of 0-2

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Haemorrhagic stroke
  • Poor clinical prognosis /palliation (considered unlikely to survive beyond 14 days post stroke).
  • Any known allergy or hypersensitivity to Exenatide
  • Females who are pregnant (known or suspected) or currently breastfeeding
  • Any past history of pancreatitis or evidence of active pancreatitis
  • History of active severe gastrointestinal disease (including but not limited to gastroparesis and dumping syndrome)
  • Current chronic kidney disease stage 4 or 5 (creatinine clearance \<30ml/min)
  • Current participation in another interventional clinical trial
  • Inability to provide consent (participant or person responsible as local laws apply)
  • Current use of Exenatide (Byetta®), or other GLP-1 agonist diabetes medication
  • Patients considered unlikely to be able to be followed up at 3 months (including but not limited to geographical location of patient at 3 months)
04

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
350 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Active

    Patients will receive exenatide injections

    Drug: Exenatide Injection

  • No intervention
    Standard Care

    Standard care for stroke as per hospital protocol

Interventions

  • DrugExenatide Injection

    5μg subcutaneously twice daily for five days, commencing within 9 hours of symptom onset

    Also known as: Byetta

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. improved neurological outcome

    Treatment with short acting Exenatide (Byetta) in patients with acute ischaemic stroke is hypothesised to improve neurological outcome as measured by ≥8 point improvement in the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) stroke disability score (or NIHSS 0-1) at 7 days

    Time frame: 7 days

Secondary outcomes

  1. post stroke hyperglycaemia

    reduce the occurrence of post stroke hyperglycaemia (\>7mmol/l).

    Time frame: 90 days

  2. Modified Rankin Scale

    improve Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at 90 days

    Time frame: 90 days

  3. NIHSS

    improve NIHSS at 90 days

    Time frame: 90 days

06

Study locations

15 sites
  • St Vincent's Hospital Sydney
    Darlinghurst, New South Wales 2010, Australia
  • Liverpool Hospital
    Liverpool, New South Wales 2170, Australia
  • Sunshine Coast University Hospital
    Birtinya, Queensland 4575, Australia
  • Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital
    Herston, Queensland 4029, Australia
  • Princess Alexandra Hospital
    Woolloongabba, Queensland 4102, Australia
  • Launceston General Hospital
    Launceston, Tasmania 7250, Australia
  • Box Hill Hospital
    Box Hill, Victoria 3128, Australia
  • St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne
    Fitzroy, Victoria 3065, Australia
  • Austin Hospital
    Heidelberg, Victoria 3084, Australia
  • Alfred Hospital
    Melbourne, Victoria 3004, Australia
  • Royal Melbourne Hospital
    Parkville, Victoria 3050, Australia
  • St John of God Midland Public & Private Hospital
    Midland, Western Australia 6056, Australia
  • Fiona Stanley Hospital
    Murdoch, Western Australia 6150, Australia
  • Helsinki University Hospital
    Helsinki, 00290, Finland
  • CDHB Christchurch Hospital
    Christchurch, 8140, New Zealand
07

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

08

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03287076
Lead sponsor
Neuroscience Trials Australia
Collaborators
National Health and Medical Research Council, Australia, Monash University
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 19, 2017
Start date
Nov 23, 2017
Primary completion
Oct 4, 2021 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 31, 2021 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 14, 2021

Study contacts

Christopher Bladin
principal investigator · The Florey Institute of Neuroscience & Mental Health Melbourne Brain Centre

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Sep 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion