A Phase 2 interventional study of Exenatide Injection in Acute Ischemic Stroke, sponsored by Neuroscience Trials Australia. Status unknown at 15 sites in 3 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-09-14.
Sponsored by Neuroscience Trials Australia · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment
A multicentre, randomised controlled Trial of Exenatide versus standard care in Acute Ischemic Stroke
Overview: Elevated blood glucose levels are common in many acute diseases, resulting in worse clinical outcomes. Hyperglycaemia in acute ischaemic stroke (post-stroke hyperglycaemia [PSH]) occurs in up to 50% patients, reduces the efficacy of stroke thrombolysis with increased risk of haemorrhage, increases infarct size, and results in worse clinical outcomes and death. Insulin-based therapies have not proved beneficial in treating PSH: they are difficult to implement and maintain, cause frequent hypoglycaemia, may cause increased infarct size, and do not reduce mortality or improve clinical outcomes. An alternative, simple to use, treatment for PSH may therefore have a significant impact not only for acute stroke care, but in other acute diseases.
Pilot data: Exenatide is a commonly used diabetes drug (a synthetic glucagon- like peptide-1 receptor agonist) that increases insulin secretion. Importantly, this action is glucose dependent - as blood glucose levels decrease, its stimulatory effect on insulin secretion subsides, with a very low risk of hypoglycaemia. A small randomised pilot study of 17 consecutive, unselected patients (ie. regardless of their admission glucose level) with acute ischaemic stroke compared subcutaneous exenatide 5μg for 5 days with routine standard of care. Overall, blood glucose levels remained consistently lower (and less variable) in the exenatide group, and most noticeably in those stroke patients with known diabetes. Exenatide was safe and well tolerated by all patients, with no symptomatic hypoglycaemia.
Trial design: TEXAIS is a 3 year Phase 2, multi centre, prospective, randomised, open label, blinded end-point (PROBE) trial comparing Exenatide to Standard of Care. The sample size is 528 patients (264 in each arm).
Intervention: Treatment arm will receive Exenatide (Byetta) 5μg subcutaneously twice daily for five days, commencing within 9 hours of symptom onset. Stroke onset time for wake-up strokes is taken as mid-point between going to bed, and waking up. Antiemetic therapy (metoclopramide or ondansetron) will be commenced with the first dose of Exenatide. In patients receiving tPA, Exenatide will be given alongside, or as soon as possible, following tPA administration (within 60 minutes). Diabetic patients already on oral agents and/or insulin may continue these (as per standard practice) in addition to Exenatide. Continuous glucose monitors (CGMs) will track the intra-day dynamic variability of glucose in acute stroke.
Translation: TEXAIS is a simple, practical, study that can enrol all patients with ischaemic stroke, regardless of admission blood glucose level, regardless of stroke severity, with no target glucose level, and with low risk of hypoglycaemia.
Exclusion Criteria:
Patients will receive exenatide injections
Drug: Exenatide Injection
Standard care for stroke as per hospital protocol
5μg subcutaneously twice daily for five days, commencing within 9 hours of symptom onset
Also known as: Byetta
improved neurological outcome
Treatment with short acting Exenatide (Byetta) in patients with acute ischaemic stroke is hypothesised to improve neurological outcome as measured by ≥8 point improvement in the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) stroke disability score (or NIHSS 0-1) at 7 days
Time frame: 7 days
post stroke hyperglycaemia
reduce the occurrence of post stroke hyperglycaemia (\>7mmol/l).
Time frame: 90 days
Modified Rankin Scale
improve Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at 90 days
Time frame: 90 days
NIHSS
improve NIHSS at 90 days
Time frame: 90 days
Plan to share: No
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
This study is status unknown, as verified in Sep 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Neuroscience Trials Australia