ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03493087Updated Apr 18, 2019

Underlying Causes of Low Vitamin K Status in Hemodialysis Patients

An interventional study of Menakinon 7 and Diet rich in vitamin K in Renal Insufficiency, Chronic, sponsored by University of Copenhagen. Completed at 1 site in Denmark. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-04-18.

Sponsored by University of Copenhagen · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
33
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Studies have shown that patients with chronic kidney disease in hemodialysis have a low vitamin K status which is believed to be related to an increased risk of atherosclerosis and increased bleeding tendency. The underlying causes of low vitamin K status in hemodialysis patients is unknown. Thus, the aim of this study is to investigate why hemodialysis patients have a low vitamin K status and how to improve it.

This study is composed of five trials. Four of them are based on possible hypotheses to the low vitamin K status. The hypotheses are:

  1. The daily intake of vitamin K is insufficient.
  2. Vitamin K is removed from the blood during dialysis.
  3. Absorption in the intestines is impaired.
  4. The analysis method (dephosphorylated-uncarboxylated MGP) is influenced by the patients' protein intake.

The purpose of the fifth trial is to investigate solutions to improve the vitamin K status of hemodialysis. One is to improve vitamin K status through diet with an increased focus on foods with high concentrations of vitamin K while considering phosphate, potassium and fluid restrictions. The second is to increase vitamin K status through a daily supplement of 360µg Menakinon-7.

Read the detailed description

Studies have reported a low vitamin K status in chronic kidney disease patients in hemodialysis linked to an increased risk of atherosclerosis and increased bleeding tendency. The overall aim of this study is to investigate the underlying causes of the reported low vitamin K status and to improve the patients' vitamin K status through diet and supplement. The study is divided in 5 sub-trials listed below. Sub-trial 1-4 focuses on determining the underlying course of low vitamin K status while sub-trial 5 deals with possible solutions to the reported low vitamin K status.

The analysis method used to determine vitamin K status is dephosphorylated-uncarboxylated Matrix-Gla-Protein (dp-ucMGP). Dp-ucMGP is the inactive form of the protein MGP whose activation is vitamin K dependent. The dp-ucMGP analysis method is not a direct measure of vitamin K status. However, an increased concentration of dp-ucMGP is a manifestation of a low vitamin K status and vice versa.

Sub-trial 1: Intake of vitamin K Aim: To assess the patients' intake of vitamin K. Hypothesis: The daily intake of vitamin K is insufficient. Method: Patients are asked to fill out a food frequency questionnaire (FFQ). The FFQ is based on their intake of different foods rich in vitamin K during the last month. To compare the results from the FFQ with their actual vitamin K status a blood sample is collected and analyzed to determine dp-ucMGP. Participants: 30.

Sub-trial 2: The influence of dialysis Aim: To examine whether vitamin K status is compromised during dialysis. Hypothesis: Vitamin K is removed from the blood during dialysis. Method: A blood test is collected before and after dialysis and analyzed to determine dp-ucMGP. At the end of the dialysis a sample of the remaining dialysis-water is collected and analyzed to determine dp-ucMGP. Furthermore, the patients will be weighed before and after dialysis with the purpose of calculating concentrations. Participants: 16 (the analysis of the dialysis water is done for five patients at first, if the results are useful the analysis is done for every participant).

Sub-trial 3: Absorption Aim: To investigate whether a decreased absorption can be the cause of the low vitamin K status. Hypothesis: Absorption in the intestines is impaired. Method: A D-xylose test is performed. The participants are given a dose of 15g D-xylose dissolved in water and after one hour a sample of blood is collected to determine D-xylose in serum. Prior to this trial the patients need to be fasting.The patients are asked to fill out a FFQ concerning their intake of fat during the last month. Participants: 16

Sub-trial 4: Concentrations of dp-ucMGP is influenced by a low protein intake. Aim: To determine if a low protein intake influence the dp-ucMGP analysis method. Hypothesis: The analysis method (dephosphorylated-uncarboxylated MGP) is influenced by the patients' protein intake. Method: Patients are given a daily protein supplement for 14 days. Before and after the intervention a blood test is collected and the concentration of dp-ucMGP is determined and compared. Moreover, the patients are asked to fill out a FFQ concerning their intake of protein during the last month. Participants: 16

Sub-trial 5: Intervention with vitamin K Aim: To investigate whether a diet or supplement with tablets is best for improve vitamin K status. Hypothesis: If the intake of vitamin K is insufficient the diet rich in vitamin K should be sufficient. However, if absorption is compromised or vitamin K is influenced by dialysis a larger dose of vitamin K might be necessary. Method: This trial lasts for 15 weeks divided in two periods of six weeks and a three week wash out period in-between. One period focuses on a diet rich in vitamin K while dealing with the possible restrictions on phosphate, potassium and fluid for hemodialysis patients. The intervention in the other period consists of a supplement of 360μg Menakinon-7/day. Blood samples are collected at the beginning, middle and end of both periods. These blood samples are analyzed to determine dp-uc-MGP during the intervention period. Moreover, coagulations factor 2, 7, 10, vitamin A and D status and calcification propency score analysis will be done as well if the funds allow it. Patients are asked to fill out a questionnaire concerning physical and mental wellbeing and the presence of bruising at the beginning and end of both periods to determine whether vitamin K has an effect. Participants: 24

02

Conditions studied

  • Renal Insufficiency, Chronic

Keywords

  • Dialysis, Vitamin-K, Malnutrition
03

In context

Renal Insufficiency, Chronic

3,224 studies on the registry are indexed under Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; 706 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 33 is below the median of 74 across 2,229 interventional studies indexed under Renal Insufficiency, Chronic.

Browse Renal Insufficiency, Chronic studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Copenhagen is the lead sponsor of 465 studies on the registry; 63 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Chronic kidney disease
  • Hemodialysis (> 3 months) at Herlev Hospital, Nephrological department
  • Understands and are able to read danish
  • Able to collaborate on diet etc.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Warfarin treatment
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding
  • Prior intake of vitamin K supplements
  • Short bowl disease, pancreatitis or other malabsorption diseases/syndromes
  • Dementia
  • Diabetes Mellitus (only an exclusion criterion in sub-trial 3: Absorption of vitamin K)
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Crossover assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
33 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Menakinon-7

    Menakinon-7 360 µg tablet by mouth, every day for 6 weeks

    Dietary Supplement: Menakinon 7

  • Active comparator
    Diet with vitamin K

    Diet rich in vitamin K for 6 weeks

    Dietary Supplement: Diet rich in vitamin K

Interventions

  • Dietary supplementMenakinon 7

    Menakinon 7 - One tablet a day against vitamin K deficiency

  • Dietary supplementDiet rich in vitamin K

    Diet with large content of vegetables and dairy products

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Δ-dp-uc-MGP (Sub-trial 5)

    Comparison of concentration of dp-ucMGP in blood samples through out the intervention

    Time frame: 15 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. dp-ucMGP status (Sub-trial 1)

    Concentration of dp-ucMGP in a blood sample collected before dialysis

    Time frame: 1 day

  2. Vitamin K intake (Sub-trial 1)

    Intake of vitamin K is estimated from FFQ results

    Time frame: 1 month

  3. dp-ucMGP concentration in dialysis water (Sub-trial 2)

    A sample of dialysis water is tested for dp-ucMGP

    Time frame: 1 day

  4. Δ-concentration of dp-ucMGP (Sub-trial 2)

    Concentration of dp-ucMGP in a blood sample collected before dialysis is compared with the concentration in a blood sample collected after dialysis

    Time frame: 1 day

  5. Δ-weight (Sub-trial 2)

    The patient's weight before and after dialysis is compared

    Time frame: 1 day

  6. Concentration of D-xylose (Sub-trial 3)

    Concentration of D-xylose in the blood an hour after intake of 15g of D-xylose

    Time frame: 1 day

  7. Fat in the diet (Sub-trial 3)

    The amount of fat in the diet is assessed from FFQ results

    Time frame: 1 day

  8. Δ-dp-uc-MGP (Sub-trial 4)

    intervention with protein is compared with the concentration in a blood sample collected after the intervention

    Time frame: 14 day

  9. Protein in the diet (Sub-trial 4)

    The amount of protein in the diet is assessed from FFQ results

    Time frame: 14 days

  10. Calcification (Sub-trial 5)

    Blood samples are analyzed via calcification propensity score, T50

    Time frame: 15 weeks

  11. Quality of life (Sub-trial 5)

    The results from mental and physical well being questionnaires are compared Based on SF-36 Danish version. Eight questions with scales ranges from 1-5 with 5 being the worse outcome. The questions are looked at individually and together.

    Time frame: 15 weeks

  12. The patient's perception of the presence of bruises (Sub-trial 5)

    The patient assess the changes in bruising in a questionnaire.

    Time frame: 15 weeks

  13. Δ-factor 2, 7,10 concentration (Sub-trial 5)

    Comparison of concentration of factor 2,7,10 in blood samples before and after both interventions

    Time frame: 15 weeks

Other outcomes

  1. Phosphate (Sub-trial 5)

    Changes in p-phosphate through out the intervention period

    Time frame: 15 weeks

  2. Potassium (Sub-trial 5)

    Changes in p-potassium through out the intervention period

    Time frame: 15 weeks

  3. Vitamin A (Sub-trial 5)

    Changes in p-vitamin A through out the supplement period

    Time frame: 15 weeks

  4. Vitamin D (Sub-trial 5)

    Changes in p-vitamin D through out the supplement period

    Time frame: 15 weeks

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Herlev Hospital
    Herlev, 2730, Denmark
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Feb 2018 to primary completion in Aug 2018, 5 months.

Of 579 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Renal Insufficiency, Chronic, half reached primary completion within 23 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 10 and three quarters within 44. This study's 5 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 617 studies reached it within 23 months; a quarter within 10 and three quarters within 44.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Feb 9, 2018
First posted
Apr 10, 2018
StartActual
Feb 22, 2018
Primary completionActual
Aug 20, 2018
CompletionActual
Nov 20, 2018
Last update
Apr 18, 2019
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 18, 2019, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03493087
Collaborators
Herlev Hospital
Responsible party
Jens Rikardt Andersen (Associate Professor, University of Copenhagen) — Principal investigator
First posted
Apr 10, 2018
Start date
Feb 22, 2018
Primary completion
Aug 20, 2018
Completion
Nov 20, 2018
Last update
Apr 18, 2019

Study contacts

Jens Rikardt Andersen
study director · University of Copenhagen

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Menaquinone 7

Start the discussion