ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03484013PEVAR-PROUpdated May 14, 2020

Totally Percutaneous Approach to Endovascular Treatment of Aortic Aneurysms (PEVAR-PRO)

An observational study in Aneurysm, Aneurysm Abdominal and Aneurysm Thoracic, sponsored by IRCCS San Raffaele. Completed at 1 site in Italy. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-05-14.

Primary conditionAortic Aneurysm, ThoracoabdominalRegistry: AneurysmReclassifiedWhy we changed it
Registry
Aneurysm — the first condition term the registry derived for this study.
ClinicalTrials.gg
Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracoabdominal
Why
  1. The study's listed conditions name Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracoabdominal, a narrower term within Aneurysm.
Confidence
High: the new condition is named in the study's own listed conditions. Of 351 hand-checked studies reclassified this way, 68% were exactly right and 84% in the right disease family; the registry's first term was right for 5% (measured 2026-10-21). How we classify →
Wrong?
Tell us the study's main condition →

Sponsored by IRCCS San Raffaele · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Other
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
320
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-12

Among 13 studies in Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracoabdominal with a site in Italy — 4 open to participants now, 6 under way, none of them phase 3. Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracoabdominal · Italy.

Enrollment
4th of 11
320 · median 100
Started
2019
with 2 others
Observational
11 of 13
4 open now
Registered
3rd of 13
by date
Lead sponsor
4 of 13
IRCCS San Raffaele

Among the 13 studies in Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracoabdominal with a site in Italy, this one is the 4th largest by enrollment of the 11 observational ones that give a count, is one of 3 that started in 2019, is one of 11 observational ones, and was the 3rd registered.

Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracoabdominal

63 studies on the registry are indexed under Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracoabdominal; 31 are open to participants now.

Browse Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracoabdominal studies →

Open to participants now

4 of the 13 studies in Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracoabdominal with a site in Italy are open now. Recruiting first, the newest first:

All 4 open studies →

A study can be open while its sites in Italy have not opened yet or have stopped. Only those recruiting at a site in Italy →

Who these studies take

Of the 25 Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracoabdominal studies recruiting now, 18 (72%) set no upper age limit and none (0%) stop at 75 or younger; 2 take children under 18; 1 takes healthy volunteers.

This study: 18 Years and older · all sexes.

The full table on the hub →

This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.

Was this useful?
Watch this landscapeDownload CSVNarrow it in search →With an account: a weekly mail of what changed among 13 studies in Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracoabdominal with a site in Italy, or all of them as a file.
02

Study summary

Purpose of the study is the evaluation of the applicability of the percutaneous technique through double Proglide and Pre-Close Technique to the treatment of complex aortic aneurysms with thoracic endoprosthesis (TEVAR), fenestrated or branched (F / B-EVAR) in which patient-related factors, the devices used or the procedure, could affect the performance.

Read the detailed description

Endovascular treatment using a percutaneous technique (Percutaneous Endovascular Aneurism Repair - P-EVAR) has been used with increasing frequency to treat aortic aneurysms by reducing operative times, postoperative pain and length of stay, compared to treatment by surgical femoral access. During EVAR procedures, two accesses to the femoral arteries are required to introduce the necessary tools for the stentgraft implantation. Such accesses can be classically obtained by surgical incision, isolation of the common femoral arteries and direct introduction of the devices.

Alternatively, the most modern approach involves direct puncture of the artery (without the need for incision), through the skin and closure of the arterial breach through prolonged manual compression of the vascular closure or systems (Vascular Closure Devices - VCD) specifically designed. Among the various closure devices one of the most used and studied is the Perclose Proglide (Abbott Vascular, Santa Clara CA, USA) that allows to affix a polypropylene stitch to close the arterial breach. When closing high-caliber accesses (> 8 French) it is necessary to use two devices that must be positioned before inserting the introducer ("Pre-Close Technique").

Few studies have so far evaluated the application of this method to the treatment of complex cases such as thoracic or thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms that requiring the use of high caliber introducers.

The objective of the study is the evaluation of the technical success and clinical outcomes of the PEVAR technique with a double vascular suture device Perclose ProGlide (Abbott Illinois, U.S.A.).Endovascular treatment using a percutaneous technique (Percutaneous Endovascular Aneurism Repair - P-EVAR) has been used with increasing frequency to treat aortic aneurysms by reducing operative times, postoperative pain and length of stay, compared to treatment by surgical femoral access. During EVAR procedures, two accesses to the femoral arteries are required to introduce the necessary tools for the stentgraft implantation. Such accesses can be classically obtained by surgical incision, isolation of the common femoral arteries and direct introduction of the devices.

Alternatively, the most modern approach involves direct puncture of the artery (without the need for incision), through the skin and closure of the arterial breach through prolonged manual compression of the vascular closure or systems (Vascular Closure Devices - VCD) specifically designed. Among the various closure devices one of the most used and studied is the Perclose Proglide (Abbott Vascular, Santa Clara CA, USA) that allows to affix a polypropylene stitch to close the arterial breach. When closing high-caliber accesses (> 8 French) it is necessary to use two devices that must be positioned before inserting the introducer ("Pre-Close Technique").

Few studies have so far evaluated the application of this method to the treatment of complex cases such as thoracic or thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms that requiring the use of high caliber introducers.

The objective of the study is the evaluation of the technical success and clinical outcomes of the PEVAR technique with a double vascular suture device Perclose ProGlide (Abbott Illinois, U.S.A.).

This is a retrospective observational study (320 cases treated in San Raffaele hospital in Milan, during the period: October 2015 - 31 December 2019).

The chronology of the assessments will include:

  • An immediate evaluation at the end of the procedure by performing the ecocolordoppler examination of the percutaneous accesses performed (as per routine). On the basis of longitudinal and sagittal scans of the vessel, the Physician must check the presence of the above complications that could be considered as "failure" of percutaneous access. In the event that these complications are clinically evident (eg uncontrollable bleeding from the puncture site), in the interest of a prompt management of the surgical problem, it will not be necessary to perform an ecocolordoppler examination and the outcome will be assigned "failure ".
  • A second echocolordoppler assessment performed on the first postoperative day (as per routine) The study will be conducted in accordance with the ethical principles deriving from the Helsinki Declaration and the current legislation on Observational Studies.
03

Conditions studied

  • Aneurysm
  • Aneurysm Abdominal
  • Aneurysm Thoracic
  • Aneurysm, Thoracoabdominal Aortic
04

In context

Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracoabdominal Reclassified

63 studies on the registry are indexed under Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracoabdominal; 31 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 320 is above the median of 100 across 20 observational studies indexed under Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracoabdominal.

Browse Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracoabdominal studies →

Lead sponsor

IRCCS San Raffaele is the lead sponsor of 454 studies on the registry; 235 are open to participants now.

Compared within Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracoabdominal, this study's primary condition as ClinicalTrials.gg classifies it; the registry's first condition term is Aneurysm. The counts are of registry records indexed under each term, refreshed daily. How we classify →

05

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

a sample of 320 subjects will be analyzed (considering the cases treated in the period: October 2015 - 31 december 2019).

The analysis of the retrospective data, will be based on the consultation of the archive of the individual treated patients, present on software platform belonging to the San Raffaele Hospital Information System) as well as the medical records.

An informatic database will be set up for the exclusive use of investigators. The data will be analyzed subsequently through the application of descriptive and inferential statistics techniques.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • adult patients aged ≥ 18 years, belonging to the Operative Unit of Vascular Surgery of the San Raffaele Hospital,
  • patients candidates for endovascular treatment for thoracic, thoracoabdominal or abdominal aortic pathologies.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • There are no criteria for exclusion of subjects from the study.
06

Study design

Observational model
Other
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
320 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No
07

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. technical success

    Use of femoral artery access in endovascular repair of aortic aneurysm (time frame between 2015 and 2020) * Endovascular procedure: TEVAR - EVAR - B/FEVAR * Side of femoral access: right- left * Employment of downsizing on the femoral access: yes - no, as reported on patients' charts and operative report * Size of percutaneous access sheath employed measured in French - Fr * Number of percutaneous access vessel closure devices employed * Access closure specific outcome: success - failure, as reported on patients' charts and operative report * Cause of failure: hemorrhagic - occlusive, as reported on patients' charts and operative report

    Time frame: during the surgery

Secondary outcomes

  1. minor complications

    Femoral access vascular anatomy and patient's characteristics (time frame between 2015 and 2020): * Previous surgical access to ipsilateral femoral artery: yes - no * Previous deployment of percutaneous vascular closure devices to ipsilateral femoral artery: yes - no * Diameter of femoral artery measured in millimiters (mm) * Presence of calcification at access site: less or equal to1/3 of circumference - between 1/3 (excluded) and 2/3 (included) - more than 2/3 as measured on preoperative CT scan * Localization of calcification: anterior - posterior - circumferential - lateral * Body mass index reported as bare number defined as weight (kg)/height\^2(m\^2)

    Time frame: 30 days after surgery

08

Study locations

1 site
  • San Raffaele Hospital
    Milano, 20132, Italy
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Melloni A, Grandi A, Spelta S, Salvati S, Loschi D, Lembo R, Melissano G, Chiesa R, Bertoglio L. Outcomes of routine use of percutaneous access with large-bore introducer sheaths (>21F outer diameter) during endovascular aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg. 2021 Jan;73(1):81-91. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2020.04.504. Epub 2020 May 19. PubMed 32442603 ↗
10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Jan 2019 to primary completion in Mar 2020, 14 months.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Dec 12, 2017
First posted
Mar 30, 2018
StartActual
Jan 9, 2019
Primary completionActual
Mar 31, 2020
CompletionActual
Mar 31, 2020
Last update
May 14, 2020
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 14, 2020, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03484013
Lead sponsor
IRCCS San Raffaele
Responsible party
Bertoglio Luca (Principal Investigator, IRCCS San Raffaele) — Principal investigator
First posted
Mar 30, 2018
Start date
Jan 9, 2019
Primary completion
Mar 31, 2020
Completion
Mar 31, 2020
Last update
May 14, 2020
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in May 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion