ClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT03481543Updated Oct 13, 2022

Effectiveness of Bronchodilator Nebulization With and Without Noninvasive Ventilation in COPD

An interventional study of In-line nebulization through NIV mask and Off-NIV nebulization in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) and Type 2 Respiratory Failure, sponsored by National University Health System, Singapore. Terminated at 1 site in Singapore. Open to participants aged 21 Years to 99 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-10-13.

Sponsored by National University Health System, Singapore · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Why this study was terminated
Poor recruitment
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
11
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
21 Years to 99 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The study aim to evaluate effectiveness of two bronchodilator nebulization strategies in patients with acute decompensated type 2 respiratory failure due to acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease..

Read the detailed description

Decompensated type 2 respiratory failure during acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is treated with non-invasive ventilation (NIV) and nebulized bronchodilators. Nebulization during NIV can be applied by two methods: in-line nebulization through NIV mask and off-NIV nebulization during which NIV mask is taken off for a short time and reapplied when nebulization is finished.

This study is a prospective randomized controlled trial to compare in-line nebulization through NIV versus off- NIV nebulization. After starting NIV in eligible COPD patients with type 2 respiratory failure, the baseline end-expiratory lung impedance (EELI) will be measured. Patient is randomized to receive either in-line or off-NIV nebulization. EELI will be measured again following completion of the nebulization, 15min after NIV is restarted (off-NIV group) or continued (in-line group). Ultrasound measurement of the thickness of the diaphragm will be recorded at baseline, 15min after NIV is restarted (off-NIV group) or continued (in-line group) and 48 hours after stopping the NIV. The main outcome measure, difference in mean end expiratory lung volume at 15min after NIV is restarted (off-NIV group) or continued (in-line group) between the two nebulization methods will be compared using independent sample T test. Thickness of the diaphragm and changes in the arterial blood gases (in terms of pH and carbon-di-oxide) will be compared between in-line nebulization and off-NIV nebulization.

02

Conditions studied

  • Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)
  • Type 2 Respiratory Failure

Keywords

  • Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)
  • Nebulization
  • Respiratory failure
  • Non-invasive ventilation(NIV)
03

In context

Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive

4,252 studies on the registry are indexed under Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; 707 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 11 is below the median of 70 across 3,008 interventional studies indexed under Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive.

Browse Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive studies →

Lead sponsor

National University Health System, Singapore is the lead sponsor of 42 studies on the registry; 13 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
21 Years to 99 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Age ≥21 years.
  2. Known or suspected COPD (defined by a ratio of Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 second (FEV1) to Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) of less than 0.7).
  3. Acute decompensated type 2 respiratory failure (ABG pH ≤ 7.35 and PaCO2>45mmHg).
  4. Clinical decision made to start NIV.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Other acute decompensated type 2 respiratory failure related conditions (e.g. neuromuscular, heart failure etc.).
  2. Pneumonia present in the chest radiograph.
  3. Other conditions which may change lung impedance (e.g. heart failure or lung fibrosis).
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
11 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    In-line nebulization through NIV mask

    Bronchodilator nebulization is given through NIV circuit.

    Procedure: In-line nebulization through NIV mask

  • Active comparator
    Off-NIV nebulization

    Bronchodilator nebulization is given during which NIV mask is taken off for a short time and reapplied when nebulization is finished.

    Procedure: Off-NIV nebulization

Interventions

  • ProcedureIn-line nebulization through NIV mask

    In-line nebulization will be given through NIV circuit.

  • ProcedureOff-NIV nebulization

    Bronchodilator nebulization is given during which NIV mask is taken off for a short time and reapplied when nebulization is finished..

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Difference in mean end-expiratory lung volumes between the two nebulization methods.

    End-expiratory lung volumes between in-line nebulization and off-NIV nebulization.

    Time frame: At baseline (approximately 15min after starting NIV) to approximately 15min after restarting (or continuing NIV) following the nebulization.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Thickness of the diaphragm (by ultrasound) between in-line nebulization and off-NIV nebulization.

    Measure thickness of the diaphragm between inspiration and expiration.

    Time frame: At baseline (approximately 15min after starting NIV) to approximately 15min after restarting (or continuing NIV) following the nebulization and repeated 48hours after stopping NIV.

  2. Changes in arterial blood gases in terms of pH and carbon dioxide between in-line. nebulization and off-NIV nebulization.

    Measure changes of arterial blood gases between in-line nebulization and off-NIV. nebulization. Differences in pH (absolute,no unit) and carbon dioxide (in mmHg) will be noted.

    Time frame: At baseline (approximately 15min after starting NIV) to approximately 15min after restarting (or continuing NIV) following the nebulization.

07

Study locations

1 site
  • National University Hospital
    Singapore, Singapore
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Brochard L, Mancebo J, Wysocki M, Lofaso F, Conti G, Rauss A, Simonneau G, Benito S, Gasparetto A, Lemaire F, et al. Noninvasive ventilation for acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. N Engl J Med. 1995 Sep 28;333(13):817-22. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199509283331301. PubMed 7651472 ↗
  • Vivier E, Mekontso Dessap A, Dimassi S, Vargas F, Lyazidi A, Thille AW, Brochard L. Diaphragm ultrasonography to estimate the work of breathing during non-invasive ventilation. Intensive Care Med. 2012 May;38(5):796-803. doi: 10.1007/s00134-012-2547-7. Epub 2012 Apr 5. PubMed 22476448 ↗
  • Pauwels RA, Buist AS, Calverley PM, Jenkins CR, Hurd SS; GOLD Scientific Committee. Global strategy for the diagnosis, management, and prevention of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. NHLBI/WHO Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) Workshop summary. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2001 Apr;163(5):1256-76. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.163.5.2101039. No abstract available. PubMed 11316667 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Apr 2018 to primary completion in Nov 2020, 31 months.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Mar 15, 2018
First posted
Mar 29, 2018
StartActual
Apr 10, 2018
Primary completionActual
Nov 12, 2020
CompletionActual
Nov 12, 2020
Last update
Oct 13, 2022
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 13, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03481543
Lead sponsor
National University Health System, Singapore
Responsible party
Amartya Mukhopadhyay (Principal investigator, National University Health System, Singapore) — Principal investigator
First posted
Mar 29, 2018
Start date
Apr 10, 2018
Primary completion
Nov 12, 2020
Completion
Nov 12, 2020
Last update
Oct 13, 2022

Study contacts

Amartya Mukhopadhyay, MBBS
principal investigator · National University Health System

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in Oct 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion