CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03479697HIRREMUpdated Apr 20, 2023Results posted

HIRREM for Stage 1 Primary Hypertension

An interventional study of HIRREM and Continued Current Care in Hypertension, Blood Pressure and Cardiovascular Diseases, sponsored by Wake Forest University Health Sciences. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-04-20.

Sponsored by Wake Forest University Health Sciences · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
5
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to determine that effects of an intervention called High-resolution, relational, resonance-based, electroencephalic mirroring (HIRREM), on Stage 1 Primary Hypertension (systolic BP 130-139, and/or diastolic BP 80-89).

Read the detailed description

The purpose of this research study is to determine the effects of a technique called High-resolution, relational, resonance-based, electroencephalic mirroring (HIRREM®), for hypertension. HIRREM uses scalp sensors to monitor brain electrical activity, and computer software algorithms translate selected brain frequencies into audible tones in real time. Those tones are reflected back to participants via ear buds in as little as four to eight milliseconds, providing the brain an opportunity for self-adjustment of its electrical pattern.

This study will compare acoustic stimulation linked to brainwave activity (HIRREM, along with continued current care, HCC), with continued current clinical care alone (CCC). Both groups will continue their other current care throughout, including non-pharmacological, and lifestyle modification therapies.

02

Conditions studied

  • Hypertension
  • Blood Pressure
  • Cardiovascular Diseases
  • Cardiovascular Risk Factor
  • Autonomic Nervous System Imbalance

Keywords

  • HIRREM
  • Neurotechnology
  • Closed-Loop
  • Allostasis
  • Stress
  • Autonomic Dysregulation
  • Hyperarousal
  • Brain Electrical Activity
  • Acoustic Stimulation
  • Primary Hypertension
  • High Blood Pressure
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Adults, age 18 and above
  • Systolic BP ranging from 130-139mmHg and/or diastolic BP ranging from 80-89mmHg

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Unable, unwilling, or incompetent to provide informed consent
  • Physically unable to come to the study visits, or to sit comfortably in a chair for up to two hours at a time
  • Weight is over the chair limit (285 pounds)
  • Known atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease
  • Cardiovascular risk score of ≥ 10% (per http://tools.acc.org/ASCVD-Risk-Estimator-Plus/#!/calculate/estimate/)
  • Prior diagnosis of stage 2 hypertension
  • Ongoing need for treatment of hypertension with medications
  • Known seizure disorder
  • Known or anticipated pregnancy
  • Severe hearing impairment (because the subject will be using headphones during the interventions)
  • Ongoing need for treatment with opiate, benzodiazepine, or anti-psychotic medications, anti-depressant medications such as SSRI, SNRI, or tricyclic, and sleep medications such as zolpidem or eszopiclone
  • Anticipated and ongoing use of recreational drugs, alcohol, or energy drinks
  • Ongoing need for treatment with thyroid medications
  • Are enrolled in another research study that includes an active intervention
  • Have previously received brainwave optimization (BWO), used a B2 or B2v2 wearable device, or previously participated in a HIRREM research study
04

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Crossover assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
5 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    HIRREM

    High-resolution, relational, resonance-based, electroencephalic mirroring (HIRREM) is a novel, noninvasive, closed-loop, brainwave mirroring, acoustic stimulation neurotechnology to support relaxation and auto-calibration of neural oscillations, using auditory tones to reflect brain frequencies in near real time.

    Device: HIRREM · Other: Continued Current Care

  • Other
    Continued Current Care

    Participants will continue their current care.

    Device: HIRREM · Other: Continued Current Care

Interventions

  • DeviceHIRREM

    Technology

    Also known as: High-resolution, relational, resonance-based, electroencephalic mirroring, Brainwave Optimization

  • OtherContinued Current Care

    Continue their current clinical care.

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change From Baseline in Blood Pressure, as Measured by an Automated Oscillometric Blood Pressure Device.

    BP will be obtained in the left arm, with the participant sitting comfortably, and the left arm resting on a desk/table. Three samples will be obtained and the last two averaged to get the value that will be used as the reading. Primary outcome will be at V3 (4-6 weeks post final session).

    Time frame: Baseline to V3 (4-6 weeks following completion of the intervention for HCC, 8-10 weeks after V1 for CCC).

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in Heart Rate Variability (SDNN)

    Heart rate variability is measured in the time domain as standard deviation of beat-to-beat interval

    Time frame: Baseline to V3 (4-6 weeks following completion of the intervention for HCC, 8-10 weeks after V1 for CCC).

  2. Change in Baroreflex Sensitivity

    Blood pressure and heart rate are acquired from 10 minute recordings of noninvasive finger arterial pressure measurements and ECG with participants lying quietly, supine. Systolic BP and beat to beat, RR intervals files generated via the data acquisition system at 1000 Hz, are analyzed using Nevrokard BRS software. Analysis is conducted on the first complete 5-minute epoch. Power spectral densities of systolic blood pressure (SBP) and R-R interval (RRI) oscillations are computed by 512 points Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) and integrated over specified frequency ranges (HF: 0.15-0.4 Hz). The square-root of the ratio of RRI's and SBP powers is computed to calculate HF alpha indices, which reflect BRS. The software scans the RRI and SBP records, identifies sequences, and calculates linear correlation between RRI and SBP for each sequence. A measure of sequence BRS is then calculated as Sequence ALL.

    Time frame: Baseline to V3 (4-6 weeks following completion of the intervention for HCC, 8-10 weeks after V1 for CCC).

  3. Change in Insomnia Severity Index (ISI)

    The severity of insomnia symptoms is measured using the ISI with each data collection visit. The ISI is a 7 question measure, with responses from 0-4 for each question, yielding scores ranging from 0-28. Higher scores indicate the strength of the insomnia severity.

    Time frame: Baseline to V3 (4-6 weeks following completion of the intervention for HCC, 8-10 weeks after V1 for CCC).

  4. Change in Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI)

    The PSQI is a 19 item inventory that assesses sleep quality over a 1-month time interval. Items are weighted on a 0-3 interval scale. A global PSQI score is calculated by totaling the seven component scores, providing an overall score ranging from 0 to 21, where lower scores denote a healthier sleep quality.

    Time frame: Baseline to V3 (4-6 weeks following completion of the intervention for HCC, 8-10 weeks after V1 for CCC).

  5. Change in Epworth Sleepiness Score (ESS)

    The ESS measures a person's general level of daytime sleepiness, or their average sleep propensity in daily life. The simple questionnaire is based on retrospective reports of the likelihood of dozing off or falling asleep in a variety of different situations. Rated on a 4-point scale (0-3), it evaluates their usual chances of dozing off or falling asleep while engaged in eight different activities. The ESS score (the sum of 8 item scores, 0-3) can range from 0 to 24. Lower scores denote a lower level of daytime sleepiness.

    Time frame: Baseline to V3 (4-6 weeks following completion of the intervention for HCC, 8-10 weeks after V1 for CCC).

  6. Change in Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D)

    The CES-D is a 20-item survey assessing affective depressive symptomatology to screen for risk of depression. Scores range from 0-60, with a score of 16 commonly used as a clinically relevant cut-off. Higher scores indicate the presence of more symptomatology.

    Time frame: Baseline to V3 (4-6 weeks following completion of the intervention for HCC, 8-10 weeks after V1 for CCC).

  7. Change in Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7)

    The GAD-7 is a seven item screening tool for anxiety that is widely used in primary care. Scores range from 0-21. A lower score denotes a lower level of anxiety.

    Time frame: Baseline to V3 (4-6 weeks following completion of the intervention for HCC, 8-10 weeks after V1 for CCC).

  8. Change in PTSD Checklist for Civilians (PCL-C)

    The PCL-C measures the American Psychiatric Association's Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM-IV) Criteria B, C, \& D of PTSD symptoms based on traumatic life experience related to civilians. Seventeen items are rated on a Likert scale with a composite score range of 17 to 85. A score of 44 or higher correlates with probability of civilian-related PTSD.

    Time frame: Baseline to V3 (4-6 weeks following completion of the intervention for HCC, 8-10 weeks after V1 for CCC).

  9. Change in Perceived Stress Scale (PSS)

    The PSS is a ten-item psychological instrument for measuring the perception of stress. It is a measure of the degree to which situations in one's life are appraised as stressful. Scores range from 0-40. A lower score denotes a lower level of perceived stress.

    Time frame: Baseline to V3 (4-6 weeks following completion of the intervention for HCC, 8-10 weeks after V1 for CCC).

  10. Change in International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ-SF)

    This is a four item questionnaire asking about physical activity in the last 7 days. Scores are calculated and categorized as low, moderate, or high. A higher score denotes more physical activity. For results, categories could not be presented so they were coded as: 1=low, 2=moderate, and 3=high.

    Time frame: Baseline to V3 (4-6 weeks following completion of the intervention for HCC, 8-10 weeks after V1 for CCC).

  11. Change in HIRREM Physical Activity Satisfaction Questions

    This is a four item questionnaire asking about the participants level of satisfaction with their physical activity. Responses range from 0-6 for each question, yielding scores ranging from 0-24. Higher scores denote a higher level of satisfaction.

    Time frame: Baseline to V3 (4-6 weeks following completion of the intervention for HCC, 8-10 weeks after V1 for CCC).

  12. Change in Quality of Life Scale (QOLS)

    The QOLS ) is a 16-item scale that was modified from a 15-item scale used in chronic disease patients. Topics include different components of daily life such as relationships, community engagement, personal fulfillment, and recreation. Each item is scaled from 1 to 7 and a sum score is calculated to represent higher levels of satisfaction in life (range is 16-112).

    Time frame: Baseline to V3 (4-6 weeks following completion of the intervention for HCC, 8-10 weeks after V1 for CCC).

  13. Change in Drop Stick Reaction Time

    Reaction testing will be evaluated by a drop-stick, clinical reaction time apparatus. The apparatus is placed between the thumb and index finger of the subject and released at a random time during a countdown. The subject catches the apparatus and the distance fallen (cm) is converted to reaction. Following two practice trials, participants perform eight trials, and a mean distance value is calculated. This is repeated with a second set of 8 trials later during the enrollment visit, and the mean distance value from the second trial will be used as the baseline value. Use of the average distance from the second set of trials will be used as the baseline value so as to avoid the impact of learning effect for this test. Only one set of trials will be used for comparison at follow up data collections. A lower average indicates a faster reaction time.

    Time frame: Baseline to V3 (4-6 weeks following completion of the intervention for HCC, 8-10 weeks after V1 for CCC).

  14. Change in Grip Strength

    Grip strength will be evaluated using a hydraulic hand dynamometer (Baseline Hydraulic Hand Dynamometer). Participants will squeeze the dynamometer three times in each hand. The scores from each hand will be averaged separately. A higher score indicates stronger grip strength.

    Time frame: Baseline to V3 (4-6 weeks following completion of the intervention for HCC, 8-10 weeks after V1 for CCC).

Other outcomes

  1. Change in Alcohol Intake Screening (Audit-C)

    The AUDIT-C is a short, 3-item alcohol screening for hazardous drinkers or active alcohol use disorders. This measure consists of 3 questions to assess an individual's alcohol use. Each question has five possible answers ranging from of 0-4 with a total scoring scale of 0-12. A total score of three or more in women and a score of four or more in men is suggestive of hazardous drinking or active alcohol use disorders.

    Time frame: Baseline to V3 (4-6 weeks following completion of the intervention for HCC, 8-10 weeks after V1 for CCC).

06

Results

Posted Apr 20, 2023
Limitations and caveats
We found that the blood pressure requirements and medication exclusions we originally set in place were very hard to meet and therefore, excluded many subjects.

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneHIRREMContinued Current Care
Started23
Completed23
Not completed00

Outcome measures

PrimaryChange From Baseline in Blood Pressure, as Measured by an Automated Oscillometric Blood Pressure Device.

BP will be obtained in the left arm, with the participant sitting comfortably, and the left arm resting on a desk/table. Three samples will be obtained and the last two averaged to get the value that will be used as the reading. Primary outcome will be at V3 (4-6 weeks post final session).

Time frame:
Baseline to V3 (4-6 weeks following completion of the intervention for HCC, 8-10 weeks after V1 for CCC).
Reported as:
Mean · mmHg
Change From Baseline in Blood Pressure, as Measured by an Automated Oscillometric Blood Pressure Device.
mmHgHIRREMContinued Current Care
∆_V1_V3 Systolic-3.00 ± 8.49-6.67 ± 22.55
∆_V1_V3 Diastolic-6.00 ± 4.24-7.67 ± 13.80
SecondaryChange in Heart Rate Variability (SDNN)

Heart rate variability is measured in the time domain as standard deviation of beat-to-beat interval

Time frame:
Baseline to V3 (4-6 weeks following completion of the intervention for HCC, 8-10 weeks after V1 for CCC).
Reported as:
Mean · ms
Change in Heart Rate Variability (SDNN)
msHIRREMContinued Current Care
Change in Heart Rate Variability (SDNN)17.55 ± 16.489.47 ± 3.83
SecondaryChange in Baroreflex Sensitivity

Blood pressure and heart rate are acquired from 10 minute recordings of noninvasive finger arterial pressure measurements and ECG with participants lying quietly, supine. Systolic BP and beat to beat, RR intervals files generated via the data acquisition system at 1000 Hz, are analyzed using Nevrokard BRS software. Analysis is conducted on the first complete 5-minute epoch. Power spectral densities of systolic blood pressure (SBP) and R-R interval (RRI) oscillations are computed by 512 points Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) and integrated over specified frequency ranges (HF: 0.15-0.4 Hz). The square-root of the ratio of RRI's and SBP powers is computed to calculate HF alpha indices, which reflect BRS. The software scans the RRI and SBP records, identifies sequences, and calculates linear correlation between RRI and SBP for each sequence. A measure of sequence BRS is then calculated as Sequence ALL.

Time frame:
Baseline to V3 (4-6 weeks following completion of the intervention for HCC, 8-10 weeks after V1 for CCC).
Reported as:
Mean · ms/mmHg
Change in Baroreflex Sensitivity
ms/mmHgHIRREMContinued Current Care
Change in Baroreflex Sensitivity0.35 ± 12.66-4.97 ± 28.14
SecondaryChange in Insomnia Severity Index (ISI)

The severity of insomnia symptoms is measured using the ISI with each data collection visit. The ISI is a 7 question measure, with responses from 0-4 for each question, yielding scores ranging from 0-28. Higher scores indicate the strength of the insomnia severity.

Time frame:
Baseline to V3 (4-6 weeks following completion of the intervention for HCC, 8-10 weeks after V1 for CCC).
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Change in Insomnia Severity Index (ISI)
score on a scaleHIRREMContinued Current Care
Change in Insomnia Severity Index (ISI)-3.00 ± 2.83-2.67 ± 5.13
SecondaryChange in Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI)

The PSQI is a 19 item inventory that assesses sleep quality over a 1-month time interval. Items are weighted on a 0-3 interval scale. A global PSQI score is calculated by totaling the seven component scores, providing an overall score ranging from 0 to 21, where lower scores denote a healthier sleep quality.

Time frame:
Baseline to V3 (4-6 weeks following completion of the intervention for HCC, 8-10 weeks after V1 for CCC).
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Change in Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI)
score on a scaleHIRREMContinued Current Care
Change in Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI)0 ± 1.41-1.33 ± 1.53
SecondaryChange in Epworth Sleepiness Score (ESS)

The ESS measures a person's general level of daytime sleepiness, or their average sleep propensity in daily life. The simple questionnaire is based on retrospective reports of the likelihood of dozing off or falling asleep in a variety of different situations. Rated on a 4-point scale (0-3), it evaluates their usual chances of dozing off or falling asleep while engaged in eight different activities. The ESS score (the sum of 8 item scores, 0-3) can range from 0 to 24. Lower scores denote a lower level of daytime sleepiness.

Time frame:
Baseline to V3 (4-6 weeks following completion of the intervention for HCC, 8-10 weeks after V1 for CCC).
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Change in Epworth Sleepiness Score (ESS)
score on a scaleHIRREMContinued Current Care
Change in Epworth Sleepiness Score (ESS)1.50 ± 2.12-0.67 ± 2.08
SecondaryChange in Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D)

The CES-D is a 20-item survey assessing affective depressive symptomatology to screen for risk of depression. Scores range from 0-60, with a score of 16 commonly used as a clinically relevant cut-off. Higher scores indicate the presence of more symptomatology.

Time frame:
Baseline to V3 (4-6 weeks following completion of the intervention for HCC, 8-10 weeks after V1 for CCC).
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Change in Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D)
score on a scaleHIRREMContinued Current Care
Change in Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D)7.00 ± 1.411.33 ± 5.13
SecondaryChange in Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7)

The GAD-7 is a seven item screening tool for anxiety that is widely used in primary care. Scores range from 0-21. A lower score denotes a lower level of anxiety.

Time frame:
Baseline to V3 (4-6 weeks following completion of the intervention for HCC, 8-10 weeks after V1 for CCC).
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Change in Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7)
score on a scaleHIRREMContinued Current Care
Change in Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7)4.50 ± 3.541.00 ± 1.00
SecondaryChange in PTSD Checklist for Civilians (PCL-C)

The PCL-C measures the American Psychiatric Association's Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM-IV) Criteria B, C, \& D of PTSD symptoms based on traumatic life experience related to civilians. Seventeen items are rated on a Likert scale with a composite score range of 17 to 85. A score of 44 or higher correlates with probability of civilian-related PTSD.

Time frame:
Baseline to V3 (4-6 weeks following completion of the intervention for HCC, 8-10 weeks after V1 for CCC).
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Change in PTSD Checklist for Civilians (PCL-C)
score on a scaleHIRREMContinued Current Care
Change in PTSD Checklist for Civilians (PCL-C)6.00 ± 9.90-4.00 ± 5.20
SecondaryChange in Perceived Stress Scale (PSS)

The PSS is a ten-item psychological instrument for measuring the perception of stress. It is a measure of the degree to which situations in one's life are appraised as stressful. Scores range from 0-40. A lower score denotes a lower level of perceived stress.

Time frame:
Baseline to V3 (4-6 weeks following completion of the intervention for HCC, 8-10 weeks after V1 for CCC).
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Change in Perceived Stress Scale (PSS)
score on a scaleHIRREMContinued Current Care
Change in Perceived Stress Scale (PSS)5.50 ± 4.95-3.33 ± 1.15
SecondaryChange in International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ-SF)

This is a four item questionnaire asking about physical activity in the last 7 days. Scores are calculated and categorized as low, moderate, or high. A higher score denotes more physical activity. For results, categories could not be presented so they were coded as: 1=low, 2=moderate, and 3=high.

Time frame:
Baseline to V3 (4-6 weeks following completion of the intervention for HCC, 8-10 weeks after V1 for CCC).
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Change in International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ-SF)
score on a scaleHIRREMContinued Current Care
Change in International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ-SF)0.00 ± 2.830.00 ± 0.00
SecondaryChange in HIRREM Physical Activity Satisfaction Questions

This is a four item questionnaire asking about the participants level of satisfaction with their physical activity. Responses range from 0-6 for each question, yielding scores ranging from 0-24. Higher scores denote a higher level of satisfaction.

Time frame:
Baseline to V3 (4-6 weeks following completion of the intervention for HCC, 8-10 weeks after V1 for CCC).
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Change in HIRREM Physical Activity Satisfaction Questions
score on a scaleHIRREMContinued Current Care
Change in HIRREM Physical Activity Satisfaction Questions3.50 ± 2.122.00 ± 3.46
SecondaryChange in Quality of Life Scale (QOLS)

The QOLS ) is a 16-item scale that was modified from a 15-item scale used in chronic disease patients. Topics include different components of daily life such as relationships, community engagement, personal fulfillment, and recreation. Each item is scaled from 1 to 7 and a sum score is calculated to represent higher levels of satisfaction in life (range is 16-112).

Time frame:
Baseline to V3 (4-6 weeks following completion of the intervention for HCC, 8-10 weeks after V1 for CCC).
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Change in Quality of Life Scale (QOLS)
score on a scaleHIRREMContinued Current Care
Change in Quality of Life Scale (QOLS)-4.00 ± 5.664.33 ± 7.23
SecondaryChange in Drop Stick Reaction Time

Reaction testing will be evaluated by a drop-stick, clinical reaction time apparatus. The apparatus is placed between the thumb and index finger of the subject and released at a random time during a countdown. The subject catches the apparatus and the distance fallen (cm) is converted to reaction. Following two practice trials, participants perform eight trials, and a mean distance value is calculated. This is repeated with a second set of 8 trials later during the enrollment visit, and the mean distance value from the second trial will be used as the baseline value. Use of the average distance from the second set of trials will be used as the baseline value so as to avoid the impact of learning effect for this test. Only one set of trials will be used for comparison at follow up data collections. A lower average indicates a faster reaction time.

Time frame:
Baseline to V3 (4-6 weeks following completion of the intervention for HCC, 8-10 weeks after V1 for CCC).
Reported as:
Mean · cm
Change in Drop Stick Reaction Time
cmHIRREMContinued Current Care
Change in Drop Stick Reaction Time-0.06 ± 0.27-0.96 ± 3.01
SecondaryChange in Grip Strength

Grip strength will be evaluated using a hydraulic hand dynamometer (Baseline Hydraulic Hand Dynamometer). Participants will squeeze the dynamometer three times in each hand. The scores from each hand will be averaged separately. A higher score indicates stronger grip strength.

Time frame:
Baseline to V3 (4-6 weeks following completion of the intervention for HCC, 8-10 weeks after V1 for CCC).
Reported as:
Mean · lbs
Change in Grip Strength
lbsHIRREMContinued Current Care
∆_V1_V3 Right Hand16.17 ± 18.150.00 ± 6.01
∆_V1_V3 Left Hand-2.33 ± 3.772.44 ± 5.54
Other pre-specifiedChange in Alcohol Intake Screening (Audit-C)

The AUDIT-C is a short, 3-item alcohol screening for hazardous drinkers or active alcohol use disorders. This measure consists of 3 questions to assess an individual's alcohol use. Each question has five possible answers ranging from of 0-4 with a total scoring scale of 0-12. A total score of three or more in women and a score of four or more in men is suggestive of hazardous drinking or active alcohol use disorders.

Time frame:
Baseline to V3 (4-6 weeks following completion of the intervention for HCC, 8-10 weeks after V1 for CCC).
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Change in Alcohol Intake Screening (Audit-C)
score on a scaleHIRREMContinued Current Care
Change in Alcohol Intake Screening (Audit-C)-1.50 ± 0.710.00 ± 0.00

Adverse events

Collected over Baseline to V3 (4-6 weeks following completion of the intervention for HCC, 8-10 weeks after V1 for CCC).. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
HIRREM0/2 (0%)0/2 (0%)0/2 (0%)
Continued Current Care0/3 (0%)0/3 (0%)0/3 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)HIRREMContinued Current CareTotal
<=18 years000
Between 18 and 65 years224
>=65 years011
Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)HIRREMContinued Current CareTotal
Mean34.00 ± 1.4168.33 ± 15.5054.60 ± 21.78
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)HIRREMContinued Current CareTotal
Female033
Male202
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)HIRREMContinued Current CareTotal
Hispanic or Latino000
Not Hispanic or Latino235
Unknown or Not Reported000
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)HIRREMContinued Current CareTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native000
Asian000
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander000
Black or African American011
White224
More than one race000
Unknown or Not Reported000
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)HIRREMContinued Current CareTotal
United States235
07

Study locations

1 site
  • Department of Neurology, Wake Forest School of Medicine
    Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27157, United States
08

References and documents

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Feb 16, 2018
  • Informed consent form · Oct 29, 2020

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03479697
Lead sponsor
Wake Forest University Health Sciences
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Mar 27, 2018
Start date
Aug 8, 2018
Primary completion
Nov 13, 2020
Completion
Nov 13, 2020
Results posted
Apr 20, 2023
Last update
Apr 20, 2023

Study contacts

Charles Tegeler, MD
principal investigator · Wake Forest University Health Sciences

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion